Green accounting research: A comparative bibliometric analysis of global and Indonesian studies
-
Author(s)Surna LastriLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9602-9446
,
SyamsidarLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8859-7502
,
Intan Rizkia QudriLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4193-8295
,
Williams ChiariLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8305-2997
,
Emmi Suryani NasutionLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7497-3765
,
Raida FuadiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4852-5711
,
LindaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0235-6089
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.16(4).2025.03
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2025, Issue #4, pp. 30-51
- 17 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Green accounting has become an increasingly crucial research field due to its significance in addressing climate change. While global studies in this field have expanded extensively, contributions from Indonesia-affiliated researchers remain relatively underexplored, much to Indonesia’s detriment, given its vast natural resources and existing environmental challenges. This study employs a bibliometric analysis to explore trends, impact, and collaboration patterns in green accounting studies globally, with a specific comparison of Indonesia-affiliated publications. A comprehensive analysis utilizing the retrieved dataset from the Scopus database was conducted to identify key research clusters and to highlight relevant topics such as carbon accounting, sustainability, environmental performance, and the integration of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into corporate policies. Network visualizations using VosViewer were constructed to examine the landscape of green accounting both globally and within Indonesia-affiliated research, aiming to compare global research with that linked to Indonesia. Global research covers broader topics surrounding carbon accounting, sustainability, environmental performance, the integration of ESG factors into corporate policies, and life cycle assessment. Meanwhile, Indonesia-affiliated research is more concentrated, focusing on topics such as financial/environmental performance and forestry issues. This study suggests that Indonesia-affiliated research would benefit from diversifying its focus toward globally emerging or established topics such as sustainable practices, carbon management, and the global sustainability reporting standards to enhance its academic visibility and relevance.
view full abstract
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M41, Q56, Q01
-
References93
-
Tables7
-
Figures8
-
- Figure 1. Publication trend of green accounting studies from the global dataset
- Figure 2. Publication trend of green accounting studies from the Indonesia-affiliated dataset
- Figure 3. Thematic map of green accounting studies from global (a) and Indonesia-affiliated datasets (b)
- Figure 4. Thematic evolution of green accounting studies from global (a) and Indonesia-affiliated datasets (b)
- Figure 5. (a) Network visualization of global green accounting keywords (weights: occurrences) and (b) Density visualization of global green accounting keywords (weights: occurrences)
- Figure 6. (a) Network visualization of Indonesia-affiliated green accounting keywords (weights: occurrences) and (b) Density visualization of Indonesia-affiliated green accounting keywords (weights: occurrences)
- Figure 7. Green accounting trends among institutions in global (A) and Indonesia-affiliated datasets (B)
- Figure 8. Network visualizations of co-authorship countries for the green accounting research based on global (a) and Indonesia-affiliated datasets (b)
-
- Table 1. Completeness of metadata of publication datasets on the global green accounting studies
- Table 2. Completeness of metadata of publication datasets on the Indonesia-affiliated green accounting studies
- Table 3. Document type of green accounting research (1975–2023)
- Table 4. Top 10 most cited globally published articles on green accounting
- Table 5. Top 10 most cited published Indonesia-affiliated articles on green accounting
- Table 6. Clusters of trending green accounting studies
- Table 7. Clusters of trending Indonesia-affiliated green accounting studies
-
- Agus, C., Putra, P. B., Kusumaningrum, A. P., Hasanah, N. A. I., & Cahyanti, P. A. B. (2021). Climate change and sustainable development goals program in Indonesia. In W. Leal Filho, J. Luetz, & D. Ayal (Eds.), Handbook of Climate Change Management: Research, Leadership, Transformation (pp. 3865-3886). Cham: Springer.
- Ahad, A. (2023). Green accounting: A new revolution. BULLET: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 2(5), 1158-1167.
- Ahmed, Z., Caglar, A. E., & Murshed, M. (2022). A path towards environmental sustainability: The role of clean energy and democracy in ecological footprint of Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, Article 132007.
- Al Frijat, Y., Altawalbeh, M., & Al-Hajaia, M. (2025). The role of environmental sustainability as a mediator in the relationship between green accounting and corporate performance in Jordan. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(2), 236-251.
- Al-Naser, K. H. Y., Riyadh, H. A., & Albalaki, F. M. M. (2021). The impact of environmental and social costs disclosure on financial performance mediating by earning management. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 23(2), 50-64.
- Andrian, T., Murwaningsari, E., & Sudibyo, Y.A. (2023). Factors influencing carbon management accounting adoption in Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 18(6), 1919-1928.
- Anees, S. A., Mehmood, K., Khan, W. R., Sajjad, M., Alahmadi, T. A., Alharbi, S. A., & Luo, M. (2024). Integration of machine learning and remote sensing for above ground biomass estimation through Landsat-9 and field data in temperate forests of the Himalayan region. Ecological Informatics, 82, Article 102732.
- Aryapratama, R., & Pauliuk, S. (2022). Life cycle carbon emissions of different land conversion and woody biomass utilization scenarios in Indonesia. Science of the Total Environment, 805, Article 150226.
- Asiaei, K., Bontis, N. Alizadeh, R., & Yaghoubi, M. (2022). Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 76-93.
- Ballhorn, U., Siegert, F., Mason, M., & Limin, S. (2009). Derivation of burn scar depths and estimation of carbon emissions with LIDAR in Indonesian peatlands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(50), 21213-21218.
- Bartsch, A., Kidd, R. A., Wagner, W., & Bartalis, Z. (2007). Temporal and spatial variability of the beginning and end of daily spring freeze/thaw cycles derived from scatterometer data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 106(3), 360-374.
- Basu, R., Vaze, P., & Chari, A. N. (2025). Ethical accounting for mineral endowments: A framework for sustainable public finances. Review of Income and Wealth, 71(2), Article e70006.
- Bebbington, J., & Unerman, J. (2018). Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An enabling role for accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 2-24.
- Bernardes, P. M. M., Brandalise, N., & Bonamigo, A. (2024). Relationship between financial performance and corporative governance of mining, oil and gas companies. Gestão & Produção, 31, Article e0224.
- Berniak-Woźny, J., & Rataj, M. (2023). Towards green and sustainable healthcare: A literature review and research agenda for green leadership in the healthcare sector. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), Article 908.
- Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63(2-3), 616-626.
- Brandon, C., Brandon, K., Fairbrass, A., & Neugarten, R. (2021). Integrating natural capital into national accounts: Three decades of promise and challenge. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 15(1), 134-153.
- Buckley, R. (2012). Sustainable tourism: Research and reality. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 528-546.
- Cairns, R. D. (2000). Sustainability accounting and green accounting. Environment and Development Economics, 5(1), 49-54.
- Cardinael, R., Cadisch, G., Gosme, M., Oelbermann, M., & Van Noordwijk, M. (2021). Climate change mitigation and adaptation in agriculture: Why agroforestry should be part of the solution. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 319, Artcile 107555.
- Chave, J, Muller-Landau, H. C., Baker, T. R., Easdale, T. A., Steege, H. T., & Webb, C. O. (2006). Regional and phylogenetic variation of wood density across 2456 neotropical tree species. Ecological Applications, 16(6), 2356-2367.
- Chiari, W., Amirah, S., Lemu, Y. K., Subbaram, K., Edwards, R. J., Kretchy, J.-P., Vento, S., Khader, Y., & Rademaker, M. (2024). Trends in publication and collaboration of health-themed systematic reviews before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A bibliometric study. Narra X, 2(1), Article e106.
- Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7-8), 639-647.
- De Villiers, C., La Torre, M., & Molinari, M. (2022). The Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI) past, present and future: Critical reflections and a research agenda on sustainability reporting (standard-setting). Pacific Accounting Review, 34(5), 728-747.
- DeFries, R., Achard, F., Brown, S., Herold, M., Murdiyarso, D., Schlamadinger, B., & de Souza Jr, C. (2007). Earth observations for estimating greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation in developing countries. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(4), 385-394.
- Dhamija, P., & Bag, S. (2020). Role of artificial intelligence in operations environment: A review and bibliometric analysis. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 869-896.
- Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296.
- Flower, J. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 1-17.
- Gheewala, S. H. (2023). Life cycle assessment for sustainability assessment of biofuels and bioproducts. Biofuel Research Journal, 10(1), 1810-1815.
- Ginting, B., Chiari, W., Duta, T. F., Hudaa, S., Purnama, A., Harapan, H., Rizki, D. R., Puspita, K., Idroes, R., Meriatna, M., & Iqhrammullah, M. (2023). COVID-19 pandemic sheds a new research spotlight on antiviral potential of essential oils – A bibliometric study. Heliyon, 9(7).
- Glavič, P. (2021). Evolution and current challenges of sustainable consumption and production. Sustainability, 13(16), Article 9379.
- Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47-62.
- Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2004). Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability: Is the planet safe in the hands of business and accounting? In Advances in environmental accounting & management (pp. 1-44).
- Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Yongvanich, K., & Ricceri, F. (2004). Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(2), 282-293.
- Hairiah, K., Van Noordwijk, M., Sari, R. R., Saputra, D. D., Widianto, N., Suprayogo, D., Kurniawan, S., Prayogo, C., & Gusli, S. (2020). Soil carbon stocks in Indonesian (agro) forest transitions: Compaction conceals lower carbon concentrations in standard accounting. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 294, Article 106879.
- Hansen, M.C., Stehman, S. V., Potapov, P. V., Arunarwati, B., Stolle, F., & Pittman, K. (2009). Quantifying changes in the rates of forest clearing in Indonesia from 1990 to 2005 using remotely sensed data sets. Environmental Research Letters, 4, Article 034001.
- He, R., Luo, L., Shamsuddin, A., & Tang, Q. (2021). Corporate carbon accounting: a literature review of carbon accounting research from the Kyoto Protocol to the Paris Agreement. Accounting & Finance, 62(1), 261-298.
- Huovila, A., Siikavirta, H., Rozado, C. A., Rökman, J., Tuominen, P., Paiho, S., Hedman, Å., & Ylén, P. (2022). Carbon-neutral cities: Critical review of theory and practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 341, Article 130912.
- Ihsani, M.A., Firmansyah, A., & Estutik, R.S. (2021). Market response to companies sustainability disclosure and environmental performance in Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 8(2), 197-214.
- Indrajaya, Y., Weikard, H. P., Mohren, F., & van der Werf, E. (2024). Paying for forest carbon: Cost-effectiveness of the Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) remuneration scheme. Natural Resource Modeling, 37(1), Article e12387.
- Iqhrammullah, M., Chiari, W., Hudaa, S., Irhamni, I., & Akbar, S.A. (2024). Microalgal – bacterial interactions: Research trend and updated review. Heliyon, 10(15).
- Iqhrammullah, M., Refin, R. Y., Rasmi, R. I., Andika, F. F., Hajjah, H., Marlina, M., & Ningsih, R. (2023). Cancer in Indonesia: A bibliometric surveillance. Narra X, 1(2), Article e86.
- Khanra, S., Kaur, P., Joseph, R. P., Malik, A., & Dhir, A. (2021). A resource-based view of green innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1395-1413.
- Kiswanto, K., Hajawiyah, A., Harjanto, A. P., & Tri Setyarini, E. (2023). Twelve years research journey of carbon accounting. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(4), 246-254.
- Kolk, A., Levy, D., & Pinkse, J. (2008). Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 719-745.
- Kshetri, N. (2021). Blockchain and sustainable supply chain management in developing countries. International Journal of Information Management, 60, Article 102376.
- Langi, M. (2023). Estimation of tree biomass and carbon stock in the Tangkoko Nature Reserve, North Sulawesi. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1192.
- Latifah, S. W., & Soewarno, N. (2023). The environmental accounting strategy and waste management to achieve MSME’s sustainability performance. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), Article 2176444.
- Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 253-261.
- Lisnawati, L., Aryati, T., & Gunawan, J. (2024). Implementation of digital innovation on sustainability performance: The moderating role of green accounting in the industrial sector. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(13), 59-68.
- Liu, B., Liu, G., Li, H., Hu, J., Shang, X., Yao, J., Xue, T., Zhang, Y., Chen, C., & Xu, L. (2025). Would widespread adoption of third-generation nuclear power HPR1000 enhance the mitigation of net greenhouse gas emissions? iScience, 28(3).
- Malerba, M.E., de Paula Costa, M. D., Friess, D. A., Schuster, L., Young, M. A., Lagomasino, D., Serrano, O., Hickey, S. M., York, P. H., Rasheed, M., Lefcheck, J. S., Radford, B., Atwood, T. B., Ierodiaconou, D., & Macreadie, P. (2023). Remote sensing for cost-effective blue carbon accounting. Earth-Science Reviews, 238, Article 104337.
- Masera, O.R., Garza-Caligaris, J., Kanninen, M., Karjalainen, T., Liski, J., Nabuurs, G., Pussinen, A., de Jong, B.H., & Mohren, G. (2003). Modeling carbon sequestration in afforestation, agroforestry and forest management projects: The CO2FIX V. 2 approach. Ecological Modelling, 164(2-3), 177-199.
- Meiryani, M., Susanto, A., & Warganegara, D. (2019). The issues influencing of environmental accounting information systems: An empirical investigation of SMEs in Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(1), 282-290.
- Mokany, K., Raison, R. J., & Prokushkin, A. S. (2006). Critical analysis of root: Shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biology, 12(1), 84-96.
- Muller, N. Z., Mendelsohn, R., & Nordhaus, W. (2011). Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy. American Economic Review, 101(5), 1649-1675.
- Nkundabanyanga, S. K., Muramuzi, B., & Alinda, K. (2021). Environmental management accounting, board role performance, company characteristics and environmental performance disclosure. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 17(5), 633-659.
- Nursulistyo, E. D., Aryani, Y. A., & Bandi, B. (2023). The disclosure of carbon emission in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 10(1), 1-18.
- Ogle, S. M., Breidt, F. J., & Paustian, K. (2005). Agricultural management impacts on soil organic carbon storage under moist and dry climatic conditions of temperate and tropical regions. Biogeochemistry, 72(1), 87-121.
- Ostroski, A., Lagos, T., Prokopyev, O. A., & Khanna, V. (2022). Consumption-based accounting for tracing virtual water flows associated with beef supply chains in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(22), 16347-16356.
- Pamungkas, I. D., Satata, D. P. I., Raihan, M. R., Kristianto, A. Y., & Oktafiyani, M. (2024). Impact of corporate social responsibility between implementation of green accounting and sustainable development goals (SDGs): A study on heavily polluting companies in energy and transportation & logistics sector in Indonesia. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 4(4), Article e02577.
- Patenaude, G., Hill, R., Milne, R., Gaveau, D., Briggs, B., & Dawson, T. (2004). Quantifying forest above ground carbon content using LiDAR remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 93(3), 368-380.
- Pesci, C., Gelmini, L., & Vola, P. (2024). On the accounting implications of the dilemma: Who speaks for nature? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 37(9), 75-99.
- Pratama, Y., Kadir, M., Rivaldi, A., Mulya, I., Amirah, S., & Iqhrammullah, M. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of the impact of environmental degradation on women and the importance of women’s representation. Global Journal of Environmental Science & Management (GJESM), 10(3), 939-954.
- Ratmono, D., Mail, R., Cahyonowati, N., & Janie, D. N. (2024). The role of environmental performance in mediating the relationship between green accounting and corporate social responsibility. Environmental Economics, 15(1), 46-55.
- Raza, S., Ghasali, E., Raza, M., Chen, C., Li, B., Orooji, Y., Lin, H., Karaman, C., Maleh, H. K., & Erk, N. (2022). Advances in technology and utilization of natural resources for achieving carbon neutrality and a sustainable solution to neutral environment. Environmental Research, 220, 115135.
- Rejeb, A., Abdollahi, A., Rejeb, K., & Treiblmaier, H. (2022). Drones in agriculture: A review and bibliometric analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 198, Article 107017.
- Rizki, T., & Perdana, H. D. (2024). Biodiversity disclosure and ESG performance: Does a chief sustainability officer important? Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 24(2).
- Rüdele, K., & Wolf, M. (2024). Industrial management meets environmental reporting – How a learning factory for engineering education is used to teach accounting of greenhouse gas emissions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 25(9), 397-418.
- Saud, S., Chen, S., Haseeb, A., & Sumayya, N. (2020). The role of financial development and globalization in the environment: Accounting ecological footprint indicators for selected one-belt-one-road initiative countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, Article 119518.
- Scarpellini, S., Marín-Vinuesa, L.M., Aranda-Usón, A., & Portillo-Tarragona, P. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and environmental accounting for the circular economy in businesses. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(7), 1129-1158.
- Serafy, S. E. (1997). Green accounting and economic policy. Ecological Economics, 21(3), 217-229.
- Setiawan, D., Rahmawati, I. P., & Santoso, A. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of evolving trends in climate change and accounting research. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), Article 2267233.
- Shahib, H. M. (2021). Towards the local government’s integrated accountability framework. Springer Singapore.
- Simpson, J., Bruce, E., Davies, K. P., & Barber, P. (2022). A blueprint for the estimation of seagrass carbon stock using remote sensing-enabled proxies. Remote Sensing, 14(15), Article 3572.
- Sisaye, S. (2021). The influence of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) on the development of voluntary sustainability accounting reporting rules. Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 1(1), 5-23.
- Smith, P., Davies, C. A., Ogle, S., Zanchi, G., Bellarby, J., Bird, N., Boddey, R. M., McNamara, N. P., Powlson, D., Cowie, A., van Noordwijk, M., Davis, S.C., Richter, D.B., Kryzanowski, L., van Wijk, M.T., Stuart, J., Kirton, A., Eggar, D., Newton-Cross, G., … Braimoh, A.K. (2012). Towards an integrated global framework to assess the impacts of land use and management change on soil carbon: Current capability and future vision. Global Change Biology, 18(7), 2089-2101.
- Solovida, G. T., & Latan, H. (2017). Linking environmental strategy to environmental performance: Mediation role of environmental management accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(5), 595-619.
- Sukoharsono, E. G. (2007). Green Accounting in Indonesia: Accountability and Environmental Issues. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 15(1), 21-60.
- Susanto, A., & Meiryani, M. (2019). The impact of Environmental Accounting Information System alignment on firm performance and environmental Performance: A case of small and medium Enterprises S of Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(2), 229-236.
- Suta, A., Molnár, P., Limbach, Z., & Tóth, Á. (2025). Dictionary-based assessment of European Sustainability Reporting Standard (ESRS) disclosure topics. Discover Sustainability, 6, Article 146.
- Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., & Mustikaningtiyas, F. (2021). Good corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia: A triple bottom line approach. Heliyon, 7(3).
- Toan, T. L., Quegan, S., Davidson, M., Balzter, H., Paillou, P., Papathanassiou, K., Plummer, S., Rocca, F., Saatchi, S., Shugart, H., & Ulander, L. (2011). The BIOMASS mission: Mapping global forest biomass to better understand the terrestrial carbon cycle. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(11), 2850-2860.
- Verma, S., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Business Research, 118, 253-261.
- Wahyuningrum, I.F.S., Humaira, N.G., Budihardjo, M.A., Arumdani, I.S., Puspita, A.S., Annisa, A.N., Sari, A.M., & Djajadikerta, H.G. (2023). Environmental sustainability disclosure in Asian countries: Bibliometric and content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 411, Article 137195.
- Wang, H., Wang, X., Zhang, X., Liu, G., Chen, W.-Q., Chen, S., Du, T., & Shi, L. (2022). The coupling between material footprint and economic growth in the “Belt and Road” countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 359, Article 132110.
- Wiedmann, T. (2009). A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecological Economics, 69(2), 211-222.
- Wiredu, I., Osei Agyemang, A., & Agbadzidah, S. Y. (2023). Does green accounting influence ecological sustainability? Evidence from a developing economy. Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), Article 2240559.
- Yan, J., Lu, Q., Tang, J., Chen, L., Hong, J., & Broyd, T. (2022). Digital tools for revealing and reducing carbon footprint in infrastructure, building, and city scopes. Buildings, 12(8), Article 1097.
- Zatini, G., Della Porta, A., & Za, S. (2025). Deciphering barriers and strategies in environmental management accounting (EMA) adoption: A comprehensive two-decade analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(3), 3355-3370.
- Zhang, W.-F., Dou, Z.-X., He, P., Ju, X.-T., Powlson, D., Chadwick, D., Norse, D., Lu, Y.-L., Zhang, Y., Wu, L., Chen, X-P., Cassman, K.G., & Zhang, F-S. (2013). New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(21), 8375-8380.
- Zheng, X., Cai, B., Park, J., Seo, B., Wang, S., & Shao, Z. (2025). Mapping lifecycle building material embodied carbon emissions for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Sustainable Cities and Society, 119, Article 106058.
- Zomer, R.J., Neufeldt, H., Xu, J., Ahrends, A., Bossio, D., Trabucco, A., Van Noordwijk, M., & Wang, M. (2016). Global tree cover and biomass carbon on agricultural land: The contribution of agroforestry to global and national carbon budgets. Scientific Reports, 6, Article 29987.
Related Articles
-
Perceived health risk, online retail ethics, and consumer behavior within online shopping during the COVID-19 pandemic
Yuniarti Fihartini ,
Arief Helmi ,
Meydia Hassan ,
Yevis Marty Oesman
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(3).2021.02
Innovative Marketing Volume 17, 2021 Issue #3 pp. 17-29 Views: 5543 Downloads: 2072 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe risk of virus contracting during the COVID-19 pandemic has changed consumer preference for online shopping to meet their daily needs than shopping in brick-and-mortar stores. Online shopping presents a different environment, atmosphere, and experience. The possibility of ethical violations is higher during online than face-to-face transactions. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the influence of perceived health risk and customer perception of online retail ethics on consumer online shopping behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, involving seven variables, namely perceived health risk, security, privacy, non-deception, reliability fulfillment, service recovery, and online shopping behavior. The data were collected through an online survey by employing the purposive sampling technique to a consumer who has shopped online during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. 315 valid responses were obtained and analyzed through quantitative method using SEM-Amos. The results showed that perceived health risk and four variables of online retail ethics including security, privacy, reliability fulfillment, and service recovery affected online shopping behavior. Meanwhile, non-deception was found to have an insignificant effect. The coefficient value proved perceived health risk to be more dominant in influencing online shopping behavior than the variables of online retail ethics. Thus, consumers pay more concern for their health during online shopping. However, positive consumer perceptions of the behavior of online retail websites in providing services also can encourage consumers to shop online during this pandemic.
-
Human resource management in promoting innovation and organizational performance
I Gede Riana ,
Gede Suparna ,
I Gusti Made Suwandana ,
Sebastian Kot 
,
Ismi Rajiani
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.10
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #1 pp. 107-118 Views: 4959 Downloads: 1204 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯHuman resource management (HRM) is one of the elements enabling an organization to remain competitive in turbulence conditions. The effective practice of HRM makes competent and innovative employees contributing to the achievement of organizational objectives. This study aims to analyze HRM practices in creating innovation and organizational performance. The questionnaire was used to measure the respondents’ perceptions of variables used by a Likert scale. A survey of 126 manager samples and middle managers at export-oriented short and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Bali, Indonesia, was conducted to test the model. The analysis has shown that the proposed model was proven to be compliant with the research hypotheses. HRM significantly affects organizational performance and innovation, and it was found out that innovation can improve organizational performance. However, in the process of simultaneous testing, it was found out that innovation cannot improve organizational performance. The lack of attention to investments in human resources became one of the barriers to SMEs in creating innovation.
-
Positive contribution of the good corporate governance rating to stability and performance: evidence from Indonesia
RR. Iramani , Muazaroh Muazaroh , Abdul Mongid
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.01
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 1-11 Views: 3984 Downloads: 580 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis paper aims to examine the impact of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) practice on bank stability and performance. Governance is measured using the GCG rating that covers eleven aspects. The authors apply instrumental regression to link governance to performance and stability. The study covers a sample of 150 banks. The result shows that bank stability can mediate bank governance and bank performance. On the determinant of bank performance, it can be concluded that the GCG rating is positive and directly influences bank performance. Bank stability is also positive for bank performance indicating the indirect contribution of the GCG rating to bank performance. NPL, LDR, CAR and bank’s size (LASSET) are all negative and significant. The aim of this paper is to provide strong empirical evidence on the importance of governance and stability for performance. The limitations of this paper are the size of the sample and that it only covers public banks which are theoretically required to apply better governance in all aspects of their business by the Capital Market Authority.
