Government debt forecasting based on the Arima model
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.08(1).2019.11
-
Article InfoVolume 8 2019, Issue #1, pp. 120-127
- Cited by
- 918 Views
-
491 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The paper explores theoretical and practical aspects of forecasting the government debt in Ukraine. A visual analysis of changes in the amount of government debt was conducted, which has made it possible to conclude about the deepening of the debt crisis in the country. The autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) is considered as the basic forecasting model; besides, the model work and its diagnostics are estimated. The EViews software package illustrates the procedure for forecasting the Ukrainian government debt for the ARIMA model: the series for stationarity was tested, the time series of monthly government debt was converted into stationary by making a number of transformations and determining model parameters; as a result, the most optimal specification for the ARIMA model was chosen.
Based on the simulated time series, it is concluded that ARIMA tools can be used to predict the government debt values.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H60, H63
-
References23
-
Tables2
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. The schedule of the time series of the Ukraine’s government debt for 2011–2019, UAH mln
- Figure 2. The results of the Dickey-Fuller test to verify the time series in the stationarity equations
- Figure 3. The results of the time series check in the first differences for stationarity
- Figure 4. The correlogram graph of the series in the first differences
- Figure 5. Properties of ACF and PACF functions for MA, AR, and ARMA processes
-
- Table 1. Test results for ARMA (p, q)
- Table 2. Forecast of the government debt amount in Ukraine, UAH mln
-
- Berti, K. (2013). Stochastic government debt projections using the historical variance-covariance matrix approach for EU countries. Economic and Financial Affairs: Economic Paper, 480, 1-26.
- Box, G., Jenkins, G. M., & Reinsel, G. (1994). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting & Control (3rd ed.) (614 p.). Prentice Hall.
- Caruk, O. V. (2007). Statystychne prohnozuvannja derzhavnoho borhu Ukrainy na osnovi protsesiv Boksa-Dzhenkinsa [Statistical forecasting of Ukraine’s government debtbased on Box-Jenkins]. Problemy statystyky – Statistics Problems, 8, 1-8.
- Demyanov, R. S. (2017). Ispolzovaniye metoda Boksa-Dzhenkinsa dlia prognozirovaniya vremennykh riadov [Using the Box-Jenkins method to predict time series]. (In Russian).
- Doronina, A. I. (2016). Time-series models. The example of oil products consumption in France. Financial university under the Government of the Russian Federation, 1-21.
- Drehmann, M., & Juselius, M. (2012). Do debt service costs affect macroeconomic and financial stability? BIS Quarterly Review, 21-34.
- Ericsson, N. R. (2017). How biased are U.S. government forecasts of the federal debt? International Journal of Forecasting, 33(2), 543-559.
- Gardner, E., &Giovanni, J. D. (2008). A simple stochastic approach to debt sustainability applied to Lebanon. IMF Working Paper, 8, 1-25.
- Gnegne, Y., & Jawadi, F. (2013). Boundedness and nonlinearities in government debtdynamics: A TAR assessment. Economic Modelling, 34, 154-160.
- Goswami, G. G., & Hossain, M. M. (2013). From Judgmental Projection to Time Series Forecast: Does it Alter the Debt Sustainability Analysis of Bangladesh? Bangladesh Development Studies, XXXVI(3).
- Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometrics analysis. New York University, 325-335.
- Kantorovych, G. G. (2002). Analiz vremennykh riadov [Time series analysis]. Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal – VSHE Economic Journal, 3, 379-401. (In Russian)
- Lihua, M., & Chao, H. (2017). ARIMA model forecast based on EViews software. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science.
- Lukianenko, I. G., & Zhuk, V. M. (2013). Analiz chasovykh riadiv. Pobudova ARIMA, ARCH/GARCH modelei z vykorystanniam paketa E.Views [Time series analysis. Construction of ARIMA, ARCH/GARCH models using E.Views package] (187 р.). Kyiv: NaUKMA; Agrar Media Grup. (In Ukrainian).
- Martinez, A. B. (2015). How good are US government forecasts of the federal debt? International Journal of Forecasting, 31(2), 312-324.
- Martyniuk, V. P. (2011). Prohnozuvannia nadkhodzhennia podatkovykh platezhiv do derzhavnoho biudzhetu za dopomohoiu vykorystannia ARIMA-modeli [Predicting tax payments to the state budget using the ARIMA model]. (In Ukrainian).
- Medeiros, J. (2012). Stochastic debt simulation using VAR models and a panel fiscal reaction function: results for a selected number of countries. European Economy Economic Paper, 459.
- Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (n.d.). Statystychni materialy shchodo derzhavnoho ta harantovanoho derzhavoiu borhu Ukrainy [Statistics on government debt and government guaranteed Ukraine’s debt].
- Navapan, K., & Boonyakunakorn, P. (2017). Forecasting the Growth of Total Debt Service Ratio with ARIMA and State Space Model. Predictive Econometrics and Big Data, Studies in Computational Intelligence, 753, 492-501.
- Nikoloski, A., & Nedanovski, P. (2017). Government debt dynamics and possibilities for its projection. The case of the Republic of Macedonia. DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic meeting, 720-734.
- Rajaraman, I., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2004). Univariate Time-Series Analysis of Public Debt. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 2(2), 122-134.
- Utkina, A. Ja. (2015). Vremennyye riady. Modelirovaniye processov tipa ARIMA (p, d, q) [Time series. Modeling ARIMA-type processes (p, d, q)]. (In Ukrainian).
- Yashchenko, L. O. (2014). Prohnosuvannia derzhavnoho borhu na osnovi dokhodiv ta vydatkiv derzhavnoho biudzhetu Ukrainy [Forecasting government debton the basis of revenues and expenditures of the Ukraine’s government budget]. Statystyka Ukrainy – Statistics of Ukraine, 2, 14-19. (In Ukrainian).