Organizational support as a moderator on academic entrepreneurship performance in state universities

  • 63 Views
  • 16 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Engaging in academic entrepreneurship enhances the potential for academics to generate scientific advancements, capitalize on findings, and create impactful contributions. This study examines how organizational support affects the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and role integration on academic entrepreneurship performance at state universities in Indonesia. The population includes lecturers from eleven state universities with research results that can be commercialized. A purposive sampling method selected 330 respondents, focusing on science and social sciences lecturers with research at a technological readiness level of 6 to 9, demonstrating pilot stages and commercialization readiness based on national assessments. Data analysis used variance-based structural equation modeling and partial least squares (PLS). The findings indicate that entrepreneurial orientation significantly affects academic entrepreneurship performance (p < 0.05), and role integration significantly affects academic entrepreneurship performance (p < 0.05). Additionally, organizational support moderates the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and academic entrepreneurship performance (p < 0.05), and organizational support moderates the relationship between role integration and academic entrepreneurship performance (p < 0.05).

Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the lecturers at eleven state universities in Indonesia who contributed to this investigation. Their assistance allowed the authors to obtain data that met the study criteria and generate accurate and exact data analysis per the research goals.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Conceptual framework
    • Table 1. Characteristics of respondents
    • Table 2. Composite reliability measurements
    • Table 3. Loadings and cross-loading of variables
    • Table 4. Path coefficient comparison
    • Conceptualization
      Frida Ramadini
    • Data curation
      Frida Ramadini, Yunizar
    • Formal Analysis
      Frida Ramadini
    • Funding acquisition
      Frida Ramadini
    • Methodology
      Frida Ramadini, Asep Mulyana, Yunizar
    • Software
      Frida Ramadini
    • Writing – original draft
      Frida Ramadini
    • Investigation
      Asep Mulyana, Kurniawan Saefullah
    • Resources
      Asep Mulyana
    • Supervision
      Asep Mulyana
    • Validation
      Asep Mulyana, Kurniawan Saefullah
    • Visualization
      Asep Mulyana, Yunizar, Kurniawan Saefullah
    • Writing – review & editing
      Asep Mulyana, Yunizar, Kurniawan Saefullah