The impact of ethnocentrism and its antecedents on cultural heritage tourism along the Silk Road

  • Received November 14, 2020;
    Accepted March 14, 2021;
    Published March 24, 2021
  • Author(s)
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.31
  • Article Info
    Volume 19 2021, Issue #1, pp. 364-371
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    6 articles
  • 839 Views
  • 665 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

The Great Silk Road offers a high potential for the cultural and heritage tourism development as more travelers are interested in the past and culture of the others. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between patriotism, cultural openness, ethnocentrism and outcomes of tourism in the context of the Central Asia. The study uses a quantitative approach. A survey method was applied to collect data from 146 local residents living in the heritage tourism areas. The analysis included descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis. The obtained results demonstrate that patriotism had a significant positive impact on ethnocentrism of local residents, while cultural openness had a negative impact on ethnocentrism. The ethnocentric attitudes of residents were significantly related to the positive and negative outcomes of tourism. Recommendations are provided for addressing problems related to cultural differences and regional cooperation for better understanding, tolerance, and social interactions between people living in the countries of Central Asia. This study contributes to the academic literature by integrating ethnocentrism and its antecedents with positive and negative outcomes of cultural tourism. It is of value to tourism practitioners and local policy makers in the Silk Road countries.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Proposed model of the study
    • Table 1. Sample characteristics (n = 146)
    • Table 2. Confirmatory factor analysis results
    • Table 3. Hypotheses testing results
    • Table 4. Mean comparison for constructs
    • Conceptualization
      Liza Rybina
    • Data curation
      Liza Rybina
    • Funding acquisition
      Liza Rybina
    • Formal Analysis
      Liza Rybina
    • Investigation
      Liza Rybina
    • Methodology
      Liza Rybina
    • Project administration
      Liza Rybina
    • Resources
      Liza Rybina
    • Software
      Liza Rybina
    • Supervision
      Liza Rybina
    • Validation
      Liza Rybina
    • Visualization
      Liza Rybina
    • Writing – original draft
      Liza Rybina
    • Writing – review & editing
      Liza Rybina