Responsible production in Kazakhstan’s manufacturing sector: An empirical assessment of environmental, operational, and social drivers
-
Author(s)Aknur ZhidebekkyzyLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-547X
,
Aisulu MoldabekovaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4330-5595
,
Yuriy BilanLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0268-009X
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.16(2).2025.09
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2025, Issue #2, pp. 119-133
- 40 Views
-
7 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The study analyzes the implementation of responsible production practices in Kazakhstan’s manufacturing sector, an area of growing importance for sustainable development in emerging economies. The aim is to examine how environmental, operational, and social factors influence production processes and community contributions. Data were collected through an online survey conducted between May and August 2024, using a voluntary response sampling method. To enhance the representativeness of the findings, the sectoral distribution of the responding enterprises was analyzed post-collection. The survey captured top, middle, and line management responses to comprehensively assess sustainability practices. Structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed to evaluate the relationships between ecological operational efficiency, environmental protection, resource efficiency, waste management, social factors, product manufacturing, and community contribution. The findings reveal that environmental protection, efficient resource use, and effective waste management significantly strengthen manufacturing performance and enhance companies’ contributions to community development. In contrast, improvements in ecological operational efficiency and workplace social initiatives do not directly impact production outcomes. The study concludes that integrating sustainable environmental and resource management practices into production processes is crucial for enhancing both manufacturing performance and broader societal outcomes. The findings offer practical implications for industrial managers, policymakers, and stakeholders aiming to promote sustainability transitions in manufacturing sectors.
Acknowledgment
This study was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. AP19576593).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q56, L60, M14, O13
-
References45
-
Tables10
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model
- Figure 2. Structural model and path coefficients
-
- Table 1. Latent variables and key indicators based on the literature
- Table 2. Companies’ characteristics
- Table 3. Reliability and validity measures
- Table 4. Correlation matrix of constructs
- Table 5. Path coefficients and significance testing
- Table 6. Hypotheses testing
- Table 7. Indirect effects
- Table 8. Direct effects
- Table A1. Questionnaire elements
- Table B1. Descriptive statistics
-
- Adae, E. K., Kosiba, J. P. B., Hinson, R. E., Twum, K. K., Newman, N., & Nutsugah, F. F. (2021). An introduction to responsible management: A corporate social responsibility, green marketing, and sustainability management perspective. In E.K. Adae, J.P.B. Kosiba, R.E. Hinson, K.K. Twum, N. Newman, & F.F. Nutsugah (Eds.), Responsible Management in Emerging Markets (pp. 1-34). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Alayón, C., Säfsten, K., & Johansson, G. (2017). Conceptual sustainable production principles in practice: Do they reflect what companies do? Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 693-701.
- Ali, W., Frynas, J. G., & Mahmood, Z. (2017). Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in Developed and Developing countries: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 273-294.
- Amos, G. J. (2018). Researching corporate social responsibility in developing-countries context: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(2), 284-310.
- Arli, D. I., & Lasmono, H. K. (2010). Consumers’ perception of corporate social responsibility in a developing country. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(1), 46-51.
- Awan, U., Sroufe, R., & Shahbaz, M. (2021). Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A literature review and recommendations for future research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 2038-2060.
- Baltabayeva, A., Altalbayeva, Z., Shelomentseva, V., Mutallyapova, S., & Allmkhanova, R. (2024). Promotion of the principles of corporate social responsibility and their implementation by large businesses in Kazakhstan. Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 18(1), 172-186.
- Baranowski, M., & Kopnina, H. (2022). Socially responsible consumption: Between social welfare and degrowth. Economics & Sociology, 15(3), 319-335.
- Boubakri, N., Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., & Wang, H. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in emerging market economies: Determinants, consequences, and future research directions. Emerging Markets Review, 46, Article 100758.
- Camilleri, M. A. (2017). The rationale for responsible supply chain management and stakeholder engagement. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(1), 111-126.
- Cezarino, L. O., Liboni, L. B., Hunter, T., Pacheco, L. M., & Martins, F. P. (2022). Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets: Opportunities and challenges for sustainability integration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, Article 132224.
- Colapinto, C., Jayaraman, R., & La Torre, D. (2020). A goal programming model to study the impact of R&D expenditures on sustainability-related criteria: The case of Kazakhstan. Management Decision, 58(11), 2497-2512.
- Ferrazzi, M., & Tueske, A. (2022). Small and medium enterprises in emerging economies: The Achilles’ heel of corporate ESG responsibility practices? (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 10065). World Bank.
- Gomez-Trujillo, A. M., Velez-Ocampo, J., Castrillon-Orrego, S. A., Alvarez-Vanegas, A., & Manotas, E. C. (2021). Responsible patterns of production and consumption: The race for the achievement of SDGs in emerging markets. AD-Minister, (38), 93-120.
- Guo, W., Zhou, J., Yu, C., Tsai, S., Xue, Y., Chen, Q., Guo, J., Huang, P., & Wu, C. (2015). Evaluating the green corporate social responsibility of manufacturing corporations from a green industry law perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 665-674.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Hens, L., Block, C., Cabello-Eras, J., Sagastume-Gutierez, A., Garcia-Lorenzo, D., Chamorro, C., Mendoza, K. H., Haeseldonckx, D., & Vandecasteele, C. (2018). On the evolution of “Cleaner Production” as a concept and a practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3323-3333.
- Huatuco, L. H., & Ball, P. D. (2019). The quest for achieving United Nations sustainability development goals (SDGs): Infrastructure and innovation for responsible production and consumption. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(3), 357-362.
- Hussain, W., Ong, T., Kamarudin, F., Khan, M. A., & Bács, Z. (2024). ESG disclosure, firm internationalization, and firm financial performance: Evidence from Asia-Pacific. Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 240-261.
- Jayashree, S., Reza, M. N. H., & Mohiuddin, M. (2021). Impact of cleaner production and environmental management systems on sustainability: The Moderating Role of Industry 4.0. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 795(1), Article 012013.
- Kalmakova, D. T., Moldabekova, A. T., & Amangeldiyeva, B. A. (2023). Decoupling economy from natural resources consumption and environmental pressure: Analysis of Kazakhstani case. The Journal of Economic Research & Business Administration, 145(3), 57-73.
- Kontautienė, R., Stravinskas, T., & Barkauskas, V. (2024). Forecasts of sustainable consumption in small economies. Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 9-37.
- Lebel, L., & Lorek, S. (2008). Enabling sustainable production-consumption systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33(1), 241-275.
- Liu, F., Lai, K., & Cai, W. (2021). Responsible production for sustainability: Concept analysis and bibliometric review. Sustainability, 13(3), Article 1275.
- McNeill, L. (2020). Transitioning to responsible consumption and production. MDPI eBooks.
- Mishchuk, H., Bilan Y., Androniceanu, A., & Krol, V. (2023). Social capital: Evaluating its roles in competitiveness and ensuring human development. Journal of Competitiveness, 15(2), 1-17.
- Nash, H. A. (2009). The European Commission’s sustainable consumption and production and sustainable industrial policy action plan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(4), 496-498.
- Orazayeva, A., & Arslan, M. (2021). Development of corporate social responsibility framework for developing countries: The case of Kazakhstan. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Potluri, R. M., Batima, Y., & Madiyar, K. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: A study of Kazakhstan corporate sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 6(1), 33-44.
- Puma-Flores, M., & Rosa-Díaz, I. M. (2024). Promoting sustainable agri-food systems through sustainability and responsible marketing: The case of Peruvian companies at international trade shows. Journal of Cleaner Production, 448, Article 141568.
- Rodríguez-Fernández, M., Gaspar-González, A. I., & Sánchez-Teba, E. M. (2020). Sustainable social responsibility through stakeholders engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2425-2436.
- Sabden, O., Kozhakhmetova, A., Zhidebekkyzy, A., & Turdalina, S. (2020). The impact of organizational support on project efficiency: Evidence from Kazakhstan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(4), 203-212.
- Sáez-Martínez, F. J., Lefebvre, G., Hernández, J. J., & Clark, J. H. (2016). Drivers of sustainable cleaner production and sustainable energy options. Journal of Cleaner Production, 138, 1-7.
- Sánchez-García, E., Martínez-Falcó, J., Marco-Lajara, B., & Zakimova, A. (2025). Achieving environmentally responsible production through green managerial awareness, human resource management and employee behavior. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, Article 123739.
- Shakoor, A., & Ahmed, R. (2023). The environmental sustainable development goals and economic growth: An empirical investigation of selected SAARC countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(54), 116018-116038.
- Spaargaren, G. (2011). Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture: Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 813-822.
- Stahl, G. K., Miska, C., Puffer, S. M., & McCarthy, D. J. (2016). Responsible global leadership in emerging markets. In Advances in Global Leadership (vol. 9, pp. 79-106). Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Thanh, N., Hens, L., Chamorro, C., & Lan, T. D. (2016). The widening concept of “cleaner production”. Cultura Educación Y Sociedad, 7(2), 9-25.
- Tsai, S., Xue, Y., Huang, P., Zhou, J., Li, G., Guo, W., Lau, H., & Shang, Z. (2015). Establishing a criteria system for green production. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 229(8), 1395-1406.
- Vázquez-Burguete, J. L., Lanero-Carrizo, A., Sahelices-Pinto, C., Vázquez-García, J. L., & Vázquez-García, J. M. (2023). Responsible production and consumption as a requirement for sustainable development. SHS Web of Conferences, 176, Article 02001.
- Veleva, V., & Ellenbecker, M. (2001). Indicators of sustainable production: Framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(6), 519-549.
- Zhaksybayeva, N., Serikkyzy, A., Baktymbet, A., & Yousafzai, S. (2024). Circular shifts: insights into Kazakhstan’s circular business ecosystem. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1).
- Zhidebekkyzy, A., Moldabekova, A., Amangeldiyeva, B., & Streimikis, J. (2022a). Assessment of factors influencing pro-circular behavior of a population. Economics & Sociology, 15(3), 202-215.
- Zhidebekkyzy, A., Temerbulatova, Z., & Bilan, Y. (2022b). The improvement of the waste management system in Kazakhstan: Impact evaluation. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 25(2), 423-439.
- Zhidebekkyzy, A., Temerbulatova, Z., Kotaskova, A., & Németh, P. (2024). Catalysing responsible production: Evaluating the impact of EPR system on manufacturing enterprises. Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 178-190.
-
Financial sector and manufacturing sector performance: evidence from Nigeria
Abiola John Asaleye ,
Joseph Ibrahim Adama ,
Joseph Olufemi Ogunjobi
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(3).2018.03
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #3 pp. 35-48 Views: 2706 Downloads: 402 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯNigerian economy depends on oil as the major source of revenue, failure to diversify the revenue base has raised questions about its sustainability and implication on the economy. This study uses market capitalization, broad money stock, credit to private sector, prime interest rate and deposit liability as proxies for the financial sector, while output in the manufacturing sector and manufacturing employment are used as proxies for manufacturing performance. The study examines the causal effects, shock effect and long-run impact using Granger Non-Causality, Vector Error Correction Model, and Dynamic Ordinary Least Square method, respectively. The results showed unidirectional causality, confirming the hypothesis of the ‘supply-leading view’ and ‘demand-following view’ except for market capitalization and output in the manufacturing sector, where independence was observed. The variance decomposition shows that the forecast error shock of credit to private sector and prime interest rate show more variations in manufacturing sector performance than other financial indicators. The long-run result using output in manufacturing sector as dependent variable shows a positive significant relationship with other financial sector indicators, except for broad money stock and deposit liability. This study recommended credit channel for transmission of monetary policy using interest rate to improve the performance of manufacturing sector, among others.
-
Factors influencing the legal regulation and management of education system in Kazakhstan: a review and analysis
Zulfiya Movkebayeva ,
Dana Khamitova ,
Aibarsha Zholtayeva ,
Venera Balmagambetova ,
Kairat Balabiyev
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.02
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #4 pp. 14-24 Views: 1764 Downloads: 241 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯNowadays, the modernization of the education system is the basis of dynamic sustainable economic development and citizens’ well-being. The key agent for the implementation of educational policy and the developer of the legal framework governing the functioning of the educational sphere is the state and its bodies. The Kazakhstani state policy’s main priorities in the field of education are formulated in several strategic documents. Using the review approach, this article examines the current state of public policy and legal regulation in Kazakhstan’s education sector. The article analyzes key documents that define the contours and content of the main directions of public policy and legal regulation. This article attempts to identify, review, and analyze the legal characteristics of the key process and factors existing in the legal field of Kazakhstani education, such as “Bologna factor,” “soviet legacy,” “provision of quality,” etc. The article concludes that the existing legal tools do not fully comply with law enforcement practice. The interpretations of some legal acts are somewhat different, which causes difficulties for actors providing educational services. Based on the result of the analysis, the article provides the main recommendations for improving legislation in education.
Acknowledgment
This article was written under grant from Kazakhstan Ministry of Education and Science No. АР05135081 “Student with disabilities and distance education learning environment: socio-practical and legal dimensions” coordinated by Prof. Dr Zulfiya Movkebayeva (Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University). -
Sustainable development and sharing economy: A bibliometric analysis
Ruihui Pu ,
Xiang Li ,
Pujiayi Chen
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(4).2021.01
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021 Issue #4 pp. 1-19 Views: 1333 Downloads: 506 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯSustainability promotes a feasible strategy to achieve a continuous development of the economy, society, and environment. This study aims to analyze the growing efforts on researches made by academic communities in exploring the sharing economy as a potential approach to promote sustainable development. A bibliometric approach with VOSviewer and COOC analysis was applied. A total number of 975 published articles were analyzed in this study. As a result, it was found that few studies have shed light on collaborative and sustainable consumption, climate change, and bioeconomy in the sharing economy by country, such as renewable resources and business models, circular economy in China, and life cycle assessment, particularly taking evidence from the urban mobility services in China. It was also revealed that there is a new indiscipline research trend in the field of sustainable development such as sustainable business models, game theory, blue economy, peer-to-peer accommodation, smart grids, and electric vehicles. Other trend concentrates on technological advancements and policies to promote sustainable development in the sharing economy.
