Impact of educational process innovation on the satisfaction of higher education students in Ecuador
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.09(2).2025.06
-
Article InfoVolume 9 2025, Issue #2, pp. 64-78
- 28 Views
-
6 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Innovation in educational processes is a key factor for student satisfaction, as it guarantees quality, academic retention, and institutional competitiveness in higher education. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of innovation in educational processes on student satisfaction in higher education institutions in Ecuador. A quantitative approach was used, with a non-experimental, cross-sectional, and explanatory design. The sample consisted of 388 university students from Guayaquil, one of the largest cities in Ecuador, who completed a structured, online, Likert-scale questionnaire after providing their informed consent between September and October 2024. Innovation in educational processes was conceptualized through two core dimensions: structure and process management. Student satisfaction was analyzed through three dimensions: trust and security, tangible elements, and motivation to participate. To ensure the validity and reliability of the constructs, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported by structural equation modeling (SEM) were conducted using SPSS version 26 and AMOS version 22. The results showed that process structure had a significant effect on trust and security (β = 0.65, p < 0.001), tangible elements (β = 0.37, p < 0.001), and motivation (β = 0.77, p < 0.001). Similarly, process management significantly influenced trust and security (β = 0.65, p < 0.001), tangible elements (β = 0.62, p < 0.001), and motivation (β = 0.72, p < 0.001). In conclusion, innovation strategies in educational processes substantially affect student satisfaction, highlighting the importance of effective and progressive academic management in Ecuadorian higher education.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I23, O31, O15, M53
-
References51
-
Tables7
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Theoretical model of hypothetical research scenarios
- Figure 2. Dimensional relationship model between innovation management variables and student satisfaction
-
- Table 1. Main characteristics of the participating sample
- Table 2. Descriptive, discriminatory, and factor loading reports on educational process innovation
- Table 3. Descriptive, discriminatory reports and factor loadings of student satisfaction
- Table 4. Dimensional reliability analysis of the innovation management variables and student satisfaction
- Table 5. Developed models
- Table 6. Hypothesis testing
- Table A1. Structure of the questionnaire measuring innovation management variables and student satisfaction
-
- Akimov, N., Kurmanov, N., Uskelenova, A., Aidargaliyeva, N., Mukhiyayeva, D., Rakhimova, S., Raimbekov, B., & Utegenova, Z. (2023). Components of education 4.0 in open innovation competence frameworks: Systematic review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2).
- Al Maani, D., & Shanti, Z. (2023). Technology-Enhanced Learning in Light of Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Student-Experience Study of the History of Architecture Course. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3).
- Alenezi, M. (2023). Digital Learning and Digital Institution in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 13(1), 1-18.
- Arevalo, D., Luciano, R., Cevallos, H., & Valdiviezo, P. (2023). The Incidence of Information Technologies on the Profitability of Service Firms. TEM Journal, 12(2), 988-999.
- Arias, J., José, C., & Neira, T. (2024). Perception of university students about innovative methodologies mediated by technologies at a Chilean university. Formación Universitaria, 17(1), 45-58. (In Spanish).
- Barrenechea, I., Beech, J., & Rivas, A. (2023). How can education systems improve? A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Change, 24(3), 479-499.
- Bellare, Y., Smith, A., Cochran, K., & Lopez, S. G. (2023). Motivations and Barriers for Adult Learner Achievement: Recommendations for Institutions of Higher Education. Adult Learning, 34(1), 30-39.
- Bhagat, K. K., Cheng, C. H., Koneru, I., Fook, F. S., & Chang, C. Y. (2023). Students’ Blended Learning Course Experience Scale (BLCES): development and validation. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6), 3971-3981.
- Bortagaray, I., & Aguirre-Bastos, C. (2021). Innovation Policies for Inclusive and Sustainable Development: Insights from the Central American Region. In Ordóñez-Matamoros, G., Orozco, L. A., Sierra-González, J. H., Bortagaray, I., & García-Estévez, J. (Eds.), Palgrave Studies in Democracy, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Growth (pp. 55-79). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Brew, A., & Saunders, C. (2020). Making sense of research-based learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87.
- Caccamo, M., Pittino, D., & Tell, F. (2023). Boundary objects, knowledge integration, and innovation management: A systematic review of the literature. Technovation, 122.
- Chapman, E., Pantoja, T., Kuchenmüller, T., Sharma, T., & Terry, R. F. (2021). Assessing the impact of knowledge communication and dissemination strategies targeted at health policy-makers and managers: an overview of systematic reviews. Health Research Policy and Systems, 19(1), 140.
- Cheah, L. F., Cheng, M. Y., & Hen, K. W. (2023). The effect of quality management practices on academics’ innovative performance in Malaysian higher education institutions. Studies in Higher Education, 48(4), 643-656.
- Chirumalla, K. (2021). Building digitally-enabled process innovation in the process industries: A dynamic capabilities approach. Technovation, 105.
- Cho, W., Choi, S., & Choi, H. (2023). Human Resources Analytics for Public Personnel Management: Concepts, Cases, and Caveats. Administrative Sciences, 13(2), 41.
- Costa, J., Pádua, M., & Moreira, A. C. (2023). Leadership Styles and Innovation Management: What Is the Role of Human Capital? Administrative Sciences, 13(2), 47.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182-185.
- Dežan, L., & Sedmak, M. (2023). How do you feel at school? A cross-country comparative analysis of migrant adolescents’ school well-being. Frontiers in Education, 8.
- Díaz-Garcia, V., Montero-Navarro, A., Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. L., & Gallego-Losada, R. (2023). Managing Digital Transformation: A Case Study in a Higher Education Institution. Electronics (Switzerland), 12(11), 2522.
- Ejigu, M. E., & Desalegn, T. A. (2023). How does strategic planning influence the performance of financial institutions? An empirical study of Ethiopia. IIMB Management Review, 35(1), 26-39.
- Elzinga, R., Janssen, M. J., Wesseling, J., Negro, S. O., & Hekkert, M. P. (2023). Assessing mission-specific innovation systems: Towards an analytical framework. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 48.
- Estrada, M., Monferrer, D., Rodríguez, A., & Moliner, M. Á. (2021). Does Emotional Intelligence Influence Academic Performance? The Role of Compassion and Engagement in Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 13(4), 1721.
- Fontalvo, T., Delahoz, E., & Morelos, J. (2021). Design of an integrated quality management system for Colombian higher education academic programs. Formación Universitaria, 14(1), 45-52. (In Spanish).
- Goh, E., & Sigala, M. (2020). Integrating Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) into classroom instruction: teaching tips for hospitality educators from a diffusion of innovation approach. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 20(2), 156-165.
- González-Castellano, N., Colmenero-Ruiz, M. J., & Cordón-Pozo, E. (2021). Factors that influence the university’s inclusive educational processes: perceptions of university professors. Heliyon, 7(4).
- González-Zamar, M. D., Jiménez, L. O., Ayala, A. S., & Abad-Segura, E. (2020). The impact of the university classroom on managing the socio-educational well-being: A global study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3).
- Guo, H. (2023). Research on the influence of university education system reform on college students’ innovation ability. International Journal of Electrical Engineering and Education, 60(1_suppl), 1569-1578.
- Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
- Hanaysha, J. R., Shriedeh, F. B., & In’airat, M. (2023). Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, information and communication technology resources, and university facilities on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2).
- Heaton, S., Siegel, D. S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Universities and innovation ecosystems: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(4), 921-939.
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
- Izquierdo, I., Olea, J., & Abad, F. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: Uses and recommendations. Psicothema, 26(3), 395-400.
- Langan, A. M., & Harris, W. E. (2024). Metrics of student dissatisfaction and disagreement: longitudinal explorations of a national survey instrument. Higher Education, 87(2), 249-269.
- Li, Q., Liu, Q., & Chen, Y. (2023). Prospective Teachers’ Acceptance of virtual reality technology: a mixed study in Rural China. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3217-3248.
- Lucas, J. W. (2003). Theory-Testing, Generalization, and the Problem of External Validity. Source: Sociological Theory, 21(3), 236-253.
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
- Mendioroz, A., Napal, M., & Peñalva, A. (2022). La competencia investigativa del profesorado en formación: percepciones y desempeño [The research competence of pre-service teachers: perceptions and performance]. Revista electrónica de Investigación Educativa – Electronic Journal of Educational Research, 24, 1-14. (In Spanish).
- Pantzos, P., Gumaelius, L., Buckley, J., & Pears, A. (2023). Engineering students’ perceptions of the role of work industry-related activities on their motivation for studying and learning in higher education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(1), 91-109.
- Pihlajamaa, M. (2023). What does it mean to be open? A typology of inbound open innovation strategies and their dynamic capability requirements. Innovation: Organization and Management, 25(1), 1-24.
- Rögele, S., Rilling, B., Apfel, D., & Fuchs, J. (2024). Sustainable development competencies and student-centered teaching strategies in higher education institutions: the role of professors as gatekeepers. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(6).
- Rotondo, F., Giovanelli, L., & Ezza, A. (2023). Implementing sustainable innovation in state universities: Process and tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 391.
- Sá, M. J. (2023). Student Academic and Social Engagement in the Life of the Academy – A Lever for Retention and Persistence in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 13(3).
- Sacoto-Loor, J., Amor, M. I., & Osuna, M. (2023). Psychometric Analysis of the WoEm-M Scale to Evaluate Women Empowerment in the Ecuadorian University Environment. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(23).
- Scherer, R., Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2021). Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who’s ready? Computers in Human Behavior, 118.
- Sipe, B. S. (2020). Embedding Design Thinking in a Culture of Innovation at Two Community Colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(9), 657-676.
- Surya Bahadur, G. C., Gurung, S. K., Poudel, R. L., Yadav, U. S., Bhattacharjee, A., & Dhungana, B. R. (2024). The effect of higher education service quality on satisfaction among business students in India and Nepal. Cogent Education, 11(1).
- Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6695-6726.
- Wei, S., Liu, W., Lin, Y., Wang, J., & Liu, T. (2023). Smart supply chain innovation model selection: exploitative or exploratory innovation? International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 26(4), 478-497.
- Wilden, R., Lin, N., Hohberger, J., & Randhawa, K. (2023). Selecting Innovation Projects: Do Middle and Senior Managers Differ When It Comes to Radical Innovation? Journal of Management Studies, 60(7), 1720-1751.
- Woltering, V., Herrler, A., Spitzer, K., & Spreckelsen, C. (2009). Blended learning positively affects students’ satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: Results of a mixed-method evaluation. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(5), 725-738.
- Zambrana, R. E., Carvajal, D., & Townsend, J. (2023). Institutional penalty: mentoring, service, perceived discrimination and its impacts on the health and academic careers of Latino faculty. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 46(6), 1132-1157.