Financial slack, CSR disclosure, and carbon emission disclosure: The moderating role of independent commissioners in Indonesian energy firms
-
Author(s)Djenni SasmitaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8673-2919
,
Agus Ismaya HasanudinLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9389-6330
,
Imam Abu HanifahLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2383-7984
,
Yeni JanuarsiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6619-486X
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.16(3).2025.07
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2025, Issue #3, pp. 100-111
- 50 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Climate change has increasingly pressured companies to enhance their environmental accountability through carbon emission disclosure. The energy sector, as one of the largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, plays a critical role in addressing this issue. This study investigates the influence of financial slack and corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure on carbon emission disclosure, while also examining the moderating role of independent commissioners. The sample consists of 23 energy companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2019 to 2023, selected through purposive sampling. Using multiple regression analysis with STATA 17, the findings reveal that financial slack has no significant effect on carbon emission disclosure, indicating that the availability of financial resources alone does not drive firms to disclose environmental information. In contrast, CSR disclosure positively and significantly affects carbon emission disclosure, showing that broader CSR practices encourage higher transparency in carbon-related reporting. Furthermore, the moderating role of independent commissioners presents mixed results: they strengthen the relationship between financial slack and carbon emission disclosure, but do not significantly moderate the link between CSR disclosure and carbon emission disclosure. The novelty of this study lies in integrating financial slack, CSR disclosure, and corporate governance mechanisms within the context of carbon disclosure in Indonesia’s energy sector. The results highlight the importance of CSR as a strategic driver of environmental transparency, while demonstrating that governance oversight is crucial in channeling financial flexibility toward sustainable reporting.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G32, O16
-
References45
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Sampled companies in the energy sector
- Table 2. Descriptive statistical analysis
- Table 3. Regression results
-
- Alfani, G. A., & Diyanty, V. (2019). Determinants of carbon emission disclosure. Journal of Economics, 22(3), 333-346.
- Amaliyah, I., & Solikhah, B. (2019). Pengaruh kinerja lingkungan dan karakteristik corporate governance terhadap pengungkapan emisi karbon [The influence of environmental performance and corporate governance characteristics on carbon emission disclosure]. Journal of Economic, Management, Accounting and Technology, 2(2), 129-141. (In Indonesian).
- An, Y., Sheng, X., Zhu, X., & Zhang, Q. (2025). The role of financial flexibility in sustainable development performance of SRDI enterprises. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 34(1), 78-101.
- Andrian, T. (2020). Linking corporate carbon emission, social responsibility disclosure and firm financial performance. TEST Engineering & Management, 83, 22356-22366.
- Andrian, T., & Sudibyo, Y. A. (2019). Disclosure effect of carbon emission and corporate social responsibility to financial performance. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 10(12).
- Apriani, N. L., Musmini, L. S., & Werastuti D. N. S. (2025). The influence of financial slack and gender board diversity on the quality of sustainability report disclosure with board of commissioners’ effectiveness as a moderating variable. Eduvest – Journal of Universal Studies, 5(3), 3211-3226.
- Aryani, D. N., & Hussainey, K. (2017). The determinants of risk disclosure in the Indonesian non-listed banks. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 10(1), 58-66.
- Asyifa, D. A., & Burhany, D. I. (2022). Carbon emission disclosure and environmental performance effect on firm value. International Journal of Arts and Social Science, 5(7), 193-203.
- Bebchuk, L. A., & Hamdani, A. (2017). Independent directors and controlling shareholders. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(6), 1271-1315.
- Coelho, R., Jayantilal, S., & Ferreira, J. J. (2023). The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), 1535-1560.
- Csutora, M., & Harangozo, G. (2017). Twenty years of carbon accounting and auditing – A review and outlook. Society and Economy, 39(4), 459-480.
- Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2), 233-262.
- Hamidah, H., Ahmad, G. N., & Aulia, R. (2015). Effect of intellectual capital, capital structure and managerial ownership toward firm value of manufacturing sector companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) period 2010–2014. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Sains Indonesia (JRMSI), 6(2), 558-578.
- Hanaya, S. A. V., & Suhartini, D. (2025). The effect of corporate ownership structure on corporate social responsibility disclosure through the independent board of commissioners as a moderating variable. Eduvest – Journal of Universal Studies, 5(8), 9576-9589.
- Hardiyansah, M., Agustini, A. T., & Purnamawati, I. (2021). The effect of carbon emission disclosure on firm value: Environmental performance and industrial type. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 123-133.
- Hasnan, S., Zaibidai Ad, M. Z. Z. A., Danial Mohd Farmy, M. H., Irfan Anuar, M., Mohd Nazri, M. Z., & Shaifuddin, A.R.M. (2023). Factors affecting corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting: A literature review. Accounting and Finance Research, 12(4).
- He, Y., Tang, Q., & Wang, K. (2013). Carbon disclosure, carbon performance, and cost of capital. China Journal of Accounting Studies, 1(3-4), 190-220.
- Hu, Y., Chen, S., Shao, Y., & Gao, S. (2018). CSR and firm value: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 10(12), Article 4597.
- Jeanette, R., & Eriandani, R. (2021). CSR disclosure quality and quantity: Do corporate governance and multinationality matters? Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 24(2), 220-232.
- Kabir, M., Habiba, U. E., Khan, W., Shah, A., Rahim, S., los Rios-Escalante, P. R. D., Farooqi, Z.-R., Ali, L., & Shafiq, M. (2023). Climate change due to increasing concentration of carbon dioxide and its impacts on environment in 21st century; A mini review. Journal of King Saud University – Science, 35(5), Article 102693.
- Kholmi, M., Karsono, A. D. S., & Syam, D. (2020). Environmental performance, company size, profitability, and carbon emission disclosure. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 10(2).
- Kılıç, M., & Kuzey, C. (2019). The effect of corporate governance on carbon emission disclosures: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 11(1), 35-53.
- Kim, S. I., Shin, H., Shin, H., & Park, S. (2019). Organizational slack, corporate social responsibility, sustainability, and integrated reporting: Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 11(16), Article 4445.
- Li, D., Cao, C., Zhang, L., Chen, X., Ren, S., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Effects of corporate environmental responsibility on financial performance: The moderating role of government regulation and organizational slack. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 1323-1334.
- Lu, J., & Wang, J. (2021). Corporate governance, law, culture, environmental performance and CSR disclosure: A global perspective. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 70, Article 101264.
- Machokoto, M., Chipeta, C., Aftab, N., & Areneke, G. (2021). The financial conservatism of firms in emerging economies. Research in International Business and Finance, 58, Article 101483.
- Mahardika, R. P. P. P., & Kawedar, W. (2019). Pengaruh faktor-faktor ekonomi greenhouse gas emission disclosure dan pengaruhnya terhadap reaksi saham [The influence of economic factors on greenhouse gas emission disclosure and its effect on stock reactions]. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 8(3), 1-11. (In Indonesian).
- Mason, C., & Simmons, J. (2014). Embedding corporate social responsibility in corporate governance: A stakeholder systems approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 77-86.
- Milne, J. E. (2024). Environmental taxation and ESG: Silent partners. In R. Saraiva & P.A. Pardal (Eds.), Sustainable Finances and the Law. Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship (vol. 16, pp. 253-279). Cham: Springer.
- Pratiwi, D. N. (2017). Pengaruh stakeholder terhadap carbon emission disclosure [Stakeholder influence on carbon emission disclosure]. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 2(1), 288-300. (In Indonesian).
- Qian, W., & Schaltegger, S. (2017). Revisiting carbon disclosure and performance: Legitimacy and management views. The British Accounting Review, 49(4), 365-379.
- Qian, W., Burritt, R. L., & Monroe, G. S. (2018). Environmental management accounting in local government: Functional and institutional imperatives. Financial Accountability & Management, 34(2), 148-165.
- Román, C. C., Zorio-Grima, A., & Merello, P. (2021). Economic development and CSR assurance: Important drivers for carbon reporting… Yet inefficient drivers for carbon management? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, Article 120424.
- Shakil, M. H., Tasnia, M., & Mostafiz, M. I. (2020). Board gender diversity and environmental, social and governance performance of US banks: Moderating role of environmental, social and corporate governance controversies. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(4), 661-677.
- Suryani, R., & Wijayati, F. L. (2019). Large determinant of greenhouse gas emissions disclosure in Indonesia. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 4(2), 101-117.
- Susanto, A., Novita, N., & Fambudi, I. N. (2024). The role of independent board of commissioners: A study ownership on ESG disclosure. Akurasi: Jurnal Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 7(2), 443-462.
- Tarjo, T., Anggono, A., Yuliana, R., Prasetyono, P., Syarif, M., Wildan, M. A., & Kusufi, M. S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility, financial fraud, and firm’s value in Indonesia and Malaysia. Heliyon, 8(12).
- Velte, P., Stawinoga, M., & Lueg, R. (2020). Carbon performance and disclosure: A systematic review of governance-related determinants and financial consequences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, Article 120063.
- Walls, J. L., & Berrone, P. (2017). The power of one to make a difference: how informal and formal CEO power affect environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 293-308.
- Yan, H., Li, X., Huang, Y., & Li, Y. (2020). The impact of the consistency of carbon performance and carbon information disclosure on enterprise value. Finance Research Letters, 37, Article 101680.
- Yang, L., Qin, H., Xia, W., Gan, Q., Li, L., Su, J., & Yu, X. (2021). Resource slack, environmental management maturity and enterprise environmental protection investment: An enterprise life cycle adjustment perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 309, Article 127339.
- Yao, S., Hong, Y., & Lın, C. (2023). Environmental information disclosure and the investment-cash flow sensitivity. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 12(1), 15-24.
- Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., Ji, Q., Lucey, B., & Liu, J. (2021). Board characteristics, external governance and the use of renewable energy: International evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 72, Article 101317.
- Zhang, Y., Wei, Y., & Zhou, G. (2018). Promoting firms’ energy-saving behavior: The role of institutional pressures, top management support and financial slack. Energy Policy, 115, 230-238.
- Zhang, Y., Zhou, W., & Liu, M. (2022). Driving factors of enterprise energy-saving and emission reduction behaviors. Energy, 256, Article 124685.
-
The effect of Lerner Index and income diversification on the general bank stability in Indonesia
Syahyunan ,
Iskandar Muda ,
Hasan Sakti Siregar ,
Isfenti Sadalia ,
Gerry Chandra
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.12(4).2017.05
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 12, 2017 Issue #4 pp. 56-64 Views: 1753 Downloads: 436 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe purpose of this study is to examine the effect of market power and income diversification on the General Bank stability in Indonesia. This research uses a data sample of 20 general banks listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2011–2014. Data analysis technique used is Multiple Linear Regression. It can be concluded simultaneously that market power and revenue diversification have significant effect on bank stability and, partially, market power has a positive and significant effect on a bank stability. Income diversification has a positive non-significant effect on bank stability.
-
The determinants of Islamic governance disclosure: the case of Indonesian Islamic banks
Ahmad Nurkhin 
,
Agus Wahyudin ,
Hasan Mukhibad ,
Fachrurrozie ,
Satsya Yoga Baswara
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(4).2019.14
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 14, 2019 Issue #4 pp. 143-152 Views: 1147 Downloads: 319 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis paper aims to examine the determinants of Islamic Governance Disclosure (IGD) in Islamic banks in Indonesia. The research method used is a quantitative approach involving Islamic commercial banks in Indonesia, where their annual reports can be accessed during the 2011–2018 observation period. The data collection methods used are analysis of documentation and content analysis. Content analysis was used to calculate the IGD index. Path analysis with WarpPLS software was used to analyze data. The results show that the number of members of the Sharia supervisory board had a negative and significant effect on IGD, while leverage, size, and age can influence the IGD positively and significantly. In addition, institutional ownership has a negative and significant effect on IGD. Profitability and composition of the independent board of commissioners do not significantly affect the IGD.
-
Is gender diversity good for the quality of accruals in Indonesia?
Robiyanto ,
Andreas Lako ,
Angelina Ika Rahutami
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(1).2022.08
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 20, 2022 Issue #1 pp. 80-92 Views: 1090 Downloads: 580 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThere is no regulation in emerging markets, i.e. Indonesia imposing the gender diversity quota. Therefore, based on the different characteristics and attributes between developed and emerging markets, this study aims to analyze the impact of the boardroom’s gender diversity on the quality of accruals, i.e. earnings in big Indonesian firms. This study used a sample of 100 big manufacturing firms in Indonesia. Moreover, this paper utilized a widely used proxy for the quality of earnings and the boardroom’s gender diversity. Data panel with fixed effect method was used to compute the quality of accruals while path analysis was utilized for hypotheses testing. Furthermore, the results showed evidence that the boardroom’s gender diversity indirectly influenced the quality of accruals through cash flow variability. However, the presence of female directors is not a significant inducement for managers to report better quality of earnings. The managerial implication of this study is that the boardroom’s gender diversity is good for the emerging markets since it supports better accounting accruals indirectly. Future studies should incorporate many industries and consider the potential of endogeneity, which has not been tackled in this paper.
