The impact of public investment on enrollment and innovation: Strategic management insights from Kazakhstan
-
Author(s)Dina AshirbekovaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9916-9222
,
Akan NurbatsinLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-5776
,
Anel KireyevaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3412-3706
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(2).2025.53
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #2, pp. 736-749
- 156 Views
-
12 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Despite ongoing efforts to modernize the higher education sector in Kazakhstan, the integration of strategic management and the effective allocation of public investment continue to pose significant challenges. This study aims to assess the relationship between public investment in higher education, enrollment dynamics, and innovation activity measured through the share of innovative organizations. Official statistical data for 2004–2024 were obtained from the Bureau of National Statistics of Kazakhstan and the World Bank. The study employs econometric analysis methods, including the evaluation of multiple linear regression models, vector autoregressive models, and Granger causality tests. According to the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression results, the impact of public investment in higher education on the number of students was not statistically significant (β = –0.00035; p = 0.507), suggesting insufficient targeting of funding and inefficient channels of distribution of funds. However, the number of higher education institutions shows a statistically significant positive effect on enrollment (β = 8048.5; p = 0.002), indicating that institutional infrastructure and territorial accessibility play a more significant role in expanding access to higher education than the overall level of funding. In addition, the constructed regression model is characterized by a high explanatory power (R2 = 0.8665), which indicates the estimates’ reliability and the correctness of the choice of explanatory factors. The findings highlight the importance of coordinating investment policy in higher education with the goals of innovative development.
Acknowledgments
This paper has been funded by the Science Committee MSHE RK (Grant “Modernization of the quality assurance system of higher education in Kazakhstan based on digitalization: development of approaches, mechanisms and information base” BR24992974).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I22, H52, O38
-
References39
-
Tables5
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Flowchart of the econometric methods used in the study
- Figure 2. Government spending on higher education for 2004–2024
-
- Table 1. Description of variables and summary statistics
- Table 2. Determinants of student enrollment in higher education
- Table 3. Determinants of innovation activity in higher education
- Table 4. First-differenced regression results: Dynamic effects of enrollment and higher education expenditure
- Table 5. Dynamic interactions between enrollment and public investment in higher education
-
- Aagaard, K., & Schneider, J. W. (2016). Research funding and national academic performance: Examination of a Danish success story. Science and Public Policy, 43(4), 518-531.
- Ashirbekova, D. А., & Nurmukhanova, G. Z. (2022). Financing high education in the context of new challenges. Bulletin of Turan University, 1, 297-305.
- Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance – An international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822-834.
- Becker, B. (2015). Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(5), 917-942.
- Cozzolino, E., Smith, C., & Crosnoe, R. L. (2018). Family-related disparities in college enrollment across the great recession. Sociological Perspectives, 61(5), 689-710.
- Enders, J., De Boer, H., & Weyer, E. (2013). Regulatory autonomy and performance: The reform of higher education re-visited. Higher Education, 65, 5-23.
- Fadeeva, Z., & Mochizuki, Y. (2010). Higher education for today and tomorrow: University appraisal for diversity, innovation and change towards sustainable development. Sustainability Science, 5, 249-256.
- Fumasoli, T., Barbato, G., & Turri, M. (2020). The determinants of university strategic positioning: A reappraisal of the organisation. Higher Education, 80(2), 305-334.
- Gunn, A., & Mintrom, M. (2016). Higher education policy change in Europe: Academic research funding and the impact agenda. European Education, 48(4), 241-257.
- Hatch, N. W., & Dyer, J. H. (2004). Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1155-1178.
- Hayter, C. S., & Cahoy, D. R. (2016). Toward a strategic view of higher education social responsibilities: A dynamic capabilities approach. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 12-34.
- Heaton, S., Teece, D., & Agronin, E. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and governance: An empirical investigation of financial performance of the higher education sector. Strategic Management Journal, 44(2), 520-548.
- Jacob, W. J., & Gokbel, V. (2018). Global higher education learning outcomes and financial trends: Comparative and innovative approaches. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 5-17.
- Kawabata, M. K., & Camargo, A. S. (2020). Innovation and institutions’ quality: A comparative study between countries. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(2), 169-185.
- Kenzheali, Y., Kenzhegulova, G. K., Kireyeva, A. A., & Ainakul, N. (2024). Assessing gender differences in managerial roles, wages, education, and soft skills in Kazakhstan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(3), 341-357.
- Kim, E., Benson, S., & Alhaddab, T. A. (2018). A career in academia? Determinants of academic career aspirations among PhD students in one research university in the US. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19, 273-283.
- Lepori, B., Masso, J., Jabłecka, J., Sima, K., & Ukrainski, K. (2009). Comparing the organization of public research funding in central and eastern European countries. Science and Public Policy, 36(9), 667-681.
- Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Macro-level indicators of the relations between research funding and research output. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 353-362.
- Martínez-Campillo, A., & Fernández-Santos, Y. (2020). The impact of the economic crisis on the (in) efficiency of public Higher Education institutions in Southern Europe: The case of Spanish universities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 71, Article 100771.
- Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313-345.
- Pinheiro, R., Langa, P. V., & Pausits, A. (2015). One and two equals three? The third mission of higher education institutions. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 233-249.
- Powers, J. B. (2003). Commercializing academic research: Resource effects on performance of university technology transfer. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(1), 26-50.
- Pöyliö, H. (2019). Something good out of the bad times? The impacts of reduced opportunity costs on the intergenerational inequalities in college enrollment. Sociological Research Online, 25(1), 23-45.
- Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2004). Returns to investment in education: A further update. Education Economics, 12(2), 111-134.
- Rabossi, M. (2017). Agency costs in higher education: Evaluating an institution through a comprehensive framework. Higher Education Policy, 30, 319-339.
- Rhoades, G. (2020). Taking college teachers’ working conditions seriously: Adjunct faculty and negotiating a labor-based conception of quality. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(3), 327-352.
- Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42(1), 51-67.
- Salazar, L., Cebolla-Boado, H., & Radl, J. (2020). Educational expectations in the great recession: Has the impact of family background become stronger? Socio-Economic Review, 18(2), 465-491.
- Sánchez, P. M., & Elena, S. (2006). Intellectual capital in universities: Improving transparency and internal management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(4), 529-548.
- Saparova, N., Kireyeva, A. A., Orynbet, P., Alimbekova, G., & Amirova, A. (2023). Analysis of the development level of higher educational institutions in the regions of Kazakhstan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(2), 244-256.
- Shrivastava, M., & Shrivastava, S. (2014). Political economy of higher education: Comparing South Africa to trends in the world. Higher Education, 67(6), 809-822.
- Somsuk, N., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2014). A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators: Resource-based view. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 198-210.
- Su, Y., Jiang, Q., Khattak, S. I., Ahmad, M., & Li, H. (2021). Do higher education research and development expenditures affect environmental sustainability? New evidence from Chinese provinces. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 66656-66676.
- Szczepanska-Woszczyna, K., Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., Infante-Moro, A., Zimbroff, A., & Solodovnikov, S. (2024). The contribution of higher education to innovation development: Long-term and short-term analysis. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 12(4), 8-29.
- Taylor, J. S., de Lourdes Machado, M., & Peterson, M. W. (2008). Leadership and strategic management: Keys to institutional priorities and planning. European Journal of Education, 43(3), 369-386.
- Tian, Z., Wei, Y., & Li, F. (2019). Who are better teachers? The effects of tenure-track and part-time faculty on student achievement. China Economic Review, 53, 140-151.
- Wang, L., Wang, X., Piro, F. N., & Philipsen, N. J. (2020). The effect of competitive public funding on scientific output: A comparison between China and the EU. Research Evaluation, 29(4), 418-429.
- Whitley, R., Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2018). The impact of changing funding and authority relationships on scientific innovations. Minerva, 56, 109-134.
- Xu, D., & Solanki, S. (2019). Tenure-track appointment for teaching-oriented faculty? The impact of teaching and research faculty on student outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(1), 66-86.
-
Industrial Revolutions and their impact on managerial practice: Learning from the past
Lucia Kohnová ,
Nikola Salajová
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(2).2019.36
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #2 pp. 462-478 Views: 5222 Downloads: 2092 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯTechnological changes that come with industrial revolution have largely affected businesses, as well as society. With the current technological shift and Fourth Industrial Revolution, many questions arise regarding the impacts and effects on current ways businesses operate. This study presents a retrospective analysis and overview of previous industrial revolutions. The aim of the retrospective analysis is to identify common characteristics that may lead to lessons learned for the forthcoming Fourth Industrial Revolution and thus complement the current debate on technological change. All previous industrial revolutions have led to change in business environments and new challenges for managers and owners. The findings show that all previous revolutions have led to increase in the number of service jobs created. The key approach of successful countries during the times of industrial revolution has included education as the source of new skills and knowledge necessary for adaption. Countries that were able to produce high skilled people could not only invent, but also adapt to new technologies sooner than others. Similarly, these approaches included introduction of new managerial practices in order to be able to utilize new technologies and new skilled workers effectively. The research article processes secondary data together with literature review on this topic.
-
Challenges of improving effectiveness and efficiency of the higher educational system in developing countries
Saheer Al-Jaghoub ,
Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan ,
Hussein Al-Yaseen ,
Anas Al-Soud ,
Ahmad Areiqat
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.03
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 17, 2019 Issue #1 pp. 19-31 Views: 2064 Downloads: 521 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯDue to the country’s lack of natural resources and its dependence on human resources, Jordanian universities have started to implement quality assurance system aiming to improve effectiveness and efficiency of the higher educational system. This paper presents the results of a research that aims to identify the main issues and challenges facing these universities in implementing quality assurance system. Data for this research were collected using a survey mailed to all public and private universities to investigate the main issues affecting the implementation of quality assurance system in Jordanian universities. The results of this research showed that the most important challenges faced by Jordanian universities are: human and lack of awareness, resistance to change and cultural among others. The research findings hoped to be useful for both universities and policy makers in the government in order to realize the full benefits of implementing quality assurance system. Hence, this and other research on implementing quality assurance in higher educational institutions might be of assistance.
-
Factors influencing the legal regulation and management of education system in Kazakhstan: a review and analysis
Zulfiya Movkebayeva ,
Dana Khamitova ,
Aibarsha Zholtayeva ,
Venera Balmagambetova ,
Kairat Balabiyev
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.02
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #4 pp. 14-24 Views: 1833 Downloads: 274 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯNowadays, the modernization of the education system is the basis of dynamic sustainable economic development and citizens’ well-being. The key agent for the implementation of educational policy and the developer of the legal framework governing the functioning of the educational sphere is the state and its bodies. The Kazakhstani state policy’s main priorities in the field of education are formulated in several strategic documents. Using the review approach, this article examines the current state of public policy and legal regulation in Kazakhstan’s education sector. The article analyzes key documents that define the contours and content of the main directions of public policy and legal regulation. This article attempts to identify, review, and analyze the legal characteristics of the key process and factors existing in the legal field of Kazakhstani education, such as “Bologna factor,” “soviet legacy,” “provision of quality,” etc. The article concludes that the existing legal tools do not fully comply with law enforcement practice. The interpretations of some legal acts are somewhat different, which causes difficulties for actors providing educational services. Based on the result of the analysis, the article provides the main recommendations for improving legislation in education.
Acknowledgment
This article was written under grant from Kazakhstan Ministry of Education and Science No. АР05135081 “Student with disabilities and distance education learning environment: socio-practical and legal dimensions” coordinated by Prof. Dr Zulfiya Movkebayeva (Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University).
