Enhancing faculty retention: The role of student initiatives, mentorship, advocacy, and collaboration
-
Author(s)Neekshitha V. ShettyLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0700-4851
,
Shareena P.Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-3376
,
Afsana MeharLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6068-7113
,
Nehila Farveen P.Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8873-4745
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.10(1).2026.03
-
Article InfoVolume 10 2026, Issue #1, pp. 26-39
- 30 Views
-
4 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
In a rapidly evolving digital landscape, higher education institutions face increasing challenges in faculty retention. The study analyzes the impact of Student Initiatives, Mentorship, Advocacy, and Collaboration on faculty intention to stay through the mediation of faculty satisfaction. The research process began with an exhaustive review of existing literature and the development of a structured questionnaire using a quantitative approach. A further survey was undertaken by collecting 390 responses from faculty members working in higher education institutions in Karnataka, India. The mediation was analyzed utilizing confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to check the model fit and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to test hypothetical relationships. Results revealed significant direct effects of Student-Led Peer Mentorship, Advocacy Groups, Student Initiatives, and Collaborative Learning on faculty satisfaction. These constructs also significantly predicted faculty retention, both directly and through the mediating effect of faculty satisfaction. Faculty satisfaction mediated these relationships, with the strongest total effect for advocacy groups (β = .537). While collaborative learning had a strong direct effect (β = .347), its mediated impact was comparatively weaker (β = .082). This study highlights that institutions that recognize and value the connection between student engagement and faculty engagement are poised to develop a strong academic community. The practical significance of the current study is considerable for institutional decision-makers and academic leaders. Institutions should not rely on just extrinsic rewards, such as salary or tenure, to be able to develop their faculties, but rather should intentionally develop a participative academic culture.
Acknowledgment
The authors acknowledge financial support for the Article Processing Charges (APC) from Yenepoya (Deemed to be University).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)J81, J63, I23, D91
-
References31
-
Tables10
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model
- Figure 2. Mediating role of faculty satisfaction in the relationship between student initiatives, mentorship, advocacy, and collaboration and faculty retention
-
- Table 1. Demographic profile of respondents
- Table 2. Construct validity
- Table 3. Direct effect of study variables
- Table 4. Mediating role of environmental advocacy behavior in the relationship between digital fatigue, psychological safety, and faculty retention
- Table B1. Student-led initiatives (SLI)
- Table B2. Student-led peer mentorship programs (SLPMP)
- Table B3. Student advocacy groups (SAG)
- Table B3. Student advocacy groups (SAG)
- Table B5. Faculty satisfaction
- Table B6. Faculty intent to stay
-
- Azambuja, G. P., Rodríguez-Peña, G., & Vargas, E. T. (2021). The role of value co-creation in the happiness of the students. Journal of Promotion Management, 27(6), 900-920.
- 2. Bashir, B., & Gani, A. (2020). Testing the effects of job satisfaction on organizational commitment. Journal of Management Development, 39(4), 525-542.
- Berger, N. D. (2014). The Co-Curriculum and the Core Curriculum: Exploring the Relationship Between Student Involvement and Academic Outcomes. Taylor University MAHE.
- Bergmark, U., & Westman, S. (2018). Student participation within teacher education: emphasising democratic values, engagement and learning for a future profession. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(7), 1352-1365.
- Blau, P. (1986). Exchange and power in social life. Routledge.
- Blithe, S. J., & Fidelibus, B. (2022). Faculty-undergraduate course curriculum collaboration. College Teaching, 70(2), 237-246.
- Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133-145.
- Candela, L., Gutierrez, A. P., & Keating, S. (2015). What predicts nurse faculty members’ intent to stay in the academic organization? A structural equation model of a national survey of nursing faculty. Nurse Education Today, 35(4), 580-589.
- Dunham-Taylor, J., Lynn, C. W., Moore, P., McDaniel, S., & Walker, J. K. (2008). What goes around comes around: Improving faculty retention through more effective mentoring. Journal of Professional Nursing, 24(6), 337-346.
- Fletcher, A., Chen, B. Y., Benrimoh, D., Shemie, S., & Lubarsky, S. (2018). Lessons learned from a student-driven initiative to design and implement an Organ and Tissue Donation course across Canadian medical schools. Perspectives on Medical Education, 7(5), 332-336.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Fountain, J., & Newcomer, K. E. (2016). Developing and sustaining effective faculty mentoring programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(4), 483-506.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414-433.
- Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review Press.
- Huang, Y.-R., & Chang, S.-M. (2004). Academic and Cocurricular Involvement: Their Relationship and the Best Combinations for Student Growth. Journal of College Student Development, 45(4), 391-406.
- Kezar, A., & Maxey, D. (2014). Faculty matter: So why doesn’t everyone think so. Thought & Action, 2014(2014), 29-44.
- Khan, F. Q., Buhari, S. M., Tsaramirsis, G., & Rasheed, S. (2021, December). A study of faculty retention factors in educational institutes in context with ABET. Frontiers in Education, 6, 678018.
- Kinsella, M., Moloney, D., Nestor, N., Wyatt, J., Last, J., & Rackard, S. (2023). Fostering Student Engagement in a Digitally Mediated Environment: Attitudes and Experiences of Student Advisers: Attitudes and Experiences of Student Advisors. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 4(3), 91-121.
- Lam, M. H. A., & Tam, C. H. A. (2022). Building co-curricular learning experiences: Lessons from a student-driven experiential learning initiative underpinned by a student-staff collaborative model. International Journal for Students as Partners, 6(2), 61-68.
- Marshall, M., Dobbs-Oates, J., Kunberger, T., & Greene, J. (2021). The peer mentor experience: Benefits and challenges in undergraduate programs. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 29(1), 89-109.
- Matthews, K. E., & Dollinger, M. (2023). Student voice in higher education: The importance of distinguishing student representation and student partnership. Higher Education, 85(3), 555-570.
- Mendez, S. L., Tygret, J. A., Conley, V. M., Keith, R., Haynes, C., & Gerhardt, R. (2019). Emeriti faculty as mentors: The benefits and rewards of mentoring the next generation. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 27(4), 439-457.
- Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102-1121.
- Rosser, V. J. (2005). Measuring the change in faculty perceptions over time: An examination of their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 81-107.
- Simmonds, A. H., & Dicks, A. P. (2018). Mentoring and professional identity formation for teaching stream faculty: A case study of a university Peer-to-Peer mentorship program. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 7(4), 282-295.
- Skjevik, E. P., Schei, E., Boudreau, J. D., Tjølsen, A., Ringberg, U., Fuks, A., Kvernenes, M., & Ofstad, E. H. (2024). What makes mentors thrive? An exploratory study of their satisfaction in undergraduate medical education. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 372.
- Snijders, I., Wijnia, L., Rikers, R. M., & Loyens, S. M. (2020). Building bridges in higher education: Student-faculty relationship quality, student engagement, and student loyalty. International Journal of Educational Research, 100, 101538.
- Xerri, M. J., Radford, K., & Shacklock, K. (2018). Student engagement in academic activities: a social support perspective. Higher Education, 75, 589-605.
- Zhao, S. R., & Cao, C. H. (2023). Exploring relationship among self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and engagement in blended collaborative context. Sage Open, 13(1).
- Zilvinskis, J., Masseria, A. A., & Pike, G. R. (2017). Student engagement and student learning: Examining the convergent and discriminant validity of the revised national survey of student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 58(8), 880-903.
-
Challenges of improving effectiveness and efficiency of the higher educational system in developing countries
Saheer Al-Jaghoub ,
Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan 
,
Hussein Al-Yaseen ,
Anas Al-Soud ,
Ahmad Areiqat
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.03
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #1 pp. 19-31 Views: 2602 Downloads: 765 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯDue to the country’s lack of natural resources and its dependence on human resources, Jordanian universities have started to implement quality assurance system aiming to improve effectiveness and efficiency of the higher educational system. This paper presents the results of a research that aims to identify the main issues and challenges facing these universities in implementing quality assurance system. Data for this research were collected using a survey mailed to all public and private universities to investigate the main issues affecting the implementation of quality assurance system in Jordanian universities. The results of this research showed that the most important challenges faced by Jordanian universities are: human and lack of awareness, resistance to change and cultural among others. The research findings hoped to be useful for both universities and policy makers in the government in order to realize the full benefits of implementing quality assurance system. Hence, this and other research on implementing quality assurance in higher educational institutions might be of assistance.
-
A bibliometric analysis of the economic effects of using artificial intelligence and ChatGPT tools in higher education institutions
Anna Vorontsova ,
Svitlana Tarasenko ,
Wojciech Duranowski ,
Arkadiusz Durasiewicz ,
John Soss ,
Artem Bilovol
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.08
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 23, 2025 Issue #1 pp. 101-114 Views: 2524 Downloads: 702 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯOne of the main challenges in higher education management is the complexity of resource optimization and increasing volumes of data, which limits the efficiency and accuracy of decision-making. The application of artificial intelligence can address these issues.
The present study aims to identify the key trends, knowledge gaps, and opportunities for further research into the economic effects of using artificial intelligence and ChatGPT tools in higher education. For this purpose, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify and screen the scientific articles related to the topic of this study indexed in Web of Science and Scopus from 1986 to 2024. A total of 234 articles were selected, all demonstrating positive growth both in scholarly output and citation count. The study identified the key contributors to scientific research on this topic by region (the United States, China, and India). It concluded that the relevant research centers are still at an early stage of their development. Based on bibliometric clusters formed by co-occurrence relations, three main areas of research were defined: 1) artificial intelligence in education for decision-making; 2) process automation and digital transformation in educational institutions; 3) artificial intelligence technologies and their application in education.
The study highlights the main areas of economic effects of artificial intelligence and ChatGPT tools in higher education, including reducing administrative costs, saving time for teachers and students, and improving the quality and accessibility of educational process.Acknowledgments
The publication is part of the research topic “Economic Basics of Technology Diffusion into the National Economy of Ukraine Considering Best International Practices” (№0124U003482). -
Marketing environment and marketing management of universities in Ukraine: national and regional dominants
Yurii Petrunia ,
Victor Chentsov ,
Norbert Życzyński ,
Vira Petrunia
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.15(1).2019.01
The marketing environment of universities’ activities in Ukraine is changing dramatically. As a result, the system of chances and risks for universities is constantly changing. Therefore, timely detection of changes in the marketing environment and effective management ensure the competitiveness of the universities. The aim of the article is to identify the marketing environment dominants of the Ukrainian universities, as well as to assess the efficiency of marketing tools application in the system of universities’ management. On the basis of statistical and primary data analyses, the higher education market in Ukraine both at the state and regional levels has been assessed and the university’s dependence on market sources of funding has been substantiated. As the modern domains of the marketing environment of universities, changes in the distribution of state-funded places, the impact of external independent testing, and the intensification of competition between universities are determined. The influence of external independent testing on structural intersegmental changes concerning the choice of specialties of universities’ entrants is proved. The comparative characteristics of the marketing management tools in Ukrainian and Polish universities are considered. The obtained results outline the importance of strengthening the marketing orientation of management in universities.
