Issue #3 (Volume 20 2025)

The implementation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) has evolved significantly in recent years, shifting from philanthropic objectives to strategic integration in Vietnam. The Government has determined the transition toward a green economy, highlighting the role of the banking industry in promoting green credit. However, adopting CSR requires a comprehensive understanding of its impact and whether it is merely a compliance cost or a strategic tool for enhancing financial stability. This study, therefore, examines the impact of CSR on the financial stability of listed commercial banks in Vietnam. Using an aggregate CSR index and its two specific dimensions, environmental and social, constructed through content analysis, the study evaluates their impact on the financial stability measured by the Z-score index. Ordinary least squares, fixed and random effect regression, feasible general least squares regression, and system generalized method of moments are applied to the sample of 19 banks over the period from 2013 to 2022. The findings demonstrate a positive relationship between social and environmental initiatives and financial stability, with the environmental pillar showing a particularly strong effect. Specifically, a 1 percent increase in CSR and environmental indices results in increases of 2.361 and 1.327 units in the Z-score, respectively. Eco-friendly practices in banking enhance financial stability, while the social dimension shows a more nuanced impact. The findings of this study provide implications for bank managers and government authorities in developing and promoting CSR practices.

Acknowledgment
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Banking Academy of Vietnam.

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
This study is motivated by the rise of the Fintech sector and its relevant role in the growth and development of the banking sector. Its purpose is to examine the influence on price formation between indices related to Financial Technology companies (Fintech) and regional stock markets in Europe, emerging markets, Latin America, and the United States. The study uses the Gregory-Hansen test to assess the long-term comovements between the main Fintech-related and regional stock indices. The results indicate that the characteristics of assets as hedging instruments can change over time and in different circumstances. During the pre-conflict period, 26 long-term comovements were identified between the Fintech indices and the regional stock markets, and 31 long-term comovements were identified during the conflict period. The Emerging Markets, Latin America, and S&P 500 stock indices were considered full hedging assets but partially lost these characteristics during the Conflict period. In the conflict sub-period, the European regional stock market displayed the characteristics of a hedging asset, as it did not influence the prices of any of the indices analyzed. The study’s implications suggest that assets behave differently in different market conditions, so investors must adapt their asset allocation strategies to manage risk efficiently and build resilient investment portfolios. These findings are also relevant for financial institutions, particularly banks, as they continue to integrate Fintech-driven innovations into their business models and risk management frameworks.

Acknowledgments
The authors are also pleased to acknowledge the financial support from Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal. 

Type of article: Research Article

Abstract
The mobilization of banking sector capital is increasingly viewed as a pivotal component of the global transition to renewable energy sources (RES), given the sector’s capacity to finance capital-intensive projects. However, banks typically favor investments and lending opportunities that offer predictable cash flows and low default risk, characteristics often lacking in RES projects without policy support. This study investigates whether the development of the banking sector facilitates the uptake of RES and how feed-in tariffs (FiTs), which provide guaranteed purchase periods and stable prices, modify this relationship. Using a panel dataset of 66 countries (selected based on data availability, allowing robust results that may be cautiously applied to countries with comparable financial and institutional contexts) from 2000 to 2020, fixed effects regression models with time dummies and robust standard errors are employed. The analysis finds that banking sector development alone does not lead to increased consumption from RES (coefficient = 0.0011, p = 0.950), suggesting that banks are reluctant to invest in renewables due to the lack of mechanisms to guarantee returns. The standalone introduction of FiTs is associated with a temporary decrease in RES uptake (coefficient = −5.07; p < 0.001), likely reflecting initial market distortions. However, when FiTs are implemented in countries with a more significant economic role of banks, the interaction yields a significant positive effect (coefficient = 0.0412; p < 0.001), indicating that FiTs reduce investment risk and unlock bank financing for RES. The model explains 20.8% (R2=0.208) of within-country variation, and fixed effects vary substantially, underscoring structural differences across countries.

Type of article: Research Article

Abstract
Poverty remains a pressing challenge in developing economies, an necessitating analysis of financial and macroeconomic drivers of poverty reduction. Financial inclusion, particularly through access to savings and credit, has gained prominence as a pathway for households to build resilience, smooth consumption, and invest in productive ventures. This study examines the short-run and long-run effects of savings and credit from deposit money banks (DMBs) and microfinance banks (MFBs) on poverty reduction in Nigeria, with poverty headcount as the dependent variable. The Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model was employed, using time-series data obtained from reputable national and international organizations. Findings show that DMB savings significantly reduce poverty in both the short run (coefficient = 0.0077, p = 0.0389) and long run (–0.0393, p = 0.0036), emphasizing their role in mobilizing resources that enhance household welfare. DMB credit also reduces poverty in the short run (0.0031, p = 0.0005) and demonstrates marginal long-run significance (0.0199, p = 0.0914), reflecting its contribution to productive opportunities. By contrast, MFB savings show only weak short-run significance (–0.0059, p = 0.0799) and no long-run effect (–0.0393, p = 0.2366), while MFB credit remains insignificant in both the short run (0.0025, p = 0.3973) and long run (0.0155, p = 0.5222). The study recommends that DMBs should extend short-term savings benefits into long-term poverty reduction and sustain credit facilities. MFBs should improve savings mobilization through government-backed incentives and restructure credit with lower rates, flexible repayment, and financial literacy to strengthen their poverty-reduction role.

Acknowledgment
We appreciate Landmark University for providing the platform and funding for this research work. We appreciate your involvement.