The dynamics of industrial activity, urbanization, and PM2.5 pollution in central Asian countries: A panel CS-ARDL analysis
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.17(2).2026.03
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2026, Issue #2, pp. 29-40
- 27 Views
-
6 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
This study examines the long-term and short-term dynamic interactions between PM2.5 pollution and its anthropogenic determinants, namely industrial activity, urbanization, economic growth, total energy use, and renewable energy utilization, across five Central Asian countries (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan) from 1992 to 2023. Preliminary tests validate pronounced cross-sectional dependence and notable slope heterogeneity, substantiating the application of the Cross-Sectionally Augmented Autoregressive Distributed Lag (CS-ARDL) model. The Westerlund cointegration results demonstrate a strong long-term equilibrium relationship. The long-term CS-ARDL estimations indicate that industrial activity is the primary driver of PM2.5 pollution, followed by total energy consumption. The analysis reveals evidence supporting the upward-sloping segment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC), as economic growth significantly elevates PM2.5 levels. In contrast, the squared GDP term is insignificant, suggesting the absence of a turning point in pollution reduction. Renewable energy consumption has a negligible moderating effect. The Error Correction Term is negative and statistically significant, indicating that approximately 24.5% of deviations from the long-term equilibrium are corrected each year. The findings indicate that environmental stability in Central Asia necessitates a strategic transformation of industrial and energy policy, underscoring the importance of coordinated regional initiatives to modernize grids and promote green industrial practices to decouple economic expansion from particulate pollution.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q53, Q43, O44, C33
-
References32
-
Tables9
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics of variables (1992–2023)
- Table 2. Pairwise correlation matrix of variables (1992–2023)
- Table 3. Cross-sectional dependence and slope homogeneity tests (1992–2023)
- Table 4. CIPS panel unit root test results (1992–2023)
- Table 5. Westerlund (2007) panel cointegration test results (1992–2023)
- Table 6. CS-ARDL long-run mean group estimates for PM2.5 determinants (1992–2023)
- Table 7. Short-run dynamic CS-ARDL error correction model results (1992–2023)
- Table 8. Country-specific long-run CS-ARDL coefficient estimates (1992–2023)
- Table 9. Robustness comparison: CS-ARDL, CCE-MG, and AMG long-run estimates (1992–2023)
-
- Chang, H.-Y., Wang, W., & Yu, J. (2021). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A spatial dynamic panel data approach. Energy Economics, 104, Article 105600.
- Chen, J., Zhou, C., Wang, S., & Li, S. (2018). Impacts of energy consumption structure, energy intensity, economic growth, urbanization on PM2.5 concentrations in countries globally. Applied Energy, 230, 94-105.
- Chen, W., & Lei, Y. (2018). The impacts of renewable energy and technological innovation on environment-energy-growth nexus: New evidence from a panel quantile regression. Renewable Energy, 123, 1-14.
- Cheng, L., Zhang, T., Chen, L., Li, L., Wang, S., Hu, S., Yuan, L., Wang, J., & Wen, M. (2020). Investigating the impacts of urbanization on PM2.5 pollution in the Yangtze River Delta of China: A spatial panel data approach. Atmosphere, 11(10), Article 1058.
- Cheng, Z., Li, L., & Liu, J. (2020). The impact of foreign direct investment on urban PM2.5 pollution in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 265, Article 110532.
- Chudik, A., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188(2), 393-420.
- Dong, Q., Lin, Y., Huang, J., & Chen, Z. (2020). Has urbanization accelerated PM2.5 emissions? An empirical analysis with cross-country data. China Economic Review, 59, Article 101381.
- Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
- Fu, Z., & Li, R. (2020). The contributions of socioeconomic indicators to global PM2.5 based on the hybrid method of spatial econometric model and geographical and temporal weighted regression. Science of the Total Environment, 703, Article 135481.
- Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377.
- Health Effects Institute (HEI). (2025). Trends in air quality and health impacts: Insights from Central, South, and Southeast Asia.
- Hsu, C. C., Zhang, Y. Q., Ch, P., Aqdas, R., Chupradit, S., & Nawaz, A. (2021). A step towards sustainable environment in China: The role of eco-innovation renewable energy and environmental taxes. Journal of Environmental Management, 299, Article 113609.
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). (2024). PM2.5 air pollution, mean annual exposure (micrograms per cubic meter). Global Burden of Disease Study.
- Li, G., Fang, C., Wang, S., & Sun, S. (2016). The effect of economic growth, urbanization, and industrialization on fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(21), 11452-11459.
- Ma, Q., Cai, S., Wang, S., Zhao, B., Martin, R. V., Brauer, M., Cohen, A., Jiang, J., Zhou, W., Hao, J., Frostad, J., Forouzanfar, M. H., & Burnett, R. T. (2017). Impacts of coal burning on ambient PM2.5 pollution in China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17, 4477-4491.
- Musa, M., Rahman, P., Saha, S. K., Chen, Z., Ali, M. A. S., & Gao, Y. (2024). Cross-sectional analysis of socioeconomic drivers of PM2.5 pollution in emerging SAARC economies. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 16357.
- Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (Working Paper). University of Cambridge.
- Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
- Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.
- Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634.
- Sahoo, M., & Sethi, N. (2022). The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: Evidence from newly industrialized countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 4244-4277.
- Shanyazov, N., Rajabov, A., Masharipova, M., Rakhimova, S., Saidov, D., & Babajanov, J. (2025). CO₂ emissions in G20 economies: A dynamic panel analysis of economic and energy-sector drivers. Environmental Economics, 16(3), 29-40.
- Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419-1429.
- Sun, X., Chen, Z., & Loh, L. (2022). Exploring the effect of digital economy on PM2.5 pollution: The role of technological innovation in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, Article 904254.
- Ul-Haq, Z., Mehmood, U., Tariq, S., & Mariam, A. (2023). Defining the role of renewable energy, economic growth, globalization, energy consumption, and population growth on PM2.5 concentration: Evidence from South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 40008-40017.
- Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709-748.
- World Bank. (2025a). PM2.5 air pollution, mean annual exposure (micrograms per cubic meter) [EN.ATM.PM25.MC.M3]. The World Bank Group.
- World Bank. (2025b). Industry (including construction), value added (% of GDP) [NV.IND.TOTL.ZS]. The World Bank Group.
- World Bank. (2025c). Urban population (% of total population) [SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS]. World Development Indicators. The World Bank Group.
- World Bank. (2025d). GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$) [NY.GDP.PCAP.KD]. World Development Indicators. The World Bank Group.
- World Bank. (2025e). Energy use (kg of oil equivalent per capita) [EG.USE.PCAP.KG.OE]. World Development Indicators. The World Bank Group.
- World Bank. (2025f). Renewable energy consumption (% of total final energy consumption) [EG.FEC.RNEW.ZS]. World Development Indicators. The World Bank Group.


