Valuation implications of ESG initiatives and technological innovation: A comparative analysis of high-tech and low-tech industries
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(3).2025.15
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2025, Issue #3, pp. 184-212
- 8 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The growing emphasis on sustainability and continuous innovation has changed the way firms approach value creation and performance. As firms increasingly adopt ESG initiatives and invest in technological innovation, understanding how these strategies jointly affect financial outcomes across different industry contexts becomes essential. The purpose of this study is to explore the valuation implications of the interplay between ESG initiatives and technological innovation, specifically in terms of accounting, valuation, and growth metrics of corporate operations, with a focus on comparing high-technology and low-technology industries. Utilizing random effects generalized least squares (GLS) regression, this paper examines 4,000 high-technology and 4,739 low-technology firm-year observations from KOSPI and KOSDAQ listed firms in Korea from 2012 to 2022. The results show that while the influence of environmental, social, and governance factors on corporate performance, firm value, and growth show specific implications across the two industries, both ESG adoption (ROA: –0.0025; p < 0.01; TQ: –0.0298; p < 0.05; SGR: –0.0052; p < 0.05) and research and development investments (ROA: –0.0928; p < 0.01; SGR: –0.1192; p < 0.01) tend to manifest a costly impact on corporate operations. Nevertheless, when these two elements are pursued together, the negative impacts are mitigated, ultimately leading to improvements in corporate performance (ROA: 0.0453; p < 0.01; TQ: 0.8902; p < 0.01 for high-tech industries; SGR: 0.0920; p < 0.10 for low-tech industries). This study provides a comparative analysis of the impact of ESG and innovation on corporate metrics across high- and low-technology industries. The findings show that integrating ESG with technological innovation can promote sustainable corporate operations across varying levels of technological intensity.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to the Korea Institute of Corporate Governance and Sustainability (KCGS) for generously providing ESG ratings data for listed firms in South Korea. Their valuable support made these analyses possible.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q56, O32, M41
-
References59
-
Tables16
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Sample selection and other distributions
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Univariate analysis
- Table A1. Classification of technological intensity of Korean listed firms
- Table B1. Study variables
- Table C1. Descriptions of ESG ratings and numerical proxies
- Table D1. Pearson correlation
- Table E1. Panel regression results: Main effects of ESG on Return on Assets (ROA)
- Table E2. Panel regression results: Main effects of R&D intensity on Return on Assets (ROA)
- Table E3. Panel regression results: ESG, innovation, and Return on Assets (ROA)
- Table F1. Panel regression results: Main effects of ESG on Tobin’s Q (TQ)
- Table F2. Panel regression results: Main effects of R&D intensity on Tobin’s Q (TQ)
- Table F3. Panel regression results: ESG, innovation, and Tobin’s Q (TQ)
- Table G1. Panel regression results: Main effects of ESG on Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR)
- Table G2. Panel regression results: Main effects of R&D intensity on Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR)
- Table G3. Panel regression results: ESG, innovation, and Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR)
-
- Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S119-S127.
- Baek, S., & Lee, D. H. (2024). Can R&D investment be a key driver for sustainable development? Evidence from Korean industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(2), 838-853.
- Barros, V., Matos, P. V., Sarmento, J. M., & Vieira, P. R. (2023). High-tech firms: Dividend policy in a context of sustainability and technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122434.
- Bay, M., & Çil, U. (2016). How well do companies manage innovation? An analysis on low-tech industries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 709-718.
- Boons, F., Montalvo, C., Quist, J., & Wagner, M. (2013). Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 1-8.
- Boufounou, P., Moustairas, Ι., Toudas, K., & Malesios, C. (2023). ESGs and customer choice: Some empirical evidence. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 3(4), 1841-1874.
- Broadstock, D. C., Matousek, R., Meyer, M., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119, 99-110.
- Buenechea-Elberdin, M., Kianto, A., & Sáenz, J. (2018). Intellectual capital drivers of product and managerial innovation in high-tech and low-tech firms. R&D Management, 48(3), 290-307.
- Byun, H. Y. (2018). Impact of ESG factors on firm value in Korea. Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 14(5), 135-160.
- Cabaleiro-Cerviño, G., & Mendi, P. (2024). ESG-driven innovation strategy and firm performance. Eurasian Business Review, 14(1), 137-185.
- Chen, W., Xie, Y., & He, K. (2024). Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Corporate Innovation Novelty. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 9, 109-131.
- Chen, X., Liu, C., Liu, F., & Fang, M. (2021). Firm sustainable growth during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of customer concentration. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(6), 1566-1577.
- Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236.
- Chua, K. T., & Byun, H. Y. (2025). Dataset and Tables of Results for the research article “ESG Initiatives, Technological Innovation, and Firm Valuation: A Comparative Analysis of High-Tech and Low-Tech Industries”. Zenodo.
- Cillo, V., Petruzzelli, A. M., Ardito, L., & Del Giudice, M. (2019). Understanding sustainable innovation: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(5), 1012-1025.
- Coluccia, D., Dabić, M., Del Giudice, M., Fontana, S., & Solimene, S. (2020). R&D innovation indicator and its effects on the market. An empirical assessment from a financial perspective. Journal of Business Research, 119, 259-271.
- Cui, L., Zhai, M., Dai, J., Liu, Y., & Zhang, P. (2019). Assessing sustainability performance of high-tech firms through a hybrid approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(8), 1581-1607.
- Czarnitzki, D., & Thorwarth, S. (2012). Productivity effects of basic research in low-tech and high-tech industries. Research Policy, 41(9), 1555-1564.
- Dechow, P. M. (2023). Understanding the Sustainability Reporting Landscape and Research Opportunities in Accounting. The Accounting Review, 98(5), 481-493.
- Doni, F., & Fiameni, M. (2023). Can innovation affect the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance issues and financial performance? Empirical evidence from the STOXX200 index. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 546-574.
- Falk, M. (2012). Quantile estimates of the impact of R&D intensity on firm performance. Small Business Economics, 39, 19-37.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
- Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
- Hargroves, K., & Smith, M. (2005). The Natural Advantage of Nations: Business Opportunities, Innovation and Governance in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.
- Hatzikian, Y. (2015). Exploring the link between innovation and firm performance. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6, 749-768.
- Herold, D. M. (2018). Demystifying the link between institutional theory and stakeholder theory in sustainability reporting. Economics, Management and Sustainability, 3(2), 6-19.
- Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2008). “Low-technology”: A forgotten sector in innovation policy. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 3(3), 11-20.
- Horish, J., Schattegger, S., & Freeman, R. E. (2020). Integrating stakeholder theory and sustainability accounting: A conceptual synthesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, (275).
- Hu, A., Yuan, X., Fan, S., & Wang, S. (2023). The impact and mechanism of corporate ESG construction on the efficiency of regional green economy: an empirical analysis based on signal transmission theory and stakeholder theory. Sustainability, 15(17), 13236.
- Huang, E. Y., & Lin, S. C. (2006). How R&D management practice affects innovation performance: An investigation of the high-tech industry in Taiwan. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(7), 966-996.
- Iddris, F. (2019). Innovation capability and product innovation performance: The case of low-tech manufacturing firms. European Business Review, 31(5), 646-668.
- Jung, M. K., & Kim, Y. L. (2022). The Interaction Effect of ESG and Innovation on Firm Value. Korean Journal of Financial Studies, 51(4), 471-498.
- Kim, S. H., Seonwoo, H. Y., Lee, W. J., & Jung, A. R. (2022). Value Implications of ESG Performance. Korean Accounting Journal, 31(3), 31-60.
- Kluza, K., Ziolo, M., & Spoz, A. (2021). Innovation and environmental, social, and governance factors influencing sustainable business models-Meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 303, 127015.
- Kong, Y., Agyemang, A., Alessa, N., & Kongkuah, M. (2023). The moderating role of technological innovation on environment, social, and governance (ESG) performance and firm value: Evidence from developing and least-developed countries. Sustainability, 15(19), 14240.
- Kwon, J. W., & Choi, W. S. (2024). The Effect of Stewardship Code Adoption on ESG Rating in Korea: Evidence from the Korean National Pension Service. Korean Accounting Journal, 33(1), 29-58.
- Law, K. M. (2010). Factors affecting sustainability development: high-tech manufacturing firms in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Management Review, 15(4). 619-633.
- Law, K. M., & Gunasekaran, A. (2012). Sustainability development in high-tech manufacturing firms in Hong Kong: Motivators and readiness. International Journal of Production Economics, 137(1), 116-125.
- Lawal, E., May, G., & Stahl, B. (2017). The significance of corporate social disclosure for high-tech manufacturing companies: Focus on employee and community aspects of sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 295-311.
- Lee, Y. H., Kang, S. G., & Park, J. M. (2019). The Determinants of R&D and Product Innovation Pattern in High-Technology Industry and Low-Technology Industry: A Hurdle Model and Heckman Sample Selection Model Approach, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 20(10), 76-91.
- Li, Y., Gong, M., Zhang, X. Y., & Koh, L. (2018). The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: The role of CEO power. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 60-75.
- Lin, S. L., Wu, S. C., & Li, Q. (2021). Do R&D and ESG affect the corporate value? Evidence from China Fin-Tech Industry. Journal of Accounting, Finance & Management Strategy, 16(2), 159-205.
- Luo, X., & Du, S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm innovation. Marketing Letters, 26, 703-714.
- McCarthy, D. J., Spital, F. C., & Lauenstein, M. C. (1987). Managing growth at high-technology companies: A view from the top. Academy of Management Perspectives, 1(4), 313-322.
- Nazir, M., Akbar, M., Akbar, A., Poulovo, P., Hussain, A., & Qureshi, M. A. (2022). The nexus between corporate environment, social, and governance performance and cost of capital: evidence from top global tech leaders. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 22623-22636.
- Nazir, M., Akbar, M., Yu, X., Hussain, A., & Svobodová, L. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance performance as an influencing factor of financial sustainability: Evidence from the global high-tech sector. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 4746-4758.
- Pu, G. (2023). A non-linear assessment of ESG and firm performance relationship: evidence from China. Economic Research, 36(1), 2113336.
- Rhee, C. S., Jung, A., & Chun, H. (2021). A study on ESG determinants and firm value: Focusing on economic policy uncertainty and operating income volatility. Korean Accounting Journal, 46(6), 115-139.
- Salzmann, O., Inoescu-Somers, A., Steger, U. (2005). The Business case for corporate sustainability: Literature review and research options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27-36.
- Seebode, D., Jeanrenaud, S., & Bessant, J. (2012). Managing innovation for sustainability. R&D Management, 42(3), 195-206.
- Shaikh, I. (2022). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practice and firm performance: an international evidence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 218-237.
- Shin, J. H., & Kim, C. B. (2021). Degree of Internationalization and Performance of High-tech Small and Medium-sized Enterprises: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Korea Trade, 25(7), 1-18.
- Tahmid, T., Hoque, M. N., Said, J., Saona, P., & Azad, M. A. K. (2022). Does ESG initiatives yield greater firm value and performance? New evidence from European firms. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2144098.
- Tang, H. (2022). The effect of ESG performance on corporate innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and agency cost. Sustainability, 14(7), 3769.
- Tanguy, A., Carrière, L., & Laforest, V. (2023). Low-tech approaches for sustainability: key principles from the literature and practice. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 19(1), 2170143.
- Wang, X., Yin, Y., Chun, D., & Li, P. (2025). How does ESG disclosure promote technological innovation? Moderating effects based on product market competition. Kybernetes, 54(4), 2245-2267.
- Xu, J., Liu, F., & Shang, Y. (2021). R&D investment, ESG performance and green innovation performance: evidence from China. Kybernetes, 50(3), 737-756.
- Yoon, S., Kim, G., Chung, Y., & Son, H. (2023). Is customer involvement always beneficial for R&D efficiency? The difference between high-tech and low-tech industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 44(3), 1678-1688.
- Zhang, X., Li, W., Ji, T., & Xie, H. (2024). The impact of ESG performance on firms’ technological innovation: evidence from China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1342420.