Examining the moderating role of institutional leadership in the relationship between institutional pressures and the use of performance measurement systems: Evidence from local government in Yogyakarta, Indonesia
-
Author(s)Anthonius H. Citra WijayaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-4995
,
Rusdi AkbarLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-430X
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(1).2026.37
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #1, pp. 562-577
- 33 Views
-
5 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Institutional leadership represents an important internal capacity for institutionalizing performance measurement systems within local government, particularly in contexts where external forces such as institutional isomorphism shape organizational behavior. This study examines the moderating role of institutional leadership in the relationship between institutional pressures (coercive, mimetic, and normative) and the use of performance measurement systems. Survey data were collected from 77 senior officials responsible for implementing and using performance measurement systems across all government agencies in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia, in 2022. The data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that institutional leadership significantly moderates the relationship between coercive pressure and performance measurement systems use (path coefficient = −0.194, p = 0.037), suggesting a negative moderating effect that weakens coercive influence. However, no significant moderating effects were found for mimetic pressure (−0.121, p = 0.138) or normative pressure (0.008, p = 0.138). Institutional leadership also does not exert a direct effect on the use of performance measurement systems (0.019, p = 0.433). Regarding direct effects, coercive and mimetic pressures positively influence performance measurement systems use (0.394 and 0.310, respectively; p < 0.05), while normative pressure is not significant (0.017, p = 0.440). These findings suggest that institutional leadership functions more effectively as a contingent moderating mechanism than as an independent driver in shaping organizational responses to institutional pressures.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H83, H11, H70, D02
-
References54
-
Tables7
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research model
- Figure 2. Output model
-
- Table 1. Demographics of respondents
- Table 2. Validity and reliability
- Table 3. Fornell–Larcker criterion
- Table 4. Fit summary
- Table 5. Hypothesis test results
- Table 6. Endogeneity and additional analysis
- Table A1. Measurements
-
- Abernethy, M. A., Bouwens, J., & van Lent, L. (2010). Leadership and control system design. Management Accounting Research, 21(1), 2-16.
- Agasisti, T., Agostino, D., & Soncin, M. (2020). Implementing performance measurement systems in local governments: Moving from the “how” to the “why.” Public Performance & Management Review, 43(5), 1100-1128.
- Ahyaruddin, M., Yusoff, M.N.H.b., & Zainuddin, S.A.b. (2023). Institutional isomorphism, accountability, and local government performance in era of public governance: A conceptual framework. In N. Mansour & L.M. Bujosa Vadell (Eds.), Finance, Accounting and Law in the Digital Age (pp. 623-633). Cham: Springer.
- Alnuaimi, B. K., Kumar, S., Ren, S., & Budhwar, P. (2022). Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy. Journal of Business Research, 145, 636-648.
- Alsharari, N. M. H. (2020). Accounting changes and beyond budgeting principles (BBP) in the public sector: Institutional isomorphism. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(2-3), 165-189.
- Ansmann, M., & Seyfried, M. (2022). Isomorphism and organizational performance: Evidence from quality management in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 30(1), 135-149.
- Barrett, B., Fernandez, F., & Gonzalez, E. M. (2019). Why universities voluntarily pursue US accreditation: The case of Mexico. Higher Education, 79(4), 619-635.
- Bartunek, J. M., Elsbach, K. D., Bell, E., Markides, C., Christianson, M. G., Sutcliffe, K. M., Pratt, M. G., Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., Glynn, M. A., Ocasio, W., Burton, M. D., & Ventresca, M. J. (2019). Theorizing about an AOM president’s response to crisis and the counter responses it evoked. Journal of Management Inquiry, 28(3), 276-282.
- Beaton, E. E. (2021). Institutional leadership: Maintaining mission integrity in the era of managerialism. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 32(1), 55-77.
- Bundgaard, K., & Brøgger, M. N. (2019). Who is the back translator? An integrative literature review of back translator descriptions in cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments. Perspectives, 27(6), 833-845.
- Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Ittner, C. D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3-4), 243-267.
- Citra, A. (2026). Moderating effect of institutional leadership on the relationship between institutional isomorphism and performance measurement system usage in local government [Data set]. Zenodo.
- De Lancer Julnes, P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 166-189.
- Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297-316.
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
- Ebbes, P., Papies, D., & Heerde, H. J. Van. (2016). Dealing with endogeneity: A nontechnical guide for marketing researchers dealing with endogeneity. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of Market Research. Springer International Publishing.
- Febriyanti, D., Widianingsih, I., Sumaryana, A., & Buchari, R. A. (2024). The typology and determinant of performance measurement for public sector organizations – A literature review. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1).
- George, B., Baekgaard, M., Decramer, A., Audenaert, M., & Goeminne, S. (2020). Institutional isomorphism, negativity bias and performance information use by politicians: A survey experiment. Public Administration, 98(1), 14-28.
- Gowon, M., Rohman, A., & Basuki, P. (2018). The effect of performance measurement system implementation on the local government performance. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(1). .
- Grafton, J., Lillis, A. M., & Widener, S. K. (2010). The role of performance measurement and evaluation in building organizational capabilities and performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 689-706.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T.M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed). Sage Publishing.
- Hansen, S. C., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2004). Multiple facets of budgeting: An exploratory analysis. Management Accounting Research, 15(4), 415-439.
- Henri, J. F. (2006). Organizational culture and performance measurement systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(1), 77-103.
- Hirsch, P. M., & Lounsbury, M. (1997). Ending the family quarrel: Toward a reconciliation of “old” and “new” institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 406-418.
- Ikegami, J. J. J., Maznevski, M., & Ota, M. (2017). Creating the asset of foreignness: Schrödinger’s cat and lessons from the Nissan revival. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 24(1), 55-77.
- Jung, K., & Choi, J. W. (2011). Institutional leadership and perceived performance: Evidence from the Korean Minister survey. The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 26(2), 45-75.
- Kloot, L. (1999). Performance measurement and accountability in Victorian local government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(7), 565-584.
- Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.
- Kock, N. (2022). Testing and controlling for endogeneity in PLS-SEM with stochastic instrumental variables. Data Analysis Perspectives Journal, 3, 1-6.
- Kusumasari, B., Pramusinto, A., Santoso, A. D., & Fathin, C. A. (2019). What shapes public sector innovation? Public Policy and Administration, 18(4), 430-446.
- Li, F., & Ding, D. Z. (2013). The effect of institutional isomorphic pressure on the internationalization of firms in an emerging economy: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 19(4), 506-525.
- Menpan.go.id. (2024). Tren Kenaikan SAKIP Selama 10 Tahun, Menteri PANRB: Korelasi Positif Akuntabilitas Kinerja dengan Akselerasi Pembangunan dan Pengentasan Kemiskinan [10-Year Uptrend in SAKIP Scores, Minister of State Apparatus Reform and Bureaucracy: Positive Correlation Between Performance Accountability and Accelerated Development and Poverty Mitigation]. (In Indonesian).
- Nkurunziza, G., Munene, J., Ntayi, J., & Kaberuka, W. (2019). Business process reengineering in developing economies Lessons from microfinance. Innovation & Management Review, 16(2), 118-142.
- Nurullah, C. A., Ibrahim, M., Djalil, M. A., & Putra, T. R. I. (2026), “Bureaucratic simplification and organizational effectiveness: the mediating role of administrative efficiency and the moderating roles of transformational and digital leadership”. International Journal of Public Leadership, 22(1), 67-81.
- Ohemeng, F. L. K., & Kamga, O. (2019). Administrative leaders as institutional entrepreneurs in developing countries: A study of the development and institutionalization of performance management in Ghana’s public service. Public Administration and Development, 40(1), 87-100.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
- Poister, T. H. (2010). The future of strategic planning in the public sector: Linking strategic management and performance. Public Administration Review, 70, 255-267.
- Pudjono, A. N. S., Wibisono, D., & Fatima, I. (2025). Advancing local governance: A systematic review of performance management systems. Cogent Business and Management, 12(1).
- Raffaelli, R., & Glynn, M. A. (2015). What’s so institutional about leadership? Leadership mechanisms of value infusion. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 44, 283-316.
- Salomo, R. V., & Rahmayanti, K. P. (2023). Progress and institutional challenges on local governments performance accountability system reform in Indonesia. SAGE Open, 13(4).
- Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage Publications.
- Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. Harper & Row Publishers.
- Seralurin, Y. C., Patma, K., & Wijaya, A. H. C. (2023). The effect of external pressure and institutional leadership on the use of local government performance reports. Journal of International Conference Proceedings, 6(5).
- Siti-Nabiha, A. K., & Jurnali, T. (2020). Institutional work and implementation of a performance measurement and management system in a developing country. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 16(3), 447-467.
- Speklé, R. F., & Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2014). The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 131-146.
- Statistics. (2025). Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia.
- Tran, Y. T., & Nguyen, N. P. (2020). The impact of the performance measurement system on the organizational performance of the public sector in a transition economy: Is public accountability a missing link? Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), Article 1792669.
- Tuttle, B., & Dillard, J. (2007). Beyond competition: Institutional isomorphism in U.S. accounting research. Accounting Horizons, 21(4), 387-409.
- Vakkuri, J. (2022). PMM and beyond – Reflections on the paper “new developments in institutional research on performance measurement and management in the public sector.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 34(4), 501-511.
- Van Elten, H. J., Kolk, B. van der, & Sülz, S. (2021). Do different uses of performance measurement systems in hospitals yield different outcomes? Health Care Management Review, 46(3), 217-226.
- Van Veen-Dirks, P. (2010). Different uses of performance measures: The evaluation versus reward of production managers. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 141-164.
- Villagran, M. M., & Lucke, J. F. (2005). Translating communication measures for use in non-English-speaking populations. Communication Research Reports, 22(3), 247-251.
- Washington, M., Boal, K., & Davis, J. (2008). Institutional leadership: past, present, and future. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, K. Sahlin (Eds.) Institutional leadership: Past, present, and future (pp. 721-736). SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Wulaningrum, P. D., Akbar, R., & Sari, M. R. (2020). Isomorphism, human resource capability and its role in performance measurement and accountability. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 1099-1110.
-
Academic resilience, emotional intelligence, and academic performance among undergraduate students
Uzoma Ononye ,
Mercy Ogbeta ,
Francis Ndudi ,
Dudutari Bereprebofa ,
Ikechuckwu Maduemezia
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.06(1).2022.01
Knowledge and Performance Management Volume 6, 2022 Issue #1 pp. 1-10 Views: 6194 Downloads: 1674 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯAcademic resilience and emotional intelligence are considered important personal resources for furthering students’ academic performance. However, many educational organizations seem to trivialize the performance implications of these constructs in teachings and curriculum. Consequently, it can decrease not just their academic performance but also their employability, as they lack the generic competencies to adapt and survive in a stressful context. Even so, empirical evidence on integrating academic resilience, emotional intelligence, and academic performance remains unexplored in the Nigerian university context. Therefore, the study aimed to investigate the linkages between academic resilience, emotional intelligence, and academic performance in Nigeria. The partial least square (PLS) modeling method was utilized for testing the stated hypotheses with data collected from 179 final year undergraduate students in the regular B.Sc. Business Administration and B.Sc. Marketing program at Delta State University, Nigeria. From the PLS results, the study reported that academic resilience was positively related to emotional intelligence (β = 0.125, p = 0.007), academic resilience (β = 0.231, p = 0.000) and emotional intelligence (β = 0.260, p = 0.000) were positively related to academic performance, and emotional resilience mediated the positive relationship between academic resilience and academic performance (β = 0.057, p = 0.005). While academic resilience predicted academic performance, it also predicted emotional intelligence, which affected academic performance significantly and positively.
-
Investigating the impact of workplace bullying on employees’ morale, performance and turnover intentions in five-star Egyptian hotel operations
In today’s competitive business environment, human resources are one of the most critical assets particularly for service-focused organizations. Consequently, employees’ morale has become invaluable for maintaining outstanding organizational performance and retaining employees. One of the most important factors which may affect employees’ satisfaction is workplace bullying from employers and colleagues at large. It is considered a negative and unethical issue which may degrade, humiliate and create a risk to a healthy working environment. Therefore, the main objective of this research is to investigate the extent to which workplace bullying may affect the organizational outcomes of a sample of five-star hotels in Egypt. Two questionnaires were distributed among the subjects of the sample; bell desk staff, kitchen stewards and head departments. The results of this research confirmed that there is a correlation between workplace bullying, employees’ morale and turnover intentions but, showed no correlation between workplace bullying and employees’ work performance.
-
The influence of servant leadership on job satisfaction with individual character as a moderating variable
Bakri Hasanuddin ,
Mustainah M ,
Pricylia Chintya Dewi Buntuang
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.37
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021 Issue #1 pp. 445-455 Views: 5171 Downloads: 2320 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study aims to investigate the influence of servant leadership on job satisfaction with individual character as a moderating variable. It used a quantitative approach with multiple linear regression analysis. The population of this study were employees of the Central Sulawesi province industry and trade office. It involved 72 samples selected using a purposive sampling technique. The results showed that servant leadership significantly influence job satisfaction with a value of 82.5%. The most significant factor affecting job satisfaction is wisdom (correlation coefficient = 0.863) in which the higher the wisdom, the higher the job satisfaction. The next factor is persuasive mapping in which the higher the persuasive mapping, the higher the job satisfaction (correlation coefficient = 0.697). Then, it was followed by altruistic calling with the correlation coefficient value of 0.524 in which the higher the altruistic calling, the higher the job satisfaction. The last is emotional healing with a correlation coefficient value of 0.291 in which the higher the emotional healing, the higher the job satisfaction. On the other hand, organizational stewardship is the only factor does not influence the job satisfaction (correlation coefficient = 0.009).
