Factors affecting brand preference in passenger car buying in Nepal
-
Received September 6, 2023;Accepted December 16, 2023;Published January 15, 2024
-
Author(s)Bharat RaiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8338-0824
,
Ganesh BhattaraiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9163-5172
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.20(1).2024.07
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2024, Issue #1, pp. 77-87
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by2 articlesJournal title: Innovative MarketingArticle title: Determinants of customers’ perception towards digital payment systemDOI: 10.21511/im.21(3).2025.16Volume: 21 / Issue: 3 / First page: 215 / Year: 2025Contributors: Gyan Mani Adhikari, Bharat Rai, Ganesh BhattaraiJournal title: Knowledge and Performance ManagementArticle title: Shaping futures: How student experience and perceived quality drive college preferences for postgraduate studies in Bandung, IndonesiaDOI: 10.21511/kpm.09(1).2025.09Volume: 9 / Issue: 1 / First page: 124 / Year: 2025Contributors: Efi Fitriani, Arief Helmi, Sucherly, Umi Kaltum
- 1381 Views
-
1083 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In today’s complex and highly competitive marketplace, marketers, realizing a need to develop sustainable strategies, have turned to branding as a solution. Understanding the brand preferences of consumers is always under discussion. In such context, this study measured the effects of price, attributes, brand personality, appearance, and self-congruity on brand preference in buying a passenger car. A deductive reasoning approach, quantitative method, and positivist epistemology with predetermined hypotheses were used. A six-point Likert scale structured survey was utilized to gather the primary information. The sample included 411 passenger car users in Nepal. A judgmental sampling technique and a causal research design were used. Through path analysis, the effect of price, attributes, brand personality, appearance, and self-congruity on dependent variables was identified using structural equation modeling. The study’s outcome showed that attribute (β = 0.062, p > 0.05), price (β = –0.041, p > 0.05), and appearance (β = 0.022, p > 0.05) have no significant positive impact on consumer brand preference. Moreover, the study discovered that brand preference is influenced by self-congruity (β = 0.297, p < 0.05) and brand personality (β = 0.232, p < 0.05) in buying passenger cars in Nepal. It is concluded that brand image and prestige are more critical for high-involvement products. These outcomes provide a road map for future scholars and business people with a view of the emerging context of market development.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M30, M31, M37
-
References48
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
- Figure 2. Structural model
-
- Table 1. Questionnaire structure
- Table 2. Characteristics of the respondents
- Table 3. An overview of model fit
- Table 4. Model validity measures
- Table 5. Descriptive and correlation insights
- Table 6. Summary of hypotheses testing
-
- Afzali, M., & Ahmed, E. M. (2016). Exploring consumer doubt towards local new products innovation and purchase intention. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(1), 2-17.
- Bairrada, C. M., Coelho, A., & Lizanets, V. (2019). The impact of brand personality on consumer behavior: The role of brand love. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 23(1), 30-47.
- Batra, S. (2015). Factors influencing consumer preferences – An exploratory study. ENVISION-International Journal of Commerce and Management, 9, 26-32.
- Bhattarai, G. (2021). Perception of organizational politics and employee performance: Antidotal role of impression management. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(1), 103-115.
- Bukhari, S. F. H. (2018). Purchase behavior of western imported foods by Pakistani buyers. Journal of Contemporary Islamic Research, 1(1), 1-14.
- Byrne, B. M. (2010). Multivariate applications series. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
- Dahal, R. K., Bhattarai, G., & Karki, D. (2020). Determinants of technological and innovation performance of the Nepalese cellular telecommunications industry from the customers’ perspective. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 5(6), 1013-1020.
- Dhanabalan, T., Subha, K., Shanthi, R., & Sathish, A. (2018). Factors influencing consumers’ car purchasing decision in Indian automobile industry. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(10), 53-63.
- Dharmaraj, R. (2020). A study on consumer behavior towards Maruti Cars in Vellore District, Tamilnadu. Shanlax: International Journal of Management, 7(4), 80-85.
- Ebrahim, R., Ghoneim, A., Irani, Z., & Fan, Y. (2016). A brand preference and repurchase intention model: The role of consumer experience. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(13-14), 1230-1259.
- Fathima, A. A. (2019). A study on consumer brand preference towards mobile phones. Journal of the Gujarat Research Society, 21(13), 687-693.
- Ghimire, B., Dahal, R. K., Rai, B., & Upadhyay, D. (2023). Employee performance factors in the Nepalese commercial banks: Insights from emerging markets. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 10(2), 29-42.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). United Kingdom: Cengage Learning.
- Hardjono, B., Teng, C. Y., & Amirtrianti, V. (2019). Evaluating the influence of the sportswear brand personality on generation Y’s customer preference in Malaysia. International Journal of Advances in Social and Economics, 1(4), 1-11.
- Hellier, P. K., Geursen, G. M., Carr, R. A., & Rickard, J. A. (2003). Customer repurchase intention: A general structural equation model. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12), 1762-1800.
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
- Jin, X. T., & Weber, K. (2013). Developing and testing a model of exhibition brand preference: The exhibitors’ perspective. Tourism Management, 38, 94-104.
- Khalid, N. R., Che Wel, C. A., Alam, S. S., & Mokhtaruddin, S. A. (2018). Cosmetic for modern consumer: The impact of self-congruity on purchase intention. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 8(1), 34-41.
- Kurnia, M. A. D., & Hasyim, I. (2023). The influence of consumer perceptions on product attributes towards brand preferences of Alpina Outdoor Sport and Eiger Adventure. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Creative Economy, 3(1), 61-73.
- Kwok, S., Uncles, M., & Huang, Y. (2006). Brand preferences and brand choices among urban Chinese consumers: An investigation of country-of-origin effects. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 18(3), 163-172.
- Laohakosol, W., Sthapit, A., & Sharma, A. (2019). Impact of product-related and social factors on purchase intention of smartphone buyers in Nepal. The Sankalpa: International Journal of Management Decisions, 4(1), 115-138.
- Lavuri, R., Navulla, D., & Naik, M. N. (2019). Buying predilection of buyers towards branded mobile phones devices. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3S3), 178-186.
- Li, Y., Zhang, C., Shelby, L., & Huan, T. C. (2022). Customers’ self-image congruity and brand preference: A moderated mediation model of self-brand connection and self-motivation. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(5), 798-807.
- Liu, X., Wu, X., Shi, W., Tong, W., & Ye, Q. (2022). The impacts of electronic word-of-mouth on high-involvement product sales: Moderating effects of price, brand origin, and number of customers. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 23(3), 177-189.
- Mao, Y., Lai, Y., Luo, Y., Liu, S., Du, Y., Zhou, J., Ma, J., Bonaiuto, F., & Bonaiuto, M. (2020). Apple or Huawei: Understanding flow, brand image, brand identity, brand personality and purchase intention of smartphone. Sustainability, 12(8), 3391.
- Munasinghe, S. N. (2018). The impact of brand personality on brand preference: A study on personal care products. International Review of Management and Marketing, 8(2), 9-11.
- Mustafa, J., & Al-Rifat, A. (2019). Factors influencing customers’ buying decisions of mobile phone in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The Business & Management Review, 10(5), 199-205.
- Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, T. T. H., Nguyen, K. O., Pham, T. T. H., & Nguyen, T. H. (2023). Brand personality and revisit intention: The mediating role of tourists’ self-image congruity. Tourism and Hospitality Management, 29(2), 235-248.
- O’Connor, P. J., & Sullivan, G. L. (1995). Market segmentation: A comparison of benefits/attributes desired and brand preference. Psychology & Marketing, 12(7), 613-635.
- Phuong, H. L. C., Anh, L. H., & Ab Rashid, A. A. (2020). Factors influencing car purchasing intention: A study among Vietnamese consumers. Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers Malaysia, 4(2), 229-252.
- Pitso, G., Ligaraba, N., & Chuchu, T. (2023). An investigation into the predictors of brand preference towards cement brands available on the South African Market: A consumer’s perspective. Journal of Business and Management Review, 4(6), 390-411.
- Rai, B. (2019). Consumer brand preference in buying car in Nepal. KMC Research Journal, 3(3), 9-22.
- Rai, B. (2021). Factors affecting smartphone purchase intention of consumers in Nepal. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB), 8(2), 465-473.
- Rai, B., & Budhathoki, P. B. (2023). Factors affecting brand choice behavior of laptop purchases of university students in Nepal. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 2194126.
- Rai, B., Dahal, R. K., & Ghimire, B. (2023). Factors affecting consumer behavior in smartphone purchases in Nepal. Innovative Marketing, 19(3), 74-84.
- Rakib, M. R. H. K. (2019). Factors influencing purchase intention of cellular phones among the university students in Bangladesh. European Journal of Business and Management, 11(2), 92-101.
- Russell, G. J., & Kamakura, W. A. (1997). Modeling multiple category brand preference with household basket data. Journal of Retailing, 73(4), 439-461.
- Sandhu, M. A., Usman, M., Ahmad, Z., & Rizwan, M. (2018). The impact of self-concept and its congruence with different brands on purchase intention: Evidence from Pakistani consumers. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 12(2), 695-709.
- Sengar, S. (2019). Quantifying the factors influencing buyer’s purchase decision in the light commercial vehicle: A study conducted in the Pune Region. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(1), 573-579.
- Sharahi, E. R., & Heshmat, A. A. E. (2020). The effect of brand personality on dimensions of consumer behavior mediated by brand love. Archives of Pharmacy Practice, 11(1), 139-146.
- Singh, J., Ehrenberg, A., & Goodhardt, G. (2008). Measuring customer loyalty to product variants. International Journal of Market Research, 50(4), 513-532.
- Tong, X., Su, J., & Xu, Y. (2018). Brand personality and its impact on brand trust and brand commitment: An empirical study of luxury fashion brands. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 11(2), 196-209.
- Toufani, S., Stanton, J. P., & Chikweche, T. (2017). The importance of aesthetics on customers’ intentions to purchase smartphones. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(3), 316-338.
- Tsaur, S. H., Hsu, F. S., & Ching, H. W. (2023). The impacts of brand personality and self-congruity on consumers’ intention to stay in a hotel: Does consumer affinity matter? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 6(1), 246-262.
- Van Rijnsoever, F., Farla, J., & Dijst, M. J. (2009). Consumer car preferences and information search channels. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(5), 334-342.
- Wahyuningsih, B. A., Dewi, R. S., & Farida, N. (2023). The effect of product attributes and price on brand switching with consumer dissatisfaction as an intervening variable. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications, 5(10), 159-163.
- Zainudin, M. I., Haji Hasan, F., & Othman, A. K. (2020). Halal brand personality and brand loyalty among millennial modest fashion consumers in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(6), 1277-1293.
- Zhang, X. (2022). Can you represent me? The influence of consumers’ self-congruity on their brand loyalty behavior. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(10), 2073-2090.
-
-
Conceptualization
Bharat Rai, Ganesh Bhattarai
-
Data curation
Bharat Rai, Ganesh Bhattarai
-
Formal Analysis
Bharat Rai
-
Investigation
Bharat Rai
-
Methodology
Bharat Rai, Ganesh Bhattarai
-
Project administration
Bharat Rai, Ganesh Bhattarai
-
Supervision
Bharat Rai, Ganesh Bhattarai
-
Validation
Bharat Rai, Ganesh Bhattarai
-
Writing – original draft
Bharat Rai
-
Writing – review & editing
Ganesh Bhattarai
-
Conceptualization
-
Production and trade patterns in the world apple market
Innovative Marketing Volume 17, 2021 Issue #1 pp. 16-25 Views: 3017 Downloads: 2544 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯAwareness of healthy food, population growth, increasing incomes, and urbanization raise the global demand for fruit, where the second position goes to apples. However, their supply is insufficient, implying the lost revenues and exacerbating nutritional food insecurity. To help growers, traders, and consumers cope with such a challenge, this research focused on revealing some world patterns in apple production and trade detailed by groups of countries, their capacities, and prices. The explored data on fresh and processed apples derived from the Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics. The methodological framework of the study engaged divisive hierarchical clustering, analysis of interval variation series, and inequality indicators. The research findings identified two major clusters of 50 out of 96 countries specialized in production and foreign sales of 83.2% and 76.9% of apples. The study outcome comparing fair trade via two triple histograms specified the prevailing deviations between –82% and 80% around farm gate apple prices in 47 exporting countries and the same between –83% and 83% in 46 importing countries. Based on the Gini coefficient, Ratio 20/20, and Hoover index, the accomplished evaluations quantified total disparity in apple trading by 13% to 40%, calculated misbalance between 20% of the top and bottom world traders, and grounded preferable market alignments ranged from 9% to 38%.
-
Impact of brand name and pricing on Kazakhstan Gen Z consumer behavior
Rajasekhara Mouly Potluri
,
Zhanaidar Zulpaidar
,
Sultanamir Kurmangazin
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.20(3).2024.06
The objective of the research is to examine the impact of brand name and pricing on Kazakhstan Gen Z consumers’ buying behavior, spending patterns, and other buying motives. Adopting a quantitative approach, the study administers a structured questionnaire following a comprehensive analysis of the relevant literature and gleaned responses from 300 Generation Z consumers after checking the reliability and validity of the instrument using Cronbach’s alpha. The selected hypotheses were tested using the Karl Pearson coefficient of correlation, which revealed that brand name significantly impacts Kazakh women, and price greatly influences both genders. The results observed that price has the most significant effect on the buying behavior of female and male Gen Z consumers in Kazakhstan, with 25 and 28 percent, respectively. Brand name and authenticity considerably influence female consumers, with 16 and 15 percent, whereas innovation, technology, and customization, with 20 and 14 percent, influence male consumers. The significant influence of branding and pricing on the buying behavior of Kazakhstan Gen Z customers is displayed, and the findings provide a focal context for developing marketing plans in this first-of-its-kind research article.
-
Study of service quality, price sensitivity, and passenger satisfaction in India’s airline sector
Vinoj Wilfred
,
M. V. Rama Prasad
,
J. P. Senthil Kumar
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.20(3).2024.15
Innovative Marketing Volume 20, 2024 Issue #3 pp. 182-192 Views: 2073 Downloads: 752 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯUnderstanding the determinants of customer satisfaction is crucial for airlines to maintain and grow their customer base. This study aims to analyze how various service quality dimensions and prices impact airline attractiveness using the service quality (SERVQUAL) model. Data were collected from 400 respondents through an online questionnaire using the convenience sampling method. The respondents included a diverse mix of frequent flyers, occasional travelers, and business professionals, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of passenger perspectives in the Indian airline sector. This study tested the hypotheses by analyzing the data using structural equation modelling (SEM) to understand the relationships between service quality attributes, price, passenger satisfaction, and airline attractiveness. The results indicate that empathy, price, tangibles, and satisfaction determinants positively develop attractiveness among passengers to use and continue in airline services. The relationships between empathy and satisfaction (β = 0.130, t = 2.317, p = 0.021), tangibles and satisfaction (β = 0.214, t = 4.321, p = 0.000), price and satisfaction (β = 0.425, t = 7.825, p = 0.000) were statistically significant, and satisfaction positively influenced airline attractiveness (β = 0.895, t = 75.529, p = 0.000). The assurance, reliability, responsiveness attributes must improve to attract passengers. The results provide insights into aviation industry and help them to make better policies and strategies to implement services and customer satisfaction to sustain heavy aviation competition in India.
Acknowledgment
The authors express gratitude to GITAM University, department heads, leadership of department of management and all individuals who have supported and contributed to the successful execution of this study.

