The impact of the deferred tax adjustment on the Economic Value Added (EVA) measure
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(3-1).2017.07
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2017, Issue #3, pp. 227-242
- 1237 Views
-
1870 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Economic Value Added (EVA) is a value-based accounting measure used by companies to measure the amount of value created for shareholders. EVA requires the conversion of accounting values to economic values. This conversion process is known as the EVA adjustment. If accounting values are not converted to economic values, the value of the EVA can be distorted. Previous studies have shown that companies are experiencing difficulties in implementing EVA adjustments. To reduce these difficulties, companies have decided to limit their EVA adjustments to ten or even fewer. The research problem is that if the appropriate adjustments are not made, an inaccurate EVA measure will be calculated.
The aim of the research is to measure whether deferred taxes impact EVA. The study is conducted within a quantitative research paradigm. Secondary data analysis was carried out on JSE-listed food producers over a seven-year period, from 2004 to 2010. The unadjusted EVA was compared to the adjusted EVA measure to determine the before and after effects of deferred taxes on EVA. The findings of the study revealed that deferred taxes either understated or overstated the value of the EVA during the period 2004–2010. In addition, the results from the regression analysis revealed an overall significance for all deferred tax predictors. The results from the study showed that deferred tax had a significant impact on the value of EVA. Therefore, the study recommends that companies implement the deferred tax adjustment on EVA.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M41, G0, G30
-
References34
-
Tables6
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Increases and decreases in deferred tax expenses (Rand values in 000’s)
- Figure 2. The unadjusted NOPAT and the adjusted NOPAT (Rand values in 000’s)
- Figure 3. Deferred tax liabilities (Rand values in 000’s)
- Figure 4. The unadjusted TCE and the adjusted TCE (Rand values in 000’s)
-
- Table 1. Multiple regression model of the unadjusted EVA
- Table 2. ANOVA test for overall significance
- Table 3. Coefficient test for individual significance
- Table 4. Multiple regression model of the adjusted EVA
- Table 5. ANOVA test for overall significance
- Table 6. Coefficient test for individual significance
-
- Abbott, M. L., & McKinney, J. (2013). Understanding and applying research design. United States of America: Wiley.
- Alzawahreh, A., & Khasawneh, S. (2011). Business strategies adopted by Jordanian organizations: The key to a sustained competitive advantage. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(5), 508-524.
- Anderson, A. M., Bey, R. P., & Weaver, S. C. (2005). Economic value added adjustments: much to do about nothing.
- Aubert, F. (2009). The relative informative ness of GAAP and pro forma earnings announcements in France.
- Bhattacharya, N., Black, E. L., Christensen, T. E., & Larson, C. R. (2003). Assessing the relative informative ness and permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36, 285-319.
- Black, D. E., & Christensen, T. E. (2009). U.S managers use of pro forma adjustments to meet strategic earnings targets. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 36(3,4), 297-326.
- Bryan, S. H., Lilien, S., & Martin, D. R. (2010). The financial statement effects of capitalizing operating leases. The CPA Journal, 80(8), 36-41.
- Burksaitiene, D. (2009). Measurement of value creation: Economic Value Added and Net Present Value. Economics & Management, 709-714.
- Callimaci, A., & Landry, S. (2004). Market valuation of research and development spending under Ca¬nadian GAAP. Canadian Accounting Perspectives, 3(1), 33-53.
- Cazavan-Jeny, A., & Jeanjean, T. (2006). The negative impact of R&D capitalization: A value relevance approach. European Accounting Review, 15(1), 37-61.
- Chang, C., Herbohn, K., & Tutticci, I. (2009). Market’s perception of deferred tax accruals. Accounting and Finance, 645-673.
- Collier, P. M. (2012). Accounting for managers: Interpreting accounting for decision-making. United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons Limited.
- Damodaran, A. (2007). ROC, ROIC and ROE: Measurement and implications.
- Damodaran, A. (2009). Leases, debt and value.
- Drury, C. (2011). Cost and management accounting: An introduction. England: South-Western/Cengage Learning.
- Eames, M. J., & Sepe, J. (2005). The valuation of special items. Journal of Applied Business Research, 21(3), 61-70.
- Gallermore, J. (2012). Deferred tax assets and bank regulatory capital.
- Gee, M. A., & Mano, T. (2006). Accounting for deferred tax in Japanese banks and the consequences for their international operations. Abacus, 42(1), 1-21.
- Herbohn, K., Tutticci, I., & Khor, P. S. (2010). Changes in unrecognized deferred tax ac¬cruals from carry-forward losses: Earnings management or signaling. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 37(7), 763-791.
- Larrabee, D. T., & Voss, J. A. (2012). Valuation techniques: dis¬counted cash flow, earnings quality, measures of value added and real options. United States of America: Wiley.
- Latha, C. (2009). Measuring value enhancement through Economic Value Added: Evidence from literature. IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 15(9), 46-62.
- Lovata, L. M., & Costigan, M. L. (2002). Empirical analysis of adopters of economic value added. Management Accounting Research, 13(2), 215-228.
- Lynn, S., Seethamraju, C., & Seetharaman, A. (2008). Incremental value relevance of unrecognized deferred taxes: Evidence from the United Kingdom. American Accounting Association, 30(2), 107-130.
- Marques, A. (2010). Disclosure strategies among S & P 500 firms: Evidence on the disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures and financial statements in earnings press releases. British Accounting Review, 42, 119-131.
- Nichols, N. B., Gray, S. J., & Street, D. L. (2005). Pro forma adjustments to GAAP earnings: bias, materiality and SEC action. Re¬search in Accounting Regulation, 18, 29-52.
- Noor, R. M., Mastuki, N., & Aziz, Z. (2007). Earnings management and deferred tax. Malaysian Accounting Review, 6(1), 1-17.
- Phillips, J., Pincus, M., & Rego, S. O. (2002). Earnings management: New evidence based on deferred tax expense.
- Quinlan, C. (2011). Business research methods. United Kingdom: Cengage Learning.
- Ray, R. (2001). Economic Value Added: Theory, evidence, a missing link. Review of Business, 22 (1/2), 66-70.
- Sharma, A. K. & Kumar, S. (2010). Economic Value Added (EVA) - Literature review and relevant issues. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(2), 200-220.
- Stewart, B. (1991). The quest for value: a guide for senior managers. New York: Harper Business.
- Stewart, B. (2013). Best practice EVA: The ultimate solution for value-based corporates. United States of America: Wiley.
- Young, D. (1997). Economic value added: A primer for European managers. European Manage¬ment Journal, 15(4), 335-343.
- Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2013). Business research methods. United States of America: Cengage Learning.