The effects of search breadth and search depth on the product innovation of young firms: Evidence from Thai manufacturing industry
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(3).2025.39
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #3, pp. 538-554
- 7 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
While the majority of open innovation literature focuses on established firms, this study extends the existing literature by examining young and newly market-entrant firms. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of two open search strategies – search breadth and search depth – on the product innovation of young firms. The study focuses on the manufacturing industry due to its higher propensity for product innovation compared to the service sector. The data were collected via a postal survey of manufacturing firms in Thailand, conducted between March and August 2021. Respondents consisted exclusively of CEOs or senior managers, yielding a final sample of 423 firms for analysis. The analysis employed Negative Binomial Regression (NBR), a statistical method suitable for data violating the mean-variance equality assumption inherent in this dataset. The results reveal that search breadth exerts a statistically significant positive influence on product innovation. An inverted U-shaped relationship between search breadth and product innovation is not statistically significant. Search depth has a statistically significant negative effect on product innovation. Finally, an inverted U-shaped relationship between search depth and product innovation is statistically significant, indicating that greater search depth corresponds to diminished innovation. In summary, the findings suggest that search breadth benefits product innovation in young firms, whereas search depth hurts their product innovation.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M13, O36, O31
-
References76
-
Tables2
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. The effects of search breadth on the number of firms’ new products – Young firms vs older firms
- Figure 2. The effects of search depth on the number of firms’ new products – Young firms vs older firms
- Figure 3. The inverted U-curve effects of search depth on the number of firms’ new products – Young firms vs older firms
-
- Table 1. Bivariate correlations and variance inflation factors (VIF) of independent variables in the NBR models
- Table 2. NBR results
-
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Antolín-López, R., Céspedes-Lorente, J., García-de-Frutos, N., Martínez-del-Río, J., & Pérez-Valls, M. (2015). Fostering product innovation: Differences between new ventures and established firms. Technovation, 41-42, 25-37.
- Arundel, A., & Kabla, I. (1998). What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research Policy, 27(2), 127-141.
- Balasubramanian, N., & Lee, J. (2008). Firm age and innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(5), 1019-1047.
- Barbieri, N., Marzucchi, A., & Rizzo, U. (2020). Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones? Research Policy, 49(2), Article 103901.
- Berchicci, L. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 42(1), 117-127.
- Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432-445.
- Bruneel, J., Yli-Renko, H., & Clarysse, B. (2010). Learning from experience and learning from others: How congenital and interorganizational learning substitute for experiential learning in young firm internationalization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(2), 164-182.
- Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation, 24(1), 29-39.
- Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68-82.
- Chandler, G.N., & Lyon, D.W. (2009). Involvement in knowledge–acquisition activities by venture team members and venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 571-592.
- Chen, J., Chen, Y., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2011). The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 31(8), 362-373.
- Chesbrough, H. (2017). The future of open innovation: The future of open innovation is more extensive, more collaborative, and more engaged with a wider variety of participants. Research-Technology Management, 60(1), 35-38.
- Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.
- Chesbrough, H.W., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.). (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press.
- Chiang, Y. H., & Hung, K. P. (2010). Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of inter-organizational knowledge flows. R&D Management, 40(3), 292-299.
- Choi, D. S., Sung, C. S., & Park, J. Y. (2020). How does technology startups increase innovative performance? The study of technology startups on innovation focusing on employment change in Korea. Sustainability, 12(2).
- Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
- Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1-19.
- Doloreux, D., Turkina, E., & Van Assche, A. (2019). Innovation type and external knowledge search strategies in KIBS: Evidence from Canada. Service Business, 13(3), 509-530.
- Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
- Ferreras-Méndez, J. L., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2016). The relationship between knowledge search strategies and absorptive capacity: A deeper look. Technovation, 54, 48-61.
- Ferreras-Méndez, J. L., Newell, S., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2015). Depth and breadth of external knowledge search and performance: The mediating role of absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 86-97.
- Flor, M. L., Cooper, S. Y., & Oltra, M. J. (2018). External knowledge search, absorptive capacity and radical innovation in high-technology firms. European Management Journal, 36(2), 183-194.
- Friesl, M. (2012). Knowledge acquisition strategies and company performance in young high technology companies. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 325-343.
- Gimenez-Fernandez, E. M., Bogers, M., & Sandulli, F. (2019). How the diversity of cooperation partners affects startups’ innovation performance: An analysis of the role of cooperation breadth in open innovation. In G. Rexhepi, R.D. Hisrich, & V. Ramadani (Eds.), Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Impetus of Growth and Competitive Advantages (pp. 9-35). Springer.
- Gimenez-Fernandez, E.M., Sandulli, F. D., & Bogers, M. (2020). Unpacking liabilities of newness and smallness in innovative startups: Investigating the differences in innovation performance between new and older small firms. Research Policy, 49(10), Article 104049.
- Gray, C. (2006). Absorptive capacity, knowledge management and innovation in entrepreneurial small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 12(6), 345-360.
- Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Cricelli, L. (2016). An analysis of the open innovation effect on firm performance. European Management Journal, 34(5), 501-516.
- Guo, B., & Wang, Y. (2014). Environmental turbulence, absorptive capacity and external knowledge search among Chinese SMEs. Chinese Management Studies, 8(2), 258-272.
- Hardin, J. W., & Hilbe, J. M. (2018). Generalized linear models and extensions. Stata Press.
- Huergo, E., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). How does probability of innovation change with firm age? Small Business Economics, 22, 193-207.
- Hughes, M., Hughes, P., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Exploitative learning and entrepreneurial orientation alignment in emerging young firms: Implications for market and response performance. British Journal of Management, 18(4), 359-375.
- Kobarg, S., Stumpf-Wollersheim, J., & Welpe, I. M. (2019). More is not always better: Effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level. Research Policy, 48(1), 1-10.
- Kostopoulos, K., Papalexandris, A., Papachroni, M., & Ioannou, G. (2011). Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1335-1343.
- Kraus, S., Kailer, N., Dorfer, J., & Jones, P. (2020). Open innovation in (young) SMEs. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 21(1), 47-59.
- Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150.
- Leiponen, A., & Helfat, C. E. (2010). Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 224-236.
- Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111-125.
- Li, H. (2022). Effects of innovation modes and network partners on innovation performance of young firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(5), 1288-1308.
- Long, S.J. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. SAGE Publications.
- Love, J. H., Roper, S., & Vahter, P. (2014). Learning from openness: The dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 35(11), 1703-1716.
- Lund Vinding, A. (2006). Absorptive capacity and innovative performance: A human capital approach. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4-5), 507-517.
- Marion, T. J., Friar, J. H., & Simpson, T. W. (2012). New product development practices and early-stage firms: Two in-depth case studies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(4), 639-654.
- Martini, A., Aloini, D., & Neirotti, P. (2012). Degree of openness and performance in the search for innovation. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 4, 4-37.
- Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1998). Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27(5), 507-523.
- Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. The American Economic Review, 72(1), 114-132.
- Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6-7), 367-377.
- Noori, J., Nasrabadi, M. B., Yazdi, N., & Babakhan, A. R. (2017). Innovative performance of Iranian knowledge-based firms: Large firms or SMEs? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 179-185.
- Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 187-206.
- Pangarkar, N., & Wu, J. (2013). Alliance formation, partner diversity, and performance of Singapore startups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30, 791-807.
- Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343-373.
- Pisano, G. P. (2010). The evolution of science-based business: Innovating how we innovate. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(2), 465-482.
- Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
- Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Vonortas, N. S. (2017). Determinants of young firms’ innovative performance: Empirical evidence from Europe. Research Policy, 46(7), 1312-1326.
- Radicic, D. (2021). Breadth of external knowledge search in service sectors. Business Process Management Journal, 27(1), 230-252.
- Rodriguez, M., Doloreux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2017). Variety in external knowledge sourcing and innovation novelty: Evidence from the KIBS sector in Spain. Technovation, 68, 35-43.
- Salomon, R. M., & Shaver, J. M. (2005). Learning by exporting: New insights from examining firm innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(2), 431-460.
- Sampson, R. C. (2004). Organizational choice in R&D alliances: Knowledge-based and transaction cost perspectives. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25(6-7), 421-436.
- Savino, T., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & Albino, V. (2017). Search and recombination process to innovate: A review of the empirical evidence and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 54-75.
- Shapiro, N. (1986). Innovation, new industries and new firms. Eastern Economic Journal, 12(1), 27-43.
- Tamer Cavusgil, S., Calantone, R. J., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(1), 6-21.
- Terjesen, S., & Patel, P. C. (2017). In search of process innovations: The role of search depth, search breadth, and the industry environment. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1421-1446.
- Tether, B. S. (2005). Do services innovate (differently)? Insights from the European innobarometer survey. Industry & Innovation, 12(2), 153-184.
- Vaona, A., & Pianta, M. (2008). Firm size and innovation in European manufacturing. Small Business Economics, 30, 283-299.
- Visser, E. J., & Boschma, R. (2004). Learning in districts: Novelty and lock-in in a regional context. European Planning Studies, 12(6), 793-808.
- Wang, C., Brunswicker, S., & Majchrzak, A. (2021). Knowledge search breadth and depth and OI projects performance: A moderated mediation model of control mechanism. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(4), 847-870.
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory economics: A modern approach. Cengage Learning.
- Xiao, T., Makhija, M., & Karim, S. (2022). A knowledge recombination perspective of innovation: Review and new research directions. Journal of Management, 48(6), 1724-1777.
- Xu, S. (2015). Balancing the two knowledge dimensions in innovation efforts: An empirical examination among pharmaceutical firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(4), 610-621.
- Ye, J., Jiang, Y., Hao, B., & Feng, Y. (2023). Knowledge search strategies and corporate entrepreneurship: Evidence from China’s high-tech firms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(2), 564-587.
- Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 587-613.
- Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
- Zang, J., Zhang, C., Yang, P., & Li, Y. (2014). How open search strategies align with firms’ radical and incremental innovation: Evidence from China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(7), 781-795.
- Zheng, S., Li, H., & Wu, X. (2013). Network resources and the innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Management Decision, 51(6), 1207-1224.
- Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090-1102.