Microfinance strategy and its impact on profitability and operating efficiency: evidence from Indonesia
-
Received February 10, 2017;Accepted March 30, 2017;Published June 2, 2017
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(2).2017.05
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2017, Issue #2, pp. 51-62
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by1 articlesJournal title: Problems and Perspectives in ManagementArticle title: Positive contribution of the good corporate governance rating to stability and performance: evidence from IndonesiaDOI: 10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.01Volume: 16 / Issue: 2 / First page: 1 / Year: 2018Contributors: RR. Iramani, Muazaroh Muazaroh, Abdul Mongid
- 1973 Views
-
2761 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
After the Asian crisis in 1998, Indonesian banking transformed very quickly into more market-oriented banking. This development increased the competition, on the one hand, and pressure to perform better financially, especially after foreign investor taking over the ownership, on the other hand. Some banks transformed their business strategies into a microfinance bank for profit motives. Such strategy jointly results in significant profitability and efficiency. Using SUR regression, it is found that for the profitability equation, the profitability relates to the size of the bank, the loan loss reserve to gross loan (LLRGL), equity ratio (ETA) and fixed asset ratio (FIXASEQ). For operating efficiency (CIR), the result is similar and only the sign is different. Interestingly that for profitability, the microfinance strategy (MFS) is significant, but not for operating cost efficiency. It implies the need for more cost efficient commercial banks entering microfinance business as it will benefit small borrowers in terms of lower interest margin.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G32
-
References35
-
Tables4
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variable, measurement and expected result
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Correlation matrix
- Table 4. The SUR regression result
-
- Ahmed, I., Bhuiyan, A. B., Ibrahim, Y., Said, J., and Salleh, M. F. M. (2016). Social Accountability of Microfinance Institutions in South Asian Region. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3), 824-829.
- Al Atoom, R. O., and Abu Zerr, A. E. (2012). Macro and microfinancial factors that assures Jordanian Microfinance Institutions’ (MFIs) financial sustainability. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 54, 146-160.
- Athanasoglou, P., Brissimis, S., and Delis, M. (2008). Bank-specific, industry specific and macroeconomic determinants of bank profitability. International Financial Markets Institutions and Money, 18(2), 121-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. intfin.2006.07.001
- Ault, J. K., and Spicer, A. (2014). The institutional context of poverty: State fragility as a predictor of cross‐national variation in commercial microfinance lending. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12), 1818-1838.
- Bassem, B. (2009). Governance and performance of microfinance insti¬tutions in Mediterranean countries. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(1), 31-43.
- Baydas, M., Graham, D., & Valenzuela, L. (1997). Commercial Banks in Microfinance: New Actors in the Microfinance World, Microenterprise Best Practices Project. USAID. Bethesda, Maryland: Development Alternatives, Inc.
- Bounouala, R., and Rihane, C. (2014). Commercial banks in microfinance: entry strategies and keys of success. Journal of Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 11(1).
- Berger, A. N., and De Young, R. (1997). Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 21(6), 849-870.
- Berger, A. N., and Di Patti, E. B. (2006). Capital structure and firm performance: A new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(4), 1065-1102.
- CGAP. (1998). Commercial Banks in Microfinance: New Actors in the Microfinance World. CGAP Focus, 12, July 1998.
- Dawood, U. (2014). Factors impacting profitability of commercial banks in Pakistan for the period of (2009-2012). International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(3), 1-7.
- Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and Huizinga, H. (1999). Determinants of commercial bank interest margins and profitability: some international evidence. The World Bank Economic Review, 13(2), 379-408.
- Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (1999). Institutions, financial markets, and firm debt maturity. Journal of financial economics, 54(3), 295-336.
- Dichter, T. W., and Harper, M. (Eds.). (2007). Whats wrong with microfinance? Practical Action Pub.
- Elaydi, R. and Harrison, C. (2010). Strategic motivations and choice in subsistence markets. Journal of Business Research, 63(6), 651-655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.jbusres.2009.04.026.
- Gardener, E., Molyneux, P., and Nguyen-Linh, H. (2011). Determinants of efficiency in South East Asian banking. The Service Industries Journal, 31(16), 2693-2719.
- Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric Analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Hughes, J. P., & Mester, L. J. (2013). Who said large banks don’t experience scale economies? Evidence from a risk-return-driven cost function. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(4), 559-585.
- Kasman, A., Tunc, G., Vadar, G. & Okan, B. (2010). Consolidation and Commerical Bank Net Interest Margins: Evidence from the old and new European Union Members and Candidate Countries. Journals of Economic Modelling, 27(3), 648-655.
- Karim, M. Z. A. (2001). Comparative Bank Efficiency across Select ASEAN countries. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 18(3), 289-304.
- Lee, C. C., & Hsieh, M. F. (2013). The impact of bank capital on profitability and risk in Asian banking. Journal of international money and finance, 32, 251-281.
- Lee, C. C., & Hsieh, M. F. (2013). The impact of bank capital on profitability and risk in Asian banking. Journal of international money and finance, 32, 251-281.
- Lieberg, D., and Schwaiger, M. S. (2009). What Drives the Interest Rate Margin Decline in EU Banking – The Case of Small Local Banks. Kredit Und Kapital, 42(4), 509-538.
- Martinez, C. (2015). Doing Well by Doing Good? Empirical Evidence from Microfinance (No. CFDWP06-2015). Centre for Finance and Development, The Graduate Institute.
- McAllister, P. H. and McManus, D. (1993). Resolving the scale efficiency puzzle in banking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 17(2), 389-405.
- Mersland, R. and Strøm, R. O. (2010). Microfinance mission drift? World Development, 38(1), 28-36.
- Molyneux, P. and Thornton, J. (1992). Determinants of European bank profitability: A note. Journal of banking & Finance, 16(6), 1173- 1178.
- Shaban, M. A., Duygun, M. A., Anwar, M. B, Akbar, B. C. (2013). Diversification and banks’ willingness to lend to small businesses: Evidence from Islamic and conventional banks in Indonesia. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 103, 39-55.
- Shahriar, A. Z. M., Schwarz, S., & Newman, A. (2015). Profit orientation of microfinance institutions and provision of financial capital to business start-ups. International Small Business Journal.
- Sufian, F., and Habibullah, M. S. (2009). Determinants of bank profitability in a developing economy: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of business economics and management, 10(3), 207-217.
- Srairi, S. A. (2009). Factors influencing the profitability of conventional and Islamic commercial banks in GCC countries. Review of Islamic Economics, 13(1), 5-30.
- Tahir, I. M. Abdul and Haron, S. (2012). The Determinants of Bank Cost Inefficiency in ASEAN Banking. Jurnal Pengurusan, 36, 69-76.
- Tan, Y., and Floros, C. (2012). Bank profitability and inflation: the case of China. Journal of Economic Studies, 39(6), 675-696.
- Rosengard, J. K. (2004). Banking on social entrepreneurship: the commercialization of microfinance. Mondes en développement, 2(126), 25-36.
- Yunus, M. (2011). Building social business: The new kind of capitalism that serves humanity’s most pressing needs. PublicAffairs.
-
ESG disclosure and financial performance: Empirical study of Vietnamese commercial banks
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 19, 2024 Issue #1 pp. 208-220 Views: 9780 Downloads: 2978 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure becomes vital for banks to be transparent and accountable for their investments and lending decisions to shareholders, regulators, and society. The potential enhancement of shareholder value through ESG disclosure is still inconsistent. Empirical studies on the association between ESG disclosure and financial performance are mixed and limited in emerging economies. This study aims to examine whether ESG disclosure impacts the financial performance of 24 Vietnamese commercial banks in terms of return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and net interest margin (NIM). The study uses the feasible generalized least squares estimation method based on panel data from 2018 to 2022. The study employs content analysis on 12 themes related to environmental, social, and governance pillars to score policy disclosure based on the Fair Finance Guide Methodology. The results highlight the positive effects of ESG policy disclosure, individual environment disclosure (E), and individual governance disclosure (G) on bank financial performance. Notably, ESG, E, and G have the largest influence on ROE, with coefficients of 0.051, 0.036, and 0.027, respectively, at a 5% significance level. However, the study does not provide evidence of a statistically significant association between social disclosure and financial performance. These results provide empirical evidence for regulators and bank managers to shape ESG policies and practices aligning with international standards.
Acknowledgment
ESG disclosure score of 11 banks as primary data in this study is conducted under the project coordinated by the Fair Finance Vietnam coalition, as part of Fair Finance International. -
Evaluating the effects of IFRS 9 on Jordanian banks’ credit and financial metrics
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 19, 2024 Issue #4 pp. 70-83 Views: 6431 Downloads: 606 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯAdopting International Financial Reporting 9 is critically relevant as it significantly transforms accounting practices, particularly in credit risk management, for banks in Jordan. The primary purpose of this study is to examine the impact of implementing International Financial Reporting 9 on the financial performance and credit risk management practices of Jordanian banks. A quantitative analysis was conducted using the Difference-in-Differences approach and Fixed Effects models on data from 19 banks operating between 2012 and 2022.
The results indicate that the adoption of International Financial Reporting 9 led to a substantial increase in loan loss provisions, with a mean increase of 0.25 (t-value = 18.00). This increase in loan loss provisions negatively affected profitability metrics such as Return on Assets and Return on Equity, which showed mean decreases of 0.0857 (t-value = 4.22) post-implementation. Despite the negative impact on profitability, the findings also highlight improvements in financial transparency and stability due to more accurate credit risk assessment.
While the adoption of International Financial Reporting 9 imposes operational and financial challenges, it enhances the robustness and clarity of financial reporting in Jordanian banks. -
The moderating role of firm size and interest rate in capital structure of the firms: selected sample from sugar sector of Pakistan
Sarfraz Hussain
,
Abdul Quddus
,
Pham Phat Tien
,
Muhammad Rafiq
,
Drahomíra Pavelková
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(4).2020.29
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #4 pp. 341-355 Views: 5638 Downloads: 918 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe selection of financing is a top priority for businesses, particularly in short- and long-term investment decisions. Mixing debt and equity leads to decisions on the financial structure for businesses. This research analyzes the moderate position of company size and the interest rate in the capital structure over six years (2013–2018) for 29 listed Pakistani enterprises operating in the sugar market. This research employed static panel analysis and dynamic panel analysis on linear and nonlinear regression methods. The capital structure included debt to capital ratio, non-current liabilities, plus current liabilities to capital as a dependent variable. Independent variables were profitability, firm size, tangibility, Non-Debt Tax Shield, liquidity, and macroeconomic variables were exchange rates and interest rates. The investigation reported that profitability, firm size, and Non-Debt Tax Shield were significant and negative, while tangibility and interest rates significantly and positively affected debt to capital ratio. This means the sugar sector has greater financial leverage to manage the funding obligations for the better performance of firms. Therefore, the outcomes revealed that the moderators have an important influence on capital structure.

