The effect of explorative and exploitative skills on innovation process during the merger of public research organizations
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(2).2025.52
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #2, pp. 722-735
- 13 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to analyze the effects of explorative and exploitative skills, along with the moderating role of knowledge vacuum, on innovation process and performance during the merger of public research organizations (PROs) to better comprehend these organizational factors. During the merger of PROs, explorative and exploitative skills can prevent a slow innovation process and knowledge loss. Meanwhile, innovation also serves as PRO’s core activity. However, the effect of explorative and exploitative skills (and also the knowledge vacuum) on the innovation process in PROs is still debatable, as they often disregard the knowledge loss effect. This study used 314 questionnaires, which were responded to by scientists of basic and technological research in Indonesia’s merged PRO, namely the National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN). Data were collected from 2023 to 2024 and analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with Smart-PLS 4.0. The results reveal that the knowledge vacuum has a positive and significant influence on both exploratory-exploitative skills and absorptive-adaptive capabilities of scientists, which will eventually shape their distinctive competencies differently. However, despite the positive influence of the knowledge vacuum, the organization needs to strengthen scientists’ explorative and exploitative skills by reinforcing strategic human resource management through periodic training, performing joint activities or active innovation hubs, and guiding scientists to cope with the dynamic transition periods due to mergers. All of them aim to reinforce knowledge exchange and research networks.
Acknowledgment
This study had no funding and did not employ artificial intelligence. This article is original and was not published in any other language or concurrently submitted to other journals. This study is also clear from reuse of any material.
Acknowledgments are expressed to all scientists in National Research and Innovation Agency that voluntarily participated in this study.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O31, O32, O38
-
References50
-
Tables5
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
- Figure 2. Path coefficient value in hypotheses framework
- Figure 3. Importance-performance map of innovation process (IPROS)
-
- Table 1. Respondents’ profile
- Table 2. Measurement model results
- Table 3. Hypotheses testing results
- Table 4. The variable values of importance-performance in innovation process (IPROS)
- Table A1. Questionnaire
-
- Aagaard, K., Hansen, H. F., & Rasmussen, J. G. (2016). Mergers between governmental research institutes and universities in the Danish HE sector. European Journal of Higher Education, 6(1), 41-55.
- Azizi, M. R., Atlasi, R., Ziapour, A., Abbas, J., & Naemi, R. (2021). Innovative human resource management strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic narrative review approach. Heliyon, 7(6), Article e07233.
- Banmairuroy, W., Kritjaroen, T., & Homsombat, W. (2022). The effect of knowledge-oriented leadership and human resource development on sustainable competitive advantage through organizational innovation’s component factors: Evidence from Thailand ’s new S-curve industries. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27(3), 200-209.
- Belte, A., Ridder, H. G., & Baluch, A. M. (2023). Addressing social-business tensions in hybridized nonprofit organizations: The contribution of strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 33(4), Article 100987.
- Berkhout, A. J., Hartmann, D., Van Der Duin, P., & Ortt, R. (2006). Innovating the innovation process. International Journal of Technology Management, 34(3-4), 390-404.
- Bolívar-Ramos, M. T., García-Morales, V. J., & García-Sánchez, E. (2012). Technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning: Effects on organizational innovation to improve firm performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 331-357.
- Cai, Y., Lin, J., & Zhang, R. (2023). When and how to implement design thinking in the innovation process: A longitudinal case study. Technovation, 126, Article 102816.
- Calipha, R., Tarba, S., & Brock, D. (2010). Mergers and acquisitions: A review of phases, motives, and success factors. In C.L. Cooper & S. Finkelstein (Eds.), Advances in mergers and acquisitions (vol. 9, pp. 1-24). Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Chi, M., Muhammad, S., Khan, Z., Ali, S., & Li, R. Y. M. (2021). Is centralization killing innovation? The success story of technological innovation in fiscally decentralized countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168, Article 120731.
- Choi, T., & Chandler, S. M. (2020). Knowledge vacuum: An organizational learning dynamic of how e-government innovations fail. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), Article 101416.
- Colombo, M. G., & Rabbiosi, L. (2014). Technological similarity, post-acquisition R&D reorganization, and innovation performance in horizontal acquisitions. Research Policy, 43(6), 1039-1054.
- Cooke, F. L., Wood, G., Wang, M., & Li, A. S. (2021). Riding the tides of mergers and acquisitions by building a resilient workforce: A framework for studying the role of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 31(3), Article 100747.
- Dandira, M. (2012). Strategy in crisis: Knowledge vacuum in practitioners. Business Strategy Series, 13(3), 128-135.
- Duan, Y., Deng, Z., Liu, H., Yang, M., Liu, M., & Wang, X. (2022). Exploring the mediating effect of managerial ability on knowledge diversity and innovation performance in reverse cross-border M&As: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing corporations. International Journal of Production Economics, 247, Article 108434.
- Erhan, T. P., Japutra, A., & Van Doorn, S. (2024). Digital product development team external knowledge processes and ambidexterity: A multi-mediation analysis of the absorptive capacity framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(9), 2610-2634.
- Fernandez, A. I., Lara, P. R., Ugalde, M. C., & Sisodia, G. S. (2018). Distinctive competencies and competency-based management in regulated sectors: A methodological proposal applied to the pharmaceutical retail sector in Spain. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 42, 29-36.
- Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2021). Strategic alliances, exploration and exploitation, and their impact on innovation and new product development: The effect of knowledge sharing. Management Decision, 59(3), 524-567.
- Fouad, F., Tourabi, A., & Lakhnati, G. (2019). The innovation process impact on the new product performance: A case study. International Journal of Innovation Science, 10(3), 385-412.
- García-Cruz, J., Rincon-Roldan, F., & Pasamar, S. (2024). When the stars align: The effect of institutional pressures on sustainable human resource management through organizational engagement. European Management Journal.
- Gilsing, V., & Nooteboom, B. (2006). Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy, 35(1), 1-23.
- Ginting, G. (2015). Open innovation model: Empowering entrepreneurial orientation and utilizing network resources as determinant for internationalization performance of small medium agroindustry. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 3, 56-61.
- Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
- Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
- Harman, G., & Harman, K. (2008). Strategic mergers of strong institutions to enhance competitive advantage. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 99-121.
- Helitha, M. N., Palar, M. R. A., & Amirulloh, M. (2023). Development of a valuation system of technology for the enhancement of innovation in Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(2), Article e13124.
- Heller-Schuh, B., Lepori, B., & Neuländtner, M. (2020). Mergers and acquisitions in the public research sector: Toward a comprehensive typology. Research Evaluation, 29(4), 366-376.
- Herranz, E., Colomo-Palacios, R., & Amescua-Seco, A. (2013). Towards a new approach to supporting top managers in SPI organizational change management. Procedia Technology, 9, 129-138.
- Iddris, F. (2016). Measurement of innovation capability in supply chain: An exploratory study. International Journal of Innovation Science, 8(4), 331-349.
- Isip, M. I. G. (2022). Adaptive capability of micro agribusiness firms: Qualitative evidence from the Philippines. Research in Globalization, 5, Article 100087.
- Lim, S. G., & Ok, C. (2023). Realizing potential through absorptive capacity to create competitive advantage in hospitality organizations. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(10), 3410-3433.
- Mukherjee, A. (2022). Merger and process innovation. Economics Letters, 213, Article 110366.
- Ocampo, L., Aro, J. L., Evangelista, S. S., Maturan, F., Yamagishi, K., Mamhot, D., Mamhot, D. F., Calibo-Senit, D. I., Tibay, E., Pepito, J., & Quiñones, R. (2022). Research productivity for augmenting the innovation potential of higher education institutions: An interpretive structural modeling approach and MICMAC Analysis. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3).
- Papa, A., Dezi, L., Gregori, G. L., Mueller, J., & Miglietta, N. (2020). Improving innovation performance through knowledge acquisition: The moderating role of employee retention and human resource management practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(3), 589-605.
- Ririh, K. R., Anggraeni, E., Machfud, M., & Rochman, N. T. (2023). Distinctive competencies and process of innovation during organizationals merger: The moderating effect of knowledge vacuum. STI Policy and Management Journal, 8(1), 43-57.
- Robertson, J., Caruana, A., & Ferreira, C. (2023). Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems. International Business Review, 32(2), Article 101866.
- Rossi, M., Tarba, S. Y., & Raviv, A. (2013). Mergers and acquisitions in the hightech industry: A literature review. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 21(1), 66-82.
- Sarjono, A. H., Slamet, A. S., & Anggraeni, E. (2024). Do Public University Business Incubators in Indonesia Have Good Performance?. Jurnal Manajemen dan Organisasi, 15(1), 114-131.
- Selviaridis, K. (2021). Effects of public procurement of R&D on the innovation process: Evidence from the UK’s small business research initiative. Journal of Public Procurement, 21(3), 229-259.
- Singh, S., Dhir, S., Gupta, A., Das, V. M., & Sharma, A. (2021). Antecedents of innovation implementation: A review of literature with meta-analysis. Foresight, 23(3), 273-298.
- Situmorang, R., & Japutra, A. (2024). Knowledge transfer within MNC hotel subsidiaries: An absorptive capacity perspective. Tourism Management, 100, Article 104794.
- Stipp, D. M., Pimenta, M. L., & Jugend, D. (2018). Innovation and cross-functional teams: Analysis of innovative initiatives in a Brazilian public organization. Team Performance Management, 24(1-2), 84-105.
- Sucupira, G., Saab, F., Demo, G., & Bermejo, P. H. (2019). Innovation in public administration: Itineraries of Brazilian scientific production and new research possibilities. Innovation & Management Review, 16(1), 72-90.
- Symeonidou, N., Leiponen, A., Autio, E., & Bruneel, J. (2022). The origins of capabilities: Resource allocation strategies, capability development, and the performance of new firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(4), Article 106208.
- Thelisson, A. (2023). Competition in a failed merger project: Why two French companies called it quits. Journal of Business Strategy, 44(1), 44-49.
- Tseole, T., & Marutha, N. S. (2024). A framework for knowledge retention to support business continuity in the cross-border mergers of the telecommunications industry in Lesotho. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54(1), 195-210.
- Valerio, E., Hilmiati, N., Prior, J., & Dahlanuddin, D. (2022). Analysis of the agricultural innovation system in Indonesia: A case study of the beef sector in Nusa Tenggara Barat. Agricultural Systems, 203, Article 103529.
- van Assche, K., Valentinov, V., & Verschraegen, G. (2022). Adaptive governance learning from what organizations do and managing the role they play. Kybernetes, 51(5), 1738-1758.
- van Lieshout, J. W. F. C., van der Velden, J. M., Blomme, R. J., & Peters, P. (2021). The interrelatedness of organizational ambidexterity, dynamic capabilities, and open innovation: A conceptual model towards a competitive advantage. European Journal of Management Studies, 26(2/3), 39-62.
- Woon, E., & Pang, A. (2017). Explicating the information vacuum: Stages, intensifications, and implications. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 22(3), 329-353.
- Yu, B., Hao, S., & Wang, Y. (2020). Organizational search and business model innovation: The moderating role of knowledge inertia. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(7), 1705-1718.