The impact of the supervisory board on bond ratings of non-financial companies
-
Received October 1, 2019;Accepted December 10, 2019;Published February 6, 2020
- Author(s)
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(1).2020.02
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2020, Issue #1, pp. 15-23
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by3 articlesJournal title: Future Business JournalArticle title: Influence of board mechanisms on sustainability performance for listed firms in Sub-Saharan AfricaDOI: 10.1186/s43093-023-00258-5Volume: 9 / Issue: 1 / First page: / Year: 2023Contributors: Peter Kwarteng, Kingsley Opoku Appiah, Bismark AddaiJournal title:Article title:DOI:Volume: / Issue: / First page: / Year:Contributors:Journal title:Article title:DOI:Volume: / Issue: / First page: / Year:Contributors:
- 1762 Views
-
558 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Issuing bonds is one of the alternative ways for non-financial companies to get money from the public besides borrowing money from banks. Compared with getting money banks, obtaining money from the bond market is slightly economical because the companies are not essential to borne the intermediation cost anymore. As a consequence, the companies in the bond market will get the assessment from the appointed agency. Furthermore, the rating of bonds will determine their reputation.
Mentioning the literature review, the bond ratings are affected by the features of the supervisory board: size, independence, and audit committee. Therefore, this research intends to attain two goals. Firstly, it aims to prove and analyze the impact of the supervisory board size and independence, as well as the audit committee size on the company’s possibility to get a high bond rating with profitability as the control variable. Secondly, it intends to know the accuracy rate of grouping the company bond ratings through the classification matrix.
The population originates from the non-financial companies. The total samples are determined by the Slovin formula with a boundary of the fault of 10%. Based on this formula, the total samples are 36 companies. Furthermore, they are randomly grabbed from the population. The ordered probit regression model and the classification matrix are utilized to analyze the data.
Based on the data analysis, this research finds out that the supervisory board size and independence, the audit committee size, and profitability positively affect the bond ratings. It means that the number of the commissioner board and the members of the audit committee have to be added until achieving the maximum level to monitor the performance of the directors so that the company can reach a high bond rating. To sum up, board governance is effective in improving the company’s bond rating.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G24, G32, G34
-
References37
-
Tables6
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. The normality test result on residuals
-
- Table 1. Description to measure research variables
- Table 2. Number of the companies based on the group of bond ratings
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics of SBS, SBI, ACS, and ROA
- Table 4. Estimation result of the ordered probit regression model: the impact of supervisory board size and independence, audit committee size, and profitability on bond rating
- Table 5. The accuracy of grouping bond rating based on SBS, SBI, ACS, and ROA
- Table A1. Names of the companies as the samples
-
- Abor, J. (2007). Corporate governance and financing decisions of Ghanaian listed firms. Corporate Governance, 7(1), 83-92.
- Altwijry, O. I. (2015). The Role of Corporate Governance and Ownership in Unconventional Bond Rating: Empirical Evidence from Companies Listed on Bursa Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking, and Finance, 11(2), 105-117.
- Aman, H., & Nguyen, P. (2013). Does good governance matter to debtholders? Evidence from the credit ratings of Japanese firms. Research in International Business and Finance, 29, 14-34.
- Ashbaugh-Skaifea, H., Collins, D. W., & LaFond, R. (2006). The effects of corporate governance on firms’ ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1-2), 203-243.
- Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The Role of Institutional Investors and Outside Directors. The Journal of Business, 76(3), 455-476.
- Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2006). Corporate Finance (8th ed.). Singapore: McGraw Hill.
- Easterbrook, F. (1984). Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends. American Economic Review, 74(4), 650-659.
- Ehrhardt, E. F., & Brigham, M. C. (2012). Financial Management (13th ed.). Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.
- Elhaj, M. A., Muhamed, N. A., & Ramli, N. M. (2017). The effects of board attributes on Sukuk rating. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 11(2), 312-330.
- Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
- Gitman, L. J., & Zutter, C. J. (2012). Principle of Managerial Finance (13th ed.). Boston: Prentice-Hall.
- Grassa, R. (2016). Corporate governance and credit rating in Islamic banks: Does Shariah governance matters? Journal of Management & Governance, 20, 875-906.
- Gray, S., Mirkovic, A., & Ragunathan, V. (2006). The Determinant of Credit Ratings: Australian Evidence. Australian Journal of Management, 31(2), 333-354.
- Hadianto, B., & Wijaya, M. S. (2010). Prediksi Kebijakan Utang, Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Ukuran, Dan Status Perusahaan Terhadap Kemungkinan Penentuan Peringkat Obligasi: Studi Empirik Pada Perusahaan Yang Menerbitkan Obligasi di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Teori & Terapan, 3(3), 204-224.
- Hanafi, M. M. (2017). Manajemen Keuangan (2nd ed.). Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Universitas Gadjah Mada.
- Hartono, J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis: Salah Kaprah & Pengalaman-Pengalaman (5th ed.). Yogyakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Gadjah Mada.
- Hartono, J. (2017). Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi (11th ed.). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Gadjah Mada.
- Husnan, S. (2009). Dasar-dasar Teori Portofolio & Analisis Sekuritas (4th ed.). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: UPP AMP YKPN.
- Kalay, A. (1982). Stockholder-Bondholder Conflict and Dividend Constraints. Journal of Financial Economics, 10(2), 211-233.
- Marfuah, & Endaryati, H. (2016). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance dan Debt Maturity Terhadap Prediksi Bond Rating. Ekuitas: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan, 20(4), 434-454.
- Mariana, M. (2016). Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Peringkat Obligasi Yang Tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2008–2010. Akrual: Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(2), 102-119.
- Mitton, T. (2004). Corporate governance and dividend policy in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 5(4), 409-426.
- Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218-228.
- Purwaningsih, A. (2008). Pemilihan Rasio Keuangan Terbaik Untuk Memprediksi Peringkat Obligasi: Studi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di BEI. KINERJA, 12, 85-99.
- Rianingsih, R. (2009). The Influence of Corporate Governance Practice Towards Credit and Bond Yields. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 24(2), 249-265.
- Ronning, G., & Kukuk, M. (1996). Efficient Estimation of Ordered Probit Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91(435), 1120-1129.
- Sareen, R., & Vij, M. (2015). Corporate Governance and Credit Ratings. Journal of Business Thought, 5, 103-125.
- Setyaningrum, D. (2005). Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Peringkat Surat Utang Perusahaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Indonesia, 2(2), 73-102.
- Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
- Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method). Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.
- Sukamulja, S. (2004). Good Corporate Governance di Sektor Keuangan: Dampak GCG Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan (Kasus di Bursa Efek Jakarta). BENEFIT, 8(1), 1-25.
- Sunarjanto, N. A., & Tulasi, D. (2013). Kemampuan Rasio Keuangan dan Corporate Governance Memprediksi Peringkat Obligasi Pada Perusahaan Consumer Goods. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 17(2), 230-242.
- Syakhroza, A. (2005). Corporate Governance: Sejarah dan Perkembangan, Teori, Model, dan Sistem Governance serta Aplikasinya pada Perusahaan BUMN. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
- Tandelilin, E. (2010). Portofolio dan Investasi: Teori dan Aplikasi (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
- Tjager, I. N., Alijoyo, A., Djemat, H. R., & Soembodo, B. (2003). Corporate Governance: Tantangan dan Kesempatan bagi Komunitas Bisnis Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Prenhallindo.
- Widarjono, A. (2013). Ekonometrika: Pengantar dan Aplikasinya disertai Panduan EViews (4th ed.). Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
- Zemzem, A., & Zouhari, S. (2016). Japan’s Corporate Governance Structures and Credit Rating. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 8(1), 195-211.
-
ESG disclosure and financial performance: Empirical study of Vietnamese commercial banks
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 19, 2024 Issue #1 pp. 208-220 Views: 9780 Downloads: 2978 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯEnvironmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure becomes vital for banks to be transparent and accountable for their investments and lending decisions to shareholders, regulators, and society. The potential enhancement of shareholder value through ESG disclosure is still inconsistent. Empirical studies on the association between ESG disclosure and financial performance are mixed and limited in emerging economies. This study aims to examine whether ESG disclosure impacts the financial performance of 24 Vietnamese commercial banks in terms of return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and net interest margin (NIM). The study uses the feasible generalized least squares estimation method based on panel data from 2018 to 2022. The study employs content analysis on 12 themes related to environmental, social, and governance pillars to score policy disclosure based on the Fair Finance Guide Methodology. The results highlight the positive effects of ESG policy disclosure, individual environment disclosure (E), and individual governance disclosure (G) on bank financial performance. Notably, ESG, E, and G have the largest influence on ROE, with coefficients of 0.051, 0.036, and 0.027, respectively, at a 5% significance level. However, the study does not provide evidence of a statistically significant association between social disclosure and financial performance. These results provide empirical evidence for regulators and bank managers to shape ESG policies and practices aligning with international standards.
Acknowledgment
ESG disclosure score of 11 banks as primary data in this study is conducted under the project coordinated by the Fair Finance Vietnam coalition, as part of Fair Finance International. -
Evaluating the effects of IFRS 9 on Jordanian banks’ credit and financial metrics
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 19, 2024 Issue #4 pp. 70-83 Views: 6431 Downloads: 606 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯAdopting International Financial Reporting 9 is critically relevant as it significantly transforms accounting practices, particularly in credit risk management, for banks in Jordan. The primary purpose of this study is to examine the impact of implementing International Financial Reporting 9 on the financial performance and credit risk management practices of Jordanian banks. A quantitative analysis was conducted using the Difference-in-Differences approach and Fixed Effects models on data from 19 banks operating between 2012 and 2022.
The results indicate that the adoption of International Financial Reporting 9 led to a substantial increase in loan loss provisions, with a mean increase of 0.25 (t-value = 18.00). This increase in loan loss provisions negatively affected profitability metrics such as Return on Assets and Return on Equity, which showed mean decreases of 0.0857 (t-value = 4.22) post-implementation. Despite the negative impact on profitability, the findings also highlight improvements in financial transparency and stability due to more accurate credit risk assessment.
While the adoption of International Financial Reporting 9 imposes operational and financial challenges, it enhances the robustness and clarity of financial reporting in Jordanian banks. -
The moderating role of firm size and interest rate in capital structure of the firms: selected sample from sugar sector of Pakistan
Sarfraz Hussain
,
Abdul Quddus
,
Pham Phat Tien
,
Muhammad Rafiq
,
Drahomíra Pavelková
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(4).2020.29
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #4 pp. 341-355 Views: 5638 Downloads: 918 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe selection of financing is a top priority for businesses, particularly in short- and long-term investment decisions. Mixing debt and equity leads to decisions on the financial structure for businesses. This research analyzes the moderate position of company size and the interest rate in the capital structure over six years (2013–2018) for 29 listed Pakistani enterprises operating in the sugar market. This research employed static panel analysis and dynamic panel analysis on linear and nonlinear regression methods. The capital structure included debt to capital ratio, non-current liabilities, plus current liabilities to capital as a dependent variable. Independent variables were profitability, firm size, tangibility, Non-Debt Tax Shield, liquidity, and macroeconomic variables were exchange rates and interest rates. The investigation reported that profitability, firm size, and Non-Debt Tax Shield were significant and negative, while tangibility and interest rates significantly and positively affected debt to capital ratio. This means the sugar sector has greater financial leverage to manage the funding obligations for the better performance of firms. Therefore, the outcomes revealed that the moderators have an important influence on capital structure.

