Enhancing portfolio optimization with multi-LLM sentiment aggregation: A Black-Litterman integration approach

  • 28 Views
  • 3 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
Sentiment analysis of financial text data plays a crucial role in investment decision-making, yet existing approaches often rely on single-model sentiment scores that may suffer from biases or hallucinations. This study aims to enhance portfolio optimization by integrating sentiment signals from multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) into the Black-Litterman framework. The proposed method aggregates sentiment scores from three finance-domain fine-tuned LLMs using a Long Short-Term Memory network, which captures non-linear relationships and temporal dependencies to produce a robust Meta-LLM sentiment score. This score is then incorporated into the Black-Litterman model as investor views to derive optimal portfolio weights. The methodology is tested on a portfolio of S&P 500 stocks. The results show that the proposed approach significantly improves portfolio performance, achieving an annualized return of 31.22%, compared to 24.57% for the market capital-weighted portfolio. Additionally, the model attains a Sharpe Ratio of 3.02, an Omega Ratio of 2.48, and a Jensen’s Alpha of 1.95%, outperforming both the benchmark portfolios and portfolios based on single-LLM sentiment. The findings demonstrate that aggregating sentiment from multiple LLMs enhances risk-adjusted returns while mitigating model-specific limitations. Future research could explore the integration of LLMs with different architectures to further refine sentiment-aware portfolio strategies.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Transformer model architecture
    • Figure 2. LSTM cell and its operations
    • Table 1. Configured parameters for LSTM sentiment aggregation
    • Table 2. Machine learning models’ predictive performance
    • Table 3. LLMs’ performance metrics on sentiment analysis
    • Table 4. Equity returns descriptive statistics
    • Table 5. Portfolio performance comparison
    • Table 6. Portfolio performance comparison: Varying τ parameter
    • Table 7. Portfolio performance: Meta-LLM vs individual LLMs
    • Conceptualization
      Lamukanyani Alson Mantshimuli, John Weirstrass Muteba Mwamba
    • Data curation
      Lamukanyani Alson Mantshimuli
    • Formal Analysis
      Lamukanyani Alson Mantshimuli
    • Investigation
      Lamukanyani Alson Mantshimuli, John Weirstrass Muteba Mwamba
    • Methodology
      Lamukanyani Alson Mantshimuli, John Weirstrass Muteba Mwamba
    • Project administration
      Lamukanyani Alson Mantshimuli
    • Resources
      Lamukanyani Alson Mantshimuli
    • Software
      Lamukanyani Alson Mantshimuli
    • Validation
      Lamukanyani Alson Mantshimuli
    • Visualization
      Lamukanyani Alson Mantshimuli
    • Writing – original draft
      Lamukanyani Alson Mantshimuli
    • Supervision
      John Weirstrass Muteba Mwamba
    • Writing – review & editing
      John Weirstrass Muteba Mwamba