Assessing the progress of exports diversification in Saudi Arabia: growth-share matrix approach
-
Received April 19, 2020;Accepted August 12, 2020;Published August 25, 2020
-
Author(s)Mohammad Imdadul HaqueLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6323-032X
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(3).2020.10
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #3, pp. 118-128
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by1 articlesJournal title: Frontiers in Public HealthArticle title: Key Sectors in the Economy of Saudi ArabiaDOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.696758Volume: 9 / Issue: / First page: / Year: 2021Contributors: Said K. M. Brika, Brahim Adli, Khalil Chergui
- 1162 Views
-
513 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
High dependence on a particular category of exports results in fluctuations in income as the price of the export item fluctuates. In Saudi Arabia, a single category of mineral exports forms over 78% of the total exports, exposing the country to revenue volatility. The study aims to assess the magnitude of diversification of the export basket for the country. It uses data from 1984 to 2018 to study the importance of non-mineral exports in total exports. It applies Granger causality, variance decomposition, and impulse response function in the vector autoregressive framework. The study also uses the growth-share matrix to evaluate individual items of non-mineral exports. The results show a long-run relationship with a 1% increase in non-mineral exports, leading to a 0.30% increase in total exports. Non-mineral exports Granger-cause total exports. In the long run, non-mineral exports have a share of 64% of the forecast error variance in total exports. Moreover, a 1% shock in non-mineral exports creates a huge initial impact on total exports. Also, the growth rate of non-mineral products is higher than mineral products. The results indicate the importance of non-mineral exports for a predominantly oil-exporting country. Finally, the study attempts to classify its non-mineral export categories based on growth rates and market shares. Targeted emphasis on export category with a strong growth rate and low market share can be an effective strategy for further export diversification.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F14, O53
-
References27
-
Tables10
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Graphical presentation of the data (in million Riyals)
- Figure 2. Impulse response function
- Figure 3. Growth-share matrix
-
- Table 1. Augmented Dickey-Fuller tests
- Table 2. VAR Lag order selection
- Table 3. Vector autoregression estimates
- Table 4. Least squares estimatesм
- Table 5. VAR Granger causality/block exogeneity Wald tests
- Table 6. Variance decomposition
- Table 7. VAR residual serial correlation LM tests
- Table 8. VAR residual normality tests
- Table 9. VAR residual heteroscedasticity tests
- Table 10. Descriptive statistics of the data
-
- Abdelhadi, S., Bashayreh, A. G., & Alomari, M. W. (2019). The impact of export instability on economic growth: sample of MENA countries. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 18(4), 429-435.
- Aditya, A., & Acharya, R. (2013). Export Diversification, Composition and Economic Growth: Evidence from Cross Country Analysis. The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 22(7), 959-992.
- Al Bakr, A. (2015). Challenges to Production Base Diversification in Saudi Arabia (SAMA Working Paper No. WP/15/8). Economic Research Department, Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency.
- Alaya, M. (2014). The Determinants of MENA Export Diversification: An Empirical Analysis (Working paper No. 709). The Economic Research Forum, Egypt.
- Ali, M. (2017). Determinants of Related and Unrelated Export Diversification. Economies, 5(4), 1-21.
- Aljebrin, M. A. (2017). Impact of Non-oil Export on Non-oil Economic Growth in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(3), 389-397.
- Al-Moneef, M. (2006). The Contribution of the Oil Sector to Arab Economic Development, Paper presented at the High-level Roundtable Partnership for Arab Development. Paper presented at High-level Roundtable Partnership for Arab Development: A Window of Opportunity.
- Alsharif, N., Bhattacharya, S., & Intartaglia, M. (2017). Economic Diversification in Resource Rich Countries: History, State of Knowledge and Research Agenda. Resources Policy, 52, 154-164.
- Altowaim, S. (2019). Promoting Industrial and Export Diversification in Resource-Dependent Countries the Case of Saudi Arabia (SAMA Working Paper No. WP/19/03). Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency, Riyadh.
- Arawomo, D. F. (2015). A comparative analysis of export diversification in resource rich and non-resource rich countries. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 7(4), 327-341.
- Auty, R. M. (1993). Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies (The Resource Curse Thesis). London: Routledge.
- Corden, W. M., & Neary, J. P. (1982). Booming Sector and De-industrialisation in a Small Open Economy. The Economic Journal, 92(368), 825-848.
- Dogruel, A. S., & Tekce, M. (2011). Trade Liberalization and Export Diversification in Selected MENA Countries. Topics in Middle Eastern and African Economies, 13, 1-24.
- Esanov, A. (2012). Economic Diversification: Dynamic, Determinants and Policy Implication. Revenue Watch Institute.
- Gelb, A. (2010). Economic Diversification in Resources Rich Countries. Washington, D.C.: Centre for Global Development.
- Haque, M. I., & Khan, M. R. (2019). Role of oil production and government expenditure in improving Human Development Index: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(2), 251-256.
- Hendrix, C. (2017). Kicking a crude habit: diversifying away from oil and gas in the twenty-first century. International Review of Applied Economics, 33(2), 188-208.
- Herzer, D., & Lehmann, N. (2006). What does Export Diversification do for a Growth? An Econometric Analysis. Applied Economic, 38(15), 1825-1838.
- Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A.-L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The Product Space Conditions the Development of Nations. Science, 317(5837), 482-487.
- Nicet-Chenaf, D., & Rougier, E. (2008). FDI, Diversification and Growth: an Empirical Assessment for MENA Countries (IMF staff papers).
- Ocampo, J. A. (2016). Foreword. In R. Cherif, F. Hasanov, and Min Zhu (Eds.), Breaking the Oil Spell: The Gulf Falcons’ Path to Diversification. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
- Oyinlola, M. A., Adeniyi, O. A., & Raheem, I. D. (2015). Natural resource abundance, institutions and economic growth in Africa. African Journal of Economic and Sustainable Development, 4(1), 34-48.
- Prebisch, R. (1950). The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems. Economic Bulletin for Latin America, 7(1), 11-22.
- Ramos, J. (1998). A development strategy founded on natural resource-based production clusters. CEPAL Review, 66, 105-127.
- Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1995). Natural resource abundance and economic growth (NBER Working Paper No. 5398). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- SAMA. (2019). Annual Statistics 2019. Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency. Riyadh.
- Singer, H. (1950). The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Borrowing Countries. American Economic Review, 40(2), 473-485.
-
-
Conceptualization
Mohammad Imdadul Haque
-
Data curation
Mohammad Imdadul Haque
-
Formal Analysis
Mohammad Imdadul Haque
-
Investigation
Mohammad Imdadul Haque
-
Methodology
Mohammad Imdadul Haque
-
Resources
Mohammad Imdadul Haque
-
Software
Mohammad Imdadul Haque
-
Supervision
Mohammad Imdadul Haque
-
Validation
Mohammad Imdadul Haque
-
Visualization
Mohammad Imdadul Haque
-
Writing – original draft
Mohammad Imdadul Haque
-
Writing – review & editing
Mohammad Imdadul Haque
-
Conceptualization
-
Cointegration between the European Union and the selected global markets following Sovereign Debt Crisis
Anna Golab
,
Ferry Jie
,
Robert Powell
,
Anna Zamojska
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(1).2018.05
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 35-45 Views: 2179 Downloads: 554 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe purpose of this paper is to provide an analytical analysis of cointegration between Europe and the other significant trading partners, namely US, China, Japan and Australia, for the period from January 1, 2010 to December 30, 2016. This captures the impact of the sovereign European debt crisis and the Greek crisis. A range of parametric techniques were adopted including Johansen cointegration analysis, Vector Error Correction Model and Granger causality. The results of the crisis Granger causality test during the European sovereign crisis implies the highest influence to be that of the US and Japanese stock market over the other four markets. Overall, found that the Asia-Pacific region plus the US stay closely related to each other, while European countries influence all the studied markets except each other. For the post-crisis sub-period, the Granger causality is slightly different. It is observable that the UK and Germany are influencing all the markets. This is probably due to the recent Brexit referendum outcome and potential consequences not only for the EU, but also for the rest of the world too. Overall, the Granger outcome shows the dependence between Europe and other global markets, but there is no European interdependence during the sovereign debt crisis period. It may be concluded that there is a separation of Asian markets from the European markets and even though cointegration exists, the relationship is rather weak.
-
An empirical study of the real effective exchange rate and foreign direct investment in Vietnam
Tram Thi Xuan Huong
,
My-Linh Thi Nguyen
,
Nguyen Thi Kim Lien
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(4).2020.01
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #4 pp. 1-13 Views: 2081 Downloads: 1561 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯForeign direct investment (FDI) inflows to Vietnam have increased significantly in recent years. Theoretically, capital inflows will put pressure on the overvaluation of local currencies in countries, despite different exchange rate mechanisms. So, the problem facing the Vietnamese government is the need to examine the relationship between the exchange rate and FDI in order to develop effective policies. This study examined the relationship between the exchange rate and FDI in Vietnam in the period of 2005–2019 using the VAR (vector autoregression) model based on quarterly frequency data. The new points of this study are: (i) using the real effective exchange rate (REER) of the Vietnamese currency with 143 major trading partners of Vietnam; and (ii) adding two control variables into the VAR model to examine the relationship between the exchange rate and FDI in Vietnam – a case study for developing countries. The findings show that, firstly, there is a positive causal relationship between FDI and Vietnam’s real effective exchange rate. Secondly, trade openness has a positive impact on FDI and REER in Vietnam. Thirdly, economic growth has an impact on REER, but no statistically significant impact on FDI was found. The findings can provide useful information to help policymakers plan and make decisions on future policies and support further research studies.
-
Dynamic relationship between equity, bond, commodity, forex and foreign institutional investments: Evidence from India
Rajeev Matha
,
Geetha E.
,
Satish Kumar
,
Raghavendra
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.19(4).2022.06
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 19, 2022 Issue #4 pp. 65-82 Views: 1760 Downloads: 552 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe interrelationship between equity, bond, commodity and forex movements can provide investors with abundant trading opportunities regardless of whether one market is trending upward or downward. Hence, to understand the interlinkage between markets, this study examines the long-run and causal linkage between forex, G-sec bonds, oil prices, gold rates, foreign institutional investment (FII) flows, and equity market and sectoral index returns. Daily time-series data from August 2012 to August 2021 were considered for empirical analysis. Johansen’s cointegration test revealed that foreign exchanges like USD, Euro, GBP and Yen, oil and gold rates, G-bond returns and FII flows were significantly cointegrated with the stock market and sectoral indices in the long run. Further, Granger causality found a uni-directional relationship between forex rates (i.e., USD, Euro, Yen) and the market, as well as sectoral indices, except Nifty 50 and Nifty IT indices. Oil price movements were found to effectively predict future price changes of Nifty consumer durables, auto, IT indices. Gold prices are useful to predict Nifty-Auto, Bank, Financial Services, Oil & Gas and PSU. The study also found a bi-directional relationship from FII inflows to the stock market and sectoral indices. The findings suggest that forex rates, oil prices and FII flows significantly affect India’s stock market and sectoral performance. The study contributes to the existing literature by comprehensively examining the interlinkage between commodities such as oil and gold, foreign exchanges like USD, Euro, GBP and Yen, G-bond, FII flows and the stock market, and fourteen sectoral indices in the Indian context.

