Comparative analysis of public administration tools in special economic zones of China and Kazakhstan

  • 12 Views
  • 3 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

This study examines the role of public administration tools in special economic zones (SEZs) in China and Kazakhstan. The aim of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of public administration tools in SEZs of both countries, focusing on governance models, regulatory frameworks, investment incentives, and their impact on economic performance. The methodology includes a review of the historical development and current practices of SEZs in both nations, especially comparing the special economic zones of Shenzhen and Astana. This involves analyzing governance structures, tax incentives, and policies impacting FDI and technology transfer using both qualitative and quantitative data. The study concludes that the effectiveness of public administration tools in SEZs depends on governance structures and alignment with national economic goals, highlighting the need for flexible governance models to maximize the economic benefits of SEZs. Findings indicate that China’s decentralized governance was a key factor in its significant and rapid economic growth, providing an example for Kazakhstan to study further and potentially implement, as it grants more decision-making autonomy to local SEZ authorities. The key recommendations are that the adaptivity of public administration strategies plays a vital role in fostering the efficiency of SEZs and attracting high technological industries for Kazakhstan.

Acknowledgment
This research is funded by the Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Project No. BR24993082).

 

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. The development of public administration policies for SEZs in China
    • Table 2. Basic tax rates in the SEZ of China and Kazakhstan
    • Table 3. Comparative framework analysis of the SEZ governance and administration in China and Kazakhstan
    • Table 4. Comparative overview analysis of the SEZ activities in China and Kazakhstan
    • Conceptualization
      Aman Konysbek, Svetlana Kozhirova
    • Data curation
      Aman Konysbek, Bauyrzhan Urazymbetov, Aigul Yessentemirova, Yelena Nechayeva
    • Formal Analysis
      Aman Konysbek
    • Investigation
      Aman Konysbek, Bauyrzhan Urazymbetov, Aigul Yessentemirova, Yelena Nechayeva
    • Methodology
      Aman Konysbek
    • Resources
      Aman Konysbek, Bauyrzhan Urazymbetov, Aigul Yessentemirova, Yelena Nechayeva
    • Validation
      Aman Konysbek, Bauyrzhan Urazymbetov, Aigul Yessentemirova, Yelena Nechayeva, Zhanna Shaimerdenova
    • Visualization
      Aman Konysbek, Bauyrzhan Urazymbetov, Aigul Yessentemirova, Yelena Nechayeva, Svetlana Kozhirova, Zhanna Shaimerdenova
    • Writing – original draft
      Aman Konysbek, Svetlana Kozhirova
    • Writing – review & editing
      Aman Konysbek, Bauyrzhan Urazymbetov, Aigul Yessentemirova, Yelena Nechayeva, Svetlana Kozhirova, Zhanna Shaimerdenova
    • Funding acquisition
      Svetlana Kozhirova, Zhanna Shaimerdenova