Evaluation of systematic risk, corporate governance, and cash holdings: evidence from Indonesia
-
Author(s)Musdalifah AzisLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1627-2513
,
Michael HadjaatLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7746-9662
,
Rositawati
,
Dio Caisar DarmaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3287-7670
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ed.20(1).2021.04
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2021, Issue #1, pp. 35-45
- 385 Views
-
140 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Profits that are calculated to finance unexpected cash need expedite management. This paper investigates the effect of corporate governance on cash holdings with systematic risk as a moderating variable. The population consists of companies from the property and real estate sectors listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during 2012–2020. Through the purposive sampling technique, the sample obtained 41 companies as the study object. Data analysis is focused on panel data and its interpretation through the Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). Hypothesis testing uses statistical terms at the 5% probability level. Important findings underline that corporate governance has a positive significant effect on cash holdings, while systematic risk has a negative insignificant effect. On the other hand, the moderation between corporate governance and cash holdings through systematic risk is positive significant. Systematic risk reflects the reliability of a stock; when the risk is higher, it tends to increase in cash flow situations, and investors prefer high-risk investments with the expectation of profit from returns. It is hoped that future contributions will serve as reference material for academics, government, and companies engaged in the financial service sector.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G11, G32, C24, G1
-
References27
-
Tables4
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Framework
- Figure 2. Cash holding average value of property and real estate sample companies in IDX
- Figure 3. Corporate governance average value of property and real estate sample companies in IDX
- Figure 4. Systematic risk average value of property and real estate sample companies in IDX
- Figure 5. Moderation average value of property and real estate sample companies in IDX
-
- Table 1. Sample criteria based on a purposive sampling technic
- Table 2. Estimated of variables
- Table 3. Review of descriptive statistics (n = 369)
- Table 4. Data panel regression analysis
-
- Acharya, V., Almeida, H., & Campello, M. (2013). Aggregate risk and the choice between cash and lines of credit. The Journal of Finance, 68(5), 2059–2116.
- Ajanthan, A., & Kumara, K. (2017). Corporate governance and cash holdings: empirical evidence from an emerging country, Sri Lanka. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 7(2), 112–128.
- Amess, K., Banerji, S., & Lampousis, A. (2015). Corporate cash holdings: causes and consequences. International Review of Financial Analysis, 42, 421–433.
- Azis, M., Amalia, S., & Darma, D. (2020). Information asymmetry, government ownership, and dividends from the building construction from Indonesia. Journal of Scientific Papers: Social Development and Security, 10(6), 3–8.
- Azis, M., Hidayati, T., & Adhimursandi, D. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance toward to equity return in banking: empirical from Indonesia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(3), 9525–9531.
- Cai, W., Zeng, C., Lee, E., & Ozkan, N. (2016). Do business groups affect corporate cash holdings? evidence from a transition economy. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(1), 1–24.
- Cheung, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and corporate cash holdings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 37, 412–430.
- Cruz, A., Kimura, H., & Sobreiro, V. (2019). What do we know about corporate cash holdings? A systematic analysis. Journal of Coorporate & Finance, 30(10), 77–143.
- Dittmar, A., & Mahrt-Smith, J. (2007). Corporate governance and the value of cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 83(3), 599–634.
- Ferreira, M., & Vilela, A. (2004). Why do firms hold cash? Evidence from EMU countries. European Financial Management, 10(2), 295–319.
- Gill, A., & Shah, C. (2012). Determinants of corporate cash holdings: evidence from Canada. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(1), 70–79.
- Gore, A. (2009). Why do cities hoard cash? Determinants and implications of municipal cash holdings. The Accounting Review, 84(1), 183–207.
- Harford, J., Mansi, S., & Maxwell, W. (2008). Corporate governance and firm cash holdings in the US. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(3), 535–555.
- Hsu, W., Huang, Y., & Lai, G. (2014). Corporate governance and cash holdings: evidence from the U.S. property–liability insurance industry. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 82(3), 715–748.
- IDX (2020). Daftar saham (List of shares).
- Ikbal, M., Irwansyah, I., Paminto, A., Ulfah, Y., & Darma, D. (2020). Explores the specific context of financial statement fraud based on empirical from Indonesia. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 8(2), 29–40.
- Indriastuti, H., Kasuma, J., Zainurossalamia, S., Darma, D., & Sawangchai, A. (2020). Achieving marketing performance through acculturative product advantages: the case of sarong Samarinda. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 13(1), 241–261.
- Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
- Jogiyanto, J. (2008). Analisis dan desain sistem informasi: pendekatan terstruktur, teori, dan praktek aplikasi bisnis [Information systems analysis and design: structured approaches, theory, and practice of business applications]. Yogyakarta: Andi.
- Khan, A., Bibi, M., & Tanveer, S. (2016). The impact of corporate governance on cash holdings: a comparative study of the manufacturing and service industry. Journal Financial Studies, 20(3), 40–79.
- Manzaneque, M., Priego, A., & Merino, E. (2016). Corporate governance effect on financial distress likelihood: Evidence from Spain. Revista de Contabilidad, 19(1), 111–121.
- Muliadi, M., Darma, D., & Kasuma, J. (2020). MSMEs as mediation in the effects of investment credit, interest rates, and labor on economic growth: evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 9(2), 1–12.
- Ngoc, H., Thuy, V., & Duy, H. (2020). The sensitivity of cash flows to cash holdings: case studies at Vietnamese enterprises. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(1), 266–276.
- Ozordi, E., Adetula, D., Eluyela, D., Aina, A., & Ogabi, M. (2019). Corporate dynamism and cash holding decision in listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(4), 1–12.
- Palazzo, B. (2012). Cash holdings, risk, and expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(1), 162–185.
- Spriestersbach, A., Röhrig, B., du Prel, J., Gerhold-Ay, A., & Blettner, M. (2009). Descriptive statistics: the specification of statistical measures and their presentation in tables and graphs. Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 106(36), 578–583.
- Tong, Z. (2008). Firm diversification and the value of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(3), 741–758ю
-
Perceived health risk, online retail ethics, and consumer behavior within online shopping during the COVID-19 pandemic
Yuniarti Fihartini ,
Arief Helmi ,
Meydia Hassan ,
Yevis Marty Oesman
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(3).2021.02
Innovative Marketing Volume 17, 2021 Issue #3 pp. 17-29 Views: 3943 Downloads: 1525 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe risk of virus contracting during the COVID-19 pandemic has changed consumer preference for online shopping to meet their daily needs than shopping in brick-and-mortar stores. Online shopping presents a different environment, atmosphere, and experience. The possibility of ethical violations is higher during online than face-to-face transactions. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the influence of perceived health risk and customer perception of online retail ethics on consumer online shopping behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, involving seven variables, namely perceived health risk, security, privacy, non-deception, reliability fulfillment, service recovery, and online shopping behavior. The data were collected through an online survey by employing the purposive sampling technique to a consumer who has shopped online during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. 315 valid responses were obtained and analyzed through quantitative method using SEM-Amos. The results showed that perceived health risk and four variables of online retail ethics including security, privacy, reliability fulfillment, and service recovery affected online shopping behavior. Meanwhile, non-deception was found to have an insignificant effect. The coefficient value proved perceived health risk to be more dominant in influencing online shopping behavior than the variables of online retail ethics. Thus, consumers pay more concern for their health during online shopping. However, positive consumer perceptions of the behavior of online retail websites in providing services also can encourage consumers to shop online during this pandemic.
-
Positive contribution of the good corporate governance rating to stability and performance: evidence from Indonesia
RR. Iramani , Muazaroh Muazaroh , Abdul Mongid
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.01
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 1-11 Views: 2984 Downloads: 251 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis paper aims to examine the impact of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) practice on bank stability and performance. Governance is measured using the GCG rating that covers eleven aspects. The authors apply instrumental regression to link governance to performance and stability. The study covers a sample of 150 banks. The result shows that bank stability can mediate bank governance and bank performance. On the determinant of bank performance, it can be concluded that the GCG rating is positive and directly influences bank performance. Bank stability is also positive for bank performance indicating the indirect contribution of the GCG rating to bank performance. NPL, LDR, CAR and bank’s size (LASSET) are all negative and significant. The aim of this paper is to provide strong empirical evidence on the importance of governance and stability for performance. The limitations of this paper are the size of the sample and that it only covers public banks which are theoretically required to apply better governance in all aspects of their business by the Capital Market Authority.
-
Human resource management in promoting innovation and organizational performance
I Gede Riana ,
Gede Suparna ,
I Gusti Made Suwandana ,
Sebastian Kot ,
Ismi Rajiani
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.10
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #1 pp. 107-118 Views: 2966 Downloads: 667 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯHuman resource management (HRM) is one of the elements enabling an organization to remain competitive in turbulence conditions. The effective practice of HRM makes competent and innovative employees contributing to the achievement of organizational objectives. This study aims to analyze HRM practices in creating innovation and organizational performance. The questionnaire was used to measure the respondents’ perceptions of variables used by a Likert scale. A survey of 126 manager samples and middle managers at export-oriented short and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Bali, Indonesia, was conducted to test the model. The analysis has shown that the proposed model was proven to be compliant with the research hypotheses. HRM significantly affects organizational performance and innovation, and it was found out that innovation can improve organizational performance. However, in the process of simultaneous testing, it was found out that innovation cannot improve organizational performance. The lack of attention to investments in human resources became one of the barriers to SMEs in creating innovation.
