Corporate governance and financial statement fraud: Evidence on the moderating influence of financial distress
-
Received December 30, 2024;Accepted June 5, 2025;Published June 23, 2025
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1669-6551
,
Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9835-6341,
Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5165-611X,
Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9194-5143 -
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(2).2025.57
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #2, pp. 785-795
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 11 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study examines the impact of corporate governance on the probability of financial statement fraud and evaluates the moderating role of financial distress in this relationship. This issue remains highly relevant given the persistence of fraudulent financial practices despite evolving governance regulations. The analysis is conducted on a sample of 330 non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2021 to 2022. Using purposive sampling and secondary data, the study measures financial statement fraud with the F-score, corporate governance through institutional ownership, ineffective monitoring, regulatory compliance, and financial distress using the Zmijewski model. The study applies moderated regression analysis across three models. The results from Model 1 show that corporate governance has a significant negative effect on the likelihood of financial statement fraud (β = –0.085; p < 0.05). Model 2 finds that financial distress alone has a significant positive effect (β = 0.315; p < 0.05). Model 3 confirms a significant moderation effect, where financial distress strengthens the relationship between governance and fraud (interaction β = 0.353; p < 0.05). These findings indicate that while effective governance can reduce fraudulent financial reporting, this effect is influenced by a company’s financial state. Therefore, robust governance structures are vital, particularly in times of financial hardship. Future studies should consider external institutional mechanisms to further understand these dynamics.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M42, G01, G34
-
References46
-
Tables4
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variable description
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Hypotheses testing
- Table 4. Classical assumption test
-
- Andres, P., Garcia-Rodriguez, I., Romero-Merino, M. E., & Santamaria-Mariscal, M. (2022). Stakeholder governance and private benefits: The case of politicians in Spanish cajas. Journal of Business Research, 144, 1272-1292.
- Andrew, A., Candy, C., & Robin, R. (2022). Detecting fraudulent of financial statements using fraud S.C.O.R.E model and financial distress. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 6(1), 696-707.
- Annan, F. (2022). Moral hazard in insurance: Theory and evidence from a credit reform in Ghana. Journal of Public Economics, 209.
- Arum, E. D. P., Wijaya, R., Wahyudi, I., & Brilliant, A. B. (2023). Corporate governance and financial statement fraud during the Covid-19: Study of companies under special monitoring in Indonesia. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(7).
- Challen, A. E., & Noermansyah, A. (2023). Peran good corporate governance dan kualitas audit terhadap manajemen laba perusahaan manufaktur [The role of good corporate governance and audit quality on manufacturing company profit management]. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing – Journal of Accounting and Auditing Research, 10(1), 23-36. (In Indonesian).
- Cheng, C. H., Kao, Y. F., & Lin, H. P. (2021). A financial statement fraud model based on synthesized attribute selection and a dataset with missing values and imbalanced classes. Applied Soft Computing, 108.
- Christian, N. (2022). Efek mediasi kesulitan keuangan dalam mendeteksi corporate fraud di Indonesia [The mediating effect of financial distress in detecting corporate fraud in Indonesia]. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi – Journal of Accounting Studies, 6(1), 44-69. (In Indonesian).
- Cole, R., Johan, S., & Schweizer, D. (2021). Corporate failures: Declines, collapses, and scandals. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, Article 101872.
- Dara, R. R., Subekti, I., & Andayani, W. (2019). The effect of corporate governance and CEO’S reputation on financial distress with financial performance as a mediation variable. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 18(5), 297-305.
- Darmiasih, N. W. R., Endiana, I. D. M., & Pramesti, I. G. A. A. (2022). Pengaruh stuktur modal, arus kas, good corporate governance dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap financial distress [The influence of capital structure, cash flow, good corporate governance and company size on financial distress]. Jurnal Kharisma – Charisma Journal, 4(1), 129-140. (In Indonesian).
- Fajri, N. A. M., Febrianti, B., & Rahmayani, S. (2023). Pengaruh fraud hexagon terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan pada perusahaan properti dan real estate yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2018-2021 [The influence of fraud hexagon on financial report fraud in property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2018–2021]. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin – Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal, 2(2), 767-780. (In Indonesian).
- Gan, H., Park, M. S., & Suh, S. H. (2020). Non-financial performance measures, CEO compensation, and firms’ future value. Journal of Business Research, 110, 213-227.
- Garanina, T., & Kim, O. (2023). The relationship between CSR disclosure and accounting conservatism: The role of state ownership. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 50, Article 100522.
- Guggenmos, R. D., & Bennett, G. B. (2021). The effects of company image and communication platform alignment on investor information processing. Journal of Financial Reporting, 6(2), 89-109.
- Harinurdin, E., & Safitri, K. A. (2023). Tata kelola perusahaan tercatat di Indonesia [Corporate governance of listed companies in Indonesia]. Jurnal Vokasi Indonesia, 10(1). (In Indonesian).
- Hussain, T., & Loureiro, G. (2022). Portability of firm corporate governance in mergers and acquisitions. Research in International Business and Finance, 63, Article 101777.
- Indiraswari, S. D., Subroto, B., & Subekti, I. (2020). The effect of compensation on accounting fraud with the genders variety of directors as a moderation variable. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 9(2), 191-201.
- Izzalqurny, T. R., Subroto, B., & Ghofar, A. (2019). Relationship between financial ratio and financial statement fraud risk moderated by auditor quality. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 8(4), 34-43.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- Kuntadi, C., & Putri, T. E. (2023). Pengaruh corporate governance, financial stability dan ineffective monitoring terhadap fraud pada laporan keuangan [The influence of corporate governance, financial stability and ineffective monitoring on fraud in financial reports]. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah – SENTRI: Scientific Research Journal, 2(1), 268-276. (In Indonesian).
- Li, Z., Crook, J., Andreeva, G., & Tang, Y. (2021). Predicting the risk of financial distress using corporate governance measures. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 68.
- Luo, L., Lee, H., Chiu, C., & Lee, C. (2023). The relations of corporate risk, operating efficiency, and firm size to managerial compensation: Evidence from Taiwan stock market-listed companies. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(2), 194-203.
- Michira, J. M., Njeru, A., & Memba, F. (2021). Inadequate insurance claims reserving and financial distress in non-life insurance companies in Kenya: A structural equation modeling approach. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 12(12), 130-139.
- Mousavi, M., Zimon, G., Salehi, M., & Stępnicka, N. (2022). The effect of corporate governance structure on fraud and money laundering. Risks, 10(9), 1-25.
- Nugroho, A. A., Baridwan, Z., & Mardiati, E. (2018). Pengaruh profitabilitas, likuiditas, leverage, dan corporate governance terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan, serta financial distress sebagai variabel intervening [The effect of profitability, liquidity, leverage, and corporate governance on financial report fraud, and financial distress as an intervening variable]. Media Trend, 13(2). (In Indonesian).
- Paputungan, R. D., Subroto, B., & Ghofar, A. (2020). Does institutional ownership moderate the effect of intellectual capital and company value? International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 9(1), 127-136.
- Pham, M. D. (M.), & Nguyen, T. H. (2023). When a gift resembles a trojan horse: CEO stock gift and stock price crash risk. The British Accounting Review, 56(4), Article 101235.
- POJK. (2015). Peraturan OJK Nomor 1/POJK.05/2015 [OJK Regulation Number 1/POJK.05/2015]. (In Indonesian).
- Popa (S.) A., Achim, M. V., & Teusdea, A. C. (2024). Corporate governance and financial fraud occurrence – Case study on Romanian companies. Journal of Risk Finance, 25(3), 489-509.
- Pratama, R., & Pupitasari, W. (2022). Pengaruh financial distress terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan [The influence of financial distress on financial report fraud]. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti – Trisakti Journal of Economics, 2(2), 703-718. (In Indonesian).
- Sanjayyana, A. R., & Urumsah, D. (2021). Factors that influence financial statement fraud and financial distress: An investigation study. APSSAI Accounting Review, 1(1), 70-84.
- Sari, S. P., & Nugroho, N. K. (2021). Financial statements fraud dengan pendekatan vousinas fraud hexagon model: Tinjauan pada perusahaan terbuka di Indonesia [Financial statements fraud with vousinas fraud hexagon model approach: Review of public companies in Indonesia]. Proceedings of 1st Annual Conference on IHTIFAZ: Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking (ACI-IJIEFB) (pp. 409-430). (In Indonesian).
- Seto, B. A., & Trisnaningsih, S. (2021). Penggunaan model Altman z-score, springate, zmijewski dan grover dalam memprediksi financial distress [The use of Altman Z-Score, Springate, Zmijewski and Grover models in predicting financial distress]. Seminar Nasional Akuntansi Dan Call for Paper (SENAPAN), 1(2), 754-769. (In Indonesian).
- Sheveleva, G. I. (2022). Corporate governance in generating companies of the Russian electric power industry in the context of ESG agenda. Global Energy Interconnection, 5(5), 512-523.
- Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (SEOJK). (2015). Tentang Pedoman Tata Kelola Perusahaan Terbuka Nomor 32/Seojk.04/2015 [Concerning Guidelines for Public Company Governance]. (In Indonesian).
- Tanjaya, A., & Kwarto, F. (2022). Tata kelola perusahaan dalam mengurangi kecurangan laporan keuangan (Systematic literature review dengan metode meta sintesis) [Corporate governance in reducing financial report fraud (Systematic literature review with meta synthesis method)]. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi – Journal of Accounting Academy, 5(3), 312-332. (In Indonesian).
- The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2020). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019 [Fraud Survey Indonesia 2019]. ACFE Indonesia Chapter. (In Indonesian).
- Tron, A., Dallocchio, M., Ferri, S., & Colantoni, F. (2023). Corporate governance and financial distress: Lessons learned from an unconventional approach. Journal of Management and Governance, 27(2), 425-456.
- Truong, K. D. (2022). Corporate governance and financial distress: An endogenous switching regression model approach in Vietnam. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1).
- Velte, P. (2023). The link between corporate governance and corporate financial misconduct. A review of archival studies and implications for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 73(1), 353-411.
- Wang, W., Hu, R., Zhang, C., & Shen, Y. (2023a). Impact of common institutional ownership on enterprise digital Transformation – Collaborative governance or collusion fraud? Heliyon, 9(11), Article e21641.
- Wang, Y., Ashton, J. K., & Jaafar, A. (2023b). Financial statement fraud, recidivism and punishment. Emerging Markets Review, 56, Article 101033.
- Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive accounting theory for the determination of accounting. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112-134.
- Wicaksono, B., Rachman, A., & Setyaningsih, P. A. (2023). Pengaruh fraud pentagon, stabilitas keuangan, dan tekanan eksternal terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan [The influence of pentagon fraud, financial stability, and external pressure on financial reporting fraud]. Monex: Journal of Accounting Research, 12(02), 297-308. (In Indonesian).
- Wu, F., Cao, J., & Zhang, X. (2023). Do non-executive employees matter in curbing corporate financial fraud? Journal of Business Research, 163, Article 113922.
- Xing, J., Zhang, Y., Xiong, X., & Li, G. (2022). Covering or monitoring? Independent director connectedness and corporate fraud in China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 15(4), Article 100273.
-
-
Conceptualization
Susmita Dian Indiraswari, Bambang Subroto, Rosidi Rosidi, Imam Subekti
-
Data curation
Susmita Dian Indiraswari
-
Formal Analysis
Susmita Dian Indiraswari
-
Funding acquisition
Susmita Dian Indiraswari
-
Software
Susmita Dian Indiraswari
-
Writing – original draft
Susmita Dian Indiraswari, Bambang Subroto
-
Investigation
Bambang Subroto
-
Project administration
Bambang Subroto
-
Supervision
Bambang Subroto, Imam Subekti
-
Methodology
Rosidi Rosidi, Imam Subekti
-
Resources
Rosidi Rosidi
-
Validation
Rosidi Rosidi
-
Writing – review & editing
Rosidi Rosidi, Imam Subekti
-
Visualization
Imam Subekti
-
Conceptualization
-
ESG disclosure and financial performance: Empirical study of Vietnamese commercial banks
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 19, 2024 Issue #1 pp. 208-220 Views: 2980 Downloads: 810 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure becomes vital for banks to be transparent and accountable for their investments and lending decisions to shareholders, regulators, and society. The potential enhancement of shareholder value through ESG disclosure is still inconsistent. Empirical studies on the association between ESG disclosure and financial performance are mixed and limited in emerging economies. This study aims to examine whether ESG disclosure impacts the financial performance of 24 Vietnamese commercial banks in terms of return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and net interest margin (NIM). The study uses the feasible generalized least squares estimation method based on panel data from 2018 to 2022. The study employs content analysis on 12 themes related to environmental, social, and governance pillars to score policy disclosure based on the Fair Finance Guide Methodology. The results highlight the positive effects of ESG policy disclosure, individual environment disclosure (E), and individual governance disclosure (G) on bank financial performance. Notably, ESG, E, and G have the largest influence on ROE, with coefficients of 0.051, 0.036, and 0.027, respectively, at a 5% significance level. However, the study does not provide evidence of a statistically significant association between social disclosure and financial performance. These results provide empirical evidence for regulators and bank managers to shape ESG policies and practices aligning with international standards.
Acknowledgment
ESG disclosure score of 11 banks as primary data in this study is conducted under the project coordinated by the Fair Finance Vietnam coalition, as part of Fair Finance International. -
An application of Altman Z-score model to analyze the bankruptcy risk: cases of multidisciplinary enterprises in Vietnam
Diep Thanh Tung , Vo Thi Hoang Phung doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(4).2019.16Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 16, 2019 Issue #4 pp. 181-191 Views: 2803 Downloads: 2759 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study applied Altman Z-score model to assess the bankruptcy risk of a set of multidisciplinary enterprises of various types, mainly small and medium enterprises, with data taken from official financial reports of 180 enterprises in Soc Trang province. The binary logistic regression was employed to assess the impact of non-financial and financial factors on the bankruptcy risk of enterprises. The research findings showed that both the non-financial factors such as business area, types and size of the business, the educational level of managers and executors and other characteristics, and the financial factors (indicators) such as earnings before tax, net profit/equity ratio, earnings before interest and tax/total assets ratio, equity/total debt ratio, affect the bankruptcy risk of enterprises. Predicting the bankruptcy risk and measuring its determinants play an important role not only as an effective managing tool of the business, but also as evidence for policymakers to support the sustainable development of business.
-
Comparison of the digital economy development parameters in the EU countries in the context of bridging the digital divide
Vladimir Bilozubenko, Olha Yatchuk
, Elżbieta Wolanin , Tetiana Serediuk
, Maxim Korneyev
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.18
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 206-218 Views: 2296 Downloads: 490 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe widespread use of information and communication technologies and subsequent transformations have led to the formation of a digital economy (DE). The European Union, as an international organization, has become the subject of building such an economy, striving to bring member countries closer in the field of digitalization.
The aim of this paper is to compare the DE development parameters of the EU countries based on cluster analysis and determine the most significant of them to solve the problems of bridging the digital divide between countries. For clustering, a feature DE vector of 20 indicators was created and the k-means algorithm and the Euclidean distance metric were used. For classification, the decision tree method was applied.
Three clusters of EU countries were identified by the level of DE development (leaders, followers and outsiders), which allowed assessing their positions relative to each other. Key parameters that determine countries’ positions in the general rating are identified. A parameter chart is generated to control the establishment of DE in the EU countries, which, in addition to key parameters, includes maximum, minimum and harmonic mean values of these parameters by cluster. This characterizes the landscape of DE development in the EU countries, assesses the digital divide and is the basis for decision-making in the area of bridging this divide.