Factors affecting innovation capacity: Empirical evidence from small and medium enterprises in Vietnam
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(3).2025.22
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #3, pp. 297-309
- 32 Views
-
8 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
This paper aims to assess the relative importance of various determinants impacting small and medium enterprises’ (SMEs) capacity for innovation. The study employed a quantitative approach with data obtained from 462 participants working across SMEs in 2023 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The collected data were subsequently processed and analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The EFA results indicated the removal of two items due to their poor fit within the variables. Furthermore, the statistical adequacy of the data for factor analysis was confirmed by a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) coefficient of 0.892 and a significant Bartlett’s test (Chi-square = 8177.250, p-value < 0.001). The remaining variables yielded a convergent solution in the subsequent CFA analysis, with goodness-of-fit indices meeting acceptable thresholds. The SEM results revealed four key factors influencing the innovation capability of SMEs in Ho Chi Minh City: collaboration networks, organizational culture, entrepreneurial leadership, and internal human resources, with p-values for all these factors’ estimates of 0.000. The survey respondents indicated that collaborative networks exerted the most substantial influence on the innovation capability of SMEs (with an estimate of 0.282). Subsequently, factors such as organizational culture and entrepreneurial leadership demonstrated progressively lesser degrees of impact, with corresponding coefficients of 0.266 and 0.207, respectively. Recommendations for both enterprises and state policies are then proposed.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L20, L21, M10
-
References44
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. SEM results
-
- Table 1. Sample description
- Table 2. EFA results
- Table 3. Relationships between factors in the research model
- Table A1. Questionnaire items
-
- Aboramadan, M., Albashiti, B., Alharazin, H., & Zaidoune, S. (2020). Organizational culture, innovation and performance: A study from a non-western context. Journal of Management Development, 39(4), 437-451.
- Akin-Adetoro, A., & Kabanda, S. (2021). Factors affecting the adoption of BYOD in South African small and medium enterprises. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 87(6), Article e12185.
- Aksoy, H. (2017). How do innovation culture, marketing innovation and product innovation affect the market performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)? Technology in Society, 51, 133-141.
- Alpkan, L., Bulut, C., Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., & Kilic, K. (2010). Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance. Management Decision, 48(5), 732-755.
- Anning-Dorson, T., & Nyamekye, M. B. (2020). Engagement capability, innovation intensity and firm performance: The role of competitive intensity. Journal of African Business, 21, 493-508.
- Apanasovich, N., Alcalde Heras, H., & Parrilli, M. D. (2016). The impact of business innovation modes on SME innovation performance in post-Soviet transition economies: The case of Belarus. Technovation, 57-58, 30-40.
- Ar, I. M., & Baki, B. (2011). Antecedents and performance impacts of product versus process innovation: Empirical evidence from SMEs located in Turkish science and technology parks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(2), 172-206.
- Barasa, L., Kimuyu, P., Kinyanjui, B., Vermeulen, P., & Knoben, J. (2017). Institutions, resources and innovation in East Africa: A firm level approach. Research Policy, 46(1), 280-291.
- Chen, J., Zhu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2017). A study of factors influencing disruptive innovation in Chinese SMEs. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 25(1), 140-157.
- Cirera, X., & Maloney, W. F. (2017). The innovation paradox: Developing-country capabilities and the unrealized promise of technological catch-up. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Clauss, T., Breier, M., Kraus, S., Durst, S., & Mahto, R. V. (2022). Temporary business model innovation – SME’s innovation response to the Covid-19 crisis. R&D Management, 52(2), 294-312.
- Cowling, M. (2016). You can lead a firm to R&D but can you make it innovate? UK evidence from SMEs. Small Business Economics, 46(4), 565-577.
- Dangelico, R. M. (2016). Green Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), 560-576.
- Delgado-Verde, M. D., Martin-de-Castro, G. M., & Navas-Lopez, J. E. (2011). Organizational knowledge assets and innovation capability Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(1), 5-19.
- Edison, H., Ali, N. B., & Torkar, R. (2013). Towards innovation measurement in the software industry. The Journal of Systems and Software, 86(5), 1390-1407.
- Eggers, F. (2020). Masters of disasters? Challenges and opportunities for SMEs in times of crisis. Journal of Business Research, 116, 199-208.
- Fındık, D., & Beyhan, B. (2015). The impact of external collaborations on firm innovation performance: Evidence from Turkey. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1425-1434.
- Gherghina, S. C., Botezatu, M. A., Hosszu, A., & Simionescu, L. N. (2020). Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): The engine of economic growth through investments and innovation. Sustainability, 12(1).
- Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Hayton, J. C., & Kelley, D. J. (2006). A competency-based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 407-427.
- Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 325-344.
- Hung, R. Y. Y., Lien, B. Y. H., Yang, B., Wu, C. M., & Kuo, Y. M. (2011). Impact of TQM and organizational learning on innovation performance in the high-tech industry. International Business Review, 20(2), 213-225.
- Kang, K. N., & Park, H. (2012). Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs. Technovation, 32(1), 68-78.
- Kaur, N., & Kaur, P. (2021). What drives innovation in micro, small, and medium enterprises? Journal of Public Affairs, 21(2), Article e2336.
- Kim, M. K., Park, J. H., & Paik, J. H. (2018). Factors influencing innovation capability of small and medium-sized enterprises in Korean manufacturing sector: Facilitators, barriers and moderators. International Journal of Technology Management, 76(3-4), 214-235.
- Kittilaksanawong, W., & Ren, Z. (2013). Innovation capability building through intermediary organizations: Cases of manufacturing small-and medium-sized enterprises from China’s Zhejiang province. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(2), 62-79.
- Lau, C., & Ngo, H. (2004). The HR system, organizational culture, and product innovation. International Business Review, 13(6), 685-703.
- Makanyeza, C., Mabenge, B. K., & Ngorora-Madzimure, G. P. K. (2023). Factors influencing small and medium enterprises’ innovativeness: Evidence from manufacturing companies in Harare, Zimbabwe. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 42(3), 10-23.
- OECD. (2021). SME and Entrepreneurship Policy in Viet Nam. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Paik, J. H., Kim, M. K., & Park, J. H. (2017). The antecedents and consequences of technology standardizations in Korean IT small and medium-sized enterprises. Information Technology and Management, 18, 293-304.
- Pollok, P., Lüttgens, D., & Piller, F. T. (2019). How firms develop capabilities for crowdsourcing to increase open innovation performance: The interplay between organizational roles and knowledge processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(4), 412-441.
- Rajapathirana, R. P. J., & Hui, Y. (2018). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performa. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 3, 44-55.
- Rangus, K., & Slavec, A. (2017). The interplay of decentralization, employee involvement and absorptive capacity on firms’ innovation and business performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 195-203.
- Romijn, H., & Albaladejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy, 31(7), 1053-1067.
- Santos-Rodrigues, H., Dorrego, P. F., & Jardon, C. F. (2016). The influence of human capital on the innovativeness of firms. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 9(9), 53-64.
- Saridakis, G., Idris, B., Hansen, J. M., & Dana, L. P. (2019). SMEs’ internationalisation: When does innovation matter? Journal of Business Research, 96, 250-263.
- Saunila, M. (2017). Innovation capability in achieving higher performance: Perspectives of management and employees. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(8), 903-916.
- Saunila, M. (2020). Innovation capability in SMEs: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 260-265.
- Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management journal, 48(3), 450-463.
- Tajeddini, K., Martin, E., & Altinay, L. (2020). The importance of human-related factors on service innovation and performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 85, Article 102431.
- Tran, Q., Doan, A. T., & Tran, T. (2021). Small and medium enterprises’ credit access, ownership structure and job development. Australian Economic Papers, 60(4), 710-735.
- Varis, M., & Littunen, H. (2010). Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 128-154.
- Wallsten, S. J. (2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the small business innovation research program. RAND Journal of Economics, 31, 82-100.
- Wang, J. (2018). Innovation and government intervention: A comparison of Singapore and Hong Kong. Research Policy, 47(2), 399-412.