Wine purchasing decisions in India from a consumer’s perspective: An analysis of influencing factors on the buying behavior
-
Received February 9, 2022;Accepted April 26, 2022;Published May 12, 2022
-
Author(s)Anagha Ravikumar ,Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9763-8363
,
Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9487-9172,
Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7396-9849,
Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6434-6153 -
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.18(2).2022.11
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2022, Issue #2, pp. 120-134
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 94 Views
-
16 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This paper analyzed the factors affecting consumers’ purchase intentions and decisions while purchasing wine. The study was performed based on the primary data collected with the help of a survey and a structured questionnaire using convenience sampling. A total of 120 respondents above 21 years old across India who were wine consumers and likely to purchase wine were the study population. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, descriptive analysis, and cluster analysis were the main methods used to analyze the data. The information gathered was subjected to further quantitative analysis using SPSS. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure (KMO) of sampling adequacy was 0.759, and Cronbach’s alpha was 0.817 indicating high reliability of the study. Factor analysis brought out six essential factors affecting the wine purchase decisions of Indian consumers. They are as follows: quality concerns, consumption preferences, consumption deterrents, consumption reasons, social factors, and risk factors. Furthermore, the study found that the purchase intentions of Indian wine consumers are affected by the attitude and awareness of consumers. The cluster analysis further helped to divide the Indian wine market into three segments, i.e., regular consumers comprising 44.2%, non-consumers comprising 29.2%, and occasional consumers comprising 26.7%. A few of the key factors influencing wine purchase are attributes and knowledge of the wine ingredients. In addition, friends and family play an important role in wine purchasing decisions.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D91, M20, M31
-
References57
-
Tables7
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework of different factors and sub-factors
- Figure 2. Model of hypotheses and variables
- Figure 3. Confirmatory factor analysis
-
- Table 1. Demographic profiling of wine consumers
- Table 2. Variables, factors, and reliability
- Table 3. Outcome of confirmatory factor analysis
- Table 4. Relation among the variables
- Table 5. Percent of cases in each cluster
- Table 6. Final cluster centers
- Table 7. Cross-tabulation of demographic variables and the clusters
-
- Agnoli, L., & Charters, S. (2022). The alcohol consumption of wine drinkers with the onset of Covid-19. Food Quality and Preference, 98, 104489.
- Agnoli, L., Begalli, D., & Capitello, R. (2011). Generation Y’s perception of wine and consumption situations in a traditional wine-producing region. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 23(2), 176-192.
- Annunziata, A., Pomarici, E., Vecchio, R., & Mariani, A. (2016). Nutritional information and health warnings on wine labels: Exploring consumer interest and preferences. Appetite, 106, 58-69.
- Aqueveque, C. (2006). Extrinsic cues and perceived risk: The influence of consumption situation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(5), 237-247.
- Atkin, T., & Johnson, R. (2010). Appellation as an indicator of quality. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 22(1), 42-61.
- Atkin, T., Nowak, L., & Garcia, R. (2007). Women wine consumers: Information search and retailing implications. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 19(4), 327-339.
- Banks, G., & Overton, J. (2010). Old World, New World, Third World? Reconceptualising the Worlds of Wine. Journal of Wine Research, 21(1), 57-75.
- Barber, N., Dodd, T., & Ghiselli, R. (2008). Capturing the Younger Wine Consumer. Journal of Wine Research, 19(2), 123-141.
- Batra, A. (2008). An Exploratory Study on Specific Preferences and Characteristics of Wine Tourists. Anatolia, 19(2), 271-286.
- Bernal-Jurado, E., Mozas-Moral, A., Fernández-Uclés, D., & Medina-Viruel, M. (2021). Online popularity as a development factor for cooperatives in the winegrowing sector. Journal of Business Research, 123, 79-85.
- Boudreaux, C., & Palmer, S. (2007). A charming little Cabernet: Effects of wine label design on purchase intent and brand personality. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 19(3), 170-186.
- Bucher, T., Frey, E., Wilczynska, M., Deroover, K., & Dohle, S. (2020). Consumer perception and behaviour related to low-alcohol wine: Do people overcompensate? Public Health Nutrition, 23(11), 1939-1947.
- Cacchiarelli, L., Carbone, A., Laureti, T., & Sorrentino, A. (2014). The value of quality clues in the wine market: evidences from Lazio, Italy. Journal of Wine Research, 25(4), 281-297.
- Calvo-Porral, C., Lévy-Mangin, J., & Ruiz-Vega, A. (2020). An emotion-based typology of wine consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 79, 103777.
- Carbone, A. (2021). From Flasks to Fine Glasses: Recent Trends in Wine Economics. Italian Economic Journal, 7(2), 187-198.
- Casini, L., Corsi, A., & Goodman, S. (2009). Consumer preferences of wine in Italy applying best-worst scaling. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 21(1), 64-78.
- Castellini, A., & Samoggia, A. (2018). Millennial consumers’ wine consumption and purchasing habits and attitude towards wine innovation. Wine Economics and Policy, 7(2), 128-139.
- Chrysochou, P., Krystallis, A., Mocanu, A., & Lewis, R. (2012). Generation Y preferences for wine: An exploratory study of the US market applying the best-worst scaling. British Food Journal, 114(4), 516-528.
- Danner, L., Johnson, T., Ristic, R., Meiselman, H., & Bastian, S. (2017). “I like the sound of that!” Wine descriptions influence consumers’ expectations, liking, emotions and willingness to pay for Australian white wines. Food Research International, 99(1), 263-274.
- Decoster, J., & Hall, G. P. (1998). Overview of Factor Analysis. In Practice, 37(2), 141.
- Elliot, S., & Barth, J. (2012). Wine label design and personality preferences of millennials. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 21(3), 183-191.
- Farshid, M., Chan, A., & Nel, D. (2012). A sweet face man: Using Chernoff faces to portray social media wine brand images. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 24(3), 183-195.
- Fihartini, Y., Helmi, A., Hassan, M., & Oesman, Y. (2021). Perceived health risk, online retail ethics, and consumer behavior within online shopping during the covid-19 pandemic. Innovative Marketing, 17(3), 17-29.
- Gallenti, G., Troiano, S., Marangon, F., Bogoni, P., Campisi, B., & Cosmina, M. (2019). Environmentally sustainable versus aesthetic values motivating millennials’ preferences for wine purchasing: evidence from an experimental analysis in Italy. Agricultural and Food Economics, 7, 12.
- Goodman, S. (2009). An international comparison of retail consumer wine choice. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 21(1), 41-49.
- Gupta, V., & Sajnani, M. (2020). Risk and benefit perceptions related to wine consumption and how it influences consumers’ attitude and behavioural intentions in India. British Food Journal, 122(8), 2569-2585.
- Hollebeek, L., Jaeger, S., Brodie, R., & Balemi, A. (2007). The influence of involvement on purchase intention for new world wine. Food Quality and Preference, 18(8), 1033-1049.
- Huiru, W., Zhijian, Z., Jianying, F., Dong, T., & Weisong, M. (2018). Influencing factors on Chinese wine consumers’ behavior under different purchasing motivations based on a multi-classification method. Italian Journal of Food Science, 30(4), 775-791.
- Hussain, M., Cholette, S., & Castaldi, R. (2007). Determinants of wine consumption of US consumers: An econometric analysis. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 19(1), 49-62.
- Jantzi, H., Hayward, L., Barton, A., Richardson, C., & McSweeney, M. (2020). Investigating the effect of extrinsic cues on consumers’ evaluation of red wine using a projective mapping task. Journal of Sensory Studies, 35(3), e12568.
- Johnson, T., & Bruwer, J. (2004). Generic Consumer Risk-Reduction Strategies (RRS) in Wine-Related Lifestyle Segments of the Australian Wine Market. International Journal of Wine Marketing, 16(1), 5-35.
- Kaur, P., Stoltzfus, J., & Yellapu, V. (2018). Descriptive statistics. International Journal of Academic Medicine, 4(1), 60-63.
- Kelley, K., Hyde, J., & Bruwer, J. (2015). U.S. wine consumer preferences for bottle characteristics, back label extrinsic cues and wine composition: A conjoint analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 27(4), 516-534.
- Liu, F., & Murphy, J. (2007). A qualitative study of Chinese wine consumption and purchasing: Implications for Australian wines. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 19(2), 98-113.
- Lo Monaco, G., Tavani, J., & Codaccioni, C. (2020). Social factors and preference for quality cues: Towards a social construction of wine quality. Food Research International, 134, 109270.
- Mehta, R., & Bhanja, N. (2018). Consumer preferences for wine attributes in an emerging market. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 46(1), 34-48.
- Miftari, I., Cerjak, M., Tomić, M., Imami, D., & Prenaj, V. (2021). Consumer ethnocentrism and preference for domestic wine in times of covid-19. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 123(3), 103-113.
- Mitchell, V., & Greatorex, M. (1989). Risk Reducing Strategies Used in the Purchase of Wine in the UK. European Journal of Marketing, 23(9), 31-46.
- Nowak, L., & Newton, S. (2008). Using winery web sites to launch relationships with Millennials. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 20(1), 53-67.
- Nowak, L., Thach, L., & Olsen, J. (2006). Wowing the millennials: Creating brand equity in the wine industry. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 15(5), 316-323.
- Onofri, L., & Boatto, V. (2020). On the economic valuation of cultural ecosystem services: A tale of myths, vine and wine. Ecosystem Services, 46, 101215.
- Orth, U. (2005). Consumer personality and other factors in situational brand choice variation. Journal of Brand Management, 13(2), 115-133.
- Oyinseye, P., Suárez, A., Saldaña, E., Fernández-Zurbano, P., DominiqueValentin, D., & Sáenz-Navajas, M.-P. (2022). Multidimensional representation of wine drinking experience: Effects of the level of consumers’ expertise and involvement. Food Quality and Preference, 98, 104536.
- Panda, R., & Misra, S. (2014). Impact of Country-of-origin Image on Brand Equity: A Study on Durable Products in India. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 494-499.
- Qenani-Petrela, E., Wolf, M., & Zuckerman, B. (2007). Generational Differences in Wine Consumption. Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, 38(1), 1-9.
- Saltman, Y., Johnson, T., Wilkinson, K., & Bastian, S. (2015). Australian wine consumers’ acceptance of and attitudes toward the use of additives in wine and food production. International Journal of Wine Research, 7, 83-92.
- Sharma, P., Singh, S., & Misra, R. (2020). Wine-related lifestyle segmentation in the context of urban Indian consumers. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 32(4), 503-522.
- Somogyi, S., Li, E., Johnson, T., Bruwer, J., & Bastian, S. (2011). The underlying motivations of Chinese wine consumer behaviour. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(4), 473-485.
- Soós, G., Csernák, J., Lakatos, L., Zsófi, Z., & Palotás, A. (2019). Cognitive Disposition to Wine Consumption: How the Brain Is Wired to Select the Perfect Bottle With a Novel Musical Twist. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1-9.
- Souza Gonzaga, L., Capone, D., Bastian, S., & Jeffery, D. (2021). Defining wine typicity: sensory characterisation and consumer perspectives. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 27(2), 246-256.
- Taylor, C., & Barber, N. (2016). How will my wine purchase decision be viewed by others? Journal of Wine Research, 27(3), 202-225.
- Thach, E., & Olsen, J. (2006). Market segment analysis to target young adult wine drinkers. Agribusiness, 22(3), 307-322.
- Tootelian, D., & Ross, K. (2000). Product Labels. What Information Do Consumers Want, and Will They Believe It? Journal of Food Products Marketing, 6(1), 25-38.
- Wan, X., Woods, A., Seoul, K., Butcher, N., & Spence, C. (2015). When the shape of the glass influences the flavour associated with a coloured beverage: Evidence from consumers in three countries. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 109-116.
- Wolf, M., Carpenter, S., & Qenani-Petrela, E. (2005). A comparison of X, Y, and Boomer generation wine consumers in California. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 36(1), 186-191.
- Yu, Y., Sun, H., Goodman, S., Chen, S., & Ma, H. (2009). Chinese choices: A survey of wine consumers in Beijing. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 21(2), 155-168.
- Zainurin, F., Neill, L., & Schänzel, H. (2021). Considerations of luxury wine tourism experiences in the new world: three Waiheke Island vintners. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management.
-
-
Conceptualization
Anagha Ravikumar, Dipen Paul, Dharmesh K. Mishra
-
Data curation
Anagha Ravikumar
-
Formal Analysis
Anagha Ravikumar, Dharmesh K. Mishra
-
Methodology
Anagha Ravikumar, Sushant Malik, Asmita Chitnis, Dharmesh K. Mishra
-
Validation
Anagha Ravikumar, Asmita Chitnis, Dipen Paul, Dharmesh K. Mishra
-
Writing – original draft
Anagha Ravikumar, Sushant Malik
-
Writing – review & editing
Anagha Ravikumar, Sushant Malik, Asmita Chitnis, Dipen Paul, Dharmesh K. Mishra
-
Software
Sushant Malik, Dipen Paul
-
Supervision
Sushant Malik, Asmita Chitnis, Dharmesh K. Mishra
-
Investigation
Asmita Chitnis, Dipen Paul, Dharmesh K. Mishra
-
Conceptualization
-
Adoption of Mobile Banking and Perceived Risk in GCC
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 72-79 Views: 1835 Downloads: 314 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe study deals with the adoption of mobile banking services by respondents in UAE and the perception of risk factors by them. A model was developed on the Customer Adoption Process of mobile banking. The model is validated based on the data collected using the questionnaire from a sample of 90 respondents in UAE. Factor analysis is used to evaluate and analyze the responses. Belief in technology and the value it creates are the major driving force for respondents to adopt mobile banking. Respondents perceive that mobile banking helps in proper financial planning due to continuous monitoring the transactions and time saving. Lack of privacy in the mobile banking transactions and not all banks offering mobile banking services in UAE are the major challenges perceived by the respondents for non-adoption of mobile banking. Respondents identify time risk, financial risk and performance risk as the most predominant risk factors compared to other risks in the adoption process.
-
Barriers to effective value chain management in developing countries: new insights from the cotton industrial value chain
Arthur Mapanga, Collins Ogutu Miruka , Nehemiah Mavetera doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(1).2018.03
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 22-35 Views: 1615 Downloads: 457 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯA rigorous and extensive application of the value chain management (VCM) has become the vogue in modern day business practices and processes. However, due to the complex and multidimensional nature of value chains, achieving efficient and effective value chain management in real value chains remains a major conundrum for practitioners. Many unknown barriers continue to impede effective and efficient value chain management in developing countries’ industrial value chains. The purpose of this study was to find out the common barriers to effective value chain management in a developing country’s industrial value chains using evidence from the cotton industry in Zimbabwe. The analysis was based on survey data sets obtained from 157 purposively sampled experts from the cotton industry value chain in Zimbabwe. Exploratory factor analysis was used to find the barriers to effective value chain management. The results revealed both architectural and governance barriers to effective value chain management. The findings also presented major policy implications for industrial value chains in the developing countries and also indicated areas for further robust research founded on a broader data set from other developing countries’ industrial chains as a way of validating the findings of this study.
-
Institutional support for the organic farming development – a conceptual framework
Environmental Economics Volume 9, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 50-59 Views: 1438 Downloads: 66 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯRealization of agricultural production complying with the sustainable development principles has resulted in a separate direction – organic farming. Its big difference from all other economy sectors is in its dependence on the natural and climatic conditions. Therefore, agricultural production has a dual nature, namely it depends on the environment health on the one hand, and, on the other hand, directly affects this health through the use of technologies that can both improve and substantially worsen the environmental situation. The institutional support for the organic farming is of great importance. This issue is relevant for scientists from countries, where organic farming is actively developing. In Ukraine, this is also a topical issue. The paper presents a conceptual framework of institutional support for the organic farming development, which includes elements such as state regulation, self-regulation, objects and subjects of organic farming, as well as an organic product market. Legal, informational, infrastructure and financial directions of ensuring the development of organic farming are also defined. The essence of each element is revealed. The main indicators of the organic farming development in Ukraine are analyzed, i.e. the organic farming areas, their proportion in agricultural lands, the number of producers, the volume of the organic market, the volume of organic consumption per capita, as well as the share of domestic organic land in the world's territory. A correlation analysis based on data from the largest world market of the USA made it possible to determine the factors that have the greatest impact on the development of the organic agricultural sector. The number of organic producers is statistically significant, and the share of land in the organic farming does not have a significant impact on the organic product consumption. At the same time, this can be seen from the point of view that the more producers will offer their products, the more saturated the market will be, and therefore the level of the organic products coverage can be greater.