Assessment of the fiscal autonomy of local governments in Armenia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.14(2).2025.10
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2025, Issue #2, pp. 97-110
- 31 Views
-
10 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Fiscal decentralization is a key component of effective economic governance, enhancing the role of local governments and promoting more efficient allocation of public resources. A central dimension of fiscal decentralization involves the distribution of tax revenues across different levels of government. The purpose of this study is to assess the level of fiscal autonomy of local governments in the Republic of Armenia using the OECD methodology and tax autonomy as a measure of local government taxing powers. By comparing Armenia with OECD unitary states through cluster analysis, the analysis identifies an optimal structure for local tax revenue systems. Armenia exhibits a low level of tax autonomy comparable to the weakest cluster of OECD unitary countries, which includes Estonia, Ireland, Israel, Lithuania, New Zealand, and the UK. The findings suggest that increasing local government revenues by deducting from existing indirect taxes, such as excise duty and VAT, is challenging due to administrative inefficiencies and difficulties in accurately estimating the tax base. Due to their narrow and centralized nature, excise taxes are poorly suited to local use, while the complexity of VAT and its allocation of revenue to customs authorities limits its effectiveness at the local level. In light of its findings, the study recommends shifting the focus toward direct taxes to improve local revenue more effectively and sustainably.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G38, H71, H21
-
References66
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Comparing the level of tax autonomy of local governments in OECD unitary countries and Armenia
- Table 2. Comparing the degree of fiscal decentralization in Armenia with OECD unitary countries in 2022
- Table 3. Comparing the structure of tax revenues of local budgets of Armenia and OECD unitary countries in 2022, % of total taxation
- Table 4. Cluster membership by country
- Table 5. Final cluster centers
- Table 6. Cluster ANOVA
-
- Ahmed, N., Hamid, Z., Rehman, K. U., Senkus, P., Khan, N. A., Wysokińska-Senkus, A., & Hadryjańska, B. (2023). Environmental regulation, fiscal decentralization, and agricultural carbon intensity: A challenge to ecological sustainability policies in the United States. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 5145.
- Aristovnik, A. (2012). Fiscal descentralization in Eastern Europe: Trends and selected issues. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 8(37), 5-22.
- Arnold, T., Mueller, S., & Vatter, A. (2021). Shock or design: What drives fiscal De/centralization? A comparative analysis of twenty-nine OECD countries, 1995–2017. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 51(1), 1-26.
- Baskaran, T., & Feld, L. P. (2013). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in OECD countries: Is there a relationship? Public Finance Review, 41(4), 421-445.
- Baskaran, T., Feld, L. P., & Schnellenbach, J. (2016). Fiscal federalism, decentralization, and economic growth: A meta-analysis. Economic Inquiry, 54(3), 1445-1463.
- Bird, R. M. (2011). Are there trends in local finance? A cautionary note on comparative studies and normative models of local government finance (IMFG Papers on Municipal Finance and Governance, No. 1). Institute of Municipal Finance and Governance, Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto.
- Blöchliger, H., & Nettley, M. (2015). Sub-central tax autonomy: 2011 update (OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, No. 20). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Boetti, L., Piacenza, M., & Turati, G. (2012). Decentralization and local governments’ performance: How does fiscal autonomy affect spending efficiency? FinanzArchiv, 68, 269-302.
- Busygina, I., Filippov, M., & Taukebaeva, E. (2018). To decentralize or to continue on the centralization track: The cases of authoritarian regimes in Russia and Kazakhstan. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(1), 61-71.
- Canales, H., Challco, J., Cubas, W., & Flores, F. (2024). Financing of municipal current expenditure through local taxes: A systematic review. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(4), 26-38.
- Canavire-Bacarreza, G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Yedgenov, B. (2017). Reexamining the determinants of fiscal decentralization: what is the role of geography? Journal of Economic Geography, 17(6), 1209-1249.
- Cavalieri, M., & Ferrante, L. (2016). Does fiscal decentralization improve health outcomes? Evidence from infant mortality in Italy. Social Science & Medicine, 164, 74-88.
- Chamber of Local Authorities. (2014, March 26). Local Democracy in Armenia: Recommendation 351, CPL(26)2FINAL. Strasbourg, France.
- Chen, H. T., Han, W., & An, M. L. (2019). Regional fiscal competition and corporate environmental information disclosure: Provincial-level evidence from China. Tropical Conservation Science, 12.
- Chu, T. (2025). Environmental tax reform roles and strategies of local governments: A quasi-natural experiment from China. Sustainable Futures, 9, Article 100453.
- Danziger, J. (1991). Intergovernmental structure and fiscal management strategies: A crossnational analysis. Governance, 4(2), 168-183.
- Gomonov, K., Ratner, S., Lazanyuk, I., & Revinova, S. (2021). Clustering of EU countries by the level of circular economy: An object-oriented approach. Sustainability, 13(13), Article 7158.
- Grdinić, M., Matić, R., & Drezgić, S. (2019). Analysis of fiscal and tax autonomy of local government units in selected EU-13 Member States. In 27th NISPAcee Annual Conference (pp. 1-12).
- Hakhverdyan, D., & Badadyan, G. (2023). Assessing disproportionate territorial development: Insights from 10 countries. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 9(3), 119-139.
- Hayrapetyan, R. (2018). Problems of local governance in Armenia. East European Scientific Journal, 2(30), 28-30.
- Hewitt, D. P. (1992). Fiscal federalism. In V. Tanzi (Ed.), Fiscal Policies in Economies in Transition (pp. 330-349). International Monetary Fund.
- Jia, J., Ding, S., & Liu, Y. (2020). Decentralization, incentives, and local tax enforcement. Journal of Urban Economics, 115, Article 103225.
- Jiao, C. (2021). From the tax-sharing system to the program system: Institutional evolution and organizational mechanism. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 7(2), 280-312.
- Kapidani, M. (2018). A comparative analysis of local government financial autonomy in Albania. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 7(1), 1-9.
- Kim, J., Lotz, J., & Blöchliger, H. (Eds.). (2013). Measuring fiscal decentralisation: Concepts and policies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Kwon, O. (2013). Fiscal decentralization: An effective tool for government reform? Public Administration, 91(3), 544-560.
- Letelier-Saavedra, L., & Saez-Lozano, J. (2015). Fiscal decentralization in specific areas of government: An empirical evaluation using country panel data. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(6), 1344-1360.
- Li, M., & Gu, Y. (2025). From fiscal decentralization to high-quality economic development: Role of tax administration intensity. Finance Research Letters, 77, Article 107047.
- Li, Y., & Bai, L. (2024). Economic decentralization and high-quality urban development: Perspective from local effect and spatial spillover in 276 prefecture-level cities in China. Sustainability, 16(22), Article 9874.
- Liberati, P., & Sacchi, A. (2013). Tax decentralization and local government size. Public Choice, 157, 183-205.
- Ligthart, J., & van Oudheusden, P. (2015). In government we trust: The role of fiscal decentralization. European Journal of Political Economy, 37, 116-128.
- Lin, B., & Zhou, Y. (2021a). Does fiscal decentralization improve energy and environmental performance? New perspective on vertical fiscal imbalance. Applied Energy, 302, Article 117495.
- Lin, B., & Zhou, Y. (2021b). How does vertical fiscal imbalance affect the upgrading of industrial structure? Empirical evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, Article 120886.
- Martinez-Vazquez, J., Lago-Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1095-1129.
- Matić, R., Blažić Pečarić, H., & Grdinić, M. (2024). Tax autonomy of local government: A comparison of Croatia and OECD countries. Hrvatska i Komparativna Javna Uprava: Časopis Za Teoriju I Praksu Javne Uprave, 24(1), 29-58.
- Mauri, N. (2024). How fiscally autonomous are local governments? An empirical test. Journal of Public Economics, 239, Article 105210.
- Michael, K., Dick, P. R., & Peersit, K. (2022). Conditions that work: Reconnecting fiscal decentralization to responsiveness in Uganda and Thai Municipal Governments. Journal of African Studies and Development, 14(2), 35-45.
- Ministry of Finance of The Republic of Armenia. (2024). Summary report of municipal budgets. (In Armenian).
- Movsisyan, M., Karapetyan, T., Ohanyan, T., & Minasyan, A. (2022). Assesment of fiscal decentralization of the RA local self-government system. Messenger of Armenian State University of Economics, 6, 9-21.
- Naisho, L. (2024). Fiscal autonomy and economic development in the United States: Exploring the mechanisms of growth in a federalist system. International Journal of Political Science, 10(2), 1-13.
- Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt: Brace Jovanovich Inc.
- Oates, W. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12, 349-373.
- OECD. (1999). Taxing powers of state and local government (OECD Tax Policy Studies No. 1). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2025a). Tax autonomy survey: Methodological guide. OECD network on fiscal relations across levels of government.
- OECD. (2025b). Fiscal decentralisation database [Data Set].
- Papcunová, V., Hudáková, J., Štubňová, M., & Urbaníková, M. (2020). Revenues of municipalities as a tool of local self-government development (comparative study). Administrative Sciences, 10(4).
- Petrova, K. (2021). Financial autonomy and sustainability of local self-government. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 19(1), 378-386.
- Pietrovito, F., Pozzolo, A. F., Resce, G., & Scialà, A. (2023). Fiscal decentralization and income (re) distribution in OECD countries’ regions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 67, 69-81.
- Pratchett, L. (2004). Local autonomy, local democracy and the “New Localism”. Political Studies, 52(2), 358-375.
- Ratner, S. V., Lychev, A. V., & Krivonozhko, V. E. (2024). Data envelopment analysis-based approach to improving of the budget allocation system for decarbonization targets. Economies, 12(7).
- Reddy, P., Nemec, J., & de Vries, M. S. (2015). The state of local government. Public Policy and Administration, 14(3), 160-176.
- Reschovsky, A. (2019). The tax autonomy of local governments in the United States (Working Paper No. WP19AR1). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
- Sergi, B. S., Balashova, S., & Ratner, S. (2023). The labour share, government expenditure and income inequality of post-soviet countries. Economies, 11(12).
- Siegel, D. (2022). Decentralization, legitimacy, and democracy in post-Soviet Central Asia. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 13(1), 66-81.
- Slavinskaite, N. (2020). Review of fiscal decentralization in European countries. International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences, 10(2), 345-355.
- Surówka, K. (2018). Sources of income and financial autonomy of local self-government. Economics World, 6(1), 22-23.
- Tan, A. (2020). Raising local fiscal autonomy in the local autonomy management: A study in Bogor Regency. Journal Bina Praja, 12(1), 53-63.
- Turyan, K. (2024). Prospects for applying decentralized finance as a growth factor for population welfare in the post-soviet countries. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(10), Article 7215.
- Vdovichen, A., Chornovol, A., Mustetsa, I., Tabenska, J., & Tomniuk, T. (2024). Fiscal decentralization and local finance in Ukraine and EU member-states. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(56), 86-96.
- Vetter, A. (2007). Local Politics: A resource for democracy in Western Europe? Local autonomy, local integrative capacity, and citizens’ attitudes towards politics. Lexington Books.
- Wang, D., Zhang, Z., & Shi, R. (2022). Fiscal decentralization, green technology innovation, and regional air pollution in China: An investigation from the perspective of intergovernmental competition. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), Article 8456.
- Weingast, B. R. (2009). Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 279-293.
- Yan, K., Zuo, M., Zhang, H., Gong, Y., & Fang, J. (2022). Optimization of tax collection and administration efficiency in less developed regions of western China. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022(1).
- Yushkov, A. (2015). Fiscal decentralization and regional economic growth: Theory, empirics, and the Russian experience. Russian Journal of Economics, 1(4), 404-418.
- Zevaya, F., Cruz, M., Syafriel, F., Sari, R., & Syahputra, R. (2024). Examining how macroeconomic variables influence regional autonomy: An examination of local taxing power. The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning, 5(1), 54-66.
- Zhao, R., & He, P. (2024). Government spending efficiency, fiscal decentralization and regional innovation capability: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 84, 693-706.