The impact of board of directors’ characteristics on financial statement fraud: The moderating role of audit committee
-
Received August 1, 2025;Accepted December 5, 2025;Published December 15, 2025
-
Author(s)Hien Nguyen Thi ThuLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6623-7153
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(4).2025.29
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2025, Issue #4, pp. 380-392
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 15 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Board characteristics play a critical role in shaping corporate transparency and preventing financial misreporting in emerging markets. This study investigates how the independence, size, gender diversity, and meeting frequency of boards of directors influence the likelihood of financial statement fraud among listed firms in Vietnam, while also examining the moderating effect of audit committees. Using a balanced panel dataset of 2,584 firm-year observations from 323 non-financial companies listed on the Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi Stock Exchanges during 2015–2022, logistic regression analysis (Stata 17) was used to test the proposed hypotheses. The results show that board independence and board size significantly reduce the likelihood of financial statement fraud, aligning with agency and resource dependence theories. Although gender diversity has no significant effect in the baseline model, it becomes negatively significant when the audit committee is included, indicating that effective oversight enhances the governance role of diverse boards. Additionally, the previously positive relationship between meeting frequency and fraud becomes insignificant when an audit committee is present, confirming its neutralizing effect. These findings highlight that the audit committee is a vital governance mechanism that enhances monitoring quality, reinforces accountability, and promotes ethical behavior. The study provides important insights for regulators and firms in Vietnam by emphasizing the need to strengthen audit committee independence, promote board diversity, and advance professional governance to reduce fraudulent reporting and support sustainable corporate integrity in emerging economies.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G32, G38, M14, M48
-
References45
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Board of directors’ characteristics measurement
- Table 2. Frequency distribution of financial statement fraud and audit committee presence
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics
- Table 4. Correlation analysis of variables
- Table 5. Regression results for Model 1 and Model 2
-
- Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
- Akinsola, K. (2025). Regulatory Compliance and the Role of Corporate Governance in Preventing Financial Misstatements. SSRN.
- Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2024). Occupational Fraud 2024: A Report to the Nations.
- Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3), 315-342.
- Anggraini, M., Estrini, D. H., & Rahayu, P. P. (2025). The Role of Organizational Governance and Environmental Social Performance on Fraud Tendency. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 10(1), 1-14.
- Arum, E. D. P., & Wendry, W. S. (2024). Board Characteristics and Financial Statement Fraud: Evidence from Indonesian Public Companies. Journal of Management World, 2024(5), 61-68.
- Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441-454.
- Dang, A. T., & Khanh Dung, N. N. (2024). The Impact of COVID-19 on earnings management: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. Sage Open, 14(3).
- Devarajar, M., Shaharudin, M. S., Pitchay, A. A., Haron, H., & Ganesan, Y. (2022). Corporate Governance and Fraudulent Financial Reporting Among Malaysian Public Listed Companies. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 7(9), 81-95.
- Ebaid, I. E. S. (2023). Board characteristics and the likelihood of financial statements fraud: Empirical evidence from an emerging market. Future Business Journal, 9(1), 47.
- Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
- Free, C., & Murphy, P. R. (2015). The ties that bind: The decision to co‐offend in fraud. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(1), 18-54.
- Ghaleb, B. A. A., Qaderi, S. A., Almashaqbeh, A., & Qasem, A. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, board gender diversity and real earnings management: The case of Jordan. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1883222.
- Girau, E. A., Bujang, I., Jidwin, A. P., & Said, J. (2021). Corporate governance challenges and opportunities in mitigating corporate fraud in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(2), 620-638.
- Hsu, Y. L., & Yang, Y. C. (2022). Corporate governance and financial reporting quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102778.
- Ibrahim, S. I., & Yahaya, O. A. (2024). Board of directors and financial statements fraud. European Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business, 12(1), 137-167.
- Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.
- Kaituko, L. E., Githaiga, P. N., & Chelogoi, S. K. (2023). Board structure and the likelihood of financial statement fraud. Does audit fee matter? Evidence from manufacturing firms in the East Africa community. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2218175.
- Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 11(3), 189-205.
- Kjærland, F., Haugdal, A. T., Søndergaard, A., & Vågslid, A. (2020). Corporate governance and earnings management in a Nordic perspective: Evidence from the Oslo stock exchange. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(11), 256.
- Kumar, P., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2008). Who monitors the monitor? The effect of board independence on executive compensation and firm value. Review of Financial Studies, 21(3), 1371-1401.
- Law, P. (2011). Corporate governance and no fraud occurrence in organizations: Hong Kong evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(6), 501-518.
- Liu, Y., Wu, B., & Zhang, M. (2023). Can independent directors identify the company’s risk of financial fraud: Evidence from predicting financial fraud based on machine learning. China Journal of Accounting Studies, 11(3), 465-492.
- Luo, J. H., Peng, C., & Zhang, X. (2020). The impact of CFO gender on corporate fraud: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 63, 101404.
- Luo, M., Ma, C., Chen, D., & Mi, X. (2025). Financial Statement Fraud Detection by Integrating Supervisory Punishment Reports into Machine Learning Methods: Evidence from China. Accounting & Finance.
- Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the Firm. Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- Mohsni, S., Otchere, I., & Shahriar, S. (2021). Board gender diversity, firm performance and risk-taking in developing countries: The moderating effect of culture. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 73, 101360.
- Obigbemi, I. F., Omolehinwa, E. O., Mukoro, D. O., Ben-Caleb, E., & Olusanmi, O. A. (2016). Earnings management and board structure: Evidence from Nigeria. Sage Open, 6(3).
- Popa, A., Achim, M. V., & Teusdea, A. C. (2024). Corporate governance and financial fraud occurrence – case study on Romanian companies. The Journal of Risk Finance, 25(3), 489-509.
- Rostami, V., & Rezaei, L. (2022). Corporate governance and fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(3), 1009-1026.
- Saleem, E., Alzoubi, E. S. S., & Selamat, M. H. (2012). The effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms on constraining earning management: Literature review and proposed framework. International Journal of Global Business, 5(1), 17-35.
- Singh, V., & Vinnicombe, S. (2004). Why so few women directors in top UK boardrooms? Evidence and theoretical explanations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 479-488.
- Sunden, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 207-211.
- Thi Lien, T., Hien, H. T., & Nguyễn Phạm, M. T. (2023). Audit Committee Effectiveness and Financial Reporting Quality in Vietnamese Stocks Exchange. Advance Knowledge for Executives, 2(2), 1-13.
- Tuan, D. A., Dung, N. N. K., & Thao, B. T. T. (2023). Real earnings management trends in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of non-financial listed companies in Vietnam. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(2), 295-306.
- Vo, T. H., & Hung, T. N. (2024). Improving financial reporting standards in Vietnam's public companies: The crucial role of audit committees. Investment Management & Financial Innovations, 21(4), 361.
- Wahid, A. S. (2019). The effects and the mechanisms of board gender diversity: Evidence from financial manipulation. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(3), 705-725.
- Wang, Y., Yu, M., & Gao, S. (2022). Gender diversity and financial statement fraud. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 41(2), 106903.
- Xie, B., Davidson III, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295-316.
- Xu, Y., Gupta, V. K., Xue, S., Mortal, S., & Chen, H. (2025). Female management representation and corporate financial fraud: do local gender norms play a role. Journal of Business Ethics.
- Yang, D., & Buckland, R. (2010). Fraudulent financial reporting in China: Consideration of timing traits and corporate governance mechanisms. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2(1), 45-59.
- Yang, D., Jiao, H., & Buckland, R. (2017). The determinants of financial fraud in Chinese firms: Does corporate governance as an institutional innovation matter? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 309-320.
- Zahid, Z., Zhang, J., Ali, F., & Shahzad, F. (2024). Board diversity and firm performance in Chinese manufacturing firms: Moderating role of CEO duality. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 28(4).
- Zahra, S. A., Priem, R. L., & Rasheed, A. A. (2005). The antecedents and consequences of top management fraud. Journal of Management, 31(6), 803-828.
- Zhi, X. Q., & Tong, P. (2005). Earnings management, transfer of control rights and change of independent directors: Based on the governance role of independent directors. Journal of Management World, 11, 137-144. (In Chinese).
-
-
Conceptualization
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Data curation
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Formal Analysis
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Funding acquisition
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Investigation
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Methodology
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Project administration
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Resources
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Software
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Supervision
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Validation
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Visualization
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Writing – original draft
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Writing – review & editing
Hien Nguyen Thi Thu
-
Conceptualization
-
Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting?
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 19-35 Views: 5520 Downloads: 2059 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯCorporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting plays a key role in management control, particularly in light of the increased demand for non-financial reporting after the financial crisis of 2008–2009. This literature review evaluates 47 empirical studies that concentrate on the influence of several board composition variables on the quantity and quality of CSR reporting. The author briefly introduces the research framework that underpins current empirical studies in this field. This is followed by a discussion of the main variables of board composition: (1) committees (audit and CSR committees), (2) board independence, (3) board expertise, (4) CEO duality, (5) board diversity (gender and foreign diversity), (6) board activity, and (7) board size. The author, then, summarizes the key findings, discusses the limitations of the existing research and offers useful recommendations for researchers, firm practice and regulators.
-
IFRS convergence: opportunities and challenges in India
Parvathy P. R. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(2).2017.02Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 13-18 Views: 4474 Downloads: 2074 TO CITEPast decade has witnessed several changes in the process of conduct of business activities across the world especially due to the wave of globalization. It has also made drastic changes in the process of financial reporting, in particular the continuing adoption of IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) worldwide. IFRS are high quality, understandable, enforceable and globally acceptable accounting standards issued by IASB (International Accounting Standard Board). Thus these are a set of international accounting standards stating how a particular type of transaction and other events should be reported in the financial statements. Thus IFRS are designed as a common global language for business affairs so that company accounts are understandable and comparable across international boundaries. IFRS is becoming the global language of business with over 40% of the world adopting this as their standard for reporting. India also decided to converge to IFRS from 1st April 2016 in a phased manner, which in turn improves the financial statement comparability and transparency that helps to attract greater cross border investments. This paper focuses on the convergence of IFRS with Indian Accounting Standards, its utility, issues and challenges faced by the stakeholders. It also throws light to the ways through which problems can be addressed.
-
Impact of corporate governance mechanisms on financial reporting quality: a study of Indian GAAP and Indian Accounting Standards
Faozi A. Almaqtari
,
Abdulwahid Abdullah Hashed
,
Mohd Shamim
,
Waleed M. Al-ahdal
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.01
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #4 pp. 1-13 Views: 4412 Downloads: 988 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe present study examines the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on financial reporting quality under Indian GAAP and Indian Accounting Standards (Ind. AS). A sample of 97 companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange is selected. Corporate governance mechanisms have been considered as independent variables, and financial reporting quality is the dependent variable. Corporate governance is measured by board effectiveness (board size, independence, diligence, and expertise), audit committee attributes (size, independence, diligence, and expertise), foreign ownership, and audit quality. Descriptive statistics, correlation, and OLS regression are conducted to estimate the results. The study results reveal that board characteristics and audit committee attributes, except for audit committee diligence, have a significant effect on financial reporting quality. However, the impact of board diligence and audit committee attributes is negative. Foreign ownership has no contribution to financial reporting quality, but audit quality has a significant effect. The findings of the study have considerable implications for regulators, policymakers, managers, investors, analysts, and academicians. More emphasis should be given to compliance with Ind. AS, and an oversight body for compliance with Ind. AS should be established.
Acknowledgment
This publication was supported by Deanship of Scientific Research, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.

