ESG performance and corporate adaptability: Evidence from listed companies in China
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.23(1).2026.21
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2026, Issue #1, pp. 277-291
- 312 Views
-
92 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Strengthening environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices is a keyway for corporations to improve their adaptability and cope with uncertainty. This study explores how ESG performance affects the adaptability of listed companies in China. The study used an observation data set of 45,031 Chinese listed companies from 2009 to 2024, and the fixed effect regression model was used to reveal the positive impact of ESG performance on corporate adaptability. The benchmark regression results show that the overall ESG performance has significantly improved corporate adaptability. In-depth analysis shows a significant U-shaped relationship between environmental performance and corporate adaptability. This shows that environmental investment will initially inhibit corporate adaptability due to cost pressure, but once it exceeds a certain threshold, it will have a positive impact. At the same time, both the social and governance dimensions show a continuous linear improvement effect. Heterogeneity analysis shows that higher internal agency costs will weaken the positive impact of ESG, while higher levels of external supervision will enhance these impacts. The economic consequence test corroborates that ESG performance indirectly has a positive impact on corporate value by enhancing adaptability. The research results show that for corporates operating in a dynamic environment, ESG development should be regarded as a strategic investment, especially through long-term continuous improvement of social and governance performance to overcome the threshold of environmental management costs, which can effectively enhance the corporate resilience and corporate adaptability of corporates and ultimately enhance the corporate value.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the General Program of the National Social Science Fund of China [Grant 25BGL022], The Impact Effect and Mechanism of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Organizational Deviant Innovation.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G34, Q56, L25, G32, G38
-
References60
-
Tables8
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research framework
-
- Table 1. Variable definition
- Table 2. Summary statistics
- Table 3. Model benchmark regression results
- Table 4. Partial regression results
- Table 5. Test results for lagging models
- Table 6. Results of robustness tests
- Table 7. Heterogeneity analysis results
- Table 8. Regional heterogeneity differences
-
- Auer, B. R., & Schuhmacher, F. (2016). Do socially (ir)responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 59, 51-62.
- Ben, S. S., & Belkacem, L. (2022). How does corporate social responsibility influence firm financial performance? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(1), 1-22.
- Bilyay-Erdogan, S., Danisman, G. O., & Demir, E. (2024). ESG performance and investment efficiency: The impact of information asymmetry. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 91, 101919.
- Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716.
- Cardillo, G., Bendinelli, E., & Torluccio, G. (2023). COVID-19, ESG investing, and the resilience of more sustainable stocks: Evidence from European firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 602-623.
- Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291.
- Cho, S. Y., Lee, C., & Pfeiffer Jr, R. J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(1), 71-83.
- Chouaibi, S., Chouaibi, J., & Rossi, M. (2022). ESG and corporate financial performance: the mediating role of green innovation: UK common law versus Germany civil law. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(1), 46-71.
- Demers, E., Hendrikse, J., Joos, P., & Lev, B. (2021). ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID-19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 48(3-4), 433-462.
- Ding, W., Levine, R., Lin, C., & Xie, W. (2021). Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(2), 802-830.
- Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693-714.
- Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2017). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? The SMS Blackwell handbook of organizational capabilities (pp. 341-363).
- Elamer, A. A., & Boulhaga, M. (2024). ESG controversies and corporate performance: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms and ESG practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), 3312-3327.
- Habib, M. A., Bao, Y., & Ilmudeen, A. (2020). The impact of green entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation and green supply chain management practices on sustainable firm performance. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1743616.
- Han, W., & Wu, D. (2024). ESG ratings, business credit acquisition, and corporate value. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103376.
- Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
- Helwege, J., Intintoli, V. J., & Zhang, A. (2012). Voting with their feet or activism? Institutional investors’ impact on CEO turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(1), 22-37.
- Huang, X., Dong, Z., Zhou, Z., & Dou, J. (2025). Research on the impact of ESG performance on enterprise resilience. Finance Research Letters, 108358.
- Jiang, W., Chai, H., Shao, J., & Feng, T. (2018). Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 1311-1323.
- Kangalakova, D. M., & Sabden, O. (2017). Methods of assessment of efficiency of small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries: Experience of Kazakhstan. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(7), 47-57.
- Kangalakova, D. M., Satpayeva, Z. T., Nurkenova, M., & Suleimenova, A. (2024). Public management of scientists’ potential as a source of economic development: A bibliometric analysis. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(3), 593-605.
- Kizys, R., Tzouvanas, P., & Donadelli, M. (2021). From COVID-19 herd immunity to investor herding in international stock markets: The role of government and regulatory restrictions. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101663.
- Kotchen, M., & Moon, J. J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility for irresponsibility. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 12(1).
- Lehn, K. (2021). Corporate governance and corporate agility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101929.
- Li, J., Lian, G., & Xu, A. (2023). How do ESG affect the spillover of green innovation among peer firms? Mechanism discussion and performance study. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113648.
- Lin, W. L., Cheah, J. H., Azali, M., Ho, J. A., & Yip, N. (2019). Does firm size matter? Evidence on the impact of the green innovation strategy on corporate financial performance in the automotive sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 974-988.
- Liu, Y., & Yin, J. (2020). Stakeholder relationships and organizational resilience. Management and Organization Review, 16(5), 986-990.
- Liu, Y., McDowell, S., Xue, C., & Zhang, J. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance performance: The role of Chinese employee stock ownership plans. Environmental Economics, 15(2),
- Martínez-Ros, E., & Kunapatarawong, R. (2019). Green innovation and knowledge: The role of size. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1045-1059.
- Mayegle, F. X., & Nguidjol, S. N. (2017). Determinants of choice of management control system in Cameroonian SMEs: a contingency approach. Journal of Management and Strategy, 8(2), 25-42.
- Nurlanova, N. K., Omarov, A. K., & Satpayeva, Z. T. (2020). Methodological Approaches to Estimation of Economic Growth and Sustainable Development: Kazakhstan’s Experience. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business.
- Piotroski, J. D., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2015). Political incentives to suppress negative information: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 405-459.
- Pujiyono, R., Marimin, Suroso, A. I., & Djohar, S. (2025). An ESG-Oriented Sustainable Business Model for Paint Industry Supply Chain in Indonesia. Sustainability, 17(8), 3741.
- Qiu, J., Cui, M., & Pan, A. (2025). Supply chain finance and corporate sustainable development: Evidence from ESG performance. Nankai Business Review. Advance Online Publication, 1-32.
- Sdiq, S. R., & Abdullah, H. A. (2022). Examining the effect of agency cost on capital structure-financial performance nexus: Empirical evidence for emerging market. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2148364.
- Shi, L., & Shizhong, H. (2022). The evolution of ESG from CSR: A literature review and future perspectives. Finance Research, 4, 13-25. (In Chinese).
- Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
- Siew, R. Y., Balatbat, M. C., & Carmichael, D. G. (2016). The impact of ESG disclosures and institutional ownership on market information asymmetry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 23(4), 432-448.
- Srivastava, J., Sampath, A., & Gopalakrishnan, B. (2022). Is ESG the key to unlock debt financing during the COVID-19 pandemic? International evidence. Finance Research Letters, 49, 103125.
- Stuart, A. C., Fuller, S. H., Heron, N. M., & Riley, T. J. (2023). Defining CSR disclosure quality: a review and synthesis of the accounting literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 45(1), 1-47.
- Sun, X., He, Z., & Qian, Y. (2024). Getting organizational adaptability in the context of digital transformation. Chinese Management Studies, 18(2), 550-574.
- Tan, J., Huang, R., & Zhang, J. (2022). ESG performance and corporate risk: An explanation from a resource acquisition perspective. Journal of Management Science, 35(5), 3-18.
- Tayeh, M., Mustafa, R., & Bino, A. (2023). Ownership structure and agency costs: evidence from the insurance industry in Jordan. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 28(56), 287-302.
- Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
- Ting, W., Yen, S. H., & Chiu, C. L. (2008). The influence of qualified foreign institutional investors on the association between default risk and audit opinions: Evidence from the Chinese stock market. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 400-415.
- Truant, E., Borlatto, E., Crocco, E., & Bhatia, M. (2023). ESG performance and technological change: Current state-of-the-art, development and future directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 429, 139493.
- Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89-104.
- Volpin, P. F. (2002). Governance with poor investor protection: Evidence from top executive turnover in Italy. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(1), 61-90.
- Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51.
- Wang, J., & Yao, X. (2025). Corporate Environmental Expenditure, Signaling Mechanism, and Green Innovation Behavior: Evidence from Chinese A-Share Listed Firms. Sustainability, 17(20), 9302.
- Wang, J., & Yao, X. (2025). Corporate Environmental Expenditure, Signaling Mechanism, and Green Innovation Behavior: Evidence from Chinese A-Share Listed Firms. Sustainability, 17(20), 9302.
- Weiss, J. W. (2021). Business ethics: A stakeholder and issues management approach. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
- Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991-995.
- Wong, W. C., Batten, J. A., Mohamed-Arshad, S. B., Nordin, S., & Adzis, A. A. (2021). Does ESG certification add firm value? Finance Research Letters, 39, 101593.
- Xie, H., & Lv, X.. (2025). Responsible international investment: esg and ofdi in china. China Finance and Economic Review 14(3), 3-22.
- Xie, H., & Lyu, X. (2022). Responsible multinational investment: ESG and Chinese OFDI. Economic Research Journal, 57(03), 83-99. (In Chinese).
- Xu, J., & Xu, W. (2025). Exploring the Transmission Pathway of” Data-Finance” Synergistic Clustering on Corporate Economic Adaptability: Evidence from Quasi-Experimental Analysis in National Big Data Pilot Zones. International Review of Economics & Finance, 104233.
- Yang, L., He, X., & Gu, H. F. (2020). Top management team’s experiences, dynamic capabilities and firm’s strategy mutation: moderating effect of managerial discretion. Journal of Management World, 36, 168-188.
- Zhang, J., & Liu, Z. (2023). Study on the impact of corporate ESG performance on green innovation performance – Evidence from listed companies in China A-Shares. Sustainability, 15(20), 14750.
- Zhang, P., Ma, B., & Chi, C. (2025). Institutional investors and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy.


