Board characteristics and firm value: The moderating role of capital adequacy
-
Received February 15, 2023;Accepted May 15, 2023;Published May 26, 2023
-
Author(s)Tahir Saeed JagiraniLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5526-6442
,
Lim Chee CheeLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6255-8884
,
Zunarni KosimLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9848-4010
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(2).2023.18
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2023, Issue #2, pp. 205-214
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by2 articlesJournal title: Problems and Perspectives in ManagementArticle title: Women’s role in effective business management: A comparative analysisDOI: 10.21511/ppm.21(2).2023.67Volume: 21 / Issue: 2 / First page: 758 / Year: 2023Contributors: Fellanze Pula, Saranda Tafa, Linda Ukmata SanajaJournal title: Problems and Perspectives in ManagementArticle title: The impact of fiscal policy on female labor force participation in EgyptDOI: 10.21511/ppm.21(4).2023.28Volume: 21 / Issue: 4 / First page: 361 / Year: 2023Contributors: Emad Attia Mohamed Omran, Yuriy Bilan
- 1332 Views
-
647 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The global financial crisis increased corporate world uncertainties. Therefore, to meet these challenges, firms take a more proactive approach to tackling various corporate governance and firm value initiatives and policies. This study aims to explore the moderating effect of capital adequacy on the relationship between board characteristics and the firm value of listed banks in Pakistan. To obtain a more robust empirical model and results, this study incorporates moderator and control variables. This study is based on half-yearly secondary data of 560 sample observations from 2009 to 2021. Multiple regression and panel data estimation techniques were employed for the analysis. The study used firm value as a dependent variable, proxied by Tobin’s Q, along with five independent variables, one moderating variable, and two control variables. The results of this study indicate that a higher capital adequacy ratio (CAR) increases firm value and has a moderating effect on board characteristics and firm value. Low proportions of women and independent directors on board affect firm value. The presence of risk management and audit committees in listed Pakistani banks, on the other hand, increases firm value. The banks in Pakistan have no problem with CEO duality. The study also found that bank size has a positive relationship with firm value, while bank age has a negative relationship with firm value.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M21, G32, O16
-
References32
-
Tables8
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Logical relationship between variables
- Figure 2. Graphical representation of correlated variables
-
- Table 1. Half-yearly observations of listed banks of Pakistan
- Table 2. Summary of variables and measurements
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics
- Table 4. Goodness of fit test
- Table 5. Regression results of financial risks and firm value
- Table 6. Pearson correlation
- Table 7. Moderating effects of CAR on board characteristics and Tobin’s Q
- Table 8. Hypotheses testing results
-
- Abdul Wahab, H., Saiti, B., Rosly, S. A., & Masih, A. M. M. (2017). Risk-taking behavior and capital adequacy in a mixed banking system: new evidence from Malaysia using dynamic OLS and two-step dynamic system GMM estimators. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(1), 180-198.
- Agyemang-Mintah, P., & Schadewitz, H. (2018). Audit committee adoption and firm value: evidence from UK financial institutions. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 26(1), 205-226.
- Abou-El-Sood, H. (2016). Are regulatory capital adequacy ratios good indicators of bank failure? Evidence from US banks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 48, 292-302.
- Ahn, S., Shrestha, K. (2013). The differential effects of classified boards on firm value. 37(11), 3993-4013. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(11).
- Ayub, H., & Javeed, A. (2016). Impact and implications of capital adequacy ratio on the financing behaviour: Evidence from Islamic banks in Pakistan. Journal of Islamic Business and Management, 6(1).
- Badru, B. O., Ahmad-Zaluki, N. A., & Wan-Hussin, W. N. (2017). Board characteristics and the amount of capital raised in the Malaysian IPO market. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 42, 37-55.
- Bhuiyan, M. B. U., Cheema, M. A., & Man, Y. (2020). Risk committee, corporate risk-taking and firm value. Managerial Finance, 47(3), 285-309.
- Fallatah, Y., & Dickins, D. (2012). Corporate governance and firm performance and value in Saudi Arabia. African Journal of Business Management, 6(36), 10025-10034.
- Ghafran, C., & O’Sullivan, N. (2013). The governance role of audit committees: reviewing a decade of evidence. International Journal of Management Review, 15(4), 381-407.
- Gupta, N., & Mahakud, J. (2020). CEO characteristics and bank performance: evidence from India, Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(8), 1057-1093.
- Isidro, H., & Sobral, M. (2015). The effects of femaleon corporate boards on firm value, financial performance, and ethical and social compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 1-19.
- Jagirani, T. S., Chee, L. C., & Kosim, Z. B. (2023). Determinants of the firm value of listed banks in Pakistan: A panel data approach. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 13(4), 241-250.
- Jagirani, T. S., Chee, L. C., & Kosim, Z. B. (2023a). Relationship between financial risks and firm value: A moderating role of capital adequacy. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(1), 293-303.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- Kadarningsih, A., Pangestuti, I. R. D., Wahyudi, S., & Safitri, J. (2020). The Role of Audit Committee of GCG in Increasing Company Value through ROA. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 9(4), 15-15.
- Khan, Z. A., & Hussanie, I. (2018). Shareholders Wealth Maximization: Objective of Financial Management Revisited. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Management & Computer Applications, 7(3), 739-741.
- Kirkpatrick, A. K., & Radicic, D. (2020). Tax Planning Activities and Firm Value: A Dynamic Panel Analysis. Advances in Taxation, 27, 103-123.
- Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler, KPMG. (2020). Snapshot of results of banks in Pakistan (pp. 1-18).
- Khaoula, F., & Moez, D. (2019). The moderating effect of the board of directors on firm value and tax planning: Evidence from European listed firms. Borsa Istanbul Review, 19(4), 331-343.
- Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259-275.
- Liu, C., Uchida, K., & Yang, Y. (2012). Corporate governance and firm value during the global financial crisis: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 21(2), 70-80.
- Mansoor, M., Ellahi, N., Khan, Z., & Rahman, M. (2017). CEO Power, Board Size and Firm Performance: Evidence from Pak, China, USA and India Banking Sector. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 3(1), 371-383.
- Mishra, R. K., & Kapil, S. (2018). Board characteristics and firm value for Indian companies. Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(1), 2-32.
- Mishkin, F. S. (1999). Lessons from the Asian Crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 18(40), 709-723.
- Nazir, M. S., & Afza, T. (2018). Does managerial behavior of managing earnings mitigate the relationship between corporate governance and firm value? Evidence from an emerging market. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 139-156.
- Rafique, A., Quddoos, M. U., Akhtar, M. H., & Karim, A. (2020). Impact of financial risk on financial performance of banks in Pakistan; the mediating role of capital adequacy ratio. Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, 6(2), 607-613.
- Ramly, Z., Chan, S.-G., Mustapha, M. Z., & Sapiei, N. S. (2017). Women on boards and bank efficiency in ASEAN-5: the moderating role of the independent directors. Review of Managerial Science, 11(1), 225-250.
- Thenmozhi, M., & Sasidharan, A. (2020). Does board independence enhance firm value of state-owned enterprises? Evidence from India and China. European Business Review, 32(5), 785-800.
- Vintila, G., & Gherghina, S. C. (2013). Board of directors independence and firm value: empirical evidence based on the bucharest stock exchange listed companies. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(4), 885.
- Vintila, G., Onofrei, M., Gherghina, Ş. C. (2015). The effects of corporate board and CEO characteristics on firm value: empirical evidence from listed companies on the Bucharest stock exchange. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(6) 1244-1260.
- Vo, T. T. A., & Bui, P. N. K. (2017). Impact of Board Gender Diversity on Firm Value: International Evidence. Journal of Economics and Development, 19(1), 65-76.
- Yammeesri, J., & Herath, S. K. (2010). Board characteristics and corporate value: evidence from Thailand. Corporate Governance, 10(3), 279-292.
-
-
Conceptualization
Tahir Saeed Jagirani, Lim Chee Chee, Zunarni Kosim
-
Data curation
Tahir Saeed Jagirani, Lim Chee Chee
-
Formal Analysis
Tahir Saeed Jagirani, Zunarni Kosim
-
Investigation
Tahir Saeed Jagirani, Lim Chee Chee
-
Methodology
Tahir Saeed Jagirani, Lim Chee Chee, Zunarni Kosim
-
Project administration
Tahir Saeed Jagirani, Zunarni Kosim
-
Software
Tahir Saeed Jagirani
-
Visualization
Tahir Saeed Jagirani, Lim Chee Chee
-
Writing – original draft
Tahir Saeed Jagirani
-
Writing – review & editing
Tahir Saeed Jagirani
-
Supervision
Lim Chee Chee, Zunarni Kosim
-
Validation
Lim Chee Chee, Zunarni Kosim
-
Conceptualization
-
Inventory management, cost of capital and firm performance: evidence from manufacturing firms in Jordan
Ashraf Mohammad Salem Alrjoub
,
Muhannad Akram Ahmad
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(3).2017.01
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 14, 2017 Issue #3 pp. 4-14 Views: 3556 Downloads: 2369 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯSeveral studies have examined the relationship between inventory management and firm performance. However, most of these studies ignore the impact of inventory types on the relationship. Moreover, the relationship is influenced by some factors such as cost of capital which has not been considered. This study examines the moderating effect of cost of capital on the relationship between inventory types and firm performance. The data of 48 firms for the period 2010-2016 which formed 279 firm-year observations were used in this study. With the use of Pearson correlation and panel Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimation, the findings show that inventory management with consideration of its types influence firm performance in the long term. In addition, it is also found that cost of capital moderates the relationship between inventory management and firm performance. However, the interaction between cost of capital and inventory types has different implications. It is suggested that firms should consider cost of capital when making decision on inventory types and align their inventory control to fit in to the changes in their business environment.
-
Impact of audit committee characteristics on firm performance: Evidence from Bahrain
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 20, 2022 Issue #1 pp. 247-261 Views: 3272 Downloads: 1554 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between different audit committee attributes and company performance in Bahrain. This paper investigates the impact of audit committee independence, size, and meeting frequency on company performance (employing ROE, ROA, and Tobin’s Q). Data from all 14 non-financial publicly listed companies on Bahrain Bourse during 2005–2019 were used. The results revealed that companies with independent audit committees and big audit committees in terms of size are performing poorly. It is also shown that the number of audit committee meetings does not affect company performance. Further, this study failed to find any association between the number of audit committee meetings and company performance. The findings show that shareholders might lack knowledge of the importance of corporate governance mechanisms. The results of this study should be of potential interest to different stakeholders, including regulators, investors, and auditors, in their attempts to improve company performance and monitoring mechanisms in emerging economies.
-
Does capital structure affect firm value in Vietnam?
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 18, 2021 Issue #1 pp. 33-41 Views: 2925 Downloads: 1585 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study aims to examine whether the capital structure and several factors have significant influences on firm value in Vietnam. To achieve this objective, 435 non-financial listed companies have been selected from 2012 to 2019 on Vietnamese stock exchanges. Four groups of firms continue to be chosen from the total to investigate the differences in the outcomes among industries. The results altogether using the GMM method show that the impact of capital structure and other control variables on firm value is significant, yet different across industries: capital structure has a significant positive impact on firm value in the food and beverage industry, but has a significant negative effect on the value of the firm in wholesale trade and construction, as well as real estate industry, while has an insignificant influence on enterprise value considering all industries. Apart from the firm size, the impact of other control factors on firm value also indicates mixed results.

