The impact of the supervisory board on bond ratings of non-financial companies
-
Received October 1, 2019;Accepted December 10, 2019;Published February 6, 2020
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(1).2020.02
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2020, Issue #1, pp. 15-23
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by1 articlesJournal title: Future Business JournalArticle title: Influence of board mechanisms on sustainability performance for listed firms in Sub-Saharan AfricaDOI: 10.1186/s43093-023-00258-5Volume: 9 / Issue: 1 / First page: / Year: 2023Contributors: Peter Kwarteng, Kingsley Opoku Appiah, Bismark Addai
- 913 Views
-
144 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Issuing bonds is one of the alternative ways for non-financial companies to get money from the public besides borrowing money from banks. Compared with getting money banks, obtaining money from the bond market is slightly economical because the companies are not essential to borne the intermediation cost anymore. As a consequence, the companies in the bond market will get the assessment from the appointed agency. Furthermore, the rating of bonds will determine their reputation.
Mentioning the literature review, the bond ratings are affected by the features of the supervisory board: size, independence, and audit committee. Therefore, this research intends to attain two goals. Firstly, it aims to prove and analyze the impact of the supervisory board size and independence, as well as the audit committee size on the company’s possibility to get a high bond rating with profitability as the control variable. Secondly, it intends to know the accuracy rate of grouping the company bond ratings through the classification matrix.
The population originates from the non-financial companies. The total samples are determined by the Slovin formula with a boundary of the fault of 10%. Based on this formula, the total samples are 36 companies. Furthermore, they are randomly grabbed from the population. The ordered probit regression model and the classification matrix are utilized to analyze the data.
Based on the data analysis, this research finds out that the supervisory board size and independence, the audit committee size, and profitability positively affect the bond ratings. It means that the number of the commissioner board and the members of the audit committee have to be added until achieving the maximum level to monitor the performance of the directors so that the company can reach a high bond rating. To sum up, board governance is effective in improving the company’s bond rating.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G24, G32, G34
-
References37
-
Tables6
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. The normality test result on residuals
-
- Table 1. Description to measure research variables
- Table 2. Number of the companies based on the group of bond ratings
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics of SBS, SBI, ACS, and ROA
- Table 4. Estimation result of the ordered probit regression model: the impact of supervisory board size and independence, audit committee size, and profitability on bond rating
- Table 5. The accuracy of grouping bond rating based on SBS, SBI, ACS, and ROA
- Table A1. Names of the companies as the samples
-
- Abor, J. (2007). Corporate governance and financing decisions of Ghanaian listed firms. Corporate Governance, 7(1), 83-92.
- Altwijry, O. I. (2015). The Role of Corporate Governance and Ownership in Unconventional Bond Rating: Empirical Evidence from Companies Listed on Bursa Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking, and Finance, 11(2), 105-117.
- Aman, H., & Nguyen, P. (2013). Does good governance matter to debtholders? Evidence from the credit ratings of Japanese firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 29, 14-34.
- Ashbaugh-Skaifea, H., Collins, D. W., & LaFond, R. (2006). The effects of corporate governance on firms’ ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1-2), 203-243.
- Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The Role of Institutional Investors and Outside Directors. The Journal of Business, 76(3), 455-476.
- Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2006). Corporate Finance (8th ed.). Singapore: McGraw Hill.
- Easterbrook, F. (1984). Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends. American Economic Review, 74(4), 650-659.
- Ehrhardt, E. F., & Brigham, M. C. (2012). Financial Management (13th ed.). Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.
- Elhaj, M. A., Muhamed, N. A., & Ramli, N. M. (2017). The effects of board attributes on Sukuk rating. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 11(2), 312-330.
- Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
- Gitman, L. J., & Zutter, C. J. (2012). Principle of Managerial Finance (13th ed.). Boston: Prentice-Hall.
- Grassa, R. (2016). Corporate governance and credit rating in Islamic banks: Does Shariah governance matters? Journal of Management & Governance, 20, 875-906.
- Gray, S., Mirkovic, A., & Ragunathan, V. (2006). The Determinant of Credit Ratings: Australian Evidence. Australian Journal of Management, 31(2), 333-354.
- Hadianto, B., & Wijaya, M. S. (2010). Prediksi Kebijakan Utang, Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Ukuran, Dan Status Perusahaan Terhadap Kemungkinan Penentuan Peringkat Obligasi: Studi Empirik Pada Perusahaan Yang Menerbitkan Obligasi di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Teori & Terapan, 3(3), 204-224.
- Hanafi, M. M. (2017). Manajemen Keuangan (2nd ed.). Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Universitas Gadjah Mada.
- Hartono, J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis: Salah Kaprah & Pengalaman-Pengalaman (5th ed.). Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Gadjah Mada.
- Hartono, J. (2017). Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi (11th ed.). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Gadjah Mada.
- Husnan, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar Teori Portofolio & Analisis Sekuritas (4th ed.). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: UPP AMP YKPN.
- Kalay, A. (1982). Stockholder-Bondholder Conflict and Dividend Constraints. Journal of Financial Economics, 10(2), 211-233.
- Marfuah, & Endaryati, H. (2016). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance dan Debt Maturity Terhadap Prediksi Bond Rating. Ekuitas: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 20(4), 434-454.
- Mariana, M. (2016). Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Peringkat Obligasi Yang Tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2008–2010. Akrual: Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(2), 102-119.
- Mitton, T. (2004). Corporate governance and dividend policy in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 5(4), 409-426.
- Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218-228.
- Purwaningsih, A. (2008). Pemilihan Rasio Keuangan Terbaik Untuk Memprediksi Peringkat Obligasi: Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di BEI. KINERJA, 12, 85-99.
- Rianingsih, R. (2009). The Influence of Corporate Governance Practice Towards Credit and Bond Yields. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 24(2), 249-265.
- Ronning, G., & Kukuk, M. (1996). Efficient Estimation of Ordered Probit Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(435), 1120-1129.
- Sareen, R., & Vij, M. (2015). Corporate Governance and Credit Ratings. Journal of Business Thought, 5, 103-125.
- Setyaningrum, D. (2005). Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Peringkat Surat Utang Perusahaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Indonesia, 2(2), 73-102.
- Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
- Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method). Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
- Sukamulja, S. (2004). Good Corporate Governance di Sektor Keuangan: Dampak GCG Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan (Kasus di Bursa Efek Jakarta). BENEFIT, 8(1), 1-25.
- Sunarjanto, N. A., & Tulasi, D. (2013). Kemampuan Rasio Keuangan dan Corporate Governance Memprediksi Peringkat Obligasi Pada Perusahaan Consumer Goods. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 17(2), 230-242.
- Syakhroza, A. (2005). Corporate Governance: Sejarah dan Perkembangan, Teori, Model, dan Sistem Governance serta Aplikasinya pada Perusahaan BUMN. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
- Tandelilin, E. (2010). Portofolio dan Investasi: Teori dan Aplikasi (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
- Tjager, I. N., Alijoyo, A., Djemat, H. R., & Soembodo, B. (2003). Corporate Governance: Tantangan dan Kesempatan bagi Komunitas Bisnis Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Prenhallindo.
- Widarjono, A. (2013). Ekonometrika: Pengantar dan Aplikasinya disertai Panduan EViews (4th ed.). Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
- Zemzem, A., & Zouhari, S. (2016). Japan’s Corporate Governance Structures and Credit Rating. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 8(1), 195-211.
-
Service quality, customers’ satisfaction, and profitability: an empirical study of Saudi Arabian insurance sector
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #2 pp. 232-247 Views: 3373 Downloads: 567 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯFinancial performance is the fundamental aspect to test the performance of the companies. The performance of insurance sector, like any other service industry, is supposed to depend significantly on customers. When it comes to customers, it is an established fact that customer satisfaction would be an important element. Customer satisfaction primarily depends on the quality of service it gets. It can be safely hypothesized that better service quality would lead to higher satisfaction, which would ultimately lead to higher profits for the company. Studies on this relationship in the insurance sector for Saudi Arabia are missing. Hence, this study aims at studying both the profitability of companies and quality of service and tries to relate it to customer satisfaction. The results are quite surprising, as the study establishes that although the qualities of services are found wanting in many areas, companies are earning good profits. A probable reason could be the statutory nature of the services. Nevertheless, this study recommends improving the quality of services and differentiating services between age groups for further improvement.
-
The moderating role of firm size and interest rate in capital structure of the firms: selected sample from sugar sector of Pakistan
Sarfraz Hussain , Abdul Quddus , Pham Phat Tien , Muhammad Rafiq , Drahomíra Pavelková doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(4).2020.29Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #4 pp. 341-355 Views: 3334 Downloads: 358 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe selection of financing is a top priority for businesses, particularly in short- and long-term investment decisions. Mixing debt and equity leads to decisions on the financial structure for businesses. This research analyzes the moderate position of company size and the interest rate in the capital structure over six years (2013–2018) for 29 listed Pakistani enterprises operating in the sugar market. This research employed static panel analysis and dynamic panel analysis on linear and nonlinear regression methods. The capital structure included debt to capital ratio, non-current liabilities, plus current liabilities to capital as a dependent variable. Independent variables were profitability, firm size, tangibility, Non-Debt Tax Shield, liquidity, and macroeconomic variables were exchange rates and interest rates. The investigation reported that profitability, firm size, and Non-Debt Tax Shield were significant and negative, while tangibility and interest rates significantly and positively affected debt to capital ratio. This means the sugar sector has greater financial leverage to manage the funding obligations for the better performance of firms. Therefore, the outcomes revealed that the moderators have an important influence on capital structure.
-
The effect of working capital management on profitability: a case of listed manufacturing firms in South Africa
Jason Kasozi doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(2-2).2017.05Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 14, 2017 Issue #2 (cont. 2) pp. 336-346 Views: 3147 Downloads: 2644 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯWorking capital management plays a pivotal role in enhancing the operational efficiency of firms and their ultimate profitability. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the trends in working capital management and its impact on the financial performance of listed manufacturing firms on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE). A panel data methodology was used with different regression estimators to analyze this relationship based on an unbalanced panel of 69 manufacturing firms listed during the period 2007–2016.
The findings revealed that the average collection period and the average payment period are negative and statistically significant for profitability, implying that firms which efficiently manage their accounts receivable and those that pay their creditors on time perform better than those that do not. Additionally, a positive statistically significant relationship between the number of days in inventory and profitability was supported suggesting that firms which stock-up and maintain their inventory levels suffer less from stock-outs and avoid challenges of securing financing when needed. This increases their operational efficiency and ensures profitability in the long run. It could not be ascertained whether a shorter or longer cash conversion cycle enhances firm profitability, since findings to support this premise were weak. However, it was observed that manufacturing firms are on average, carrying lot of debt in their capital structures.
The present study contributes to existing literature by presenting one of the very recent findings on this topic while simultaneously testing the validity of recent local and international methodologies, in order to inform policy change.