Parallel imports and their influence on firm performance and consumer satisfaction: Evidence from Kazakhstan
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(2).2026.11
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #2, pp. 145-161
- 10 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The study examines how parallel imports affect company efficiency and consumer satisfaction in Kazakhstan amid shifting global supply chains and trade restrictions. It assesses their impact on business expectations and consumer perceptions by identifying price asymmetries, risks, and cost optimization effects linked to intermediary shipments. A quantitative survey was conducted using purposive sampling of legally registered firms involved in the sourcing and distributing branded goods (n = 50) and urban consumers who regularly purchase such products (n = 51), ensuring respondents’ direct exposure to the relevant market mechanisms. The results confirm significant price asymmetry: consumers tend to perceive domestic prices as inflated, while firms only partially realize cost optimization opportunities through alternative supply channels. Specifically, 80.4% of consumers believe branded goods are more expensive domestically than abroad, whereas 70% of firms report negative economic effects from intermediary-based sourcing. The findings also reveal a substantial risk-reality gap. While 90.2% of consumers report encountering counterfeit goods, only 25% of firms identify counterfeiting as a primary risk. At the same time, evidence of proportional convergence between firm-level cost optimization (55%) and consumer price-oriented purchasing behavior (54.9%) suggests partial cost-price transmission under the current restrictive trademark regime.
This study provides recommendations for improving government policy on trademark regulation and parallel imports, as well as for refining companies’ pricing strategies. The identified price asymmetry and discrepancies in perceived counterfeit risks underscore the need to strengthen consumer protection and optimize supply chains.
Acknowledgments
This research is funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP23489368).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)E21, D12, D22, F13
-
References45
-
Tables8
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Structural characteristics of the business sample (B2B)
- Table 2. Structural characteristics of the consumer sample (B2B)
- Table 3. Consumer perception of price levels (B2C, H1): Compared to foreign markets, what are domestic prices for socially significant branded goods?
- Table 4. Economic effect of intermediary-based supply (B2B, H1): How does sourcing through intermediaries affect your firm’s economic performance?
- Table 5. Consumer exposure to counterfeit goods (B2C, H2): Have you personally encountered counterfeit goods under known brands?
- Table 6. Business perception of parallel import risks (B2B, H2): What risks do you associate with parallel-imported goods?
- Table 7. Cost optimization effect of parallel imports (B2B, H3): How do parallel imports affect your procurement costs?
- Table 8. Consumer price orientation in purchasing decisions (B2C, H3): What factor most influences your purchasing decisions?
-
- Agaev, R. (2025). The impact of parallel imports on the auto parts market. IRE Journals.
- Alnes, P. K., & Haugom, E. (2024). The effects of price framing and magnitude of price differences on perceived fairness when switching from static to variable pricing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
- Bin-Husayn, A. R., Abdullah, M., & Rimmel, G. (2025). Risk perception and risk management: A systematic review. Journal of Risk Research.
- Cao, J., Jiang, H., Ren, X., & Shi, J. (2024). Consumers’ risk perception, market demand, and firm innovation: Evidence from China. PLoS ONE, 19(5), e0301802.
- Chen, J. V. (2024). The managerial perception of uncertainty and cost elasticity. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 77(1), 101613.
- Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research: Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(3), 623-630.
- Danzon, P. M., & Furukawa, M. F. (2018). International price comparisons for pharmaceuticals: evidence for the U.S. and Europe. Journal of Health Economics, 59, 74-84.
- De Loecker, J., Eeckhout, J., & Unger, G. (2020). The rise of market power and the macroeconomic implications. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2), 561-644.
- Doskeyeva, G., Zh., Baitalassova, K. A., Omarkhan, D. N., Bekova, R. Z., & Rakhimbekova, A. E. (2019). Assessment of the Current State of Employment in the Regions of Kazakhstan. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 18(6), 61-65.
- Engau, C., & Hoffmann, V. (2011). Corporate Response Strategies to Regulatory Uncertainty: Evidence from Uncertainty about Post-Kyoto Regulation. Policy Sciences, 44(1), 53-80.
- Eyster, E., Madarász, K., & Michaillat, P. (2021). Pricing under fairness concerns. Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(3), 1853-1898.
- Fasii, B., Vysochyn, D., & Fasii, A. (2024). Parallel Imports: Striking a Delicate Balance in a Multifaceted Environment. Lex Portus.
- Fatma, M., & Khan, I. (2024). Brand authenticity and consumers’ willingness to pay a premium price (WPP): The mediating role of brand identification. Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, 31(5), 469-481.
- Granlund, D. (2022). Direct and indirect savings from parallel imports in Sweden. Health Economics Review, 12, 46.
- Han, X., Yue, B., & He, Z (2023). Thriving in uncertainty: examining the relationship between perceived environmental uncertainty and corporate ecoinnovation through the lens of dynamic capabilities. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1196997.
- Hoekman, B., & Shepherd, B. (2017). Services productivity, trade policy, and manufacturing exports. World Economy, 40(3), 499-516.
- Hummels, D., & Schaur, G. (2013). Time as a Trade Barrier. American Economic Review, 103(7), 2935-59.
- Iravani, F., Dasu, S., & Ahmadi, R. (2016). Beyond price mechanisms: How much can service help manage the competition from gray markets? European Journal of Operational Research, 252(3), 789-800.
- Ishikawa, J., Morita, H., & Mukunoki, H. (2020). Parallel imports and repair services. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 172, 137-160.
- Jones, T., Vazquez, J., Davis, K., & Thompson, M. (2022). Parallel imports and exhaustion doctrine. Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 3(1), 1-4.
- Kanavos, P., & Vandoros, S. (2010). Competition in prescription drug markets: is parallel trade the answer? Managerial and Decision Economics, 31(5), 325-338.
- Kussaiynkyzy, A., & Doskeyeva, G. Zh. (2021). Modernising the mechanism of state regulation of women’s employment in the innovation sphere of Kazakhstan. Public Policy and Administration, 20(4).
- Leckie, C., Dwivedi, A., & Johnson, L. W. (2023). Credibility and price premium-based competitiveness for industrial brands. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74.
- Li, H., Shao, J., Zhu, S. X., & Xiang, X. (2025). Retailers’ parallel importation and service provision in a supply chain: Incentives and impacts. International Journal of Production Economics.
- Li, H., Wang, J., Qing, Q., & Hong, X. (2021). An analysis of technology licensing and parallel importation under different market structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 281(1), 132-143.
- Li, K. J., Zhang, J., & Schaefer, R. (2022). Parallel imports of status goods: A strategic analysis of aesthetic design. Production and Operations Management, 31(5), 2268-2288.
- Mao, F., Yuan, Y., & Zhang, F. (2025). Firm-level perception of uncertainty, risk aversion, and corporate real estate investment: Evidence from China’s listed firms. Economic Analysis and Policy, 85, 1428-1441.
- Mukayev, A., Satpayeva, Z., Kangalakova, D., Doskeyeva, G., & de Matos Pedro, E. (2023). Assessment of the population’s quality of life in Kazakhstan during COVID-19: The effectiveness of public policy. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(3), 69-83.
- Mukherjee, S., & Datta B. (2025, January). Counterfeit conundrum: Insights into bottom of the pyramid consumer behavior in India. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 82, 104114.
- Nurmagambetov, Z., & Nurmagambetov, A. (2024). Exhaustion of trademark rights in Kazakhstan under regional exhaustion in the Eurasian Economic Union. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 7(2), 191-211.
- Razmus, W., Grabner-Kräuter, S., & Adamczyk, G. (2024). Counterfeit brands and Machiavellianism: Consequences of counterfeit use for social perception. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, 103579.
- Remer, M. (2015). An empirical investigation of the determinants of asymmetric pricing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 42(C), 46-56.
- Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. (1976). Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: An essay on the economics of imperfect information. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(4), 629-649.
- Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.).
- Selin, Ş., Ustabaş, A., & Fındıklı, M. A. (2024). The effect of corporate discourses in brand awareness and legitimacy: The rhetorical analysis of an automobile brand. Asia Pacific Management Review, 29(4), 427-440.
- Shokamanov, Yu. K., & Demesinova, A. A. (2025). The influence of structural changes in the import of Kazakhstan from the EAEU countries on the development of the manufacturing industry of Kazakhstan. Statistics, Accounting and Audit, 3(98), 5-16.
- Theodoulou, I. (2023). Cost Pass Through and Asymmetric Price Transmission (Ph.D. thesis).
- Vomberg, A., Homburg, C., & Sarantopoulos, P. (2025). Algorithmic pricing: Effects on consumer trust and price search. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 42(4), Part B, December 2025, 1166-1186.
- Wang, M., Huang, H., & Liu, F. (2023). To adapt or to standardize? Cross-market green product design under parallel importation impact. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 174, 103133.
- Weyl, E. G., & Fabinger, M. (2013). Pass-Through as an Economic Tool: Principles of Incidence under Imperfect Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 121(3),
- Wu, Q., & Zhao, S. (2021). Determinants of Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Counterfeit Luxury Products: An Empirical Test of Linear and Inverted U-Shaped Relationship. Sustainability, 13(3), 1194.
- Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004). The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 1-15.
- Zhang, Y. (2022). Limits of Law in the Multilevel System: Explaining the European Commission’s Toleration of Noncompliance Concerning Pharmaceutical Parallel Trade. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60, 1001-1018.
- Zhang, Y., Zhang, S. & Feng, H. (2021). The impacts of money-back guarantees in the presence of parallel importation. European Journal of Operational Research, 295(1), 170-182.
- Zhou, H., Zhang, X., & Ruan, R. (2023). Firm’s perception of economic policy uncertainty and corporate innovation efficiency. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(3), 100371.


