Does female representation on corporate boards boost the strengthening of internal control in socially responsible firms?
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.19(4).2022.24
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2022, Issue #4, pp. 294-308
- Cited by
- 578 Views
-
117 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study examines the relationship between corporate social responsibility and the effectiveness of internal control, while simultaneously examining board gender diversity to check whether female directors contribute to corporate transparency or not. The sample of the study comprises 15,231 firm-year observations of companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2013 to 2018. The raw data for variable calculation come from authoritative and reputable sources, such as China Stock Market and Accounting Research (CSMAR), DIB Internal Control database, and RKS CSR score. The empirical study shows that socially high-performing firms possess a more effective internal control mechanism. However, the paper failed to find a positive association of gender diversity on the board with internal control effectiveness, and failed to attest reinforcing effect of female directors on internal control in socially responsible firms. This study suggests that in China’s institutional environment, female directors are unlikely to contribute to increased corporate transparency. This study is useful for both regulators and company management to establish a master plan and tactics for board composition to improve corporate transparency, taking into account the effect of the investigated phenomena within the jurisdiction under study.
Acknowledgment
This paper is co-funded by the European Union through the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) within the project “EMBRACING EU CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF BUSINESS-SOCIETY BONDS TRANSFORMATION IN UKRAINE” 101094100 — EECORE — ERASMUS-JMO-2022-HEI-TCH-RSCH-UA-IBA / ERASMUS-JMO-2022-HEI-TCHRSCH https://eecore.snau.edu.ua/
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G34, M14, M41
-
References56
-
Tables8
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Description of variables used in the study
- Table 2. Sample selection process
- Table 3. Sectoral distribution of the study sample
- Table 4. Annual distribution of the sample
- Table 5. Descriptive statistics
- Table 6. Pearson correlation test
- Table 7. Regression results
- Table 8. Summary of study results
-
- Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
- Adams, R. B., de Haan, J., Terjesen, S., & van Ees, H. (2015). Board Diversity: Moving the Field Forward. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 77-82.
- Aliani, K., Alsalih, A., & Hamza, F. (2022). Executives’ commitment, corporate governance, and performance of Islamic banks: Evidence from the Saudi context. Banks and Bank Systems, 17(2), 86-97.
- Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., Chowdhury, F., & Desai, S. (2022). CEO gender, institutional context and firm exports. International Business Review, 31(5), 102008.
- Bernile, G., Bhagwat, V., & Yonker, S. (2018). Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 127(3), 588-612.
- Boulhaga, M., Bouri, A., Elamer, A. A., & Ibrahim, B. A. (2022). Environmental, social and governance ratings and firm performance: The moderating role of internal control quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
- Chang, H.-Y., Hu, W.-Y., Liu, H.-H., & Sue, H.-C. (2020). Does women on board affect the socially responsible firms’ effectiveness of internal control? Applied Economics, 52(56), 6162-6170.
- Chebbi, K., & Ammer, M. A. (2022). Board Composition and ESG Disclosure in Saudi Arabia: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance Reforms. Sustainability, 14(19), 12173.
- Chen, Y., Eshleman, J. D., & Soileau, J. S. (2016). Board Gender Diversity and Internal Control Weaknesses. Advances in Accounting, 33, 11-19.
- Chouaibi, J., & Boulhaga, M. (2020). The Effect of the Board of Directors and Audit Quality on Disclosure of Internal Control Practices: Evidence from European Companies. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 16(4).
- Ding, X., Ye, L., Yang, Y., Efimova, O., Steblyanskaya, A., & Zhang, J. (2022). The Impact Mechanism of Environmental Information Disclosure on Corporate Sustainability Performance – Micro-Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(19), 12366.
- Dwekat, A., Seguí-Mas, E., Zaid, M. A. A., & Tormo-Carbó, G. (2022). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: mapping the most critical drivers in the board academic literature. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(6), 1705-1739.
- Farooq, S., Gan, C., & Nadeem, M. (2022). Boardroom gender diversity and investment inefficiency: New evidence from the United Kingdom. Corporate Governance: An International Review.
- Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1-2), 85-106.
- Franco, S., Caroli, M. G., Cappa, F., & Del Chiappa, G. (2020). Are you good enough? CSR, quality management and corporate financial performance in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, 102395.
- Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Pucheta-Martínez, M. C. (2020). Corporate social responsibility reporting and corporate governance mechanisms: An international outlook from emerging countries. Business Strategy & Development, 3(1), 77-97.
- García-Sánchez, I. (2020). Drivers of the CSR report assurance quality: Credibility and consistency for stakeholder engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2530-2547.
- Grigoraș-Ichim, C. E., Cosmulese, C. G., Savchuk, D., & Zhavoronok, A. (2018). Shaping the perception and vision of economic operators from the Romania-Ukraine-Moldova border area on interim financial reporting. Economic Annals-ХХI, 173(9-10), 60-67.
- Han, L., & Peng, C. (2022). Do the Age and Gender of Chairperson Affect Firms’ Environmental Protection Investment? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14495.
- Harjoto, M. A. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and corporate fraud. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(4), 762-779.
- Heinberg, M., Liu, Y., Huang, X., & Eisingerich, A. B. (2021). A Bad Job of Doing Good: Does Corporate Transparency on a Country and Company Level Moderate Corporate Social Responsibility Effectiveness? Journal of International Marketing, 29(2), 45-61.
- Karpoff, J. M. (2021). On a stakeholder model of corporate governance. Financial Management, 50(2), 321-343.
- Khan, H. U. R., Khidmat, W. Bin, Al Hares, O., Awan, S., & Saleem, K. (2022). How do Independent Directors View Carbon Information Disclosure? Evidence From China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10.
- Khidmat, W. Bin, Habib, M. D., Awan, S., & Raza, K. (2022). Female directors on corporate boards and their impact on corporate social responsibility (CSR): evidence from China. Management Research Review, 45(4), 563-595.
- Khlif, H., Samaha, K., & Amara, I. (2020). Internal control quality and voluntary disclosure: does CEO duality matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(2), 286-306.
- Li, X. (2020). The effectiveness of internal control and innovation performance: An intermediary effect based on corporate social responsibility. PLOS ONE, 15(6), e0234506.
- Louche, C., & Baeten, X. (2006). A Stepwise Approach to Stakeholder Management. In Management Models for Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 171-179). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Lu, H., Liu, X., & Falkenberg, L. (2022). Investigating the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on Risk Management Practices. Business & Society, 61(2), 496-534.
- Lu, H., Oh, W.-Y., Kleffner, A., & Chang, Y. K. (2021). How do investors value corporate social responsibility? Market valuation and the firm specific contexts. Journal of Business Research, 125, 14-25.
- Mahmood, Z., Kouser, R., Ali, W., Ahmad, Z., & Salman, T. (2018). Does Corporate Governance Affect Sustainability Disclosure? A Mixed Methods Study. Sustainability, 10(1), 207.
- Malafry, L., & Brinca, P. (2022). Climate policy in an unequal world: Assessing the cost of risk on vulnerable households. Ecological Economics, 194, 107309.
- Mayberry, M. (2020). Good for managers, bad for society? Causal evidence on the association between risk-taking incentives and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 47(9-10), 1182-1214.
- Min, J. (2022). Gender diversity on boards for organizational impression management: An empirical study of Japanese firms. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(3), 777-789.
- Nicolò, G., Zampone, G., Sannino, G., & De Iorio, S. (2022). Sustainable corporate governance and non-financial disclosure in Europe: does the gender diversity matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 227-249.
- Nord, W. R., MacAulay, K. D., & Kelso, J. L. (2022). Not all CSR initiatives are created equally: the theoretical implications. Social Responsibility Journal.
- Oradi, J., & E-Vahdati, S. (2021). Female directors on audit committees, the gender of financial experts, and internal control weaknesses: evidence from Iran. Accounting Forum, 45(3), 273-306.
- Pasko, O. (2022). Institutionally Speaking, are Global Standards Adoptable in a Given Jurisdiction? A Critical Analysis of the IFRS’s Use in Ukraine through the Lens of New Institutional Accounting. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 30(1), 36-48.
- Pasko, O., Chen, F., Kuts, T., Sharko, I., & Ryzhikova, N. (2022). Sustainability reporting nexus to corporate governance in scholarly literature. Environmental Economics, 13(1), 61-78.
- Pasko, O., Chen, F., Proskurina, N., Mao, R., Gryn, V., & Pushkar, I. (2021). Are corporate social responsibility active firms less involved in earnings management? Empirical evidence from China. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(2), 504-516.
- Pasko, O., Marenych, T., Diachenko, O., Levytska, I., & Balla, I. (2021). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: the case study of Ukrainian public agricultural companies. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 58-80.
- Pasko, O., Zhang, L., Bezverkhyi, K., Nikytenko, D., & Khromushyna, L. (2021). Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(4), 309-325.
- Pasko, O., Zhang, L., Tkal, Y., Hordiyenko, M., Popova, L., & Abraham, Y. (2021). Can CSR Engagement and Strong Internal Control Enhance Sustainable Corporate Growth? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 15(3), 497-521.
- Pasko, O., Zhang, L., Tuzhyk, K., Proskurina, N., & Gryn, V. (2021). Do sustainability reporting conduct and corporate governance attributes relate? Empirical evidence from China. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(4), 110-123.
- Peng, X., Qi, T., & Wang, G. (2022). Board Gender Diversity, Corporate Social Disclosures, and National Culture. SAGE Open, 12(4), 215824402211309.
- Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., & Bel-Oms, I. (2019). What have we learnt about board gender diversity as a business strategy? The appointment of board subcommittees. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 301-315.
- Rodgers, W., Söderbom, A., & Guiral, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility Enhanced Control Systems Reducing the Likelihood of Fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(4), 871-882.
- Sattar, M., Biswas, P. K., & Roberts, H. (2022). Board gender diversity and firm risk in UK private firms. Global Finance Journal, 54, 100766.
- Sepasi, S., Rexhepi, G., & Rahdari, A. (2021). The changing prospects of corporate social responsibility in the decade of action: Do personal values matter? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 138-152.
- Sokil, O., Zvezdov, D., Zhuk, V., Kucherkova, S., & Sakhno, L. (2020). Social and environmental costs: the impact of accounting and analytical support on enterprises’ sustainable development in Germany and Ukraine. Economic Annals-ХХI, 181(1-2), 124-136.
- Sri Utaminingsih, N., Kurniasih, D., Pramono Sari, M., & Rahardian Ary Helmina, M. (2022). The role of internal control in the relationship of board gender diversity, audit committee, and independent commissioner on tax aggressiveness. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1).
- Tunyi, A. A., Areneke, G., Tob-Ogu, A., & Khalid, S. (2023). Doing more with more: Women on the board and firm employment. Journal of Business Research, 154, 113385.
- Wang, X., Zhang, Z., & Chun, D. (2021). The Influencing Mechanism of Internal Control Effectiveness on Technological Innovation: CSR as a Mediator. Sustainability, 13(23), 13122.
- Yarram, S. R., & Adapa, S. (2022). Women on boards, CSR and risk-taking: An investigation of the interaction effects of gender diversity and CSR on business risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378, 134493.
- Yongming, Z., & Yini, S. (2017). The Impact of Coupling Interaction of Internal Control and CSR on Corporate Performance – Based on the Perspective of Stakeholder. Procedia Engineering, 174, 449-455.
- Zaman, R., Nadeem, M., & Carvajal, M. (2021). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies: evidence from New Zealand. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(1), 135-160.
- Zhong, Q. (2022). Managerial Ownership and Stock Price Volatility: The Moderating Role of Corporate Transparency in China. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 1-10.