Enhancing organizational effectiveness through knowledge-centric distance learning: The case of military education in Lithuania
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.10(1).2026.02
-
Article InfoVolume 10 2026, Issue #1, pp. 12-25
- 14 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Modern defense environments demand sustainable, knowledge-driven training systems that adapt to technological, organizational, and strategic challenges. This study explores the sustainability of military distance learning in Lithuanian military education and its role in enhancing adaptability and resilience. It assesses how digital, knowledge-based systems support long-term effectiveness and flexibility. Sustainability refers to maintaining scalable, resilient education under changing conditions. Adaptability is the ability to adjust learning processes and technologies, while resilience ensures institutional stability and performance during disruptions. The study employs fuzzy logic integrated with the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method to analyze interdependencies among eight critical factors of sustainable distance learning. A structured expert survey was conducted in 2024 with 17 Lithuanian military education specialists, all holding Ph.D. degrees and possessing extensive academic and practical experience in e-learning, instructional design, and technology management. The analysis revealed that technological infrastructure, instructional design, and scalability function as primary causal drivers shaping learner engagement and institutional support. Quantitative results show that technological infrastructure exerted the highest influence weight (0.187), followed by instructional design (0.162), while psychological support acted primarily as an effect factor. These findings confirm that sustainable distance learning enhances adaptability by ensuring uninterrupted access to training, flexible pacing, and integration of emerging digital tools. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that sustainable military distance learning serves as a strategic enabler of knowledge transfer, leadership development, and organizational effectiveness, thereby strengthening both the adaptability and institutional resilience of military education systems.
Acknowledgment
We acknowledge the General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania for financial support in publishing this article.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I23, M53, O32
-
References45
-
Tables6
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Cause-and-effect relationship diagram
-
- Table 1. Competencies and teaching strategies that affect cadet education
- Table 2. Linguistic assessment of the evaluators’ opinion (average)
- Table 3. Defuzzied total-relation matrix into a crisp total-relation matrix
- Table A1. Linguistic scale to express judgment
- Table A2. Initial direct relation matrix
- Table A3. Normalized fuzzy directed-relation matrix
-
- Air University Public Affairs. (2022, June 16). Air University exploring gamification teaching model. Air University News. Maxwell Air Force Base.
- Air University. (2024). Enlisted Professional Military Education Instructor Course syllabus.
- Ali Alnaqbi, A. M., & Yassin, A. (2021). Current Status, Challenges and Strategies of Artificial Intelligence and E-learning the UAE Military Education System. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12(3), 352-361.
- Amalia, D., Suryan, V., Septiani, V., Komalasari, Y., Rizko, R., Febriansyah, A., & Hendra, O. (2024). Development of a game-based learning: Airfield lighting system simulator using virtual reality and augmented reality. Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science (JAETS), 5(2), 978-994.
- Army University. (n.d.a.). Department of Distance Education (DDE) – CGSS.
- Army University. (n.d.b.). Lifelong Learning Center (Blackboard).
- Bekesiene, S., Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I., & Hošková-Mayerová, Š. (2021a). Military leader behavior formation for sustainable country security. Sustainability, 13(8), 4521.
- Bekesiene, S., Smaliukienė, R., Vaičaitienė, R., Bagdžiūnienė, D., Kanapeckaitė, R., Kapustian, O., & Nakonechnyi, O. (2024). Prioritizing competencies for soldier’s mental resilience: An application of integrative fuzzy-trapezoidal decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory in updating training program. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1239481.
- Bekesiene, S., Vasiliauskas, A. V., Hošková-Mayerová, Š., & Vasiliene-Vasiliauskienė. (2021b). Comprehensive assessment of distance learning modules by fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method. Mathematics, 9, 409.
- Çelikbilek, Y., & Adıgüzel Tüylü, A. N. (2019). Prioritizing the components of e-learning systems by using fuzzy DEMATEL and ANP. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(2), 322-343.
- Curry, L., & Docherty, M. (2017). Implementing competency-based education. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 61-73.
- Ebrahimi, S. H. (2023). Some equations to identify the threshold value in the DEMATEL method. Operations Research and Decisions, 33(2), 1-22.
- Fontela, E., & Gabus, A. (1976). The DEMATEL observer: DEMATEL 1976 report. Battelle Geneva Research Center.
- Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A.-T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive learning using artificial intelligence in e-learning: A literature review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1216.
- Hornstra, S. P. A., Durning, S. J., Hoogenboezem, J. A., & Van Mook, W. N. K. A. (2024). Closing the gap between skills training and academic education at a military academy: An integrated instructional design model. Ukrainian Journal of Educational Studies and Information Technology, 12(1), 1-14.
- Hornstra, S., Hoogenboezem, J., Durning, S., & Van Mook, W. (2023). Instructional design linking military training and academic education for officer cadets: A scoping review. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 22(4), 212-244.
- Huynh-Cam, T. T., Nalluri, V., Chen, L. S., White, J., Nguyen, T. H., Nguyen, V. C., & Lu, T. C. (2024). DT-fuzzy DEMATEL: A new method for determining important factors for student satisfaction with e-course adoption in a Vietnamese university. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(1), 123-140.
- Kenyon, T. (2020). U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command Virtual Learning. Journal of Military Learning, 91-96.
- Khraban, T. (2022). Cadets’ psychological well-being during training period at military institutions of higher education. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, 52(3), 146-155.
- Kim, J., Miller, J., Wang, K., Dorneich, M. C., Winer, E., & Brown, L. J. (2024). Empowering Instructors: Augmented Reality Authoring Toolkit for Aviation Weather Education. EEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 2195-2206.
- Lee, H., Woo, D., & Yu, S. (2022). Virtual reality metaverse system supplementing remote education methods: Based on aircraft maintenance simulation. Applied Sciences, 12(5), 2667.
- Lepinoy, A., Lo Bue, S., & Vanderlinde, R. (2021). Basic needs satisfaction in a military learning environment: An exploratory study. Military Psychology, 34(1), 98-109.
- Mamites, I., Almerino, P., Sitoy, R., Atibing, N. M., Almerino, J. G., Cebe, D., Ybañez, R., Tandag, J., Villaganas, M. A., Lumayag, C., Plando, D., Añero, M., Acebes, H. M., Maturan, F., Evangelista, S. S., Aro, J. L., Himang, C., & Ocampo, L. (2022). Factors influencing teaching quality in universities: Analyzing causal relationships based on neutrosophic DEMATEL. Education Research International, 2022(1), 9475254.
- Mehta, K., & Sharma, R. (2023). Prioritizing the critical success factors of e-learning systems by using DEMATEL. In Bansal, R., Singh, R., Singh, A., Chaudhary, K., & Rasul, T. (Eds.), Redefining virtual teaching learning pedagogy (pp. 401-420). Springer.
- Ministry of National Defence of the Republic of Lithuania. (2022). The military strategy of the Republic of Lithuania.
- Mun, J. (2022). Optimizing warfighters ‘intellectual capability: return on investment of military education and research. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 29(3), 192-245.
- National University. (2021, March 29). Engaging students in distance learning. National University Blog.
- Nguyen, P. H. (2024). A data-driven MCDM approach-based spherical fuzzy sets for evaluating global augmented reality providers in education. IEEE Access, 13, 6102-6119.
- Noble, D. D. (2017). The classroom arsenal: Military research, information technology and public education. Routledge.
- Powell, M., & Townley, D. (2025). The challenges and opportunities for academics in professional military education. Defence Studies, 25(3), 644-661.
- Presnall, A., Nickolaus, M., & Banks, S. (2025). Sustaining Resilient Military Training in the Multi-Domain Era: Challenges and Opportunities. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 24(1), 59-71.
- Qian, J., Zhou, G., He, W., Cui, Y., & Deng, H. (2024). Optimization of teacher evaluation indicator system based on fuzzy-DEMATEL-BP. Heliyon, 10(13).
- Rastgar, A. A., & Farokhizadeh, F. (2021). An Investigation and Analysis of the Relation between Futures Study and Knowledge Management in a Military Higher Education Center. Futures Studies of the Islamic Revolution, 1(3), 7-30.
- Retter, L., Eken, M., Palicka, O., & Davies, H. (2024). Blended learning in joint professional military education. RAND Corporation.
- Sato, S. N., Condes Moreno, E., Rubio-Zarapuz, A., Dalamitros, A. A., Yañez-Sepulveda, R., Tornero-Aguilera, J. F., & Clemente-Suárez, V. J. (2024). Navigating the new normal: Adapting online and distance learning in the post-pandemic era. Education Sciences, 14(1), 19.
- Shia, Z., Chengb, B., & Wangc, L. (2021). Research on the Application of Smart Classroom in Practical Teaching in Military School. In 9th International Conference on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (SSEHR 2021) (pp. 96-101).
- Si, S. L., You, X. Y., Liu, H. C., & Zhang, P. (2018). DEMATEL technique: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodologies and applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018(1), 3696457.
- Slattery, M. (2024). Education Strategy in a Changing Society: Personalised, Smarter, Lifelong Learning in the 21st Century (1st ed.). Routledge.
- Sottilare, R. A. (2024). Examining the Role of Knowledge Management in Adaptive Military Training Systems. In Sottilare, R. A., & Schwarz, J. (Eds.), Adaptive Instructional Systems. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol. 14727). Cham: Springer.
- Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2025). AI-driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 1921-1947.
- Tang, H. W. V. (2020). Modeling critical leadership competences for junior high school principals: A hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. Kybernetes, 49(11), 2589-2613.
- Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54.
- Tornero-Aguilera, J. F., Stergiou, M., Rubio-Zarapuz, A., Martín-Rodríguez, A., Massuça, L. M., & Clemente-Suárez, V. J. (2024). Optimising Combat Readiness: Practical Strategies for Integrating Physiological and Psychological Resilience in Soldier Training. Healthcare, 12(12), 1160.
- Volk, F., Floyd, C. G., Shaler, L., Ferguson, L., & Gavulic, A. M. (2020). Active duty military learners and distance education: Factors of persistence and attrition. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(2), 106-120.
- Zemmer, J. D. (2024). Military faculty experience within a faculty learning community and its interest in learning technology integration (Doctoral Thesis). Wright State University.


