Factors affecting sustainability reporting in Indonesia: The moderating role of external assurance
-
Received September 17, 2025;Accepted January 27, 2026;Published February 4, 2026
-
Author(s)Desmiyawati DesmiyawatiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-8201
,
Vince RatnawatiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1630-4546
,
Nur AzlinaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7204-537X
,
Andewi RokhmawatiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3713-972X
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.23(1).2026.13
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2026, Issue #1, pp. 172-185
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 20 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The increasing demand for environmental and social impact information has made the sustainability report a crucial instrument for building stakeholder trust in corporate conduct in this era. This study aims to provide empirical findings on the impact of corporate governance mechanisms, such as independent commissioners, institutional ownership, and gender diversity, on the disclosure of sustainability reports with external assurance as a moderating variable. The study is quantitative research that employs Hayes’s moderation model bootstrapping technique. It covers 867 observations of non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange over the period 2018 to 2023. Results show that independent commissioners (p < 0.01) and gender diversity (p < 0.05) positively and significantly affect sustainability report disclosure. Conversely, institutional ownership had no significant impact (p > 0.05). For the moderating effect, the interaction terms of external assurance and independent commissioners, and external assurance and institutional ownership are negatively significant (p < 0.05), indicating that external assurance weakens the relations in these cases. The interaction between external assurance and gender diversity was negative but insignificant for sustainability reporting (p > 0.05). This study concludes by examining whether the role of third-party assurance or internal governance mechanisms can positively affect the quality of reporting. The results suggest that third-party assurance, when used to enhance internal governance mechanisms, does not optimally improve the quality of reporting. The latter result reveals that third-party guarantees for non-financial firms have not amplified the effects of corporate governance mechanisms on the quality of sustainability reports.
Acknowledgments
We want to acknowledge the Ministry of Education and Technology for its support of this study with contract numbers 102/C3/DT.05.00/PL/2025 and 19483/UN19.5.1.3/AL.04/2025. We also thank the LPPM Riau University for its research cooperation, as well as the entire team that supports this research.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G18, G32, M41
-
References49
-
Tables8
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Research sample description
- Table 2. Summary of variables
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics of variables (n = 867)
- Table 4. Correlation matrix for the variables
- Table 5. The results of the hypothesis test using Hayes’s PROCESS macro
- Table 6. Robustness test – H1 and H4 (n = 867)
- Table 7. Robustness test – H2 and H5 (n = 867)
- Table 8. Robustness test – H3 and H6 (n = 867)
-
- Al-Shaer, H., & Zaman, M. (2016). Board gender diversity and sustainability reporting quality. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 12(3), 210-222.
- Amatullah, A. N., Suharman, H., & Fatmawati, F. U. (2025). Sustainability reporting quality: The effect of good corporate governance, gender diversity, and company age. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business, 8(1), 76-89.
- Bawai, R., & Kusumadewi, H. (2021). Effect of Corporate Governance, Firm Characteristic, Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on Firm Value. Jurnal Economia, 17(1), 20033.
- Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners of Issuers or Public Companies. (2014). Financial Services Authority Regulations No. 33/POJK.04/2014. (In Indonesian).
- Boiral, O., & Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2020). Sustainability reporting assurance: Creating stakeholder accountability through hyperreality? Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 1-17.
- Calabrese, G. G., & Manello, A. (2021). Board diversity and performance in a masculine, aged and glocal supply chain: new empirical evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(7), 1440-1459.
- Cicchiello, A. F., Fellegara, A. M., Kazemikhasragh, A., & Monferrà, S. (2021). Gender diversity on corporate boards: How Asian and African women contribute on sustainability reporting activity. Gender in Management, 36(7), 801-820.
- Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.
- Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2017). Do Institutional Investors Drive Corporate Social Responsibility? International Evidence.
- Elaigwu, M., Abdulmalik, S. O., & Talab, H. R. (2024). Corporate integrity, external assurance and sustainability reporting quality: evidence from the Malaysian public listed companies. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 16(2), 410-440.
- Elkington, J. (1998). Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring Business Excellence, 2(3), 18-22.
- Erben Yavuz, A., Kocaman, B. E., Doğan, M., Hazar, A., Babuşcu, Ş., & Sutbayeva, R. (2024). The Impact of Corporate Governance on Sustainability Disclosures: A Comparison from the Perspective of Financial and Non-Financial Firms. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(19).
- Erin, O. A., & Ackers, B. (2024). Corporate board, assurance and sustainability reporting practices: a focus on selected African countries. Journal of Accounting & Organization Change, 20(6), 85-118.
- Erin, O., Adegboye, A., & Bamigboye, O. A. (2022). Corporate governance and sustainability reporting quality: evidence from Nigeria. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(3), 680-707.
- Freeman, R. E. (1994). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421.
- Fuzi, S. F. S., Halim, S. A. A., & Julizaerma, M. K. (2016). Board Independence and Firm Performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 460-465.
- Girón, A., Kazemikhasragh, A., Cicchiello, A. F., & Panetti, E. (2021). Sustainability Reporting and Firms’ Economic Performance: Evidence from Asia and Africa, 1741-1759.
- Githaiga, P. N., & Kosgei, J. K. (2023). Board characteristics and sustainability reporting: a case of listed firms in East Africa. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 23(1), 3-17.
- Gulzar, M. A., Cherian, J., Hwang, J., Jiang, Y., & Sial, M. S. (2019). The Impact of Board Gender Diversity and Foreign Institutional Investors on the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Engagement of Chinese Listed Companies. Sustainability, 11(2), 307.
- Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
- Hsueh, J. W.-J. (2018). Governance Structure and the Credibility Gap: Experimental Evidence on Family Businesses’ Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(2), 547-568.
- Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411-432.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- Kamaliah, K. (2020). Disclosure of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its implications on company value as a result of the impact of corporate governance and profitability. International Journal of Law and Management, 62(4), 339-354.
- Kenton, W. (2025). Triple Bottom Line: What It Is and How to Measure.
- Kordsachia, O., Focke, M., & Velte, P. (2022). Do sustainable institutional investors contribute to firms’ environmental performance? Empirical evidence from Europe. Review of Managerial Science, 16(5), 1409-1436.
- Kravchuk, N., Karnaukh, L., Avramenko, O., Skrypnyk, N., & Kravchenko, O. (2024). Influence of gender stereotypes on the socialization of the children of older preschool age. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 14(75), 221-233.
- Kumar, P. (2024). The impact of executives’ compensation and corporate governance attributes on voluntary disclosures: Does audit quality matter ?
- Kurnia, P., Agustia, D., Soewarno, N., & Ardianto, A. (2025). The mediating role of carbon emission disclosure in the relationship between structure of corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Applied Accounting Research.
- Li, Z., Jia, J., & Chapple, L. (Ellie). (2023). The corporate sustainability committee and its relation to corporate environmental performance. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(5), 1292-1324.
- Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409-424.
- Lonkani, R. (2018). Firm Value. In Firm Value – Theory and Empirical Evidence. InTech.
- Manning, B., Braam, G., & Reimsbach, D. (2019). Corporate governance and sustainable business conduct – Effects of board monitoring effectiveness and stakeholder engagement on corporate sustainability performance and disclosure choices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 351-366.
- Mishra, R. K., & Kapil, S. (2018). Effect of Board Characteristics on Firm Value: Evidence from India. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 7(1), 41-72.
- Nguyen, A. H., Pham, C. D., Doan, N. T., Ta, T. T., Nguyen, H. T., & Truong, T. V. (2021). The Effect of Dividend Payment on Firm’s Financial Performance: An Empirical Study of Vietnam. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(8).
- Nicolò, G., Zampone, G., Sannino, G., & De Iorio, S. (2022). Sustainable corporate governance and non-financial disclosure in Europe: does the gender diversity matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 227-249.
- Orazalin, N. (2019). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in an emerging economy: evidence from commercial banks of Kazakhstan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(3), 490-507.
- Oyerogba, E. O., Oladele, F., Kolawole, P. E., & Adeyemo, M. A. (2024). Corporate governance practices and sustainability reporting quality: evidence from the Nigerian listed financial institution. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1).
- Permatasari, A., & Yanto, H. (2022). The Effect of Corporate Governance and Company Characteristic on SR. AFEBI Journal Review, 24-36.
- Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2019). An international approach of the relationship between board attributes and the disclosure of corporate social responsibility issues. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 612-627.
- Rashid, M. M., & Kabir, M. R. (2025). Corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance: the mediating role of CSR expenditure. Asian Review of Accounting, 33(1), 1-17.
- Ratnawati, V., Desmiyawati, D., Azlina, N., & Rokhmawati, A. (2026). Factors affecting sustainability reporting in Indonesia: The moderating role of external assurance. Zenodo.
- Sahetapy, K. (2023). Sustainability Report and Firm Value: an Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing, 10(1), 1-8.
- Spence, M. (1973). Job Market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
- Suttipun, M. (2021). The influence of board composition on environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure of Thai listed companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(4), 391-402.
- Thanatawee, Y. (2023). Institutional ownership and cost of debt: evidence from Thailand. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2).
- Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., & Mustikaningtiyas, F. (2021). Good corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia: A triple bottom line approach. Heliyon, 7(3), e06453.
- Utami, R., Ameraldo, F., Fella Rizki, M., & Jihad Rabaya, A. (2024). A Factor Influencing Sustainability Reporting Assurance: A Study of Indonesian Public Listed Companies. Journal of Accounting Science, 8(2), 199-216.
- Yuwono, M. A., & Ellitan, L. (2024). Corporate Governance, Sustainability, and Corporate Performance: Multi-Level Perspectives from Existing Companies. July.
-
-
Conceptualization
Desmiyawati Desmiyawati, Vince Ratnawati, Nur Azlina, Andewi Rokhmawati
-
Data curation
Desmiyawati Desmiyawati, Nur Azlina
-
Formal Analysis
Desmiyawati Desmiyawati, Vince Ratnawati, Andewi Rokhmawati
-
Methodology
Desmiyawati Desmiyawati, Vince Ratnawati
-
Resources
Desmiyawati Desmiyawati, Vince Ratnawati, Nur Azlina, Andewi Rokhmawati
-
Software
Desmiyawati Desmiyawati, Nur Azlina
-
Validation
Desmiyawati Desmiyawati, Vince Ratnawati, Nur Azlina, Andewi Rokhmawati
-
Writing – original draft
Desmiyawati Desmiyawati, Vince Ratnawati, Nur Azlina, Andewi Rokhmawati
-
Writing – review & editing
Desmiyawati Desmiyawati, Vince Ratnawati, Nur Azlina, Andewi Rokhmawati
-
Funding acquisition
Vince Ratnawati
-
Investigation
Vince Ratnawati, Nur Azlina, Andewi Rokhmawati
-
Supervision
Vince Ratnawati, Nur Azlina, Andewi Rokhmawati
-
Project administration
Nur Azlina, Andewi Rokhmawati
-
Visualization
Nur Azlina
-
Conceptualization
-
ESG disclosure and financial performance: Empirical study of Vietnamese commercial banks
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 19, 2024 Issue #1 pp. 208-220 Views: 7320 Downloads: 2303 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure becomes vital for banks to be transparent and accountable for their investments and lending decisions to shareholders, regulators, and society. The potential enhancement of shareholder value through ESG disclosure is still inconsistent. Empirical studies on the association between ESG disclosure and financial performance are mixed and limited in emerging economies. This study aims to examine whether ESG disclosure impacts the financial performance of 24 Vietnamese commercial banks in terms of return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and net interest margin (NIM). The study uses the feasible generalized least squares estimation method based on panel data from 2018 to 2022. The study employs content analysis on 12 themes related to environmental, social, and governance pillars to score policy disclosure based on the Fair Finance Guide Methodology. The results highlight the positive effects of ESG policy disclosure, individual environment disclosure (E), and individual governance disclosure (G) on bank financial performance. Notably, ESG, E, and G have the largest influence on ROE, with coefficients of 0.051, 0.036, and 0.027, respectively, at a 5% significance level. However, the study does not provide evidence of a statistically significant association between social disclosure and financial performance. These results provide empirical evidence for regulators and bank managers to shape ESG policies and practices aligning with international standards.
Acknowledgment
ESG disclosure score of 11 banks as primary data in this study is conducted under the project coordinated by the Fair Finance Vietnam coalition, as part of Fair Finance International. -
Financial sustainability management of the insurance company: case of Ukraine
Ruslana Pikus
,
Nataliia Prykaziuk
,
Mariia Balytska
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.18
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 219-228 Views: 4862 Downloads: 724 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn the current conditions of the Ukrainian economy, which is characterized by crisis phenomena and frequent changes in legislation, the insurance organizations are facing a number of difficulties in maintaining their financial sustainability. Moreover, these processes take place under the increased requirements for solvency of insurers. However, a significant part of domestic insurance companies is financially unstable, which is conditioned not only by the lack of funds, but also by the low level of management. This situation hinders the further development of the insurance market in Ukraine and has a negative impact on all areas of the domestic financial system and prevents it from successful integration into the European financial field. In order to address this problem, it is necessary to distinguish the key groups of risks that affect the financial sustainability of insurance organizations, among which there are the following: insurance, strategic, market risk, risk of inefficient capital structure, risk of limiting the insurance company’s liquidity, tax risk, investment risk, operational risk, the risk of ineffective organizational structure of the enterprise, and information risk. It should be noted that under conditions of changing environment, the impact of these risks only increases, and therefore the task of minimizing the impact of these risks on the activities of insurance companies is highly important. Accordingly, the authors of the article proposed a four-stage strategy to manage the financial sustainability of the insurance company, the purpose of which is to identify the risks of limiting the insurer’s financial sustainability, their qualitative and quantitative assessment, as well as the development and implementation of appropriate measures to minimize and eliminate unacceptable consequences.
-
Green product buying intentions among young consumers: extending the application of theory of planned behavior
Andhy Setyawan
,
Noermijati Noermijati
,
Sunaryo Sunaryo ,
Siti Aisjah
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.13
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 145-154 Views: 4789 Downloads: 1788 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis research reveals the factors explaining the purchase intention toward green products among young consumers. Young consumers are beginner consumers who are going to play an important role to take a responsibility in preserving the environment. Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is selected as the main theoretical framework in this research alongside some other variables (environmental concern, environmental knowledge, and willingness to pay), which are added in the research model to expand TPB application. Three hundred and twenty-six respondents were interviewed through a survey and the data are analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).
The findings illustrated that not every explanatory variable influenced the purchase intention toward green products among young consumers. Environmental concern and attitude did not influence the purchase intention toward green products among young consumers.

