How structural and behavioral factors influence performance in Moroccan public institutions: The mediating role of management control practices
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(3).2025.32
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #3, pp. 442-456
- 23 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
This study explores the modernization of governance in Moroccan public sector institutions by analyzing the adoption of modern management control practices and their impact on organizational performance. Specifically, it examines how clearly defined structural factors (e.g., technological capabilities, organizational size, and age) and behavioral factors (e.g., leadership style and internal motivation) influence the implementation of these practices. The study also assesses how the effective use of such practices relates to performance outcomes. Data were collected through a structured survey administered to 100 Moroccan public establishments between 2023 and 2024, targeting key managerial profiles (such as finance directors and department heads). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied to test the hypothesized relationships. The findings reveal that behavioral factors, particularly leadership style, have a significant positive influence on the adoption of modern management control practices. Technological capabilities also play a facilitating role, whereas structural characteristics such as organizational age and size do not show statistically significant effects. Moreover, external control mechanisms exert a dual influence: they encourage compliance-oriented practices but may hinder more interactive and adaptive uses. The study confirms that the effective implementation of modern management control practices is positively associated with enhanced organizational performance. These results underscore the central role of behavioral and technological factors in promoting performance-driven reforms in the public sector.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M41, H83, D23, L32
-
References49
-
Tables8
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual research framework
- Figure 2. Adjusted structural model (Bootstrapping output)
-
- Table 1. Characteristics of the surveyed establishments
- Table 2. Respondent profile
- Table 3. Reliability and convergent and discriminant validity
- Table 4. Results of R2 and Q2
- Table 5. Bootstrap results of the first hypothesis
- Table 6. Bootstrap results of the second hypothesis
- Table 7. Bootstrap results of the third hypothesis
- Table 8. Bootstrap results of the fourth hypothesis (Moderation)
-
- Abernethy, M. A., & Brownell, P. (1999). The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: An exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(3), 189-204.
- Abeysekera, I., & Sharma, R. (2023). Adoption of activity-based costing technology in Australian universities. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1168955.
- Ahsina, K., Taouab, O., & Cherqaoui, M. B. (2014). L’impact de l’adoption des IFRS sur les sociétés cotées à la bourse de Casablanca: Une étude exploratoire [The impact of IFRS adoption on companies listed on the Casablanca Stock Exchange: An exploratory study]. La Revue Gestion et Organisation, 6(2), 75-83.
- Arnaboldi, M., Busco, C., & Cuganesan, S. (2017). Accounting, accountability, social media, and big data: Revolution or hype? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(4), 762-776.
- Bazarouj, R., & Alaoui, L. Z. O. (2019). Nécessité d’un contrôle de gestion moderne dans les établissements publics: Une analyse théorique [The necessity of modern management control in public institutions: A theoretical analysis]. Revue du Contrôle, de la Comptabilité et de l’Audit, 3(3).
- Bazarouj, R., Hasnaoui, R., & Ait Lhassan, I. (2024). Modern management control and internal governance of Moroccan public establishments: An analysis using the structural equation method. Review of Economics and Finance, 22(1), 530-540.
- Bernard, O. (2010). Systèmes de contrôle de gestion et trajectoire des dirigeants de petites entreprises: Le cas de la décoration intérieure en France [Management control systems and the trajectory of small firm owner-managers: The interior design industry in France] (Doctoral dissertation). University of Montpellier.
- Bhimani, A., & Willcocks, L. (2014). Digitisation, ‘big data’ and the transformation of accounting information. Accounting and Business Research, 44(4), 469-490.
- Chapellier, P. (1997). Manager profiles and accounting data in SMEs. Revue Internationale P.M.E., 10(1), 9-41.
- Chapellier, P., Mohammed, A., & Teller, R. (2013). Le système d’information comptable des dirigeants de PME syriennes: Complexité et contingences [The accounting information system of Syrian SME managers: Complexity and contingencies]. Management & Avenir, 65(7), 48-72.
- Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2), 127-168.
- Chenhall, R. H., & Moers, F. (2007). The issue of endogeneity within theory-based, quantitative management accounting research. European Accounting Review, 16(1), 173-196.
- Davila, T., & Foster, G. (2007). Management control systems in early-stage startup companies. Accounting Review.
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
- Fernandes, T. de O., Câmara, R. P. de B., & Silva, G. R. da. (2023). Análise de fatores contingenciais e sistemas de controles gerenciais associados às práticas de gestão sustentáveis [Analysis of contingency factors and management control systems associated with sustainable management practices]. Revista Ambiente Contábil, 15(1).
- Gao, J. (2015). Performance measurement and management in the public sector : Some lessons from research evidence. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 86 96.
- Germain, C., & Gates, S. (2010). L’engagement des parties prenantes internes dans les démarches de Responsabilité Globale (RG): l’intégration des indicateurs de RG dans les outils de pilotage du contrôle de gestion [The commitment of internal stakeholders in Global Responsibility (GR) approaches: Integrating GR indicators into management control tools]. Management & Avenir, 33(3), 223-237.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Hammouch, A., Manta, F., & Palazzo, B. (2024). Adapting management control systems to organizational contingency factors: A study of Moroccan industrial companies. Businesses, 4(4), 883-898.
- Henri, J.-F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529-558.
- Ibrahimi, M., & Naym, S. (2019). The contingency of performance measurement systems in Moroccan public institutions and enterprises. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(4), 613-632.
- Izenzal, M., & Benazzi, K. (2024). Exploring the factors influencing the adoption of management control systems in Moroccan municipalities: Analysis of interviews through IRAMUTEQ. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(7), Article 2025334.
- Julnes, P. De L., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693-708.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Johnson, H. T. (1987). Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting. Harvard Business School Press.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part II. Accounting Horizons, 15(2), 147-160.
- Lhassan, I., Azdod, M., Razzouki, M., Bouayad, M., & Babounia, A. (2024). The contribution of balanced scorecard perspectives for improving supply chain performance: A PLS-SEM approach. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(4), 2741-2752.
- Martel, J., Nadeau, R., Elsliger, & Guay. (1985). Les processus de décision des gestionnaires dans les PME québécoises : Étude exploratoire [Decision-making processes of managers in Quebec SMEs: An exploratory study]. Laval University.
- Mawadia, A., Chapellier, P., & Eggrickx, A. (2016). ERP et profil d’activités du contrôleur de gestion: une évolution par paliers ? [ERP and the evolution of the management controller’s activities: A phased approach?] Management & Avenir, 87(5), 125-149.
- Meyssonnier, F. (2019). Le contrôle de gestion des entreprises de taille réduite [Management control in small-sized enterprises]. ACCRA, 6(3), 63-82.
- Modell, S. (2004). Performance measurement myths in the public sector: A research note. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(1), 39-55.
- Nadeau, R., Martel, J. J., & Zali, B. M. (1988). L’utilisation des méthodes quantitatives pour les décisions de gestion dans les PME québécoises: Une étude empirique [The use of quantitative methods for management decisions in Quebec SMEs: An empirical study] (Research Paper GRADE RR 88). Laval University.
- Nassou, H., & Bennani, L. (2024). Contingency theory in management: Conceptual phases and strategic link with performance measurement systems. European Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 183-187.
- Nelson, E. R. (1987). Promotion of small enterprises. In P. Neck & E. R. Nelson (Eds.), Small enterprise development: Policies and programmes. International Labour Organization.
- Ngongang, D., & Njojo, J. G. N. (2018). Facteurs de contingence et nature du contrôle de gestion dans les PME camerounaises [Contingency factors and the nature of management control in Cameroonian SMEs]. Journal of African Business, 19(3), 335-350.
- Otley, D. T., & Pierce, B. J. (1996). Auditor time budget pressure: Consequences and antecedents. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 31-58.
- Porter, M. E. (1985). The competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
- Raucci, D., & Tarquinio, L. (2020). Sustainability performance indicators and non-financial information reporting. Evidence from the Italian case. Administrative Sciences, 10(1), Article 13.
- Shao, Z. (2019). Interaction effect of strategic leadership behaviors and organizational culture on IS-business strategic alignment and enterprise systems assimilation. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 96-108.
- Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal (1st ed.). Harvard Business School Press.
- Stouthuysen, K., Schierhout, K., Roodhooft, F., & Reusen, E. (2014). Time-driven activity-based costing for public services. Public Money & Management, 34(4), 289-296.
- Talbot, C. (1999). Public performance – Towards a new model? Public Policy and Administration, 14(3), 15–34.
- Ter Bogt, H. J. (2008). Management accounting change and new public management in local government: A reassessment of ambitions and results – An institutionalist approach to accounting change in the Dutch public sector. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(3), 209-241.
- Ter Bogt, H. J., & Scapens, R. W. (2012). Performance management in universities: Effects of the transition to more quantitative measurement systems. European Accounting Review, 21(3), 451-497.
- Van der Stede, W. A. (2001). Measuring “tight budgetary control”. Management Accounting Research, 12(1), 119-137.
- Van Helden, J., & Reichard, C. (2019). Making sense of the users of public sector accounting information and their needs. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(4), 478-495.
- Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195.
- Widener, S. K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7-8), 757-788.
- Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 15-32.