ESG practices maturity in Ukraine’s largest banks: Evaluation framework and insight
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(3).2025.44
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #3, pp. 614-630
- 20 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Assessing the ESG readiness of the Ukrainian banking sector is important in the context of growing global attention to sustainable finance, Ukraine’s aspiration to align with EU regulations, and overcoming war consequences. The study examines the ESG practices of Ukraine’s largest banks and their disclosure, providing a framework for assessing their ESG commitment and maturity. The study aims to identify the level of ESG practices development, including their disclosure, in Ukraine’s largest banks. The paper suggest that this ESG maturity scoring approach may be relevant for emerging sustainability markets. The scoring methodology comprises two sub-indices: the first evaluates ESG information disclosure through content analysis of official websites, while the second uses frequency analysis to evaluate ESG-related terminology in banks’ annual reports. The results show that ESG practices of the largest banks in Ukraine and their integration into corporate reporting are on the preparatory stage, with most banks exhibiting a low or moderate level of ESG maturity. Foreign-owned and state-owned banks demonstrate better results. There is no interconnectedness between banks’ asset size and ESG maturity. The paper highlights the significance of regulatory support in accelerating ESG integration within Ukraine’s banking sector. The proposed framework can serve as a diagnostic tool for regulators, investors, and bank managers to monitor progress, benchmark practices, and guide strategic alignment with EU sustainability requirements. The findings contribute to a broader understanding of how ESG principles can be applied in uncertain financial ecosystems, offering insights for other developing or conflict-affected countries.
Acknowledgments
The article was prepared within the framework of the state-funded research topic Financial’ ecosystem transformation in the post-war recovery of Ukraine on the basis of resilience and sustainable development’ (state registration number 0125U000541) performed at Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, M14, O16
-
References39
-
Tables6
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Ukrainian banks’ ESG Maturity Sub-index 1 vs Sub-index 2
- Figure 2. Ukrainian banks’ ESG Maturity Index vs Logarithm of assets
- Figure 3. Distribution of ESG Maturity Index by type of bank ownership
-
- Table 1. Sample profile by ownership type
- Table 2. Direct effects using linear regression
- Table 3. ESG Maturity Index: Descriptive statistics
- Table 4. Matrix of ESG Maturity Index category dependence on bank types by ownership
- Table A1. Characteristics of the bank sample for the content analysis (January 1, 2025)
- Table B1. Ukrainian banks’ ESG Maturity Index Matrix
-
- Andries, A. M., & Sprincean, N. (2023). ESG performance and banks’ funding costs. Finance Research Letters, 54, Article 103811.
- Billio, M., Costola, M., Hristova, I., Latino, C., & Pelizzon, L. (2021). Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1426-1445.
- Bruno, E., Iacoviello, G., & Giannetti, C. (2024). Bank credit loss and ESG performance. Finance Research Letters, 59, Article 104719.
- Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality, 30(1), 98-115.
- Chiaramonte, L., Dreassi, A., Girardone, C., & Piserà, S. (2022). Do ESG strategies enhance bank stability during financial turmoil? Evidence from Europe. European Journal of Finance, 28(12), 1173-1211.
- Corporate Governance Professional Association. (2020). ESG Transparency Index Ukraine 2020.
- Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2012). Does ownership type matter for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3), 233-252.
- European Commission. (n.d.). Corporate sustainability reporting.
- Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64.
- Gai, L., Bellucci, M., Biggeri, M., Ferrone, L., & Ielasi, F. (2023). Banks’ ESG disclosure: A new scoring model. Finance Research Letters, 57, Article 104199.
- Khamisu, M. S., Paluri, R. A., & Sonwaney, V. (2024). Environmental social and governance (ESG) disclosure motives for environmentally sensitive industry: An emerging economy perspective. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1).
- Korzeb, Z., Niedziółka, P., Szpilko, D., & Di Pietro, F. (2024). ESG and climate-related risks versus traditional risks in commercial banking: A bibliometric and thematic review. Future Business Journal, 10(1), Article 106.
- Kouzez, M., Lee, J-Y., & Leroux, J. (2024). Investment in ESG activities and bank performance: Does bank ownership matter? International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 18(4/5).
- Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., Tang, D. Y., & Zhong, R. (2021). The effects of mandatory ESG disclosure around the world. Journal of Accounting Research.
- Kustono, A. S. (2021). Managing market pressure using sustainability disclosure in the banking industry. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 25(2).
- Lavin, J. F., & Montecinos-Pearce, A. A. (2021). ESG disclosure in an emerging market: An empirical analysis of the influence of board characteristics and ownership structure. Sustainability, 13(19), Article 10498.
- Lee, J., & Koh, K. (2024). ESG performance and firm risk in the U.S. financial firms. Review of Financial Economics, 42(3), 328-344.
- Liu, M. (2022). Quantitative ESG disclosure and divergence of ESG ratings. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
- Liu, S., Jin, J., & Nainar, K. (2023). Does ESG performance reduce banks’ nonperforming loans? Finance Research Letters, 55, Article 103859.
- LSEG. (n.d.). LSEG ESG Scores.
- Makarenko, I., Serpeninova, Y., Fominov, R., & Makarenko, S. (2024). Zvitnist pro stalyi rozvytok bankiv yak subiektiv suspilnoho interesu: porivnialnyi analiz YeS-Ukraina [Sustainability reporting of banks as public interest entities: A comparative analysis of the EU and Ukraine]. Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics, (5). (In Ukrainian).
- Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2022). ESG dimensions and bank performance: An empirical investigation in Italy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(3), 563-586.
- Nathania, R., & Ekawati, E. (2024). Banking on ESG: How ownership influences financial outcomes in 5-ASEAN countries. Banks and Bank Systems, 19(3), 121-132.
- National Securities and Stock Market Commission (2020). The Core Code of Corporate Governance: Requirements and Recommendations.
- NBU. (2021, November 25). Natsionalnyi bank prezentuvav Polityku shchodo rozvytku staloho finansuvannia na period do 2025 roku [NBU Presents Sustainable Finance Development Policy 2025]. (In Ukrainian).
- NBU. (2024, October 1). Polityka z rozvytku staloho finansuvannia [Sustainable finance development policy]. (In Ukrainian).
- NBU. (2025, June 30). Bila knyha z upravlinnia ekolohichnymy, sotsialnymy ta upravlinskymy (ESG) ryzykamy u finansovomu sektori [White Paper on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Risks Management in the Financial Sector]. (In Ukrainian).
- Ng, A. (2016). The tangibility of the intangibles: What drives banks’ sustainability disclosure in the emerging economies? (GEG Working Paper No. 120). University of Oxford, Global Economic Governance Programme.
- OECD. (2020). Developing sustainable finance definitions and taxonomies.
- Rahat, B., & Nguyen, P. (2023). Does ESG performance impact credit portfolios? Evidence from lending to mineral resource firms in emerging markets. Resources Policy, 85, Article 104052.
- Rezaee, Z., Homayoun, S., Rezaee, N. J., & Poursoleyman, E. (2022). Environmental, Social, and Governance sustainability disclosures: Evidence from EU and US. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Sustainalytics. (n.d.). ESG risk rating by industry (banks). Morningstar Sustainalytics.
- UNEP Finance Initiative (UNEP FI). (2018). Rethinking impact to finance the SDGs: A position paper and call to action.
- Vakhovych, I., Biloshapka, V., Ivashyna, O., Ivashyna, S., Korneev, V., & Khodzhaian, A. (2023). Modelling of the anti-crisis management system in the banking sector of the Ukrainian economy to ensure its financial stability. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 5(52), 52-66.
- Wang, L. L. (2023). Transmission effects of ESG disclosure regulations through bank lending networks. Journal of Accounting Research, 61(3), 935-978.
- World Bank. (2025). Ukraine. Fourth Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (February 2022 – December 2024).
- Xiao, Z., Ma, S., Zhang, Z., & Xiang, L. (2024). Shaping sustainable future: The role of central bank in galvanizing corporate ESG performance. Finance Research Letters, 67, Article 105787.
- Yang, F. (2024). The impact of mandatory ESG disclosure on share price. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences, 115(1), 10-18.
- Zhou, W., Chen, F., Zhu, Y., Xiang, L., & Lei, L. (2024). Media attention, negative reports and textual information of banks’ ESG disclosure. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, Article 103583.