Managing women’s participation in Kazakhstan’s agricultural research sector: Determinants in the context of the 5MS framework
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.10(1).2026.10
-
Article InfoVolume 10 2026, Issue #1, pp. 137-154
- 18 Views
-
4 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
A balanced gender distribution is observed in agricultural sciences in Kazakhstan. This study aims to define and analyze the factors influencing women’s participation in the agricultural research sector in Kazakhstan using the 5Ms analytical framework (macro/meso environment, money, motherhood, management). The study applies quantitative statistical analysis of science development indicators from bulletins of the Bureau of National Statistics, extracts from the minutes of the National Scientific Council, and qualitative content analysis of regulatory legal acts from the “Adilet” system. The empirical analysis covers the period 2018–2025. In Kazakhstan, 1,185 women scientists are engaged in agricultural research, accounting for 9.2% of female scientists and 51.3% of researchers in agricultural science. Women’s participation is shaped by factors across all dimensions of the 5M framework. Key drivers include the public policies promoting equal opportunities, access to postgraduate education in agriculture (master’s programs: 11.1-66.7%; Ph.D. programs: 20-90.9% of students), and employment opportunities in the agricultural system (18,212 people, 30%). The barriers include stereotypes about the masculinity of the scientific profession and activities in the agricultural sector, as well as limited access to large research grants. One of the most significant barriers is the “glass ceiling”, reflected in the underrepresentation of women in leadership positions (3.2% female executives, 8.8-21% female rectors, etc.) and the presence of a gender pay gap (21.2% in salaries, 60.8% in grants), as well as the “motherhood penalty”. Strengthening women’s participation in agricultural sciences requires not only increasing their representation but also promoting their presence in leadership and decision-making positions.
Acknowledgments
This research has been funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (IRN AP19579256 “Mechanisms for empowering women in scientific activity in the interests of the development of the innovative economy of Kazakhstan”).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)J16, M54, Q16
-
References59
-
Tables7
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Women scientists in agricultural sciences in Kazakhstan, people, %, 2019–2024
- Figure 2. Female managers in higher education organizations of Kazakhstan, people, %, 2000–2022
- Figure 3. Female rectors in higher education organizations of Kazakhstan, people, %, 2000–2022
-
- Table 1. Women scientists in agricultural sciences in Kazakhstan by academic degree, people (ppl.), %, 2019–2024
- Table 2. Female graduates of master’s and PhD programs in Kazakhstan, people, share (%), 2020–2025 academic years
- Table 3. Average monthly nominal wages of workers in the agricultural sector in Kazakhstan, tenge, 2024
- Table 4. Volumes of funding for agricultural research projects in Kazakhstan, tenge, 2020–2025
- Table 5. Actual employment by profession (positions) in Kazakhstan, people, 2024
- Table 6. Average number of hours spent on unpaid household work in Kazakhstan, hours-minutes, 2018
- Table A1. Source base of the study
-
- Almukhambetova, A. (2023). Exploring STEM teacher educators’ gender awareness and understanding of gender-responsive pedagogies in Kazakhstan. In Durrani, N., & Thibault, H. (Eds.), The Political Economy of Education in Central Asia. The Steppe and Beyond: Studies on Central Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
- Anessova, A., Bekbossinov, A., & Abdullayeva, B. (2024). Socio-economic gender inequality in Kazakhstan: Analysis based on the cluster approach. Eurasian Journal of Gender Studies, 1(2), 54-65.
- Avolio, B., Chávez, J., & Vílchez-Román, C. (2020). Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: a literature review. Social Psychology of Education, 23, 773-794.
- Balta, N., Japashov, N., Karimova, A., Agaidarova, S., Abisheva, S., & Potvin, P. (2023a). Middle and high school girls’ attitude to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics career interest across grade levels and school types. Frontiers in Education, 8, e1158041.
- Balta, N., Japashov, N., Mansurova, A., Tzafilkou, K., Oliveira, A. W., & Lathrop, R. (2023b). Middle- and secondary-school students’ STEM career interest and its relationship to gender, grades, and family size in Kazakhstan. Science Education, 107(2), 401-426.
- Beintema, N. (2020). The role of women in agricultural research.
- Blaszczak, W., Ahmed, A., Leithner, K., Schubert, A., Leech, M., Bonder, C., & Tsagakis, I. (2022). Outlook of women in science: an interview with our authors. Molecular Oncology, 16, 1047-1056.
- BNS. (2024). The main indicators of research and development work in the Republic of Kazakhstan.
- Brush, C. G., de Bruin, A., & Welter, F. (2009). A gender-aware framework for women’s entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 8-24.
- Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241-247.
- CohenMiller, A., Saniyazova, A., Sandygulova, A., & Izekenova, Z. (2021). Gender equity in STEM higher education in Kazakhstan. In Gender Equity in STEM in Higher Education: International Perspectives on Policy, Institutional Culture, and Individual Choice (pp. 140-157). Taylor and Francis.
- Dabkienė, V., Šikšnelytė-Butkienė, I., Štreimikienė, D., Šapolaitė, V., & Baležentis, T. (2025). From glass to grass ceiling: Addressing gender barriers in agricultural innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 212, e123957.
- EIGE. (2023). Gender Equality Index 2023: Sweden.
- Eldala. (n.d.). Companies and associations.
- European Commission (EC). (2024). She Figures 2024.
- GosZakup. (n.d.). Government procurement of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
- Hollows, S., Rab, M., & Schulze, C. (2015). Understanding female participation in STEM subjects in Pakistan. British Council.
- Huang, J., Gates, A.J., Sinatra, R., & Barabási, A. (2020). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 117(9), 4609-4616.
- IMF. (2024). Taking stock of gender gaps in Chad.
- Iskindirova, Zh. Bekturganova, M., Tayshanova, S., & Sabitov, Zh. (2026). Breaking the glass ceiling in Kazakhstani science: Government grants and gender representation trends. Knowledge and Performance Management, 10(1), 54-65.
- Kabzhalalova, M. (2023). Gendernyye stereotipy i frazy v Kazakhstane v devyatoy rabote laureata Nobelevskogo Klaudii Goldina [Gender stereotypes and inequality in Kazakhstan in the context of the works of Nobel laureate Claudia Goldin]. Halyk Research. (In Russian).
- Kakabadse, N. K., Tatli, A., Nicolopoulou, K., Tankibayeva, A., & Mouraviev, N. (2018). A gender perspective on entrepreneurial leadership: Female leaders in Kazakhstan. European Management Review, 15(2), 155-170.
- Kaliyeva, S., Rakhmetova, R., Maxyutova, A., Kabylkairatkyzy, R., & Sadykov, I. (2025). Impact of energy factors and digitalization advancement on employment: Evidence from mining, industry and electricity labor markets. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 15(5), 480-489.
- Kangalakova, D. M., Satpayeva, Z. T., Nurkenova, M., & Suleimenova, A. (2024). Public management of scientists’ potential as a source of economic development: A bibliometric analysis. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(3), 593-605.
- Kangalakova, D., Satpayeva, Z., Kangalakov, K., & Battalov, N. (2025). Development of agricultural scientific potential to ensure the competitiveness of the agricultural sector of Kazakhstan: Gender aspect. E3S Web Conf., 613, е05002.
- Kireyeva, A. A., & Olzhebayeva, G. S. (2023). Gender imbalance in science: analytical overview and best global practices. Economy: Strategy and Practice, 18(4), 7-21. (In Kazakh).
- Kurmankulov, S., Dikhanbayeva, D., Perveen, A., & Tsakalerou, M. (2023). Female engineers in a transitional economy: Perceptual facilitators for and barriers to studying in STEM fields. 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (Baltimore, Maryland).
- Kuzhabekova, A., & Almukhambetova, A. (2017). Female academic leadership in the post-Soviet context. European Educational Research Journal, 16(2-3), 183-199.
- Lewison, G. (2001). The quantity and quality of female researchers: A bibliometric study of Iceland. Scientometrics, 52, 29-43.
- Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474-16479.
- Mulema, A. A., Jogo, W., Damtew, E., Mekonnen, K., & Thorne, P. (2019). Women farmers’ participation in the agricultural research process: implications for agricultural sustainability in Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 17(2), 127-145.
- NAAS (n.d.). National academy of agrarian sciences.
- National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2023). National science report. Astana, Almaty.
- National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2024). National science report (268 p.). Astana, Almaty.
- NASEC. (n.d.). Innovations in agriculture. Science for the future of Kazakhstan.
- NCSTE. (n.d.). JSC “NCSTE” competitions.
- OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development, the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities.
- Powell, S., & Grubbström, A. (2021). Leading gender equality change in higher education – the case of forestry. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 29(2), 199-216.
- Pyburn, R., & van Eerdewijk, A. (Eds). (2021). Advancing gender equality through agricultural and environmental research: Past, present, and future. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
- Ramadani, V., Hisrich, R., & Rashiti, S. (2015). Female entrepreneurs in transition economies: Insights from Albania, Macedonia and Kosovo. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 11(4), 391-413.
- Rannís. (2020). Science and Technology Policy 2020–2022.
- Research Council of Norway. (2024). Evaluation of Norwegian research within natural sciences 2022–2024.
- Roche, M., MacNamara, N., & Hurley, M. A. (2022). HER-SELF. Summary Report (DAFM Project 2022PSS127).
- Rudzki, E. N., Kuebbing, S. E., Clark, D. R., Gharaibeh, B., Janecka, M. J., Kramp, R., K. D., Mastalski, T., Ohmer, M. E. B., Turcotte, M. V., & Richards Zawacki, C. L. (2022). A guide for developing a field research safety manual that explicitly considers risks for marginalized identities in the sciences. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 13(11), 2318-2330.
- Satpayeva, Z. T., Kireyeva, A. A., Kenzhegulova, G., & Yermekbayeva, D. (2020). Gender equality and women business of framework 5Ms in Kazakhstan: Analysis and basic directions. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(3), 253-263.
- Stoet, G., & Geary, D. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581-593.
- UN Women. (2024). Afghanistan gender country profile 2024.
- UNDP Kazakhstan. (2023). Obshchestvennoye Vospriyatiye Gendernogo Ravenstva I Rasshireniya Prav I Vozmozhnostey Zhenshchin V Kazakhstane [Public perception of gender equality and women’s empowerment in Kazakhstan]. Astana: UNDP Kazakhstan, UN Women Kazakhstan. (In Russian).
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2021). Women in science.
- UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). Bokova, I. (Ed.). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
- UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Science Report: The Race Against Time for Smarter Development. Schneegans, S., Straza, T., & Lewis, J. (Eds). Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
- UNESCO. (2024). Call to Action: Closing the gender gap in science. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
- UNESCO. (2025). Power of women: Inspiring Central Asian students to pursue careers in science.
- Uzman, N., Selcuk, A., Pehlivanovic, B., Balta, E., Hammoudi Halat, D., Etukakpan, A., Masyitah, N., Thompson, C., & Duggan, C. (2022). Enabling positive practice environments for women in science and education with FIPWiSE toolkit. Pharmacy Education, 22(1), 761-770.
- WEF (2023). Global Gender Gap Report 2023. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
- World Bank. (2021). Women and STEM in Europe and Central Asia. Munoz Boudet, A. M., Rodriguez Chamussy, L., Oral Savonitto, I., & Chiarella, C. (Eds.). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
- World Bank. (2023). Democratic Republic of Congo.
- World Fish Center. (2015). Why women in agricultural science is good for development?
- World Population Review. (2025). Gender equality by country 2025.


