The effect of two-tier board characteristics on firm value: The mediating role of corporate reputation in Indonesia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(4).2025.33
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2025, Issue #4, pp. 449-461
- 35 Views
-
5 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
This study examines the effect of two-tier board characteristics on firm value, with corporate reputation, proxied by Return on Assets (ROA), as a mediating variable. The research focuses on the Indonesian two-tier governance context, where the Board of Commissioners supervises management under concentrated ownership structures. The study uses panel data from 333 firm-year observations of non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) and included in the Kompas 100 Index over the 2019–2023 period. Data were analyzed using panel regression models with the Sobel test applied to evaluate the mediating effect. The results reveal that among the six examined board attributes, namely independence, size, tenure, education, meeting frequency, and age, only board meeting frequency shows a significant positive effect on firm value (p < 0.01). Board size positively affects ROA, indicating that a larger supervisory board enhances operational efficiency, while board education exhibits a negative influence, suggesting a potential mismatch between academic qualifications and practical business needs. However, ROA does not significantly affect firm value (p > 0.05), indicating that corporate reputation, when proxied by financial performance, fails to mediate the relationship between board characteristics and firm value. These findings underscore the crucial role of board meetings as a formal mechanism for effective supervision in Indonesia’s two-tier system. Moreover, they highlight that financial reputation alone is insufficient to drive firm value in emerging markets where direct governance mechanisms are more influential.
Acknowledgment
This research was conducted without financial support from any public, commercial, or nonprofit funding agency.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G34, G32, M14
-
References57
-
Tables10
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research model
-
- Table 1. Operationalization of board characteristics and firm-level variables
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Correlation between variables
- Table 4. Model test for H1: Board characteristics and corporate reputation
- Table 5. Panel data regression results for H1: Effect of board characteristics on corporate reputation
- Table 6. Model test for H2: Corporate reputation and firm value
- Table 7. Panel data regression results for H2: Effect of corporate reputation on firm value
- Table 8. Model test for H3: Board characteristics and firm value
- Table 9. Panel data regression results for H3: Effect of board characteristics on firm value
- Table 10. Mediation analysis using the Sobel test: ROA as Corporate Reputation
-
- Achour, Z. (2022). Board Gender Diversity and Firm Risk. In Lawrence Emeagwali, O. & Bhatti, F. (Eds.). Corporate Governance – Recent Advances and Perspectives. IntechOpen.
- Almaskati, N., Bird, R., & Lu, Y. (2020). Corporate governance, institutions, markets, and social factors. Research in International Business and Finance, 51, 101089.
- Altunbaş, Y., Thornton, J., & Uymaz, Y. (2020). The effect of CEO power on bank risk: Do boards and institutional investors matter? Finance Research Letters, 33, 101202.
- Anggreni Das, N., Lukviarman, N., Rahim, R., & Alfarisi, M. F. (2025). Panel Data of Board Characteristics, Corporate Reputation, and Firm Value: Evidence from Kompas 100 Index Companies (2019–2023) [Dataset]. Zenodo.
- Ardiany, Y., Lukviarman, N., Hamidi, M., & Luthan, E. (2023). Conservatism as a moderating variable on the determinants of earnings management. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(4), 324-334.
- Baral, R. P. (2020). Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Commercial Banks of Nepal. Janapriya Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 9(1), 120-134.
- Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property (Originally published in 1932 by Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
- Cai, C., Qiu, R., & Tu, Y. (2022). Role of Digital Economy in Rebuilding and Sustaining the Space Governance Mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 828406.
- Campbell, R. J., Busenbark, J. R., Graffin, S. D., & Boivie, S. (2021). Retaining problems or solutions? The POST‐ACQUISITION performance implications of director retention. Strategic Management Journal, 42(9), 1716-1733.
- Chen, R. (Ryan), El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Liu, F. (2022). The corporate governance consequences of small shareholdings: Evidence from sovereign wealth fund cross‐border investments. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 30(6), 656-685.
- Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 81-112.
- Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate Governance: Decades of Dialogue and Data. The Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371.
- Demirbag, M., Malikov, K., Kuvandikov, A., & Manson, S. (2021). Workforce reductions and post-merger operating performance: The role of corporate governance. Journal of Business Research, 122, 109-120.
- Eang, M., Clarke, A., & Ordonez-Ponce, E. (2023). The roles of multinational enterprises in implementing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals at the local level. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 26(1), 79-97.
- Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, XXVI.
- Farooq, M., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Nexus between board characteristics, firm performance and intellectual capital: An emerging market evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(6), 1269-1297.
- Filsaraei, M. (2024). Stock Liquidity, Corporate Governance and Dividend Payout: Evidence From Tehran Stock Exchange. Economics & Management Information, 1-12.
- Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Harvard Business School Press.
- Fombrun, C. J. (2012). The Building Blocks of Corporate Reputation: Definitions, Antecedents, Consequences. Oxford University Press.
- Gad, J. (2020). The association between disclosures on control system over financial reporting and mechanisms of corporate governance: Empirical evidence from Germany and Poland. International Journal of Management and Economics, 56(4), 351-369.
- Garel, A., Martin-Flores, J. M., Petit-Romec, A., & Scott, A. (2021). Institutional investor distraction and earnings management. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101801.
- Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A. M. (2023). The effect of board diversity and tenure on environmental performance. Evidence from family and non-family firms. Journal of Family Business Management.
- Gharbi, S., & Othmani, H. (2023). Threshold effects of board gender diversity on firm performance: Panel smooth transition regression model. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(1), 243-261.
- Gounopoulos, D., Mazouz, K., & Wood, G. (2021). The consequences of political donations for IPO premium and performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, 101888.
- Gupta, A., Wowak, A. J., & Boeker, W. (2022). Corporate directors as heterogeneous network pipes: How director political ideology affects the interorganizational diffusion of governance practices. Strategic Management Journal, 43(8), 1469-1498.
- Jelic, R., Zhou, D., & Ahmad, W. (2021). Do stressed PE firms misbehave? Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101798.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- Kara, A., Nanteza, A., Ozkan, A., & Yildiz, Y. (2022). Board gender diversity and responsible banking during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Corporate Finance, 74, 102213.
- Kyaw, K., Thomsen, S., & Treepongkaruna, S. (2022). Firms’ potential for economic sustainability and firm value: The moderating role of blockholders. Sustainable Development, 30(5), 884-901.
- La Porta, R., Lopez‐De‐Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Corporate Ownership Around the World. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517.
- Li, Q., Zhou, W., Zhou, H., & Chen, J. (2021). Do Board Characteristics Matter for Growth Firms? Evidence from China. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(8), 380.
- Lukviarman, N., & Prima Johan, A. (2018). Meta-analysis of corporate governance in Asia. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(2), 267-280.
- McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595-612.
- Meng, B., Zang, Q., & Li, G. (2024). Study on the impact of corporate social responsibility on carbon performance in the background of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 33(3), 416-430.
- Mollah, S., Liljeblom, E., & Mobarek, A. (2021). Heterogeneity in independent non-executive directors’ attributes and risk-taking in large banks. Journal of Corporate Finance, 70, 102074.
- Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.
- Nkonge Habakkuk, B., Samuel Nduati, K., & Peter Wang’ombe, K. (2023). The nexus between corporate governance, asset structure, and value of listed firms: Evidence from Kenya. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(2), 102-115.
- Novoselova, O. A. (2022). What matters for interorganizational connectedness? Locating the drivers of multiplex corporate networks. Strategic Management Journal, 43(4), 872-899.
- Orazalin, N., Makarov, R., & Ospanova, M. (2015). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in the Oil and Gas Industry of Russia. Pressacademia, 4(4), 710-710,
- Paolone, F., Pozzoli, M., Cucari, N., & Bianco, R. (2023). Longer board tenure and audit committee tenure. How do they impact environmental performance? A European study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 358-368.
- Pascual-Fuster, B., & Crespí-Cladera, R. (2022). Optimal board independence with gray independent directors. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 25(2), 193-209.
- Raithel, S., & Schwaiger, M. (2015). The effects of corporate reputation perceptions of the general public on shareholder value. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 945-956.
- Ravid, S. A., & Sekerci, N. (2020). Large investors’ portfolio composition and firms value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 61, 101404.
- Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093.
- Saravanan, P., Thenmozhi, M., & Sasidharan, A. (2022). Are independent directors enhancing value in the post mandate period? Empirical evidence from India. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(S1), e2730.
- Schnatterly, K., Calvano, F., Berns, J. P., & Deng, C. (2021). The effects of board expertise‐risk misalignment and subsequent strategic board reconfiguration on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42(11), 2162-2191.
- Shoham, A., Lee, S. M., Khan, Z., Tarba, S. Y., & Ahammad, M. F. (2020). The effect of board gender diversity on cross-listing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65, 101767.
- Sierra-Morán, J., Cabeza-García, L., & González-Álvarez, N. (2024). Independent directors and firm innovation: The moderating role of gender and nationality diversity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(2), 373-402.
- Singh, J., Crisafulli, B., & Quamina, L. T. (2020). ‘Corporate image at stake’: The impact of crises and response strategies on consumer perceptions of corporate brand alliances. Journal of Business Research, 117, 839-849.
- Souther, M. E. (2021). Does Board Independence Increase Firm Value? Evidence from Closed-End Funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(1), 313-336.
- UU_Perseroan Terbatas, U.-U. (2007). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas.
- Wang, T. (2022). Board human capital diversity and corporate innovation: A longitudinal study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(4), 680-701.
- Wiersema, M. F., Ahn, A. M., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Activist Hedge Fund Success: The Role of Reputation. Strategic Management Journal, 41(13), 2493-2517.
- Wiwattanakantang, Y. (2001). Controlling shareholders and corporate value: Evidence from Thailand. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 9(4), 323-362.
- Xu, L., Zhao, Y., Wang, C., & Ponnapalli, A. R. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and corporate reputation: The moderating roles of CEO and state political ideologies. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(3), 501-517.
- Yadav, S. (2022). Agency Theory and Internationalization: A Critical Assessment of Literature. In Lawrence Emeagwali, O., & Bhatti, F. (Eds.). Corporate Governance – Recent Advances and Perspectives. IntechOpen.
- Zaid, A. A. M., Wang, M. T. F., Abuhijleh, S., Issa, A. W. A., Saleh, M., & Ali, F. (2020). Corporate governance practices and capital structure decisions: The moderating effect of gender diversity. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(5), 939-964.


