Financial determinants of environmental, social and governance performance: Empirical evidence from India
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.21(1).2024.02
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2024, Issue #1, pp. 13-24
- Cited by
- 496 Views
-
135 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The present study aims to examine the firm-level financial determinants of ESG performance. It elucidates what financial resources it takes to enable the integration of ESG practices and improve a firm’s ESG scores, based on a sample of 94 Indian firms listed on the National Stock Exchange of India between 2015 and 2020. Econometrically, the study employs fixed effects and random effects panel data models as an appropriate methodology. The findings show that firm size, asset intangibility, analyst coverage, and operating cash flow influence firms’ ESG scores positively, whereas leveraging and strategic holding impact them negatively. In addition to the mentioned variables, cash holdings positively influence firms’ environmental, social, and governance scores. While dividend yield does not contribute to combined ESG and governance scores, it has a positive impact on a firm’s environmental and social scores. This is the first study examining the determinants of firm-level ESG performance in an emerging market. Results endorse the interaction of legitimacy theory and slack resource theory in determining a firm’s ESG performance.
Acknowledgement
The infrastructural support provided by FORE School of Management, New Delhi, India in completing this paper is gratefully acknowledged.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G30, O16
-
References43
-
Tables8
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variables and their symbols and description
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Regression results for ESG combined scores on firm-level financial variables using pooled cross-section, fixed effect, and random effect
- Table 4. Regression results for environmental scores on firm-level financial variables using pooled cross-section, fixed effect, and random effect
- Table 5. Regression results for social scores on firm-level financial variables using pooled cross-section, fixed effect, and random effect
- Table 6. Regression results for governance scores on firm-level financial variables using pooled cross-section, fixed effect, and random effect
- Table 7. Hausman test for ESG, Environmental, Social, and Governance on firm-level financial variables
- Table 8. Key findings of results
-
- Ademi, B., & Klungseth, N. J. (2022). Does it pay to deliver superior ESG performance? Evidence from US S&P 500 companies. Journal of Global Responsibility, 2041-2568.
- Aksu, M., & Kosedag, A. (2006). Transparency and disclosure scores and their determinants in the Istanbul Stock Exchange. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(4), 277-296.
- Ashwin, A. S., Krishnan, R. T., & George, R. (2015). Family firms in India: family involvement, innovation and agency and stewardship behaviors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32, 869-900.
- Baldini, M., Maso, L. D., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., & Terzani, S. (2018). Role of country-and firm-level determinants in environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 79-98.
- Benlemlih, M. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and dividend policy. Research in International Business and Finance, 47, 114-138.
- Bhatt, P., & Joshi, H. (2022). ‘Stakeholder’ and ‘resource’ labelled employee treatment practices and firm performance-an integrative review and implications for future research. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 25(4), 473-494.
- Byoun, S. (2011). Financial flexibility and capital structure decision.
- Cappucci, M. (2018). The ESG integration paradox. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 30(2), 22-28.
- Chelawat, H., & Trivedi, I. V. (2016). The Business Value of ESG Performance: The Indian Context. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 5(2), 195-210.
- Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291.
- Daugaard, D. (2020). Emerging new themes in environmental, social and governance investing: a systematic literature review. Accounting & Finance, 60(2), 1501 1530.
- D’hondt, C., Merli, M., & Roger, T. (2022). What drives retail portfolio exposure to ESG factors? Finance Research Letters, 46, 102470.
- De la Fuente, G., Ortiz, M., & Velasco, P. (2022). The value of a firm’s engagement in ESG practices: Are we looking at the right side? Long Range Planning, 55(4), 102143.
- Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
- Eccles, R. G., & Kastrapeli, M. D. (2017). The investing enlightenment. State Street, 1-40.
- El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.
- El Khoury, R., Nasrallah, N., & Alareeni, B. (2021). The determinants of ESG in the banking sector of MENA region: a trend or necessity? Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal.
- Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., & Saleh, A. (2021). ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102097.
- Fernandez, R., & Elfner, N. (2015). ESG integration in corporate fixed income. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 27(2), 64-72.
- Giese, G., Lee, L. E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., & Nishikawa, L. (2019). Foundations of ESG investing: How ESG affects equity valuation, risk, and performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(5), 69-83.
- Gregory, A., Tharyan, R., & Whittaker, J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Disaggregating the effects on cash flow, risk and growth. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 633-657.
- Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425-445.
- Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A., 2001. Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107-156.
- Javadi, S., Masum, A. A., Mollagholamali, M., & Rao, R. P. (2020). Climate Change and Corporate Cash Holdings: Global Evidence.
- Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 441-456.
- Joshi, H. (2019). Cash Holding or Net Debt, what is Relevant for Indonesian 599 Firms? The South East Asian Journal of Management, 13(1). 600.
- Joshi, H. (2021). Cash holdings or net debt, what matters for firms’ financial policies? Evidence from India. Indian Journal of Finance, 15(2), 8-21.
- Joshi, H. (2022). Do Precautionary Corporate Cash Holdings Help During the Economic Shocks? Evidence from the Covid-19 Pandemic. FIIB Business Review, 23197145221110286.
- Khan, M. A. (2022). ESG disclosure and firm performance: A bibliometric and meta-analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 101668.
- Li, H., Zhang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2022). ESG and firm’s default risk. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102713.
- Malik, M. (2015). Value-enhancing capabilities of CSR: A brief review of contemporary literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 419-438.
- Martins, H. C. (2021). Competition and ESG practices in emerging markets: Evidence from a difference-in-differences model. Finance Research Letters.
- Mitton, T. (2004). Corporate governance and dividend policy in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 5(4), 409-426.
- Mitra, G., Gupta, V., & Gupta, G. (2023). Impact of macroeconomic factors on firm performance: empirical evidence from India.
- Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1), 3-46.
- Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Bansal, P. (2016). The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1615-1631.
- Rezaee, Z. (2016). Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective. Journal of Accounting Literature.
- Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351-366.
- Saygili, E., Arslan, S., & Birkan, A. O. (2022). ESG practices and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 525-533.
- Van Duuren, E., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2016). ESG integration and the investment management process: Fundamental investing reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 525-533.
- Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG Performance Have an Impact on Financial Performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169-178.
- Verga Matos, P., Barros, V., & Miranda Sarmento, J. (2020). Does ESG affect the stability of dividend policies in Europe? Sustainability, 2(21), 8804.
- Xiao, C., Wang, Q., van Donk, D. P., & van der Vaart, T. (2018). When are stakeholder pressures effective? An extension of slack resources theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 199, 138-149.