Budget deficit and CO₂ emissions in Morocco: An asymmetric NARDL-based analysis
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.15(1).2026.07
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2026, Issue #1, pp. 87–100
- 10 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
In emerging economies, the integration of environmental considerations into fiscal policy analysis has emerged as a priority of sustainable development strategies. This paper seeks to investigate the asymmetric short- and long-term impacts of the budget deficit on CO₂ emissions per capita in Morocco from 1974 to 2022. A nonlinear ARDL model is employed to identify asymmetric fiscal dynamics over the period under study. The estimation results indicate that, in the short run, an increase in the budget deficit immediately and significantly reduces CO₂ emissions per capita (−0.0046; p < 0.05), while the delayed effect of this increase significantly increases emissions in the following period (0.0068; p < 0.05), revealing opposing dynamics and instability in the short-term adjustment process. Conversely, the immediate and delayed effects of negative changes in the deficit do not exert statistically meaningful short-run effects (p > 0.10). In the long run, both increases and decreases in the budget deficit reduce emissions (−0.0075; p < 0.05; −0.0171; p < 0.01, respectively), with a stronger effect associated with deficit reductions. The results also show that urbanization significantly reduces emissions (–0.0168; p < 0.05), whereas fossil fuel consumption increases them (0.0003; p < 0.05). In contrast, GDP per capita, along with inward FDI inflows, fails to demonstrate statistical significance over the long-term horizon (p > 0.05). These results underscore the nonlinear and asymmetric nature of the fiscal policy and environmental quality nexus, suggesting that prudent budget management can promote sustainable environmental outcomes.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)E62, H62, Q56, C22
-
References23
-
Tables8
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)
- Figure 2. Correlogram of residuals
- Figure 3. Jarque–Bera test
- Figure 4. CUSUM test
- Figure 5. CUSUM of squares test
-
- Table 1. Description of model variables
- Table 2. Results of the unit root tests (ADF)
- Table 3. NARDL model estimation
- Table 4. Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey test
- Table 5. Bounds cointegration test
- Table 6. Coefficient symmetry tests
- Table 7. Short-term coefficients
- Table 8. Long-term coefficients
-
- Al-Mulali, U., Fereidouni, H. G., Lee, J. Y. M., & Sab, C. N. B. (2013). Exploring the relationship between urbanisation, energy consumption, and CO2 emission in MENA countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 23, 107-112.
- Asif, M., Sharma, V., Sharma, H. P., Aldawsari, H., Wani, S. K., Khosla, S., & Chandniwala, V. J. (2023). Is fiscal deficit ‘curse’ or ‘haven’ for environmental quality in India? Empirical investigation employing a battery of distinct ARDL approaches. Heliyon, 9(10), Article e20711.
- Behera, S. R., & Dash, D. P. (2017). The effect of urbanisation, energy consumption, and foreign direct investment on the carbon dioxide emission in the SSEA (South and Southeast Asian) region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 96-106.
- Çetin, A. P. M., & Ecevit, A. P. E. (2015). Urbanisation, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Sub-Saharan countries: A panel cointegration and causality analysis. Journal of Economics and Development Studies, 3(2), 66-76.
- Gasimli, O., Haq, I., Naradda Gamage, S. K., Shihadeh, F., Rajapakshe, S., & Shafiq, M. (2019). Energy, trade, urbanisation and environmental degradation nexus in Sri Lanka: Bounds testing approach. Energies, 12(9).
- Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement (Working Paper No. 3914). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377.
- Katircioğlu, Sa., & Katircioğlu, Se. (2017). Testing the role of fiscal policy in the environmental degradation: The case of Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(6), 5616-5630.
- Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.
- Liu, Q., Wang, S., Zhang, W., Zhan, D., & Li, J. (2017a). Does foreign direct investment affect environmental pollution in China’s cities? A spatial econometric perspective. Science of the Total Environment, 613-614, 521-529.
- Liu, Y., Han, L., Yin, Z., & Luo, K. (2017b). A competitive carbon emissions scheme with hybrid fiscal incentives: The evidence from a taxi industry. Energy Policy, 102, 414-422.
- Mahadevan, R., & Sun, Y. (2020). Effects of foreign direct investment on carbon emissions: Evidence from China and its Belt and Road countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 276, Article 111321.
- Martínez-Zarzoso, I., & Maruotti, A. (2011). The impact of urbanisation on CO2 emissions: Evidence from developing countries. Ecological Economics, 70(7), 1344-1353.
- Munir, K., & Ameer, A. (2018). Effect of economic growth, trade openness, urbanisation, and technology on environment of Asian emerging economies. Management of Environmental Quality, 29(6), 1123-1134.
- Nasir, M. A., Huynh, T. L. D., & Tram, H. T. X. (2019). Role of financial development, economic growth and foreign direct investment in driving climate change: A case of emerging ASEAN. Journal of Environmental Management, 242, 131-141.
- Nathaniel, S. P. (2021). Biocapacity, human capital, and ecological footprint in G7 countries: The moderating role of urbanisation and necessary lessons for emerging economies. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 6, 435-450.
- Paramati, S. R., Ummalla, M., & Apergis, N. (2016). The effect of foreign direct investment and stock market growth on clean energy use across a panel of emerging market economies. Energy Economics, 56, 29-41.
- Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
- Qingquan, J., Khattak, S. I., Ahmad, M., & Ping, L. (2020). A new approach to environmental sustainability: Assessing the impact of monetary policy on CO2 emissions in Asian economies. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1331-1346.
- Shahbaz, M., Sbia, R., Hamdi, H., & Ozturk, I. (2014). Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanisation and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecological Indicators, 45, 622-631.
- Sung, B., Song, W.-Y., & Park, S.-D. (2018). How foreign direct investment affects CO2 emission levels in the Chinese manufacturing industry: Evidence from panel data. Economic Systems, 42(2), 320-331.
- Xu, Q., Dong, Y.-x., & Yang, R. (2018). Urbanisation impact on carbon emissions in the Pearl River Delta region: Kuznets curve relationships. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 514-523.
- Yuelan, P., Akbar, M. W., Hafeez, M., Ahmad, M., Zia, Z., & Ullah, S. (2019). The nexus of fiscal policy instruments and environmental degradation in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 28919-28932.


