Managerial responses to One Report: A cluster analysis of Thai listed companies
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(4).2025.03
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #4, pp. 29-47
- 11 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Mandatory reporting regulations challenge management adaptation. Organizational response patterns during regulatory transitions in emerging markets require further investigation. The study examines managerial responses of Thai-listed companies to the mandatory One Report regulation in 2021 and classifies firms into strategic clusters based on adaptation patterns to International Integrated Reporting Framework components. The paper used a comprehensive Integrated Reporting Quality Index and two-step cluster analysis on 232 annual reports from 58 largest companies in Thailand’s SET50 index (2019–2022) to move beyond simple compliance measurement and identify distinct managerial strategies and their organizational implications. Results demonstrate significant improvement in the quality of managerial responses to the regulation, representing a 36.4% increase, from moderate levels (X̄ = 1.21, SD = 0.24) before implementation to high levels (X̄ = 1.65, SD = 0.18) afterward. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirmed statistical significance (Z values between –3.205 and –5.526, p < 0.001). Notably, cluster analysis identifies two distinct strategic approaches: Strategic adopters (Cluster 1), who demonstrate comprehensive integrated thinking, and compliance-oriented responders (Cluster 2), who adopt minimalist approaches. The study reveals significant organizational learning over the study period, with strategic adopters growing from 27 to 44 companies (46.6% to 75.9%) while compliance-oriented responders declined from 31 to 14 companies (53.4% to 24.1%). Mandatory implementation successfully catalyzed strategic differentiation, though challenges in disclosing non-financial capital persist. These findings provide crucial insights for managers seeking competitive advantage during regulatory transitions and for policymakers designing effective governance frameworks.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M41, M48, L51, C38
-
References53
-
Tables4
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Transition of firms between strategic and compliance-oriented clusters (2019–2022)
- Figure B1. Dendrogram of strategic management clustering based on the IIRF (2019)
- Figure B2. Dendrogram of strategic management clustering based on the IIRF (2020)
- Figure B3. Dendrogram of strategic management clustering based on the IIRF (2021)
- Figure B4. Dendrogram of strategic management clustering based on the IIRF (2022)
-
- Table 1. Comparison of strategic management approaches between strategic adopters and compliance-oriented responders
- Table A1. Comparison of strategic management effectiveness before and after one report implementation based on IIRF components
- Table A2. Strategic management clusters by IIRF components, 2019–2022
- Table C1. Integrated Reporting Quality Index (IRQI) assessment framework
-
- Adams, C. A. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: A call to action. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 23-28.
- Agustia, D., Muhammad, N. P. A., & Permatasari, Y. (2020a). Earnings management, business strategy, and bankruptcy risk: Evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 6(2), Article e03317.
- Agustia, D., Sriani, D., Wicaksono, H., & Gani, L. (2020b). Integrated reporting quality assessment. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 10(1), 47-59.
- Barth, M. E., Cahan, S. F., Chen, L., & Venter, E. R. (2017). The economic consequences associated with integrated report quality: Capital market and real effects. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 62, 43-64.
- Bochenek, M. (2020). Analysis of the integrated reporting use in EU countries. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 106-117.
- Boonlua, S., & Phankasem, S. (2016). Engagement in integrated reporting: Evidence from the international integrating reporting council adoption framework. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 10(3), 126-141.
- Burke, J. J., & Clark, C. E. (2016). The business case for integrated reporting: Insights from leading practitioners, regulators, and academics. Business Horizons, 59(3), 273-283.
- de Villiers, C., Venter, E. R., & Hsiao, P. C. K. (2017). Integrated reporting: background, measurement issues, approaches and an agenda for future research. Accounting & Finance, 57(4), 937-959.
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
- Dragu, I. M., & Tiron-Tudor, A. (2013). The integrated reporting initiative from an institutional perspective: Emergent factors. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 275-279.
- Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & Demartini, P. (2016). Integrated reporting: A structured literature review. Accounting Forum, 40(3), 166-185.
- Fasan, M., & Mio, C. (2017). Fostering stakeholder engagement: The role of materiality disclosure in integrated reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 288-305.
- Giovannoni, E., & Pia Maraghini, M. (2013). The challenges of integrated performance measurement systems: Integrating mechanisms for integrated measures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(6), 978-1008.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
- Hoang, T. G., Vu, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Luu, H. N. (2020). Mandatory integrated reporting disclosure and corporate misreporting. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(3), 363-382.
- International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2013). The International
Framework. - International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2021). The International
Framework. International Integrated Report Council. - Ioana, D., & Adriana, T. T. (2014). Research agenda on integrated reporting: New emergent theory and practice. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 221-227.
- Jain, A. K. (2010). Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31(8), 651-666.
- Jensen, J. C., & Berg, N. (2012). Determinants of traditional sustainability reporting versus integrated reporting. An institutionalist approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(5), 299-316.
- Kılıç, M., Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2021). Does institutional theory explain integrated reporting adoption of Fortune 500 companies? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(1), 114-137.
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality and Quantity, 38, 787-800.
- Lipunga, A. M. (2015). Integrated reporting in developing countries: Evidence from Malawi. Journal of Management Research, 7(3), 130-156.
- Liu, Z., Jubb, C., & Abhayawansa, S. (2019). Analysing and evaluating integrated reporting: Insights from applying a normative benchmark. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(2), 235-263.
- Loprevite, S., Ricca, B., & Rupo, D. (2018). Performance sustainability and integrated reporting: Empirical evidence from mandatory and voluntary adoption contexts. Sustainability, 10(5), Article 1351.
- Macias, H. A., & Farfan-Lievano, A. (2017). Integrated reporting as a strategy for firm growth: Multiple case study in Colombia. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 605-628.
- MacQueen, J. (Eds.). (1967). Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, CA.
- Malafronte, I., & Pereira, J. (2021). Integrated thinking: Measuring the unobservable. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(4), 805-822.
- Manetti, G., & Toccafondi, S. (2012). The role of stakeholders in sustainability reporting assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 363-377.
- Mans-Kemp, N., & Van der Lugt, C. T. (2020). Linking integrated reporting quality with sustainability performance and financial performance in South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 23(1), Article a3572.
- Martinez, C. (2016). Does the level of alignment with the integrated reporting framework reduce information asymmetry? SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Melloni, G., Caglio, A., & Perego, P. (2017). Saying more with less? Disclosure conciseness, completeness and balance in integrated reports. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(3), 220-238.
- Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1988). A study of standardization of variables in cluster analysis. Journal of Classification, 5(2), 181-204.
- Oktorina, M., Siregar, S. V., Adhariani, D., & Mita, A. F. (2022). The diffusion and adoption of integrated reporting: A cross-country analysis on the determinants. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(1), 39-73.
- Pallant, J. (2020). Part Five Statistical techniques to compare groups. In J. Pallant (Ed.), SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (pp. 281-289). London: Routledge.
- Pattanapong, S., & Limpivest, J. (2025). SET ESG ratings and firm value: The new sustainability performance assessment tool in Thailand. PLOS One, 20(2), e0315935.
- Petcharat, N. (2020). Can an integrated reporting system in Thai context create sustainable value to users? International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, 13(3), 253-259.
- Petcharat, N., & Zaman, M. (2019). Sustainability reporting and integrated reporting perspectives of Thai-listed companies. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 17(4), 671-694.
- Pistoni, A., Songini, L., & Bavagnoli, F. (2018). Integrated reporting quality: An empirical analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 489-507.
- Popa, D. N., Bogdan, V., Sabau Popa, C. D., Belenesi, M., & Badulescu, A. (2022). Performance mapping in two-step cluster analysis through ESEG disclosures and EPS. Kybernetes, 51(13), 98-118.
- Pratama, A. (2017). Clustering Indonesian Companies’ Annual Reports: Preliminary assessment of the implementation of integrated reporting by Indonesian listed companies. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 9(1), 46-54.
- PwC Thailand. (2021, November 29). Thai companies need to embrace ESG to draw foreign investors.
- Securities and Exchange Commission Thailand (SEC Thailand). (2021). SEC prepares listed companies for disclosure of annual registration statement via Form 56-1 One Report.
- Serafeim, G. (2015). Integrated reporting and investor clientele. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 27(2), 34-51.
- Setia, N., Abhayawansa, S., Joshi, M., & Huynh, A. V. (2015). Integrated reporting in South Africa: Some initial evidence. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(3), 397-424.
- Sheskin, D. J. (2011). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (5th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
- Soriya, S., & Rastogi, P. (2022). A systematic literature review on integrated reporting from 2011 to 2020. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 20(3/4), 558-579.
- Stent, W., & Dowler, T. (2015). Early assessments of the gap between integrated reporting and current corporate reporting. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(1), 92-117.
- Stubbs, W., & Higgins, C. (2018). Stakeholders’ perspectives on the role of regulatory reform in integrated reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(3), 489-508.
- Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M., & Garzoni, A. (2020). The determinants of integrated reporting quality in financial institutions. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(3), 429-444.
- Ward, J. H. Jr. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236-244.
- Zhou, S., Simnett, R., & Green, W. (2017). Does integrated reporting matter to the capital market? Abacus, 53(1), 94-132.
- Zhuravka, F., Kravchenko, O., Ovcharova, N., Oleksich, Z., & Miroshnychenko, O. (2020). Impact of integrated reporting on enterprise value-based management: evidence from Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(2), 154-165.