1727-70511810-5467
Business Perspectives
  • Login

Editorial office contact form

Please complete all required fields!

Please specify your request here

Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Captcha Refresh Invalid data

Your request has been successfully sent.

Your Cart

Price Total
€0.00

(₴0)

Proceed to Checkout
Your cart is empty
Cart 0 Items
Submit Manuscript
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publishing policies
  • Editorial Policies
  • Books
FOLLOW US
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Problems and Perspectives in Management
  • Issue #1
  • The reciprocal effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices and tax aggressiveness in Indonesian and Malaysian companies

The reciprocal effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices and tax aggressiveness in Indonesian and Malaysian companies

  • Received September 2, 2024;
    Accepted February 11, 2025;
    Published March 3, 2025
  • Author(s)
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2030-4680
    Heri Yanto
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3374-1871
    Ain Hajawiyah
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1089-7360
    Niswah Baroroh
    ORCID Researcher ID
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.25
  • Article Info
    Volume 23 2025, Issue #1, pp. 339-351
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • 241 Views
  • 58 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

This study highlights the complexity of the relationship between sustainability performance, environment, social and governance (ESG) reporting, and tax aggressiveness, which is a critical concern amidst the increasing demands for corporate social accountability. Companies in Indonesia and Malaysia, especially those in the non-financial sector, face increasing regulatory pressure to meet ESG standards. This study uses 263 Indonesian and 311 Malaysian companies as samples because both countries are prominent emerging markets in Southeast Asia with fast-growing economies, diverse industries, and abundant natural resources. However, aggressive tax avoidance remains a common strategy to maintain financial flexibility. This study aims to examine whether companies with high ESG performance tend to reduce tax avoidance practices or use it as a strategy to cover ESG costs. Through 2SLS regression analysis on 2012–2021 data, the results show that ESG performance has a significant positive effect on tax aggressiveness, where companies with high ESG performance also tend to engage in tax avoidance to cover ESG costs. Conversely, tax aggressiveness positively affects ESG performance because companies increase ESG engagement to reduce reputational risks from aggressive tax practices. The simultaneous test found a reciprocal relationship between the two variables with an R² value of 29.4% for tax aggressiveness and 63.1% for ESG performance. This study suggests stricter regulations to reduce tax avoidance in companies with high ESG performance and provides insights for policymakers in Southeast Asia.

view full abstract hide full abstract
  • PAPER PROFILE
  • AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS
  • FIGURES
  • TABLES
  • REFERENCES
  • Keywords
    ESG performance, Indonesia, Malaysia, sustainability performance, tax aggressiveness
  • JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)
    Q56, H26, M41, M48
  • References
    28
  • Tables
    5
  • Figures
    0
    • Table 1. Definition and operationalization of the variables
    • Table 2. Sample selection criteria
    • Table 3. Descriptive statistics
    • Table 4. Multiple regression results for model 1
    • Table 5. Multiple regression results for model 2
    • Amidu, M., Kwakye, T.O., Harvey, S., & Yorke, S.M. (2016). Do firms manage earnings and avoid tax for corporate social responsibility? Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 8(2), 11-27.
    • Col, B., & Patel, S. (2019). Going to haven? Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 1033-1050.
    • Davis, A. K., Guenther, D. A., Krull, L. K., & Williams, B. M. (2016). Do socially responsible firms pay more taxes? The Accounting Review, 91(1), 47-68.
    • Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467-496.
    • Gandullia, L., & Piserà, S. (2020). Do income taxes affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from European-listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 1017-1027.
    • Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1), 51-71.
    • Hajawiyah, A., Kiswanto, K., Suryarini, T., Yanto, H., & Harjanto, A.P. (2022). The bidirectional relationship of tax aggressiveness and CSR: Evidence from Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), Article 2090207.
    • Hasibuan, D. H., & Khomsiyah. (2019). Do corporate social responsibility and corporate governance affect tax aggressiveness? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, 7(1), 8-16.
    • Hoi, C. K., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2013). Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) associated with tax avoidance? Evidence from irresponsible CSR activities. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 2025-2059.
    • Huseynov, F., & Klamm, B. K. (2012). Tax avoidance, reporting transparency, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4), 804-827.
    • Jatiningrum, C., Fauzi, F., & Septarina, L. (2024). Mitigation of tax aggressiveness through good corporate governance company’s website and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence-concentrated ownership companies. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 16(1), 1-15.
    • Karthikeyan, M., & Jain, B. (2017). Relationship between CSR rating and tax avoidance. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC). Coimbatore, India.
    • Kim, J.-B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011). Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 639-662.
    • Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1), 86-108.
    • Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(1), 75-100.
    • Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2015). Is corporate social responsibility performance associated with tax avoidance? Journal Business Ethics, 127, 439-457.
    • Mao, C.-W. (2019). The effect of corporate social responsibility on corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from a matching approach. Quality & Quantity, 53, 49-67.
    • Marsdenia, & Martani, D. (2018). Environmental CSR disclosure and tax avoidance behavior: Empirical study of Indonesia’s capital market listed company. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 175, Article 012088.
    • Minnick, K., & Noga, T. (2010). Do corporate governance characteristics influence tax management? Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(5), 703-718.
    • Pamungkas, I. D., Raihan, M. R., Satata, D. P. I., & Kristianto, A.Y. (2024). Impact of corporate social responsibility between green accounting and sustainable development goals. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 16(1), 43-57.
    • Pranata, I. P. A. A., Adhitanaya, K., Rizaldi, M. F., Winanda, G. B. E., Lestari, N. M. I. D., & Astuti, P. D. (2021). The effect of corporate social responsibility, firm size, and leverage on tax aggressiveness: An empirical evidence. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(6), 1478-1486.
    • Pratiwi, I. S., & Djakman, C. D. (2017). The role of corporate political connections in CSR and tax avoidance: Evidence from Indonesia. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 6(suppl_1).
    • Qodraturrasyid, M. B. R. (2017). The role of risk management systems in moderating the influence of CSR activities on tax aggressiveness (Master’s Thesis). University of Indonesia.
    • Rusydi, M. K., & Siregar, S. V. (2014). Pengaruh Pengungkapan CSR Terhadap Aggressive Tax Avoidance [The effect of CSR disclosure on aggressive tax avoidance]. National Seminar of Maranatha Christian University Bandung.
    • Shafer, W. E., & Simmons, R. S. (2008). Social responsibility, Machiavellianism and tax avoidance: A study of Hong Kong tax professionals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(5), 695-720.
    • Sikka, P. (2010). Smoke and mirrors: Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance. Accounting Forum, 34(3-4), 153-168.
    • Wahab, E. A., Ariff, A. M., Marzuki, M. M., & Sanusi, Z. M. (2017). Political connections, corporate governance, and tax aggressiveness in Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 25(3), 424–451.
    • Zeng, T. (2021). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Canadian family firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(5), 703-718.
    • Conceptualization
      Heri Yanto, Ain Hajawiyah
    • Funding acquisition
      Heri Yanto, Ain Hajawiyah, Niswah Baroroh
    • Methodology
      Heri Yanto, Ain Hajawiyah
    • Supervision
      Heri Yanto
    • Writing – original draft
      Heri Yanto, Ain Hajawiyah
    • Data curation
      Ain Hajawiyah, Niswah Baroroh
    • Investigation
      Ain Hajawiyah, Niswah Baroroh
    • Software
      Ain Hajawiyah
    • Validation
      Ain Hajawiyah
    • Formal Analysis
      Niswah Baroroh
    • Project administration
      Niswah Baroroh
    • Resources
      Niswah Baroroh
    • Visualization
      Niswah Baroroh
    • Writing – review & editing
      Niswah Baroroh
Related Articles
  • Perceived health risk, online retail ethics, and consumer behavior within online shopping during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Yuniarti FihartiniORCID , Arief HelmiORCID , Meydia HassanORCID , Yevis Marty OesmanORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(3).2021.02
    Innovative Marketing Volume 17, 2021         Issue #3         pp. 17-29 Views: 4851 Downloads: 1808 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The risk of virus contracting during the COVID-19 pandemic has changed consumer preference for online shopping to meet their daily needs than shopping in brick-and-mortar stores. Online shopping presents a different environment, atmosphere, and experience. The possibility of ethical violations is higher during online than face-to-face transactions. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the influence of perceived health risk and customer perception of online retail ethics on consumer online shopping behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, involving seven variables, namely perceived health risk, security, privacy, non-deception, reliability fulfillment, service recovery, and online shopping behavior. The data were collected through an online survey by employing the purposive sampling technique to a consumer who has shopped online during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. 315 valid responses were obtained and analyzed through quantitative method using SEM-Amos. The results showed that perceived health risk and four variables of online retail ethics including security, privacy, reliability fulfillment, and service recovery affected online shopping behavior. Meanwhile, non-deception was found to have an insignificant effect. The coefficient value proved perceived health risk to be more dominant in influencing online shopping behavior than the variables of online retail ethics. Thus, consumers pay more concern for their health during online shopping. However, positive consumer perceptions of the behavior of online retail websites in providing services also can encourage consumers to shop online during this pandemic.

  • Human resource management in promoting innovation and organizational performance

    I Gede RianaORCID , Gede SuparnaORCID , I Gusti Made SuwandanaORCID , Sebastian KotORCID Researcher ID, Ismi RajianiORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.10
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020         Issue #1         pp. 107-118 Views: 4031 Downloads: 936 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Human resource management (HRM) is one of the elements enabling an organization to remain competitive in turbulence conditions. The effective practice of HRM makes competent and innovative employees contributing to the achievement of organizational objectives. This study aims to analyze HRM practices in creating innovation and organizational performance. The questionnaire was used to measure the respondents’ perceptions of variables used by a Likert scale. A survey of 126 manager samples and middle managers at export-oriented short and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Bali, Indonesia, was conducted to test the model. The analysis has shown that the proposed model was proven to be compliant with the research hypotheses. HRM significantly affects organizational performance and innovation, and it was found out that innovation can improve organizational performance. However, in the process of simultaneous testing, it was found out that innovation cannot improve organizational performance. The lack of attention to investments in human resources became one of the barriers to SMEs in creating innovation.

  • Positive contribution of the good corporate governance rating to stability and performance: evidence from Indonesia

    RR. Iramani , Muazaroh Muazaroh , Abdul MongidORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.01
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018         Issue #2         pp. 1-11 Views: 3475 Downloads: 368 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This paper aims to examine the impact of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) practice on bank stability and performance. Governance is measured using the GCG rating that covers eleven aspects. The authors apply instrumental regression to link governance to performance and stability. The study covers a sample of 150 banks. The result shows that bank stability can mediate bank governance and bank performance. On the determinant of bank performance, it can be concluded that the GCG rating is positive and directly influences bank performance. Bank stability is also positive for bank performance indicating the indirect contribution of the GCG rating to bank performance. NPL, LDR, CAR and bank’s size (LASSET) are all negative and significant. The aim of this paper is to provide strong empirical evidence on the importance of governance and stability for performance. The limitations of this paper are the size of the sample and that it only covers public banks which are theoretically required to apply better governance in all aspects of their business by the Capital Market Authority.

< Prev Next >
Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management
  • Issue #1
  • Journal Homepage
  • Indexed/Abstracted
  • Aims and Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies and Publication Ethics
  • Submission Guidelines for Authors
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Acceptance rate
  • Self-Archiving Policy
  • Article processing charge
 

COOKIES
The cookie settings on this website are set to 'allow all cookies' to give you the best experience.

If you continue without changing these settings, you consent to this Read more

Accept
newsletter
We accept payment with:
  • visa
  • mastercard
  • ISNI: 0000 0004 6439 8257
  • Copyright © 2025 LLC “CPC “Business Perspectives”,
    except Open Access articles

Developed by MindK. Designed by Crisp.

  • About Us
    • Company
    • News
    • Cooperation and partners
    • Advertising
    • Manuscript Administration System
  • Users support
    • Your profile
    • External services instructions
    • Site navigation
Contact us
  • Hryhorii Skovoroda lane, 10 Sumy, 40022 , Ukraine
  • +380-542-221707
  • +38-063-2891070
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Tweets by LLC “Business Perspectives”