Audit committee characteristics and environmental, social, and governance reporting quality: An analysis of top 100 JSE-listed corporations
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.06(1).2025.04
-
Article InfoVolume 6 2025, Issue #1, pp. 38-52
- 47 Views
-
24 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Audit committees are key in corporate reporting, ensuring credibility through internal controls, assurance processes, and risk management. This study examines the relationship between audit committee characteristics and Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting quality among the top 100 Johannesburg Stock Exchange-listed corporations. Using agency and legitimacy theories, the study analyzes how audit committees serve as mechanisms for lowering information asymmetries and attaining legitimacy through transparent Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting. It focuses on three audit committee attributes: independence, meeting frequency, and average age. Panel data regression models using Ernst & Young’s Excellence in Integrated Reporting Awards were used. Data were obtained from the Bloomberg database spanning five years (2017–2021). The results reveal a significant positive correlation between Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting quality and audit committee independence (p-value < 0.05), but no significant relationship for meeting frequency or average age (p < 0.05). The findings highlight the importance of internal assurance in enhancing Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting, addressing stakeholder concerns on sustainability and corporate responsibility. The study contributes to the governance literature by offering actionable insights for firm managers and evidence that stronger audit committee independence enhances governance structures. This study underscores the need for policies that improve Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting quality and suggests further exploration of qualitative audit committee attributes influencing Environmental, Social, and Governance disclosures. It added to the ongoing debate examining the effect of audit committee characteristics on Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting quality in South Africa’s context.
Acknowledgment
Gratitude is extended to the anonymous referees for their helpful and thoughtful suggestions, recommendations, and constructive comments, by which the paper was substantially improved. Moreover, the University of KwaZulu Natal is acknowledged for providing excellent research support and facilities. Notably, the article has never been published previously. The paper was extracted from Ruth Mutsa Ruziwa’s Masters dissertation, which was submitted to the University of KwaZulu Natal, with first authorship of this article attributed to the same.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M42, G34, M41, Q56
-
References75
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics
- Table 2. Correlation matrix and VIF
- Table 3. Regression results
-
- Abela, M. (2022). A new direction? The “mainstreaming” of sustainability reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(6), 1261-1283.
- Alhossini, M. A., Ntim, C. G., & Zalata, A. M. (2021). Corporate board committees and corporate outcomes: An international systematic literature review and agenda for future research. The International Journal of Accounting, 56(01), 2150001.
- Appiagyei, K., Djajadikerta, H. G., & Mat Roni, S. (2023). The impact of corporate governance on integrated reporting (IR) quality and sustainability performance: evidence from listed companies in South Africa. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(4), 1068-1092.
- Appuhami, R., & Tashakor, S. (2017). The impact of audit committee characteristics on CSR disclosure: An analysis of Australian firms. Australian Accounting Review, 27(4), 400-420.
- Arayssi, M., Jizi, M., & Tabaja, H. H. (2020). The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 137-161.
- Arif, M., Sajjad, A., Farooq, S., Abrar, M., & Joyo, A. S. (2021). The impact of the audit committee attributes on the quality and quantity of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(3), 497-514.
- Arvidsson, S., & Dumay, J. (2022). Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 1091-1110.
- Baker, A. (2022). Simplicity. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Bamahros, H. M., Alquhaif, A., Qasem, A., Wan-Hussin, W. N., Thomran, M., Al-Duais, S. D., Shukeri, S.N., & Khojally, H. M. (2022). Corporate governance mechanisms and ESG reporting: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market. Sustainability, 14(10), 6202.
- Baran, M. L. (2022). Mixed methods research design. In Research Anthology on Innovative Research Methodologies and Utilization Across Multiple Disciplines (pp. 312-333). IGI Global.
- Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2009). The audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), 65-122.
- Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022). Business research methods. Oxford University Press.
- Bergianti, M., Cioffo, N., Del Buono, F., Paganelli, M., & Porrello, A. (2023). Avoiding the Pitfalls on Stock Market: Challenges and Solutions in Developing Quantitative Strategies. Ital-IA 2023. 3rd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 489-494). Pisa, Italy.
- Bloomberg, L. P. (2023). Research domain. Software and database. New York, NY.
- Bose, S. (2020). Evolution of ESG reporting frameworks. In Esty, D. C., & Cort, T. (Eds.), Values at work: Sustainable investing and ESG reporting (pp. 13-33). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Buallay, A. M., & AlDhaen, E. S. (2018). The relationship between audit committee characteristics and the level of sustainability report disclosure. In Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital Era: 17th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society (pp. 492-503). Kuwait, Springer International Publishing.
- Buallay, A., & Al-Ajmi, J. (2020). The role of audit committee attributes in corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(2), 249-264.
- Chan, J. Y. L., Leow, S. M. H., Bea, K. T., Cheng, W. K., Phoong, S. W., Hong, Z. W., & Chen, Y. L. (2022). Mitigating the multicollinearity problem and its machine learning approach: a review. Mathematics, 10(8), 1283.
- Chariri, A., & Januarti, I. (2017). Audit committee characteristics and integrated reporting: Empirical study of companies listed on the Johannesburg stock exchange. European Research Studies Journal, 20, 305-318.
- Chouaibi, J. (2022). Do audit committee attributes improve integrated reporting quality? Evidence from European Companies listed on STOXX EUROPE 600 INDEX.
- Davies, P. A., Dudek, P. M., & Wyatt, K. S. (2020). Recent developments in ESG reporting. In Esty, D. C., & Cort, T. (Eds.), Values at work: Sustainable investing and ESG reporting (pp. 161-179). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
- Desoky, A. M. (2025). The influence of board and audit committee characteristics on CSR reporting in Bahrain: the legitimacy perspective. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 23(1), 417-435.
- Diwan, H., & Sreeraman, B. A. (2023). From financial reporting to ESG reporting: a bibliometric analysis of the evolution in corporate sustainability disclosures. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 13769-13805.
- Donkor, A., Djajadikerta, H. G., & Mat Roni, S. (2021). Impacts of combined assurance on integrated, sustainability and financial reporting qualities: Evidence from listed companies in South Africa. International Journal of Auditing, 25(2), 475-507.
- Dorfleitner, G., Kreuzer, C., & Sparrer, C. (2022). To sin in secret is no sin at all: On the linkage of policy, society, culture, and firm characteristics with corporate scandals. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 202, 762-784.
- Eloff, A. M., & Steenkamp, S. (2022). Integrated report quality and earnings management. Evidence from South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 25(1), 1-10.
- Ernst & Young (EY). (2022). Excellence in Integrated Reporting 2022. How can business work for sustainability and sustainability work for business?
- Fayad, A. A., Khatib, S. F., Alomair, A., & Al Naim, A. S. (2024). Audit Chair Characteristics and ESG Disclosure: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market. Sustainability, 16(24), 11011.
- Ghafran, C., O’Sullivan, N., & Yasmin, S. (2022). When does audit committee busyness influence earnings management in the UK? Evidence on the role of the financial crisis and company size. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 47, 100467.
- Girella, L., Rossi, P., & Zambon, S. (2019). Exploring the firm and country determinants of the voluntary adoption of integrated reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1323-1340.
- Grassmann, M. (2021). The relationship between corporate social responsibility expenditures and firm value: The moderating role of integrated reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124840.
- Greenstone Plus. (2023). ESG reporting in South Africa – preparing for regulation.
- Gwalani, H., & Mazumdar, S. (2022). ESG Reporting Genesis and Significance. The Management Accountant Journal, 57(3), 53-57.
- Haji, A.A. & Anifowose, M. (2016). Audit committee and integrated reporting practice: does internal assurance matter? Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(8/9), 915-948.
- Helfaya, A., Morris, R., & Aboud, A. (2023). Investigating the factors that determine the ESG disclosure practices in Europe. Sustainability, 15(6), 5508.
- Hossain, A., Bose, S., & Shamsuddin, A. (2023). Diffusion of integrated reporting, insights and potential avenues for future research. Accounting & Finance, 63(2), 2503-2555.
- IIRC. (2021). International
Framework. - Institute of Directors South Africa (IoDSA). (2016). King IV Report. Corporate Governance for South Africa.
- Ismail, A. M., & Latiff, I. H. M. (2019). Board diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence on environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(3), 31-50.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- JSE. (2022). Leading the way for a better tomorrow. JSE Sustainability Disclosure Guidance.
- Khunkaew, R., Wichianrak, J., & Suttipun, M. (2023). Sustainability reporting, gender diversity, firm value and corporate performance in ASEAN region. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2200608.
- Kılıç, M., & Kuzey, C. (2018). Determinants of forward-looking disclosures in integrated reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(1), 115-144.
- Komal, B., Bilal, Ezeani, E., Shahzad, A., Usman, M., & Sun, J. (2023). Age diversity of audit committee financial experts, ownership structure and earnings management: Evidence from China. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(3), 2664-2682.
- Lakhani, L., & Herbert, S. L. (2022). Theoretical frameworks applied in integrated reporting and sustainability reporting research. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 25(1), 1-12.
- Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
- Ma, Y., Ahmad, M. I., & Torelli, R. (2024). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: The moderating role of audit committee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 5971-5983.
- Madi, H. K., Ishak, Z., & Manaf, N. A. A. (2014). The impact of audit committee characteristics on corporate voluntary disclosure. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 486-492.
- Malola, A., & Maroun, W. (2019). The measurement and potential drivers of integrated report quality: Evidence from a pioneer in integrated reporting. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 33(2), 114-144.
- Mans-Kemp, N., & van der Lugt, C. T. (2020). Linking integrated reporting quality with sustainability performance and financial performance in South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 23(1), 1-11.
- Marrone, A. (2020). Corporate governance variables and integrated reporting. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(5), 26-36.
- Matta, R., Trivedi, S., Premchandran, S., & Mishra, A. (2024). Role of audit committee in ESG reporting quality: evidence from India. Accountancy Business and the Public Interest, 40(5), 51-64.
- Mitchell-Marais, J. (2024). State of SA businesses navigating the ‘Zombie Zone’.
- Mohammed, A. (2023). Mitigating greenwashing: The role of audit committees and internal audits in ESG reporting assurance (Doctoral Thesis). Durham University.
- Mohd Ariff, A. H., Fayad, A. A., Sawandi, N., Abu Bakar, F., Md Hashim, M. F. A., & Abdul Latif, R. (2023). Audit committee and integrated reporting quality: empirical evidence from an emerging market. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 28(2).
- Morais, F., De Villiers, V., Prinsloo, M., & Vawda, S. (2024). The state of ESG strategic integration in JSE listed companies.
- Mukeredzi, T. C. G. (2019). Impact of integrated reporting on financial performance (Doctoral Thesis). University of KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.
- Muzanya, S. (2022). ESG and corporate financial performance: evidence from JSE listed firms (Master’s Tesis). Faculty of Commerce, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
- Ndung’u, D. T. (2022). Environmental, social and governance reporting (ESG) post-Covid-19: An emerging trend. AfricaGrowth Agenda, 19(3), 18-21.
- Neri, S. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) and integrated reporting. In Vertigans, S., & Idowu, S. O. (Eds), Global Challenges to CSR and Sustainable Development: Root Causes and Evidence from Case Studies, (pp. 293-302). Cham: Springer
- Omran, M., Ramdhony, D., Mooneeapen, O., & Nursimloo, V. (2021). Integrated reporting and board characteristics: Evidence from top Australian listed companies. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(4), 732-758.
- Pernamasari, R., & Chariri, A. (2024). Characteristics of the Audit Committee and the Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Performance in Indonesian Companies. KnE Social Sciences, 9(21), 286-302.
- Pollman, E. (2022). The making and meaning of ESG. Harvard Business Law Review, 14, 403-453.
- Pozzoli, M., Pagani, A., & Paolone, F. (2022). The impact of audit committee characteristics on ESG performance in the European Union member states: Empirical evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371, 133411.
- Qaderi, S. A., Alhmoud, T. R., & Ghaleb, B. A. A. (2020). Audit committee features and CSR disclosure: Additional evidence from an emerging market. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(5), 226-237.
- Qaderi, S. A., Ghaleb, B. A. A., Hashed, A. A., Chandren, S., & Abdullah, Z. (2022). Board characteristics and integrated reporting strategy: Does sustainability committee matter? Sustainability, 14(10), 6092.
- Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., Marrone, A. & Rubino, M. (2021). Do audit committee attributes influence integrated reporting quality? An agency theory viewpoint. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 522-534.
- Songini, L., Pistoni, A., Tettamanzi, P., Fratini, F., & Minutiello, V. (2021). Integrated reporting quality and BoD characteristics: an empirical analysis. Journal of Management and Governance, 26, 579-620.
- Sultana, N., Singh, H., & Rahman, A. (2019). Experience of audit committee members and audit quality. European Accounting Review, 28(5), 947-975.
- Sun, Y. (2021). Towards an integrated reporting framework for China (Doctoral Thesis). The University of Waikato.
- Toerien, F., Breedt, C., & de Jager, P. G. (2023). Does board gender diversity improve environmental, social and governance disclosure? Evidence from South Africa. South African Journal of Business Management, 54(1), 3646.
- Velte, P. (2018). Is audit committee expertise connected with increased readability of integrated reports: Evidence from EU companies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(2), 23-41.
- Velte, P. (2022). Archival research on integrated reporting: a systematic review of main drivers and the impact of integrated reporting on firm value. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(3), 997-1061.
- Wang, M. L., & Phillips-Fein, K. (2023). Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance: A History of ESG Standardization from 1970s to the Present (Undergraduate. Senior Thesis). New York, NY: Columbia University.
- Wang, R., Zhou, S., & Wang, T. (2020). Corporate governance, integrated reporting and the use of credibility-enhancing mechanisms on integrated reports. European Accounting Review, 29(4), 631-663.