Valuation implications of ESG initiatives and technological innovation: A comparative analysis of high-tech and low-tech industries

  • 8 Views
  • 1 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
The growing emphasis on sustainability and continuous innovation has changed the way firms approach value creation and performance. As firms increasingly adopt ESG initiatives and invest in technological innovation, understanding how these strategies jointly affect financial outcomes across different industry contexts becomes essential. The purpose of this study is to explore the valuation implications of the interplay between ESG initiatives and technological innovation, specifically in terms of accounting, valuation, and growth metrics of corporate operations, with a focus on comparing high-technology and low-technology industries. Utilizing random effects generalized least squares (GLS) regression, this paper examines 4,000 high-technology and 4,739 low-technology firm-year observations from KOSPI and KOSDAQ listed firms in Korea from 2012 to 2022. The results show that while the influence of environmental, social, and governance factors on corporate performance, firm value, and growth show specific implications across the two industries, both ESG adoption (ROA: –0.0025; p < 0.01; TQ: –0.0298; p < 0.05; SGR: –0.0052; p < 0.05) and research and development investments (ROA: –0.0928; p < 0.01; SGR: –0.1192; p < 0.01) tend to manifest a costly impact on corporate operations. Nevertheless, when these two elements are pursued together, the negative impacts are mitigated, ultimately leading to improvements in corporate performance (ROA: 0.0453; p < 0.01; TQ: 0.8902; p < 0.01 for high-tech industries; SGR: 0.0920; p < 0.10 for low-tech industries). This study provides a comparative analysis of the impact of ESG and innovation on corporate metrics across high- and low-technology industries. The findings show that integrating ESG with technological innovation can promote sustainable corporate operations across varying levels of technological intensity.

Acknowledgment
The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to the Korea Institute of Corporate Governance and Sustainability (KCGS) for generously providing ESG ratings data for listed firms in South Korea. Their valuable support made these analyses possible.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Sample selection and other distributions
    • Table 2. Descriptive statistics
    • Table 3. Univariate analysis
    • Table A1. Classification of technological intensity of Korean listed firms
    • Table B1. Study variables
    • Table C1. Descriptions of ESG ratings and numerical proxies
    • Table D1. Pearson correlation
    • Table E1. Panel regression results: Main effects of ESG on Return on Assets (ROA)
    • Table E2. Panel regression results: Main effects of R&D intensity on Return on Assets (ROA)
    • Table E3. Panel regression results: ESG, innovation, and Return on Assets (ROA)
    • Table F1. Panel regression results: Main effects of ESG on Tobin’s Q (TQ)
    • Table F2. Panel regression results: Main effects of R&D intensity on Tobin’s Q (TQ)
    • Table F3. Panel regression results: ESG, innovation, and Tobin’s Q (TQ)
    • Table G1. Panel regression results: Main effects of ESG on Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR)
    • Table G2. Panel regression results: Main effects of R&D intensity on Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR)
    • Table G3. Panel regression results: ESG, innovation, and Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR)
    • Conceptualization
      Kevin Troy Chua, Hae-Young Byun
    • Data curation
      Kevin Troy Chua
    • Formal Analysis
      Kevin Troy Chua, Hae-Young Byun
    • Investigation
      Kevin Troy Chua, Hae-Young Byun
    • Methodology
      Kevin Troy Chua, Hae-Young Byun
    • Project administration
      Kevin Troy Chua, Hae-Young Byun
    • Resources
      Kevin Troy Chua
    • Software
      Kevin Troy Chua, Hae-Young Byun
    • Validation
      Kevin Troy Chua
    • Visualization
      Kevin Troy Chua, Hae-Young Byun
    • Writing – original draft
      Kevin Troy Chua, Hae-Young Byun
    • Writing – review & editing
      Kevin Troy Chua, Hae-Young Byun
    • Funding acquisition
      Hae-Young Byun
    • Supervision
      Hae-Young Byun