Do female audit committee characteristics influence audit fees? Evidence from the UK

  • 44 Views
  • 20 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

This study examines the effect of female representation on audit fees in listed UK companies, concentrating on the demographic characteristics of female directors, specifically age and nationality. Using a sample of 165 FTSE 350 companies from 2011 to 2021, generalized least squares regression models are employed to test the link between female audit committee members and audit fees from both the demand and supply sides. The results show a negative relationship between the proportion of females on audit committees and audit fees with a coefficient of –0.2273 (p < 0.05). Thus, higher female representation tends to lower audit costs. However, when considering demographic characteristics, the age and nationality of female members have a positive effect on audit costs, with coefficients of 0.0145 (p < 0.01) and 0.5546 (p < 0.01), respectively. Thus, while gender diversity reduces audit costs overall, experienced (older) female directors and those from diverse national backgrounds may add to audit complexity and, therefore, increase fees. The implications of these findings are relevant to policymakers and corporate governance bodies. Diversity policies should go beyond simple gender quotas. Instead, they should include a broader set of demographic attributes when promoting female representation on audit committees to achieve audit quality and cost efficiency.

Acknowledgment
This study received full funding from the Middle East University, Amman, Jordan.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Sample selection and distribution
    • Table 2. Descriptive statistics
    • Table 3. Pearson correlation
    • Table 4. Variance inflation factors (VIF)
    • Table 5. Results of GLS regression analysis
    • Table 6. Results of 2SLS regression
    • Conceptualization
      Naila Amara, Saad Bourouis, Sajead Mowafaq Alshdaifat, Houssam Bouzgarrou, Hany Elbardan
    • Data curation
      Naila Amara, Sajead Mowafaq Alshdaifat
    • Formal Analysis
      Naila Amara, Saad Bourouis, Sajead Mowafaq Alshdaifat
    • Investigation
      Naila Amara, Saad Bourouis, Hany Elbardan
    • Methodology
      Naila Amara, Sajead Mowafaq Alshdaifat
    • Project administration
      Naila Amara, Saad Bourouis
    • Writing – original draft
      Naila Amara, Saad Bourouis, Sajead Mowafaq Alshdaifat, Houssam Bouzgarrou, Hany Elbardan
    • Writing – review & editing
      Naila Amara, Saad Bourouis, Sajead Mowafaq Alshdaifat, Houssam Bouzgarrou, Hany Elbardan
    • Supervision
      Saad Bourouis, Houssam Bouzgarrou
    • Validation
      Saad Bourouis, Houssam Bouzgarrou, Hany Elbardan
    • Visualization
      Sajead Mowafaq Alshdaifat, Houssam Bouzgarrou