Determinants of IFRS S2 compliance quality: The mediating role of data capability and the moderating roles of market scrutiny and firm size
-
Received November 9, 2025;Accepted December 24, 2025;Published January 14, 2026
-
Author(s)Dao Manh HuyLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2622-649X
,
Ho Tuan VuLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6725-6487
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.07(1).2026.03
-
Article InfoVolume 7 2026, Issue #1, pp. 22-35
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 12 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
The global business landscape increasingly demands transparent climate reporting, yet factors driving compliance quality remain unclear. This study examines the organizational and institutional determinants influencing IFRS-S2 compliance quality in Vietnamese enterprises, focusing on sustainability strategic orientation, climate data management capability, and market scrutiny. A quantitative research design was used, and a survey was distributed among managers in Vietnamese enterprises from March to June 2025. A total of 326 valid responses were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The results prove that sustainability strategic orientation (β = 0.254, p < 0.001), climate data management capability (β = 0.285, p < 0.001), and market scrutiny (β = 0.209, p < 0.001) have a significant positive effect on IFRS-S2 compliance quality. The mediating role of climate data management capability is also strongly supported. However, the moderating role of market scrutiny was not statistically significant. The study highlights the need to align strategic commitment with data capabilities to enhance climate transparency in an emerging market and provides recommendations for managers and policymakers.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to acknowledge the reviewers and the editor-in-chief for their assistance.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M40, M41, L25, Q56
-
References35
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research framework
- Figure 2. Results of the PLS-SEM structural equation model analysis
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the survey sample (N = 326)
- Table 2. Results of the measurement model analysis
- Table 3. Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio
- Table 4. Results of research hypothesis testing
- Table 5. Results of the model’s predictive power assessment
- Table A1. Summary of measurement design
-
- Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The Influence of Governance Structure and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Toward Sustainability Reporting Quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217-235.
- Banerjee, S. B. (2002). Corporate environmentalism: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 177-191.
- Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
- Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176-1248.
- Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 303-327.
- Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67.
- Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2008). Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting? Journal of International Management, 14(4), 364-376.
- Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027-1055.
- Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147.
- Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
- Engert, S., Rauter, R., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2016). Exploring the integration of corporate sustainability into strategic management: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2833-2850.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
- Ghasemaghaei, M., Ebrahimi, S., & Hassanein, K. (2018). Data analytics competency for improving firm decision making performance. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 101-113.
- Gond, J.-P., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., & Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 205-223.
- Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Hassan, A., Elamer, A. A., Fletcher, M., & Sobhan, N. (2020). Voluntary assurance of sustainability reporting: evidence from an emerging economy. Accounting Research Journal, 33(2), 391-410.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018). ISO 14064-1:2018 – Greenhouse gases – Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals.
- International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB). (2023). IFRS S2 Climate-related disclosures.
- Khatri, V., & Brown, C. V. (2010). Designing data governance. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 148-152.
- Kolk, A., Levy, D., & Pinkse, J. (2008). Corporate Responses in an Emerging Climate Regime: The Institutionalization and Commensuration of Carbon Disclosure. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 719-745.
- Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2014). Does voluntary carbon disclosure reflect underlying carbon performance? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 10(3), 191-205.
- Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127-148.
- Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59-78.
- Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Pappas, I. O., & Pavlou, P. (2020). Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities. Information & Management, 57(2), 103169.
- Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347.
- Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on Sustainability Reports: An International Comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937-967.
- Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571.
- Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). (2017). Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
- Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
- The Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG Protocol). (2004). A corporate accounting and reporting standard (Revised edition). World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
- Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5-33.
- Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2007). The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4333-4355.
-
-
Conceptualization
Dao Manh Huy, Ho Tuan Vu
-
Data curation
Dao Manh Huy, Ho Tuan Vu
-
Formal Analysis
Dao Manh Huy, Ho Tuan Vu
-
Funding acquisition
Dao Manh Huy, Ho Tuan Vu
-
Investigation
Dao Manh Huy, Ho Tuan Vu
-
Methodology
Dao Manh Huy, Ho Tuan Vu
-
Project administration
Dao Manh Huy, Ho Tuan Vu
-
Resources
Dao Manh Huy
-
Software
Dao Manh Huy
-
Supervision
Dao Manh Huy, Ho Tuan Vu
-
Validation
Dao Manh Huy, Ho Tuan Vu
-
Visualization
Dao Manh Huy, Ho Tuan Vu
-
Writing – original draft
Dao Manh Huy, Ho Tuan Vu
-
Writing – review & editing
Dao Manh Huy, Ho Tuan Vu
-
Conceptualization
-
Effect of corporate governance on the financial performance of commercial banks in Nigeria
Lawrence Uchenna Okoye
,
Felicia Olokoyo
,
Johnson I. Okoh ,
Felix Ezeji ,
Rhoda Uzohue
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(3).2020.06
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 15, 2020 Issue #3 pp. 55-69 Views: 3611 Downloads: 2349 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯBanks are expected to operate within acceptable standards of governance for consistent profitable operations. They run heavily on customer deposits, which is confidence-driven. Since the quality of governance is critical to winning and retaining customer confidence and patronage, the imperative for good governance practices in banks cannot be overemphasized. This research paper explores the nexus between governance practices and bank profitability in Nigeria. It adopts the size of bank board and directors’ stake as proxies for corporate governance, with return on assets and return on equity as representations for financial performance. The research incorporates firm size as a controlled variable. The estimation technique of the Generalized Method of Moments was employed. Evidence from the research reveals that board size, directors’ equity, and firm size substantially affect Nigerian banks’ financial performance. Besides, the study shows a robust effect of lagged return on equity on the current level of performance. Therefore, the study asserts that governance in business entities strongly affects their financial performance and recommends maintaining optimum board size to minimize boardroom conflicts. It further prescribes that the requirement for substantial equity stake by directors of banking institutions be sustained, as it secures commitment to governance practices that support profitability.
Acknowledgment
The authors acknowledge the support of Covenant University towards the publication of this paper. -
The determinants of audit report lag: Evidence from Indonesia
Endri Endri
,
Santi Sari Dewi ,
Sigid Eko Pramono
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(1).2024.01
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 21, 2024 Issue #1 pp. 1-12 Views: 3365 Downloads: 1910 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe determining factors that cause delays in audit reports are essential for shareholders to pay attention to when making quick decisions. Delays in audit reports receive significant attention in the capital markets where audited financial statements in annual reports are the only reliable source of information available to investors. This study aims to identify factors that cause delays in audit reports in the form of company and industry specifics consisting of profitability, company size, audit committee, audit opinion, and size of a public accounting firm. The research method uses a panel data regression model to test five hypotheses based on data collected from annual reports from 2011 to 2021. The research sample selected were 46 companies in the construction and property services sector listed on the Indonesian Sharia Stock Index. Empirical findings show that a public accounting firm’s profitability, audit opinion, and size hurt audit report lag, while the audit committee has a positive impact. Company size is the only factor that does not have an impact on audit reporting delays. The research results provide recommendations for company management and shareholders that delays in audit reports can be reduced by increasing company profits. Apart from that, audit delay lag can also be reduced by appointing a reputable or international public accounting firm and providing a quality audit opinion.
-
Determinants of financing decision: empirical evidence on manufacturing firms in Indonesia
Sutomo Sutomo , Sugeng Wahyudi
,
Irene Rini Demi Pangestuti
,
Harjum Muharam
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(2).2019.14
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 16, 2019 Issue #2 pp. 159-170 Views: 3192 Downloads: 618 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study aims to contribute to the emergence of the literature focusing on exploring the factors influencing the financing decision, as well as examining the relationship between the firm size, profitability and firm growth towards the corporate debt. Questions such as how relevant firm size, profitability and firm growth to debt are, quantitatively, had not been fully answered in the business literature. The purpose of this study is to fill this large gap by examining the role of the firm size, profitability, investment and firm growth for the corporate debt. This study tries to examine the determinants of debt in the financial literature which include size, growth, business risk, and profitability in accordance with the capital structure theory, in manufacturing firms in Indonesia. The sample contained financial data from 150 firms for the period 2012–2017. The results showed that the manufacturing firms in Indonesia had high debt levels, especially the size, profitability, firm growth and profitability had proven to be the debt determinants, which also confirmed the Pecking Order Theory. This study also found that the management preference of manufacturing firms in Indonesia for risk was the risk-seeker or risk-neutral ones. This finding implies that the choice of funding sources originating from debt still provided greater returns compared to the capital cost needed due to business uncertainties.

