Assessing the impact of internal governance mechanisms on the tax aggressiveness of listed companies in Morocco
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(2).2025.16
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2025, Issue #2, pp. 192-205
- 11 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study examines how internal governance mechanisms influence tax aggressiveness among listed companies in Morocco. Using a quantitative approach, the study applies linear regression analysis to panel data from 2018 to 2022. The analysis assesses the impact of key governance factors, such as ownership concentration, board size, board independence, CEO duality, firm performance, and firm age, on tax aggressiveness.
The findings indicate significant relationships between governance mechanisms and tax behavior. Ownership concentration is negatively associated with the effective tax rate, implying that firms with a dominant shareholder are less likely to engage in aggressive tax planning. Conversely, financial performance is positively linked to effective tax rate, suggesting that more profitable firms tend to comply with tax obligations. In the current effective tax rate model, board size, board independence, CEO duality, and financial performance are positively related to tax aggressiveness, while firm age has a negative effect. The book-tax difference model reveals that board independence and CEO duality reduce tax aggressiveness, whereas ownership concentration and financial performance increase it.
These results highlight the significant role of corporate governance in shaping tax strategies. Strengthening governance structures – especially by reinforcing board independence and limiting CEO duality – could help curb aggressive tax practices and promote greater fiscal transparency in Morocco’s financial market.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G30, H26, O16
-
References56
-
Tables9
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Companies by sector
- Table 2. Variables measurement
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics
- Table 4. Correlation matrix
- Table 5. Variance Inflation Factor (VIF)
- Table 6. Regression analysis for model (1)
- Table 7. Regression analysis for model (2)
- Table 8. Regression analysis for model (3)
- Table 9. Summary of hypothesis verification
-
- Abdul Wahab, E. A., Ariff, A. M., Madah Marzuki, M., & Mohd Sanusi, Z. (2017). Political connections, corporate governance, and tax aggressiveness in Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(3), 424-451.
- Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
- Adela, V., Agyei, S. K., & Peprah, J. A. (2023). Antecedents of tax aggressiveness of listed non-financial firms: Evidence from an emerging economy. Scientific African, 20, e01654.
- Agoraki, M.-E. K., Giaka, M., Konstantios, D., & Patsika, V. (2023). Firms’ sustainability, financial performance, and regulatory dynamics: Evidence from European firms. Journal of International Money and Finance, 131, 102785.
- Amri, K., Ben Mrad Douagi, F. W., & Guedrib, M. (2023). The impact of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms on tax aggressiveness: evidence from Tunisia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 13(1), 43-68.
- Anggraeni, D. P., & Kurnianto, S. (2020). The effect of board size and female directors on tax avoidance. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(8), 1127-1141.
- Ann, S., & Manurung, A. H. (2019). The influence of liquidity, profitability, intensity inventory, related party debt, and company size to aggressive tax rate. Archives of Business Research, 7(3), 105-115.
- Belahouaoui, R., & Attak, E. H. (2023). The importance of perceived fairness regarding tax burden in compliance behavior: a qualitative study using the Delphi method in Morocco. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.
- Belahouaoui, R., & Attak, E. H. (2024). Digitalization of Tax Administration and Tax Avoidance: Evidence on Tax Reform Dynamics in Morocco. In Impact of Digitalization on Reporting, Tax Avoidance, Accounting, and Green Finance (pp. 200-225). IGI Global.
- Belahouaoui, R., & Attak, E. H. (2025). Tax Policy Responses to Economic Crises: The Case of Post-COVID-19 Reform in Morocco (2023-2026). In Assessing Policy Landscapes in Taxation Dynamics (pp. 357-384). IGI Global.
- Boussaidi, A., & Hamed, M. S. (2015). The impact of governance mechanisms on tax aggressiveness: empirical evidence from Tunisian context. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 5(1), 1.
- Boussaidi, A., & Hamed-Sidhom, M. (2021). Board’s characteristics, ownership’s nature and corporate tax aggressiveness: new evidence from the Tunisian context. EuroMed Journal of Business, 16(4), 487-511.
- Chen, M., Zhao, K., & Jin, W. (2024). Corporate digital transformation and tax avoidance: evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 85, 102400.
- Chyz, J. A., Eulerich, M., Fligge, B., & Romney, M. A. (2023). Codetermination and aggressive reporting: Audit committee employee representation, tax aggressiveness, and earnings management. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 51, 100543.
- Dakhlaoui, M., & Gana, M. R. (2020). Ownership structure and cost of equity capital: Tunisian evidence. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 14(1), 96-121.
- Derashid, C., & Zhang, H. (2003). Effective tax rates and the “industrial policy” hypothesis: evidence from Malaysia. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 12(1), 45-62.
- Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145-179.
- Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2009). Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537-546.
- Doghmi, H. (2020). La capacite de mobilisation des recettes fiscales au Maroc [The mobility capacity of fiscal receipts in Morocco]. Bank Al Maghrib. (In Arabic).
- Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., Marquéz, J. R. G., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., & Leitão, P. J. (2013). Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 27-46.
- El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Pittman, J. (2018). External versus internal monitoring: The importance of multiple large shareholders and families to auditor choice in Western European firms.
- Fan, J. P. H., & Wong, T. J. (2002). Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 401425.
- Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467-496.
- Franke, G. R. (2010). Multicollinearity. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing.
- Gavious, I., Livne, G., & Chen, E. (2022). Does tax avoidance increase or decrease when tax enforcement is stronger? Evidence using CSR heterogeneity perspective. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, 102325.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis.
- Halioui, K., Neifar, S., & Ben Abdelaziz, F. (2016). Corporate governance, CEO compensation and tax aggressiveness: Evidence from American firms listed on the NASDAQ 100. Review of Accounting and Finance, 15(4), 445-462.
- Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127-178.
- Iazzi, A., Vacca, A., Maizza, A., & Schiavone, F. (2023). The role of corporate board and auditors in tax planning: evidence from Italy. Management Research Review, 46(3), 321-339.
- Ibrahim, N. A., Howard, D. P., & Angelidis, J. P. (2003). Board members in the service industry: An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility orientation and directorial type. Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 393-401.
- Jabbouri, I., & Attar, A. El. (2018). Dividend policy of firms listed on Casablanca Stock Exchange: a panel data analysis. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 10(1), 57-79.
- Kastlunger, B., Dressler, S. G., Kirchler, E., Mittone, L., & Voracek, M. (2010). Sex differences in tax compliance: Differentiating between demographic sex, gender-role orientation, and prenatal masculinization (2D: 4D). Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(4), 542-552.
- Khaoula, A., & Ali, Z. M. (2012). The board of directors and the corporate tax planning: Empirical Evidence from Tunisia. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(2), 142.
- Kingdom of Morocco. (2021). Framework Law 69-19 on Tax Reform.
- Kolias, G., & Koumanakos, E. (2022). CEO duality and tax avoidance: Empirical evidence from Greece. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 47, 100465.
- Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2011). The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), 50-70.
- Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 86-108.
- Lanis, R., Richardson, G., & Taylor, G. (2017). Board of director gender and corporate tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 144, 577-596.
- Lisowsky, P. (2010). Seeking shelter: Empirically modeling tax shelters using financial statement information. The Accounting Review, 85(5), 1693-1720.
- Mills, L. F. (1998). Book-tax differences and Internal Revenue Service adjustments. Journal of Accounting Research, 36(2), 343-356.
- Minnick, K., & Noga, T. (2010). Do corporate governance characteristics influence tax management? Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(5), 703-718.
- Pfeffer, J. (2019). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. In Corporate governance (pp. 53-64). Gower.
- Ramadhani, S., & Sitorus, R. R. (2022). Tax Digitalization and Tax Service Quality’s Effects on Taxpayer Obligation During the Pandemic Era. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(4), 443-450.
- Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 327-347.
- Richardson, G., Lanis, R., & Leung, S. C.-M. (2014). Corporate tax aggressiveness, outside directors, and debt policy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25, 107-121.
- Richardson, G., Taylor, G., & Lanis, R. (2013). The impact of board of director oversight characteristics on corporate tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(3), 68-88.
- Richardson, G., Wang, B., & Zhang, X. (2016). Ownership structure and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from publicly listed private firms in China. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 12(2), 141-158.
- Salihu, I. A., Annuar, H. A., & Obid, S. N. S. (2015). Foreign investors’ interests and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 11(2), 138-147.
- Shamil, M. M., Gooneratne, D. W., Gunathilaka, D., & Shaikh, J. M. (2024). The effect of board characteristics on tax aggressiveness: the case of listed entities in Sri Lanka. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 14(4), 747-770.
- Sugeng, S., Prasetyo, E., & Zaman, B. (2020). Does capital intensity, inventory intensity, firm size, firm risk, and political connections affect tax aggressiveness? JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi Dan Manejemen, 17(1), 78-87.
- Taxe Justice Network (TJN). (2023). State of Tax Justice 2023.
- The General Tax Administration. (2013). 2013 Activity Report.
- Vacca, A., Iazzi, A., Vrontis, D., & Fait, M. (2020). The role of gender diversity on tax aggressiveness and corporate social responsibility: evidence from Italian listed companies. Sustainability, 12(5), 2007.
- Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169-178.
- Wilson, R. J. (2009). An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 969-999.
- Zhou, Y. (2011). Ownership structure, board characteristics, and tax aggressiveness.