Assessment of the fiscal autonomy of local governments in Armenia

  • 31 Views
  • 10 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Fiscal decentralization is a key component of effective economic governance, enhancing the role of local governments and promoting more efficient allocation of public resources. A central dimension of fiscal decentralization involves the distribution of tax revenues across different levels of government. The purpose of this study is to assess the level of fiscal autonomy of local governments in the Republic of Armenia using the OECD methodology and tax autonomy as a measure of local government taxing powers. By comparing Armenia with OECD unitary states through cluster analysis, the analysis identifies an optimal structure for local tax revenue systems. Armenia exhibits a low level of tax autonomy comparable to the weakest cluster of OECD unitary countries, which includes Estonia, Ireland, Israel, Lithuania, New Zealand, and the UK. The findings suggest that increasing local government revenues by deducting from existing indirect taxes, such as excise duty and VAT, is challenging due to administrative inefficiencies and difficulties in accurately estimating the tax base. Due to their narrow and centralized nature, excise taxes are poorly suited to local use, while the complexity of VAT and its allocation of revenue to customs authorities limits its effectiveness at the local level. In light of its findings, the study recommends shifting the focus toward direct taxes to improve local revenue more effectively and sustainably.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Comparing the level of tax autonomy of local governments in OECD unitary countries and Armenia
    • Table 2. Comparing the degree of fiscal decentralization in Armenia with OECD unitary countries in 2022
    • Table 3. Comparing the structure of tax revenues of local budgets of Armenia and OECD unitary countries in 2022, % of total taxation
    • Table 4. Cluster membership by country
    • Table 5. Final cluster centers
    • Table 6. Cluster ANOVA
    • Conceptualization
      Armen Grigoryan, Manuk Movsisyan
    • Project administration
      Armen Grigoryan
    • Supervision
      Armen Grigoryan
    • Writing – original draft
      Armen Grigoryan, Manuk Movsisyan, Anush Shirinyan, Anna Minasyan, Taguhi Ohanyan, Bella Gabrielyan
    • Writing – review & editing
      Armen Grigoryan, Manuk Movsisyan, Anush Shirinyan, Anna Minasyan, Taguhi Ohanyan, Bella Gabrielyan
    • Formal Analysis
      Manuk Movsisyan
    • Methodology
      Manuk Movsisyan, Anush Shirinyan
    • Data curation
      Anush Shirinyan, Anna Minasyan, Taguhi Ohanyan, Bella Gabrielyan
    • Software
      Anush Shirinyan
    • Validation
      Anush Shirinyan, Anna Minasyan, Taguhi Ohanyan
    • Resources
      Anna Minasyan
    • Investigation
      Bella Gabrielyan