The interests: Game-changer of the global security architecture
-
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21511/gg.07(1).2026.04
-
Article InfoVolume 7 2026, Issue #1, pp. 44-53
- 15 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Reflexive Preface
This study examines the problem of interest in international relations among the selected most important participants in ongoing conflicts. The results indicated that the content of raison d’état is univocal for all states, but the interests significantly differentiate them in the context of time and place. The paper processed the criteria of interest classification. The analysis deals with the interests of selected powers, such as the Russian Federation, the United States, the European Union, and the People’s Republic of China. At the end, the report presents conclusions with reference to the actual global situation.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F51, F52, F55, Н56, О50
-
References17
-
Tables0
-
Figures0
-
- Abumbe, G. T., Kingsley, N., & Lawrence, O. O. (2024). Hegemony of the United States and wars in the Middle East. Global Journal of Social Sciences, 23, 229-239.
- Allison, G. T., & Blackwill, R. (2000). America’s national interests. The Commission on America’s National Interests.
- Brzeziński, Z. (1997). The Big Chesboard. American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives (1st ed.). Warszawa: Basic Books, A Member of the Perseus Books Group.
- Chun, Z. (2023). China initiatives boost common development of Global South. Contemporary World, 06(45), 9.
- Desch, M. C. (2026, February 26). Ukraine is loosing the war. With Moscow pressing its advantage, Kyiv should trade land for peace. Foreign Affairs.
- Focus. (2008, August). Im Zangengriff der Russen.
- Heller, M., & Niekricz, A. (1986). Utopia u władzy. Historia Związku Sowieckiego, T.1. Warszawa. (In Polish).
- Høvsgaard, J. (2017). Spionerne der komind med varmen [The spies who came in with the heat]. Gyldendal. (In Danish).
- Kagan, R. (2022, May/June). The price of hegemony. Can America learn to use its power? Foreign Affairs
- Kissinger, H. (2011). Diplomacy. Simon & Schuster.
- Niezavisimaja Gazieta. (1996, May 23). Vozroditsya li Soyuz? TezisySoveta po vneshney i oboronnoypolitike [Will the Union be Reborn? Theses of the Council on foreign and defense policy]. (In Russian).
- Renwei, H., & Jiejin, Z. (2022). BRICS mechanismus and global governance. Contemporary World, 04(37), 21.
- Slezkine, P., & Shifrinson, J. (2026, February 16). The price of peace in Ukraine. Why recognizing a new border could serve Kyiv’s interests. Foreign Affairs.
- United Nations (UN). (1968). Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice. New York.
- Von Fritsch, R. (2022). Quo vadis Rosjo? Spojrzenieambasadora Niemiec (p. 333). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie SEDNO. (In Polish).
- Walt, S. M. (2026, February 3). The predatory hegemon. How Trump wields American Power. Foreign Affairs.
- Xi, J. (2022). Speeches on Diplomacy by Xi Jinping (Volumes I). Central Party Literature Press.


