Causal and nonlinear effects of digital financial inclusion on bank stability: Evidence from emerging and advanced economies

  • 9 Views
  • 2 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
Digital financial inclusion (DFI) has become a critical driver of sustainable growth and financial resilience in the digital era, yet its implications for bank stability remain ambiguous, particularly across heterogeneous institutional contexts. This study examines whether and under what conditions DFI fosters bank stability, using data from 65 emerging and advanced economies during 2010–2022. Employing Double Machine Learning (DML) and Causal Forests to address endogeneity and treatment heterogeneity, together with Panel Threshold Regression (PTR) to capture nonlinear dynamics, the paper provides a causal and structural assessment of the DFI–stability nexus. Results reveal that, on average, DFI exerts no statistically significant impact on bank stability across the full sample. However, substantial heterogeneity emerges in financially developed and institutionally strong economies, DFI significantly enhances stability (CATE = +0.0165, p < 0.001), while in underdeveloped systems it weakens it (CATE = –0.0082, p < 0.001). The PTR model identifies a critical DFI threshold (–1.3611), below which DFI undermines stability and above which its effect becomes neutral, confirming nonlinear regime behavior. These findings highlight that DFI alone cannot guarantee stability; its benefits materialize only within robust institutional and financial ecosystems. Methodologically, the integration of causal machine learning and threshold modeling offers a novel framework for examining digital finance policies and contributes to a deeper understanding of conditional digital effectiveness in modern banking systems.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Distribution of the bank stability indicator (ZSC)
    • Figure 2. Distribution of the bank stability indicator (ZSC) across country groups
    • Figure 3. Evolution of bank stability across country groups (2011–2022)
    • Figure 4. Evolution of digital financial inclusion across country groups (2011–2022)
    • Figure 5. Correlation matrix of key financial indicators
    • Figure 6. Distribution of conditional average treatment effects (CATE)
    • Figure 7. Mean conditional average treatment effect (CATE) by subgroup
    • Figure 8. Feature importances driving CATE – Causal Forest
    • Figure C1. CATE distribution by country type: developed vs. developing economies
    • Figure C2. CATE distribution by institutional quality (WGI) Figure C3. CATE distribution by financial development (FD)
    • Figure C3. CATE distribution by institutional quality (WGI)
    • Table 1. Heterogeneous conditional average treatment effects (CATE) by country characteristics
    • Table 2. Estimated effects of DFI below and above the threshold
    • Table 3. Robustness check – summary of regression results
    • Table A1. Principal component analysis results (DFI)
    • Table A2. Normalized weights for constructing the composite index (DFI)
    • Table A3. Principal component analysis results (WGI)
    • Table B1. Variable description, measurement, and data sources
    • Table D1. Country classification
    • Conceptualization
      Dien Vy Phan
    • Data curation
      Dien Vy Phan, Thuy Tu Pham
    • Formal Analysis
      Dien Vy Phan, Thuy Tu Pham
    • Methodology
      Dien Vy Phan, Thuy Tu Pham
    • Project administration
      Dien Vy Phan
    • Resources
      Dien Vy Phan, Thuy Tu Pham
    • Supervision
      Dien Vy Phan
    • Validation
      Dien Vy Phan, Thuy Tu Pham
    • Writing – original draft
      Dien Vy Phan, Thuy Tu Pham
    • Writing – review & editing
      Dien Vy Phan, Thuy Tu Pham
    • Software
      Thuy Tu Pham
    • Visualization
      Thuy Tu Pham