2222-18672222-1875
Business Perspectives
  • Login

Editorial office contact form

Please complete all required fields!

Please specify your request here

Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Should not be empty

Your request has been successfully sent.

Your Cart

Price Total
€0.00

(₴0)

Proceed to Checkout
Your cart is empty
Cart 0 Items
Submit Manuscript
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publishing policies
  • Editorial Policies
  • Books
  • JIC index
FOLLOW US
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Public and Municipal Finance
  • Issue #1
  • Meta-analysis of the literature related to SDG 3 and its investment

Meta-analysis of the literature related to SDG 3 and its investment

  • Received September 1, 2021;
    Accepted October 19, 2021;
    Published October 25, 2021
  • Author(s)
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7326-5374
    Inna Makarenko
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    E-mail:
    Link to Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/pub/plastun-alexey/57/7bb/444/
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8208-7135
    Alex Plastun
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4535-2240
    Mario Situm
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4448-3484
    Yuliia Serpeninova
    ORCID Researcher ID , Giuseppe Sorrentino
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.10(1).2021.10
  • Article Info
    Volume 10 2021, Issue #1, pp. 119-137
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    2 articles
    Journal title: Environmental Economics
    Article title: Digital and economic transformations for sustainable development promotion: A case of OECD countries
    DOI: 10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.12
    Volume: 12 / Issue: 1 / First page: 140 / Year: 2022
    Contributors: Leonid Melnyk, Oleksandr Kubatko, Vladyslav Piven, Kyrylo Klymenko, Larysa Rybina
    Journal title: Knowledge and Performance Management
    Article title: SDG 4 and SDG 8 in the knowledge economy: A meta-analysis in the context of post-COVID-19 recovery
    DOI: 10.21511/kpm.05(1).2021.05
    Volume: 5 / Issue: 1 / First page: 50 / Year: 2021
    Contributors: Inna Makarenko, Alex Plastun, Yuriy Petrushenko, Anna Vorontsova, Stanislaw Alwasiak
  • 449 Views
  • 115 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

2020 revealed the vulnerability of the healthcare systems in most countries. It also highlighted their failure to generate serious progress in the fulfillment of Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG 3): Ensure healthy lives and promote welfare for all at all ages. One of the key problems inhibiting its progress is the lack of financial resources. Based on a comprehensive meta-analysis of the literature related to SDG 3 and its investment, it aims to demonstrate that lack of appropriate academic support is a part of the failure to generate serious progress in the fulfillment of SDG 3. To do this academic literature published in the period 2010–2019 is analyzed. SciVal Elsevier, VosViewer, and Google Trends tools are applied for analysis. The results show that there is a significant interest in the academic circles on SDG 3 alone. However, this interest is concentrated toward its medical aspects while economic aspects, including investment, are poorly represented. This study shows that the reason for the current investment gap in SDG 3 is the lack of academic support to provide a theoretical, methodological, and analytical framework for tackling the financing problem for SDG 3.

view full abstract hide full abstract
  • PAPER PROFILE
  • AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS
  • FIGURES
  • TABLES
  • REFERENCES
  • Keywords
    financial market, healthcare, investment, meta-analysis, responsible investment, SDG 3
  • JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)
    I18, Q01, H87, C42
  • References
    57
  • Tables
    7
  • Figures
    11
    • Figure 1. Results of the analysis of keyphrases for “SDG 3: good health and well-being” from 2015 to 2020
    • Figure 2. Newly emerged topics for SDG 3 in 2021
    • Figure 3. Bibliometric map of the publications concerning “SDG 3 and investment” and “SDG 3 and responsible investment” by keywords
    • Figure 4. Bibliometric map of publications concerning “SDG 3 and investment” and “SDG 3 and responsible investment” by authors
    • Figure 5. Internet queries concerning “SDG 3,” “SDG 3 and investment,” “SDG 3 and responsible investment,” and “responsible investment” in 2010–2021
    • Figure 6. Ngram concerning “SDG 3 and investment” in 1960–2019
    • Figure 7. Ngram concerning “SDG 3 and responsible investment” in 1960–2019
    • Figure A1. Structural analysis by subjects for “SDG 3”
    • Figure A2. Structural analysis by subjects for “SDG 3 and investment”
    • Figure A3. Structural analysis by subjects for “SDG 3 and responsible investment”
    • Figure D1. Topics and topics clusters in each research area, 2010–2019
    • Table 1. Cross-SDGs meta-analysis results of relevant academic papers
    • Table 2. Static analysis of SDG 3 and investment coverage in academic literature over the period 2010–2019 as of March 31, 2021
    • Table 3. Dynamic analysis of SDG 3 and investment coverage in academic literature over the period 2010–2019 as of March 31, 2021
    • Table 4. Economic topics and topic clusters in each research area during 2010–2019 by prominence percentile
    • Table B1. Top 10 institutions, sectors, and countries in each research area by scholarly output, 2010–2019
    • Table C1. Top 10 authors by scholarly output and citation in each research area, 2010–2019
    • Table E1. List of articles based on the bibliometric map of publications concerning “SDG 3 and investment” and “SDG 3 and responsible investment”
    • Adams, J., Khan, H. T. A., & Raeside, R. (2014). Research methods for business and social science students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    • Aftab, W., Siddiqui, F. J., Tasic, H., Perveen, S., Siddiqi, S., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2020). Implementation of health and health-related sustainable development goals: Progress, challenges and opportunities – a systematic literature review. British Medical Journal Global Health, 5(8), e002273.
    • Amadi, A., Adetiloye, K. A., Babajide, A., & Amadi, I. (2021). Banking system stability: A prerequisite for financing the Sustainable Development Goals in Nigeria. Banks and Bank Systems, 16(2), 103-118.
    • Asatani, K., Takeda, H., Yamano, H., & Sakata, I. (2020). Scientific Attention to Sustainability and SDGs: Meta-Analysis of Academic Papers. Energies, 13(4), 975.
    • Asi, Y. M., & Williams, C. (2018). The role of digital health in making progress toward sustainable development goal (SDG) 3 in conflict-affected populations. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 114, 114-120.
    • Bansal, E., Chaturvedi, K. R., Saroha, K., Kaur, J., Mehra, P., Ahmad, F., & Vynnychenko, N. (2020). Covid-19: Social media impact on agricultural prices and consumer‘s buying behavior. International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences, 16, 953-957.
    • Bennich, T., Weitz, N., & Carlsen, H. (2020). Deciphering the scientific literature on SDG interactions: A review and reading guide. Science of The Total Environment, 728, 138405.
    • Bertram, M. Y., Sweeny, K., Lauer, J.A., Chisholm, D., Sheehan, P., Rasmussen, B., Upreti, S. R., Dixit, L. P., George, K., & Deane, S. (2018). Investing in non-communicable diseases: An estimation of the return on investment for prevention and treatment services. The Lancet, 391(10134), 2071-2078.
    • Bhutta, Z. A., Siddiqi, S., Aftab, W., Siddiqui, F. J., Huicho, L., Mogilevskii, R., Mahmood, Q., Friberg, P., & Akbari, F. (2020). What will it take to implement health and health-related sustainable development goals? British Medical Journal Global Health, 5(9), e002963.
    • Boyle, C. F., Levin, C., Hatefi, A., Madriz, S., & Santos, N. (2015). Achieving a “grand convergence” in global health: Modeling the technical inputs, costs, and impacts from 2016 to 2030. PLoS ONE, 10(10), 1-20.
    • Browne, W., & Rabash, J. (2009). Multilevel modelling. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), The handbook of data analysis (pp. 459-480). London, UK: Sage Publications.
    • Card, N. A., & Casper, D. M. (2013). Meta-analysis and quantitative research synthesis. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology: Vol. 2: Statistical analysis (pp. 701-717). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    • Cerf, M. E. (2019). Sustainable development goal integration, interdependence and implementation: The environment-economic-health nexus and universal health coverage. Global Challenges, 3(9), 1-6.
    • Chigrin, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2014). The ways of corporate sector firms financing for sustainability of performance. International Journal of Ecology and Development, 29(3), 1-13.
    • Consolandi, C., Phadke, H., Hawley, J., & Eccles, R. G. (2020). Material ESG outcomes and SDG externalities: Evaluating the health care Sector’s contribution to the SDGs. Organization and Environment, 33(4), 511-533.
    • Edejer, T., Hanssen, O., Mirelman, A., Verboom, P., Lolong, G., Watson, O., Boulanger, L., & Soucat, A. (2020). Articles projected health-care resource needs for an effective response to COVID-19 in 73 low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study. The Lancet Global Health, 8(11), e1372-e1379.
    • Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. London, UK: Sage Publications.
    • García-Feijoo, M., Eizaguirre, A., & Rica-Aspiunza, A. (2020). Systematic review of sustainable-development-goal deployment in business schools. Sustainability, 12(1), 440.
    • Georgeson, L., & Maslin, M. (2018). Putting the United Nations sustainable development goals into practice: A review of implementation, monitoring, and finance. Geo: Geography and Environment, 5(1), 1-25.
    • González-Pier, E., Barraza-Lloréns, M., Beyeler, N., Jamison, D., Knaul, F., Lozano, R., Yamey, G., & Sepúlveda, J. (2016). Mexico’s path towards the sustainable development goal for health: An assessment of the feasibility of reducing premature mortality by 40% by 2030. The Lancet Global Health, 4(10), e714-e725.
    • Khovrak, I. (2020). ESG-driven approach to managing insurance companies’ sustainable development. Insurance Markets and Companies, 11(1), 42-52.
    • Lehenchuk, S.F., Valinkevych, N.V., Vyhivska, I.M., & Khomenko, H.Y. (2020). The significant principles of development of accounting support for innovative enterprise financing. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(8 Special Issue), 2282-2289.
    • Lim, S. S., Allen, K., Dandona, L., Forouzanfar, M. H., Fullman, N., Goldberg, E. M., & Zonies, D. (2016). Measuring the health-related sustainable development goals in 188 countries: A baseline analysis from the global burden of disease study 2015. The Lancet, 388(10053), 1813-1850.
    • López-Concepción, A., Gil-Lacruz, A. I., & Saz-Gil, I. (2021). Stakeholder engagement, Csr development and Sdgs compliance: A systematic review from 2015 to 2021. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1-13.
    • Lozano, R., Fullman, N., Abate, D., Abay, S. M., Abbafati, C., Abbasi, N., Abbastabar, H., Abd-Allah, F., Abdela, J., Abdelalim, A., Abdel-Rahman, O., Abdi, A., Abdollahpour, I., Abdulkader, R. S., Abebe, N. A., Abebe, Z., Abejie, A. N., Abera, S. F., Abil, O. Z., . . . Murray, C. J. L. (2018). Measuring progress from 1990 to 2017 and projecting attainment to 2030 of the health-related sustainable development goals for 195 countries and territories: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. The Lancet, 392(10159), 2091-2138.
    • Meara, J. G., Leather, A. J. M., Hagander, L., Alkire, B. C., Alonso, N., Ameh, E. A., Bickler, S. W., Conteh, L., Dare, A. J., Davies, J., Merisier, E. D., El-Halabi, S., Farmer, P. E., Gawande, A., Gillies, R., Greenberg, S. L. M., Grimes, C. E., Gruen, R. L., Ismail, E. A., … Yip, W. (2015). Global surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. The Lancet, 386(9993), 569-624.
    • Meurs, M., Seidelmann, L., & Koutsoumpa, M. (2019). How healthy is a ‘healthy economy’? incompatibility between current pathways towards SDG3 and SDG8. Globalization and Health, 15(1), 1-13.
    • Miralles-Quirós, J. L., Miralles-Quirós, M. M., & Nogueira, J. M. (2020). Sustainable development goals and investment strategies: The profitability of using five-factor fama-french alphas. Sustainability, 12(5), 1842.
    • Nabukalu, B., Asamani, J. A., & Nabyonga-Orem, J. (2020). Monitoring sustainable development goals 3: Assessing the readiness of low- and middle-income countries. International Journal of Health Policy Management, 9(7), 297-308.
    • Nilsson, M., Chisholm, E., Griggs, D., Howden-Chapman, P., McCollum, D., Messerli, P., Neumann, B., Stevance, A.-S., Visbeck, M., & Stafford-Smith, M. (2018). Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals: lessons learned and ways forward. Sustainability Science, 13(6), 1489-1503.
    • Nugent, R., Bertram, M. Y., Jan, S., Niessen, L. W., Sassi, F., Jamison, D. T., Pier, E. G., & Beaglehole, R. (2018). Investing in non-communicable disease prevention and management to advance the sustainable development goals. The Lancet, 391(10134), 2029-2035.
    • Pauliukevičienė, G., & Stankevičienė, J. (2021). Assessing statistical link between FinTech PEST environment and achievement of SDGs. Public and Municipal Finance, 10(1), 47-66.
    • Peters, D., Hanssen, O., Gutierrez, J., Abrahams, J., & Nyenswah, T. (2019). Financing common goods for health: Core government functions in health emergency and disaster risk management. Health Systems & Reform, 5(4), 307-321.
    • Petrushenko, Y., Aleksandrov, V., Vorontsova, A., & Ponomarenko, O. (2020). Sustainable development goals as a tool for strategic planning in communities: A bibliometric analysis of research. E3S Web of Conferences, 202, 03005.
    • Petrushenko, Y., Kozarezenko, L., Glinska-Newes, A., Tokarenko, M., & But, M. (2018). The opportunities of engaging FinTech companies into the system of cross-border money transfers in Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(4), 332-344.
    • Pizzi, S., Caputo, A., Corvino, A., & Venturelli, A. (2020). Management research and the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs): A bibliometric investigation and systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124033.
    • Plastun, A., Makarenko, I., Grabovska, T., Situmeang, R., & Bashlai, S. (2021). Sustainable Development Goals in agriculture and responsible investment: A comparative study of the Czech Republic and Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(2), 65-76.
    • Roa, L., Jumbam, D. T., Makasa, E., & Meara, J. G. (2019). Global surgery and the sustainable development goals. British Journal of Surgery, 106(2), e44-e52.
    • Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., & Rockström, J. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(9), 805-814.
    • Seshaiyer, P., & McNeely, C. L. (2020). Challenges and opportunities from COVID-19 for global sustainable development. World Medical and Health Policy, 12(4), 443-453.
    • Siddiqi, S., Aftab, W., Siddiqui, F. J., Huicho, L., Mogilevskii, R., Friberg, P., Lindgren-Garcia, J., Causevic, S., Khamis, A., Shah, M. M., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2020). Global strategies and local implementation of health and health-related SDGs: Lessons from consultation in countries across five regions. British Medical Journal Global Health, 5(9), e002859.
    • Siti, N. M., & Rusnah, M. (2020). Sustainable business practices and financial performance during pre- and post-SDG adoption periods: a systematic review. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(4), 291-309.
    • Situm, M., Plastun, A., Makarenko, I., Serpeninova, Y., & Sorrentino, G. (2021). SDG 3 and financing instruments in Austria and Ukraine: Challenges and perspectives. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(3), 118-135.
    • Skevington, S. M., & Epton, T. (2018). How will the sustainable development goals deliver changes in well-being? A systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether WHOQOL-BREF scores respond to change. BMJ Global Health, 3(1), e000609.
    • Smiianov, V. A., Lyulyov, O. V., Pimonenko, T.V., Andrushchenko, A. A., Sova, S., & Grechkovskaya, N.V. (2020). The Impact of The Pandemic Lockdown on Air Pollution, Health and Economic Growth: System Dynamics Analysis. Wiadomosci lekarskie, 73(11), 2332-2338.
    • Stenberg, K., Hanssen, O., Bertram, M., Brindley, C., Meshreky, A., Barkley, S., & Tan-Torres Edejer, T. (2019). Guide posts for investment in primary health care and projected resource needs in 67 low-income and middle-income countries: A modelling study. The Lancet Global Health, 7(11), e1500-e1510.
    • Stenberg, K., Hanssen, O., Tan-Torres Edejer, T., Bertram, M., Brindley, C., Meshreky, A., Rosen, J. E., Stover, J., Verboom, P., Sanders, R., & Soucat, A. (2017). Financing transformative health systems towards achievement of the health Sustainable Development Goals: A model for projected resource needs in 67 low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet Global Health, 5(9), e875-e887.
    • Stukalo, N. V., Lytvyn, M. V., Petrushenko, Y. M., Pylypenko, Y. I., & Kolinets, L. B. (2021). The concept of sustainable development of Ukraine in the context of global threats. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu Scientific Bulletin of the National Mining University, 2021(3), 178-183.
    • Sweileh, W. M. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on “sustainable development goals” with emphasis on “good health and well-being” goal (2015–2019). Global Health, 16(68), 1-13.
    • United Nations. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
    • United Nations. (2015a). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
    • United Nations. (2015b). Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development.
    • United Nations. (2015c). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015.
    • United Nations. (2019). The sustainable development goals report 2019.
    • United Nations. (2020a). The sustainable development goals report 2020.
    • United Nations. (2020b). Progress towards the sustainable development goals.
    • Walker, J. (2016). Achieving health SDG 3 in Africa through NGO capacity building - insights from the gates foundation investment in partnership in advocacy for child and family health (PACFaH) project. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 20(3), 55-61.
    • Conceptualization
      Inna Makarenko, Alex Plastun, Mario Situm, Giuseppe Sorrentino
    • Investigation
      Inna Makarenko, Alex Plastun, Yuliia Serpeninova
    • Methodology
      Inna Makarenko, Alex Plastun
    • Project administration
      Inna Makarenko, Alex Plastun, Mario Situm
    • Visualization
      Inna Makarenko, Alex Plastun
    • Writing – original draft
      Inna Makarenko, Alex Plastun, Yuliia Serpeninova, Giuseppe Sorrentino
    • Writing – review & editing
      Inna Makarenko, Alex Plastun, Mario Situm, Giuseppe Sorrentino
    • Data curation
      Alex Plastun
    • Formal Analysis
      Alex Plastun, Yuliia Serpeninova
    • Funding acquisition
      Alex Plastun
    • Resources
      Alex Plastun, Yuliia Serpeninova, Giuseppe Sorrentino
    • Software
      Alex Plastun
    • Supervision
      Alex Plastun, Mario Situm
    • Validation
      Alex Plastun
Related Articles
  • Multi-agent modeling and simulation of a stock market

    Mohamed Amine SouissiORCID , Khalid BensaidORCID , Rachid Ellaia doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.10
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018         Issue #4         pp. 123-134 Views: 1727 Downloads: 508 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The stock market represents complex systems where multiple agents interact. The complexity of the environment in the financial markets in general has encouraged the use of modeling by multi-agent platforms and particularly in the case of the stock market.
    In this paper, an agent-based simulation model is proposed to study the behavior of the volume of market transactions. The model is based on the case of a single asset and three types of investor agents. Each investor can be a zero intelligent trader, fundamentalist trader or traders using historical information in the decision making process. The goal of the study is to simulate the behavior of a stock market according to the different considered endogenous and exogenous variables.

  • The role of foreign direct investment and trade on carbon emissions in Turkey

    Gizem Kaya , M. Özgür KayalicaORCID Researcher ID, Merve Kumaş , Burc Ulengin doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.08(1).2017.01
    Environmental Economics Volume 8, 2017         Issue #1         pp. 8-17 Views: 1622 Downloads: 876 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    This study aims to observe the long run and short run effects of gross domestic product, foreign direct investment inflows and trade on CO2 emissions and causality relationships between these factors, using annual data for the period of 1974-2010. The empirical results demonstrate that the inverted U-shaped relationship of environmental Kuznets curve is valid for Turkey. In addition, there are positive long run effects of foreign direct investment and trade openness on CO2 emissions. The authors also find a bidirectional causality relationship between CO2 emission and FDI.

  • Investment attractiveness of the Ukrainian tourism system

    Margarita BoikoORCID Researcher ID, Myroslava BosovskaORCID Researcher ID, Nadiia VedmidORCID Researcher ID, Liudmila BovshORCID Researcher ID, Alla OkhrimenkoORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.16
    Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018         Issue #4         pp. 193-209 Views: 1453 Downloads: 110 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Global and crisis transformations result in structural and functional changes in the tourism system, which combines resource potential, infrastructure, tourism entities, institutional structures, and consumers. For Ukraine, with its high tourist potential, tourism development is a significant factor after the crisis recovery of the economy. Overcoming the disparities in the tourism system functioning, shaping optimal business models of its development, increasing the sustainability and efficiency of the tourism entities functioning impose an objective need for investment. Investment attractiveness is one of the key characteristics causing the investor’s interest in financing the project, including the tourist one.
    The essence, determinants of influence and characteristic features of investment attractiveness of the Ukrainian tourism system are substantiated. The investment attractiveness of the tourism system is proposed to be considered as a complex feature of conditions and advantages that form its ability to attract investment resources based on the availability of their needs, unique tourist potential, favorable environment for ensuring the efficient functioning of the tourism system and guaranteeing the investor profit and reduced risks of investing.
    The article considers basic preconditions to form the investment attractiveness of the tourism system, which include unique strategic opportunities, to shape a favorable institutional environment and provide a background for an investor concerned and a system of guaranteeing the expected result.
    Given the need for complex consideration of the tourism system’s investment attractiveness, a methodology based on the calculation of integrated indicators for estimating the effectiveness and prospects for the development of tourism systems in the Ukrainian regions is used. In the method considered, it is proposed to take into account not only financial aspects, but also the resource potential, its development level, the growth rates of tourism entities activities, and the prospects for the tourism system development. In general, indicators and criteria for the tourism system investment attractiveness are classified into four groups: the efficiency of investment, the effectiveness of the tourism system development, the prospects for the tourism system development, the environment and the potential for its development.
    According to the method developed, the integral indicator of investment attractiveness of the tourism systems of Ukrainian regions has been calculated, and the regions are differentiated according to the level of investment attractiveness. Estimation of the investment attractiveness of Ukrainian tourism systems allows to determine their rating, differentiate them according to the maturity level of complementary preconditions to form and develop tourist potential and serves as a basis for potential investors in investment decisions-making.
    Using the results of determining the level of investment attractiveness of tourism systems of Ukraine’s regions over time will help identify trends, and, accordingly, serve as a guide for potential investors in strategic proposition space of regions which are investment recipients.

< Prev Next >
Download Preview
Close
Public and Municipal Finance
Public and Municipal Finance
  • Issue #1
  • Journal Homepage
  • Indexed/Abstracted
  • Aims and Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies and Publication Ethics
  • Submission Guidelines for Authors
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Acceptance rate
  • Self-Archiving Policy
  • Article processing charge
 

COOKIES
The cookie settings on this website are set to 'allow all cookies' to give you the best experience.

If you continue without changing these settings, you consent to this Read more

Accept
newsletter
We accept payment with:
  • visa
  • mastercard
  • ISNI: 0000 0004 6439 8257
  • Copyright © 2022 LLC “CPC “Business Perspectives”,
    except Open Access articles

Developed by MindK. Designed by Crisp.

  • About Us
    • Company
    • News
    • Cooperation and partners
    • Advertising
    • Manuscript Administration System
  • Users support
    • Your profile
    • External services instructions
    • Site navigation
Contact us
  • Hryhorii Skovoroda lane, 10 Sumy, 40022 , Ukraine
  • +380-542-221707
  • +38-063-2891070
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Tweets by LLC “Business Perspectives”