Financial and intangible factors explaining the market value of firms: Evidence from the Romanian capital market
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.06(1).2025.06
-
Article InfoVolume 6 2025, Issue #1, pp. 60-68
- 7 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Understanding the impact of traditional financial factors and intangible assets on the value of listed companies is increasingly important amid rapid changes driven by the recent pandemic, energy, and geopolitical crises, alongside emerging economies’ shift toward knowledge-based models. This study aims to assess how traditional financial indicators and the intensity of intangible assets influence the market value of firms listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange (BVB), using Tobin’s Q as the valuation measure. Out of an initial population of 84 companies, 56 were selected based on data completeness and consistency, covering the period 2019–2023, a timeframe marked by significant economic shocks. A multiple linear regression approach was employed, with Tobin’s Q as the dependent variable and firm size, intangible assets, leverage, liquidity, and profitability as predictors. Data exhibit significant dispersion and asymmetry, particularly in profitability and liquidity, indicating varied shock absorption capacities across firms. The regression model explains nearly 60% of the variation in firm value and meets all diagnostic criteria. Intangible assets emerged as the most influential positive factor, followed by firm size, while leverage negatively affects firm value. Liquidity and profitability showed no statistically significant effect when controlling for other variables. These results suggest that Romanian investors place growing emphasis on knowledge-based resources and firm scale, while penalizing high leverage. The study enriches existing literature and offers practical guidance for managers to prioritize investments in intangible capital over mere expansion of tangible assets.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G01, M21, M41
-
References47
-
Tables4
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics of variables
- Table 2. Summary of the econometric model
- Table 3. ANOVA
- Table 4. Regression coefficients
-
- Aboalganam, K. M., & Alzghoul, A. (2025). The impact of digital marketing on the reputation of insurance companies: The role of service quality and brand trust. Insurance Markets and Companies, 16(1), 1-14.
- Afridi, F. A., Khan, Y., Zafar, S., & Ayaz, M. B. (2022). The effect of firm size, investment opportunity set, and capital structure on firm value. International Journal of Social Science & Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 32-46.
- Aivaz, K. A., Mastac, L., Jula, D., Vancea, D. P. C., Duhnea, C., & Condrea, E. (2025). Volatility Spillovers Between the US and Romanian Markets: The BET – SFT-500 Dynamic Under Political Uncertainty. Risks, 13(8), 150.
- Ali, I. (2025). The impact of ambiguity on the value-relevance of earnings volatility: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 22(1), 275-287.
- Aliamutu, K. F., & Mkhize, M. V. (2024). Usefulness of accounting information systems for small business profitability in South Africa: A systematic literature review. Accounting and Financial Control, 5(1), 1-15.
- Alrasyid, M. F., Wijayanti, I., Trihatmoko, H., & Saraswati, L. R. (2025). When goodwill is not always good: an analysis of the impact of intangible assets on the value of Indonesian media companies. Journal of Social and Economics Research, 7(1), 1562-1572.
- Alrifae, A. A. M. (2025). The role of technological enablers and government support in e-commerce adoption among SMEs in Jordan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(2), 775-784.
- Al-Smadi, M. O. (2025). Insurance sector readiness for digital transformation: Empirical evidence from Jordan. Insurance Markets and Companies, 16(1), 33-41.
- Bon, S. F., & Hartoko, S. (2022). The effect of dividend policy, investment decision, leverage, profitability, and firm size on firm value. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 7(3), 7-13.
- Buzinskiene, R., & Rudyte, D. (2021). The impact of intangible assets on the company’s market value. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 17(2), 59-73.
- Cheryta, A. M., Moeljadi, M., & Indrawati, N. K. (2018). Leverage, asymmetric information, firm value, and cash holdings in Indonesia. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 22(1), 83-93.
- Chua, K. T., & Byun, H.-Y. (2025). ESG initiatives and financial stability in the Korean financial industry: The moderating role of ownership concentration. Banks and Bank Systems, 20(3), 215-235.
- Clipa, A. M., Chițac, I. M., Clipa, C. I., & Florea, N. (2024). Social Capital and Innovative Performance in Networks: The Journey of Romanian SaaS Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 14(4), 1817-1856.
- Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Sichel, D. (2009). Intangible Capital and U.S. Economic Wealth. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 661-685.
- Cosmulese, C. G., Socoliuc, M., Ciubotariu, M.-S. Grosu, V., & Mateş, D. (2020). Empirical Study on the Impact of Evaluation of Intangible Assets on the Market Value of the Listed Companies. E&M Economics and Management, 24(1), 84-101.
- Dancaková, D., Sopko, J., Glova, J., & Andrejovská, A. (2022). The impact of intangible assets on the market value of companies: Cross-sector evidence. Mathematics, 10(20), 3819.
- Gamayuni, R. R. (2015). The effect of intangible asset, financial performance and financial policies on the firm value. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 4(1), 202-212.
- Gharaibeh, A. M. O., & Qader, A. A. A. A. (2017). Factors influencing firm value as measured by the Tobin’s Q: Empirical evidence from the Saudi Stock Exchange (TADAWUL). International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(6), 333-358.
- Golubtsov, D., Kedziora, J., Kozhakhmetova, A., & Kedziora, D. (2025). Assessing the impact of digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) on the efficiency of supply chain. Economics and Sociology, 18(1), 149-173.
- Hasan, S.M., Islam, R., and Saha, P. (2025). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm value in emerging markets: Evidence from the banking sector of Bangladesh. Banks and Bank Systems, 20(3), 263-278.
- Husna, A., & Satria, I. (2019). Effects of return on asset, debt to asset ratio, current ratio, firm size, and dividend payout ratio on firm value. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(5), 50-54.
- Intara, P., Jirathumrong, P., and Rattanapan, N. (2025). Revisiting the role of capital structure and financial distress in shaping sustainable growth and firm value: Insights from Thailand’s listed service industry. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 22(3), 152-162.
- Ionescu, R. (2011). SMEs between Truth and the Political Approach. The Future of the SMEs in Romaniaю EuroEconomica, 5(30), 111-118.
- Jihadi, M., Vilantika, E., Hashemi, S. M., Arifin, Z., Bachtiar, Y., & Sholichah, F. (2021). The effect of liquidity, leverage, and profitability on firm value: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 423-431.
- Jumaiyah, Andayani, W., Rosidi, R., & Purwanti, L. (2025). Digital transformation in village financial management: A bibliometric analysis of research evolution and contemporary challenges. Public and Municipal Finance, 14(2), 15-28.
- Kozhakhmetova, A., Tazhiyeva, Zh., Zhidebekkyzy, A., & Bács, Z. (2025). Effects of digital transformation on green investment: Evidence from developing economies. Journal of International Studies, 18(2), 138-158.
- Listyaningsih, F. (2020). Effect of company profitability, liquidity, and size on corporate value. International Journal of Management Studies and Social Science Research, 2(4), 304-314.
- Lumapow, L. S., & Tumiwa, R. A. F. (2017). The effect of dividend policy, firm size, and productivity to the firm value. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8(22), 20-24.
- Marchuk, U., Gutsalenko, L., Rybalchenko, S., & Zabolotnyy, S. (2025). Accounting and control in the system of marketing and logistics support for Ukrainian wineries. Accounting and Financial Control, 6(1), 25-37.
- Mia, M. A., Hossain, V. I., & Sangwan, S. (2024). Determinants of digitalization: Evidence from Asia and the Pacific countries. Digital Transformation and Society, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 3(4), 340-358.
- Mohammed, Z. O., & Al Ani, M. K. (2020). The effect of intangible assets, financial performance and financial policies on the firm value: Evidence from Omani industrial sector. Contemporary Economics, 379-391.
- Moolkham, M. (2025). How do firm characteristics amplify the importance of ESG ratings for investors? Economics and Sociology, 18(1), 90-115.
- Mujiyati, M., Zulfikar, Z., Witono, B., & Utomo, I.C. (2024). The impact of digital platforms in tax administration services on local government tax revenues: evidence from Indonesia. Public and Municipal Finance, 13(2), 195-203.
- Natsir, K., & Yusbardini, Y. (2020). The effect of capital structure and firm size on firm value through profitability as intervening variable. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Entrepreneurship and Business Management Untar (ICEBM 2019) (pp. 218-224). Atlantis Press.
- Okeke, O. C., Abdoush, T., Jemutu, A. S., & Okere, W. (2025). Determinants of leverage in emerging markets and the moderating effect of foreign ownership: Evidence from Nigeria. Global Business Review, 09721509241295526.
- Pongsaporamat, P. (2023). The Impact of Intangible Assets on Firm Growth and Firm Value. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi, 8(6), 586-596.
- Pratiwi, R. D. (2020). Do Capital Structure, Profitability, and Firm Size Affect Firm Value? Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 5(2), 194-202.
- Putri, M. O. O. D., & Wiksuana, I. G. B. (2021). The effect of liquidity and profitability on firm value mediated by dividend policy. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), 5(1), 204-212.
- Radonić, M., Milosavljević, M., & Knežević, S. (2021). Intangible assets as financial performance drivers of IT industry: Evidence from an emerging market. E & M Ekonomie A Management, 24(2), 119-135.
- Reschiwati, R., Syahdina, A., & Handayani, S. (2020). Effect of liquidity, profitability, and size of companies on firm value. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(6), 325-332.
- Rizqia, D. A., & Sumiati, S. A. (2013). effect of managerial ownership, financial leverage, profitability, firm size, and investment opportunity on dividend policy and firm value. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(11), 120-130.
- Straková, J., Talíř, M., Váchal, J., Dobrovič, J., & Filep, B. (2025). Creating a business model in the context of changes in the macro environment. Journal of International Studies, 18(1), 284-296.
- Swagerman, D. (2025). Shifting the controller paradigm: Some reflections. Accounting and Financial Control, 6(1), 53-59.
- Tkachuk, І., Kobelia, М., Popelo, О., Zhavoronok, А., & Vinnychuk, О. (2023). Modelling financial influence of political and oligarchic interests of the governedsponsored enterprises on the creation and implementation of the financial policy in the state. Journal of Hygienic Engineering and Design, 42, 271-279.
- Yanti, N. M. Y. W. A., & Dwirandra, A. A. N. B. (2019). The effect of profitability in income smoothing practice with good corporate governance and dividend of payout ratio as a moderation variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(2), 12-21.
- Zhang, L., Pasko, O., Proskurina, N., Ryzhikova, N., & Mykhailova, Ye. (2024). Does internal audit matter? Audit committee, its attributes, and corporate social responsibility reporting quality. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 21(2), 70-88.
- Zhao, Q., & Sahari, S. (2025). Economic policy uncertainty and corporate investment: The moderating effect of corporate social responsibility. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 22(2), 1-13.