2543-54852544-1450
Business Perspectives
  • Login

Editorial office contact form

Please complete all required fields!

Please specify your request here

Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Captcha Refresh Invalid data

Your request has been successfully sent.

Your Cart

Price Total
€0.00

(₴0)

Proceed to Checkout
Your cart is empty
Cart 0 Items
Submit Manuscript
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publishing policies
  • Editorial Policies
  • Books
FOLLOW US
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Accounting and Financial Control
  • Issue #1
  • Audit committee characteristics and environmental, social, and governance reporting quality: An analysis of top 100 JSE-listed corporations

Audit committee characteristics and environmental, social, and governance reporting quality: An analysis of top 100 JSE-listed corporations

  • Received June 18, 2025;
    Accepted July 15, 2025;
    Published August 8, 2025
  • Author(s)
    Ruth Mutsa Ruziwa ,
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3356-9493
    Jean Damascene Mvunabandi
    ORCID ,
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5471-1172
    Bomi Cyril Nomlala
    ORCID
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.06(1).2025.04
  • Article Info
    Volume 6 2025, Issue #1, pp. 38-52
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • 47 Views
  • 24 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Audit committees are key in corporate reporting, ensuring credibility through internal controls, assurance processes, and risk management. This study examines the relationship between audit committee characteristics and Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting quality among the top 100 Johannesburg Stock Exchange-listed corporations. Using agency and legitimacy theories, the study analyzes how audit committees serve as mechanisms for lowering information asymmetries and attaining legitimacy through transparent Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting. It focuses on three audit committee attributes: independence, meeting frequency, and average age. Panel data regression models using Ernst & Young’s Excellence in Integrated Reporting Awards were used. Data were obtained from the Bloomberg database spanning five years (2017–2021). The results reveal a significant positive correlation between Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting quality and audit committee independence (p-value < 0.05), but no significant relationship for meeting frequency or average age (p < 0.05). The findings highlight the importance of internal assurance in enhancing Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting, addressing stakeholder concerns on sustainability and corporate responsibility. The study contributes to the governance literature by offering actionable insights for firm managers and evidence that stronger audit committee independence enhances governance structures. This study underscores the need for policies that improve Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting quality and suggests further exploration of qualitative audit committee attributes influencing Environmental, Social, and Governance disclosures. It added to the ongoing debate examining the effect of audit committee characteristics on Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting quality in South Africa’s context.

Acknowledgment
Gratitude is extended to the anonymous referees for their helpful and thoughtful suggestions, recommendations, and constructive comments, by which the paper was substantially improved. Moreover, the University of KwaZulu Natal is acknowledged for providing excellent research support and facilities. Notably, the article has never been published previously. The paper was extracted from Ruth Mutsa Ruziwa’s Masters dissertation, which was submitted to the University of KwaZulu Natal, with first authorship of this article attributed to the same.

 
view full abstract hide full abstract
  • PAPER PROFILE
  • AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS
  • FIGURES
  • TABLES
  • REFERENCES
  • Keywords
    audit committee, governance, reporting quality, sustainability
  • JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)
    M42, G34, M41, Q56
  • References
    75
  • Tables
    3
  • Figures
    0
    • Table 1. Descriptive statistics
    • Table 2. Correlation matrix and VIF
    • Table 3. Regression results
    • Abela, M. (2022). A new direction? The “mainstreaming” of sustainability reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(6), 1261-1283.
    • Alhossini, M. A., Ntim, C. G., & Zalata, A. M. (2021). Corporate board committees and corporate outcomes: An international systematic literature review and agenda for future research. The International Journal of Accounting, 56(01), 2150001.
    • Appiagyei, K., Djajadikerta, H. G., & Mat Roni, S. (2023). The impact of corporate governance on integrated reporting (IR) quality and sustainability performance: evidence from listed companies in South Africa. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(4), 1068-1092.
    • Appuhami, R., & Tashakor, S. (2017). The impact of audit committee characteristics on CSR disclosure: An analysis of Australian firms. Australian Accounting Review, 27(4), 400-420.
    • Arayssi, M., Jizi, M., & Tabaja, H. H. (2020). The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 137-161.
    • Arif, M., Sajjad, A., Farooq, S., Abrar, M., & Joyo, A. S. (2021). The impact of the audit committee attributes on the quality and quantity of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(3), 497-514.
    • Arvidsson, S., & Dumay, J. (2022). Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 1091-1110.
    • Baker, A. (2022). Simplicity. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    • Bamahros, H. M., Alquhaif, A., Qasem, A., Wan-Hussin, W. N., Thomran, M., Al-Duais, S. D., Shukeri, S.N., & Khojally, H. M. (2022). Corporate governance mechanisms and ESG reporting: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market. Sustainability, 14(10), 6202.
    • Baran, M. L. (2022). Mixed methods research design. In Research Anthology on Innovative Research Methodologies and Utilization Across Multiple Disciplines (pp. 312-333). IGI Global.
    • Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2009). The audit committee oversight process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), 65-122.
    • Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022). Business research methods. Oxford University Press.
    • Bergianti, M., Cioffo, N., Del Buono, F., Paganelli, M., & Porrello, A. (2023). Avoiding the Pitfalls on Stock Market: Challenges and Solutions in Developing Quantitative Strategies. Ital-IA 2023. 3rd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 489-494). Pisa, Italy.
    • Bloomberg, L. P. (2023). Research domain. Software and database. New York, NY.
    • Bose, S. (2020). Evolution of ESG reporting frameworks. In Esty, D. C., & Cort, T. (Eds.), Values at work: Sustainable investing and ESG reporting (pp. 13-33). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Buallay, A. M., & AlDhaen, E. S. (2018). The relationship between audit committee characteristics and the level of sustainability report disclosure. In Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital Era: 17th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society (pp. 492-503). Kuwait, Springer International Publishing.
    • Buallay, A., & Al-Ajmi, J. (2020). The role of audit committee attributes in corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(2), 249-264.
    • Chan, J. Y. L., Leow, S. M. H., Bea, K. T., Cheng, W. K., Phoong, S. W., Hong, Z. W., & Chen, Y. L. (2022). Mitigating the multicollinearity problem and its machine learning approach: a review. Mathematics, 10(8), 1283.
    • Chariri, A., & Januarti, I. (2017). Audit committee characteristics and integrated reporting: Empirical study of companies listed on the Johannesburg stock exchange. European Research Studies Journal, 20, 305-318.
    • Chouaibi, J. (2022). Do audit committee attributes improve integrated reporting quality? Evidence from European Companies listed on STOXX EUROPE 600 INDEX.
    • Davies, P. A., Dudek, P. M., & Wyatt, K. S. (2020). Recent developments in ESG reporting. In Esty, D. C., & Cort, T. (Eds.), Values at work: Sustainable investing and ESG reporting (pp. 161-179). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
    • Desoky, A. M. (2025). The influence of board and audit committee characteristics on CSR reporting in Bahrain: the legitimacy perspective. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 23(1), 417-435.
    • Diwan, H., & Sreeraman, B. A. (2023). From financial reporting to ESG reporting: a bibliometric analysis of the evolution in corporate sustainability disclosures. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 13769-13805.
    • Donkor, A., Djajadikerta, H. G., & Mat Roni, S. (2021). Impacts of combined assurance on integrated, sustainability and financial reporting qualities: Evidence from listed companies in South Africa. International Journal of Auditing, 25(2), 475-507.
    • Dorfleitner, G., Kreuzer, C., & Sparrer, C. (2022). To sin in secret is no sin at all: On the linkage of policy, society, culture, and firm characteristics with corporate scandals. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 202, 762-784.
    • Eloff, A. M., & Steenkamp, S. (2022). Integrated report quality and earnings management. Evidence from South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 25(1), 1-10.
    • Ernst & Young (EY). (2022). Excellence in Integrated Reporting 2022. How can business work for sustainability and sustainability work for business?
    • Fayad, A. A., Khatib, S. F., Alomair, A., & Al Naim, A. S. (2024). Audit Chair Characteristics and ESG Disclosure: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market. Sustainability, 16(24), 11011.
    • Ghafran, C., O’Sullivan, N., & Yasmin, S. (2022). When does audit committee busyness influence earnings management in the UK? Evidence on the role of the financial crisis and company size. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 47, 100467.
    • Girella, L., Rossi, P., & Zambon, S. (2019). Exploring the firm and country determinants of the voluntary adoption of integrated reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1323-1340.
    • Grassmann, M. (2021). The relationship between corporate social responsibility expenditures and firm value: The moderating role of integrated reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124840.
    • Greenstone Plus. (2023). ESG reporting in South Africa – preparing for regulation.
    • Gwalani, H., & Mazumdar, S. (2022). ESG Reporting Genesis and Significance. The Management Accountant Journal, 57(3), 53-57.
    • Haji, A.A. & Anifowose, M. (2016). Audit committee and integrated reporting practice: does internal assurance matter? Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(8/9), 915-948.
    • Helfaya, A., Morris, R., & Aboud, A. (2023). Investigating the factors that determine the ESG disclosure practices in Europe. Sustainability, 15(6), 5508.
    • Hossain, A., Bose, S., & Shamsuddin, A. (2023). Diffusion of integrated reporting, insights and potential avenues for future research. Accounting & Finance, 63(2), 2503-2555.
    • IIRC. (2021). International Framework.
    • Institute of Directors South Africa (IoDSA). (2016). King IV Report. Corporate Governance for South Africa.
    • Ismail, A. M., & Latiff, I. H. M. (2019). Board diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence on environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(3), 31-50.
    • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    • JSE. (2022). Leading the way for a better tomorrow. JSE Sustainability Disclosure Guidance.
    • Khunkaew, R., Wichianrak, J., & Suttipun, M. (2023). Sustainability reporting, gender diversity, firm value and corporate performance in ASEAN region. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2200608.
    • Kılıç, M., & Kuzey, C. (2018). Determinants of forward-looking disclosures in integrated reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(1), 115-144.
    • Komal, B., Bilal, Ezeani, E., Shahzad, A., Usman, M., & Sun, J. (2023). Age diversity of audit committee financial experts, ownership structure and earnings management: Evidence from China. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(3), 2664-2682.
    • Lakhani, L., & Herbert, S. L. (2022). Theoretical frameworks applied in integrated reporting and sustainability reporting research. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 25(1), 1-12.
    • Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
    • Ma, Y., Ahmad, M. I., & Torelli, R. (2024). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: The moderating role of audit committee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 5971-5983.
    • Madi, H. K., Ishak, Z., & Manaf, N. A. A. (2014). The impact of audit committee characteristics on corporate voluntary disclosure. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 486-492.
    • Malola, A., & Maroun, W. (2019). The measurement and potential drivers of integrated report quality: Evidence from a pioneer in integrated reporting. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 33(2), 114-144.
    • Mans-Kemp, N., & van der Lugt, C. T. (2020). Linking integrated reporting quality with sustainability performance and financial performance in South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 23(1), 1-11.
    • Marrone, A. (2020). Corporate governance variables and integrated reporting. International Journal of Business and Management, 15(5), 26-36.
    • Matta, R., Trivedi, S., Premchandran, S., & Mishra, A. (2024). Role of audit committee in ESG reporting quality: evidence from India. Accountancy Business and the Public Interest, 40(5), 51-64.
    • Mitchell-Marais, J. (2024). State of SA businesses navigating the ‘Zombie Zone’.
    • Mohammed, A. (2023). Mitigating greenwashing: The role of audit committees and internal audits in ESG reporting assurance (Doctoral Thesis). Durham University.
    • Mohd Ariff, A. H., Fayad, A. A., Sawandi, N., Abu Bakar, F., Md Hashim, M. F. A., & Abdul Latif, R. (2023). Audit committee and integrated reporting quality: empirical evidence from an emerging market. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 28(2).
    • Morais, F., De Villiers, V., Prinsloo, M., & Vawda, S. (2024). The state of ESG strategic integration in JSE listed companies.
    • Mukeredzi, T. C. G. (2019). Impact of integrated reporting on financial performance (Doctoral Thesis). University of KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.
    • Muzanya, S. (2022). ESG and corporate financial performance: evidence from JSE listed firms (Master’s Tesis). Faculty of Commerce, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
    • Ndung’u, D. T. (2022). Environmental, social and governance reporting (ESG) post-Covid-19: An emerging trend. AfricaGrowth Agenda, 19(3), 18-21.
    • Neri, S. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) and integrated reporting. In Vertigans, S., & Idowu, S. O. (Eds), Global Challenges to CSR and Sustainable Development: Root Causes and Evidence from Case Studies, (pp. 293-302). Cham: Springer
    • Omran, M., Ramdhony, D., Mooneeapen, O., & Nursimloo, V. (2021). Integrated reporting and board characteristics: Evidence from top Australian listed companies. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(4), 732-758.
    • Pernamasari, R., & Chariri, A. (2024). Characteristics of the Audit Committee and the Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Performance in Indonesian Companies. KnE Social Sciences, 9(21), 286-302.
    • Pollman, E. (2022). The making and meaning of ESG. Harvard Business Law Review, 14, 403-453.
    • Pozzoli, M., Pagani, A., & Paolone, F. (2022). The impact of audit committee characteristics on ESG performance in the European Union member states: Empirical evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371, 133411.
    • Qaderi, S. A., Alhmoud, T. R., & Ghaleb, B. A. A. (2020). Audit committee features and CSR disclosure: Additional evidence from an emerging market. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(5), 226-237.
    • Qaderi, S. A., Ghaleb, B. A. A., Hashed, A. A., Chandren, S., & Abdullah, Z. (2022). Board characteristics and integrated reporting strategy: Does sustainability committee matter? Sustainability, 14(10), 6092.
    • Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., Marrone, A. & Rubino, M. (2021). Do audit committee attributes influence integrated reporting quality? An agency theory viewpoint. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 522-534.
    • Songini, L., Pistoni, A., Tettamanzi, P., Fratini, F., & Minutiello, V. (2021). Integrated reporting quality and BoD characteristics: an empirical analysis. Journal of Management and Governance, 26, 579-620.
    • Sultana, N., Singh, H., & Rahman, A. (2019). Experience of audit committee members and audit quality. European Accounting Review, 28(5), 947-975.
    • Sun, Y. (2021). Towards an integrated reporting framework for China (Doctoral Thesis). The University of Waikato.
    • Toerien, F., Breedt, C., & de Jager, P. G. (2023). Does board gender diversity improve environmental, social and governance disclosure? Evidence from South Africa. South African Journal of Business Management, 54(1), 3646.
    • Velte, P. (2018). Is audit committee expertise connected with increased readability of integrated reports: Evidence from EU companies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(2), 23-41.
    • Velte, P. (2022). Archival research on integrated reporting: a systematic review of main drivers and the impact of integrated reporting on firm value. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(3), 997-1061.
    • Wang, M. L., & Phillips-Fein, K. (2023). Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance: A History of ESG Standardization from 1970s to the Present (Undergraduate. Senior Thesis). New York, NY: Columbia University.
    • Wang, R., Zhou, S., & Wang, T. (2020). Corporate governance, integrated reporting and the use of credibility-enhancing mechanisms on integrated reports. European Accounting Review, 29(4), 631-663.
    • Conceptualization
      Ruth Mutsa Ruziwa, Jean Damascene Mvunabandi, Bomi Cyril Nomlala
    • Formal Analysis
      Ruth Mutsa Ruziwa
    • Investigation
      Ruth Mutsa Ruziwa
    • Methodology
      Ruth Mutsa Ruziwa
    • Writing – original draft
      Ruth Mutsa Ruziwa, Jean Damascene Mvunabandi
    • Writing – review & editing
      Ruth Mutsa Ruziwa, Jean Damascene Mvunabandi, Bomi Cyril Nomlala
    • Project administration
      Jean Damascene Mvunabandi, Bomi Cyril Nomlala
    • Supervision
      Jean Damascene Mvunabandi, Bomi Cyril Nomlala
    • Validation
      Jean Damascene Mvunabandi, Bomi Cyril Nomlala
    • Visualization
      Jean Damascene Mvunabandi, Bomi Cyril Nomlala
Related Articles
  • Financial sustainability management of the insurance company: case of Ukraine

    Ruslana PikusORCID , Nataliia PrykaziukORCID , Mariia BalytskaORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.18
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018         Issue #4         pp. 219-228 Views: 4093 Downloads: 480 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    In the current conditions of the Ukrainian economy, which is characterized by crisis phenomena and frequent changes in legislation, the insurance organizations are facing a number of difficulties in maintaining their financial sustainability. Moreover, these processes take place under the increased requirements for solvency of insurers. However, a significant part of domestic insurance companies is financially unstable, which is conditioned not only by the lack of funds, but also by the low level of management. This situation hinders the further development of the insurance market in Ukraine and has a negative impact on all areas of the domestic financial system and prevents it from successful integration into the European financial field. In order to address this problem, it is necessary to distinguish the key groups of risks that affect the financial sustainability of insurance organizations, among which there are the following: insurance, strategic, market risk, risk of inefficient capital structure, risk of limiting the insurance company’s liquidity, tax risk, investment risk, operational risk, the risk of ineffective organizational structure of the enterprise, and information risk. It should be noted that under conditions of changing environment, the impact of these risks only increases, and therefore the task of minimizing the impact of these risks on the activities of insurance companies is highly important. Accordingly, the authors of the article proposed a four-stage strategy to manage the financial sustainability of the insurance company, the purpose of which is to identify the risks of limiting the insurer’s financial sustainability, their qualitative and quantitative assessment, as well as the development and implementation of appropriate measures to minimize and eliminate unacceptable consequences.

  • Green product buying intentions among young consumers: extending the application of theory of planned behavior

    Andhy SetyawanORCID Researcher ID, Noermijati NoermijatiORCID , Sunaryo Sunaryo , Siti AisjahORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.13
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018         Issue #2         pp. 145-154 Views: 3996 Downloads: 1383 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This research reveals the factors explaining the purchase intention toward green products among young consumers. Young consumers are beginner consumers who are going to play an important role to take a responsibility in preserving the environment. Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is selected as the main theoretical framework in this research alongside some other variables (environmental concern, environmental knowledge, and willingness to pay), which are added in the research model to expand TPB application. Three hundred and twenty-six respondents were interviewed through a survey and the data are analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).
    The findings illustrated that not every explanatory variable influenced the purchase intention toward green products among young consumers. Environmental concern and attitude did not influence the purchase intention toward green products among young consumers.

  • The risk management practices in the manufacturing SMEs in Cape Town

    Clinton Mbuyiselo Sifumba , Kevin Boitshoko Mothibi , Anthony Ezeonwuka , Siphesande Qeke , Mamorena Lucia Matsoso doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2-2).2017.08
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017         Issue #2 (cont. 2)         pp. 386-403 Views: 3849 Downloads: 637 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Risk management is one of the prominent issues which are pivotal to the success of a business and may adversely affect profitability if not properly practised. Therefore, the main objective of this paper was to determine risk management practices in manufacturing SMEs in Cape Town. The research conducted was quantitative in nature and constituted the collection of data from 74 SME leaders, all of whom had to adhere to a list of strict delineation criteria. All data collected were thoroughly analyzed through means of descriptive statistics. From the findings made, it is clear that SMEs in the manufacturing sector do in fact understand risk management initiatives applicable to ‘manage’ their respective businesses towards sustainability, but not to a large extent. It was found that respondents are unaware of the elements which make risk management effective, which ultimately aids to the development of problems for SMEs. All employees, managers and owners must coordinate their efforts together to identify and manage organizational risks within their ambit to obtain total risk coverage, as well as provide assurance that these risks are effectively managed from a coordinated approach. Further studies may be carried out to identify measures that can be taken to improve the effectiveness of risk management practices in SMEs.

< Prev
Download Preview
Close
Accounting and Financial Control
Accounting and Financial Control
  • Issue #1
  • Journal Homepage
  • Indexed/Abstracted
  • Aims and Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies and Publication Ethics
  • Submission Guidelines for Authors
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Acceptance rate
  • Self-Archiving Policy
  • Article processing charge
 

COOKIES
The cookie settings on this website are set to 'allow all cookies' to give you the best experience.

If you continue without changing these settings, you consent to this Read more

Accept
newsletter
We accept payment with:
  • visa
  • mastercard
  • ISNI: 0000 0004 6439 8257
  • Copyright © 2025 LLC “CPC “Business Perspectives”,
    except Open Access articles

Developed by MindK. Designed by Crisp.

  • About Us
    • Company
    • News
    • Cooperation and partners
    • Advertising
    • Manuscript Administration System
  • Users support
    • Your profile
    • External services instructions
    • Site navigation
Contact us
  • Hryhorii Skovoroda lane, 10 Sumy, 40022 , Ukraine
  • +380-542-221707
  • +38-063-2891070
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Tweets by LLC “Business Perspectives”